Airports: Polluting The Air And Nearby Areas?

how polluted is an area close to an airport

Air quality is a pressing issue for airports aiming to achieve sustainability and reduce their environmental impact. Airports are considered major sources of pollution, with aircraft emissions and ground vehicle operations contributing to poor air quality in the vicinity. Ultrafine particles, nitrogen oxides, and black carbon released during aircraft take-off and landing have been detected in residential areas near airports, impacting the health of those who live and work nearby. Studies have found elevated levels of ultrafine particulate matter (UFP) and other pollutants near airports, with potential consequences for respiratory and cardiovascular health. The distribution of these pollutants is influenced by factors such as wind patterns and the proximity to freeways. As a result, communities located near airports may experience a range of health issues, from respiratory problems to decreased life expectancy. While some airports are implementing measures to reduce emissions, the impact of airport pollution on surrounding areas remains a significant concern.

shunwaste

Ultrafine particles in aircraft exhaust

Ultrafine particles (UFPs) are produced during combustion in aircraft jets when they pass through very cold air. The hot air coming out of the aircraft engines freezes, and the water vapour particles crystallise through a process called reverse sublimation. These UFPs are harmful to human health and can worsen lung and heart conditions, aggravate bronchitis and emphysema, and even lead to blocked arteries.

UFPs are of particular concern near airports, where they can reach high concentrations. Aircraft emissions play an etiologic role, independent of noise and traffic-related pollution. Studies have shown that UFP levels are elevated in and around airports, with measurements at Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) finding Particle Number Concentrations (PNCs) four times greater than on nearby major freeways. The impacted area around LAX was larger than near roadway sites, and neighbourhoods up to 10 miles away had elevated particle levels.

The behaviour of UFPs in the atmosphere and their potential impact are not yet fully understood. While aircraft engines, especially jet turbines, emit large quantities of UFPs, detailed information about the physical and chemical properties of these particles is lacking. The particles are known to penetrate deeper into the human respiratory system and are less likely to be removed than larger particles, potentially entering the bloodstream.

Air quality is a significant challenge for the aviation industry, with airports considered one of the biggest sources of pollution. Airports pose serious health risks to those living and working in the vicinity. To address this issue, some airports are providing electric power and air supplies at terminal gates, reducing fuel burn and pollutants. Additionally, alternative fuels, such as liquid petroleum gas and compressed natural gas, are being explored to reduce emissions from vehicles used on the tarmac.

Vaporizers: A Solution to Pollution?

You may want to see also

shunwaste

Aircraft noise pollution

While technological advancements have led to quieter airplanes, noise remains a concern for residents near airports. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) in the United States has recognized this issue and is taking steps to address community concerns. They assess the impact of airplane noise on communities and conduct public outreach to address these issues. However, communities have expressed a need for more information, particularly regarding how changes in flight paths could impact noise levels.

One of the challenges in managing aircraft noise pollution is the concentration of noise over a smaller area. The implementation of performance-based navigation (PBN) by the FAA, which allows for more precise flight paths, has the potential to intensify noise levels for specific communities. While PBN aims to reduce flying time, fuel use, and emissions, it is crucial to carefully consider the noise impacts on the surrounding areas.

To address these concerns, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) has made several recommendations to the FAA. These include identifying additional metrics for assessing the noise impacts of new flight paths, utilizing tools such as noise metrics and visualization tools for better communication, and improving guidance for communities to effectively engage with the FAA. By implementing these improvements, the FAA can enhance its understanding of the effects of aircraft noise and develop more effective solutions in collaboration with affected communities.

Additionally, aircraft manufacturers have also contributed to noise reduction efforts. For example, the geared Pratt & Whitney PW1000G engine has significantly reduced noise levels in several aircraft models. This was achieved through a gearbox design that optimizes the fan speed, resulting in slower fan tip speeds and a 75% smaller noise footprint compared to current equivalents. Similarly, the PowerJet SaM146 engine, featured in the Sukhoi Superjet 100, incorporates 3D aerodynamic fan blades and a specially designed nacelle to reduce noise levels. These advancements demonstrate the ongoing efforts to mitigate aircraft noise pollution and minimize its impact on communities near airports.

shunwaste

Climate change

Airports are critical transportation hubs that connect people and goods globally, playing a pivotal role in the economy, tourism, and trade. However, they are also significant contributors to greenhouse gas emissions. As the world grapples with the intensifying effects of climate change, the aviation industry must address the challenges it poses to airport infrastructure and operations.

Secondly, extreme weather events, such as hurricanes, heavy rainfall, and heatwaves, are becoming more frequent and intense due to climate change. These events can disrupt airport operations, leading to flight cancellations and stranded passengers, as witnessed during the 2022 summer and winter holiday storms. Extreme temperatures can also impact aircraft performance, requiring operational adjustments, and cause pavement and asphalt deterioration, resulting in structural issues on runways and taxiways.

To mitigate these risks, airports must future-proof their infrastructure by adopting sustainable practices and technologies. This includes investing in renewable energy sources, improving energy efficiency, and utilizing eco-friendly transportation options within airport premises. Comprehensive hazard risk assessments are essential for identifying vulnerabilities and developing adaptation plans to address identified risks. By enhancing the resilience of airport infrastructure, the safety of individuals within the airport environment can be ensured, and the impact of disruptions on operations can be minimized.

Additionally, federal airport resilience programs and policies are crucial. Congress should incentivize airport authorities to develop climate resilience plans and modernize airport infrastructure to protect against short- and long-term climate threats. With climate change intensifying, airports must adapt to safeguard their operations, the economy, and the safety of passengers and employees.

shunwaste

Health risks

Air pollution is a significant issue for areas surrounding airports, with airports considered to be one of the biggest sources of pollution in the United States. Aircraft emissions, particularly ultrafine particulate matter (UFPs), have been linked to a range of adverse health effects, including respiratory and cardiovascular issues, increased rates of premature death, pre-term births, oxidative DNA damage, and childhood leukemia.

The exhaust from aircraft contains ultrafine particles that are released when jet fuel is burnt. These particles, below 100 nanometres in diameter, can reach very high concentrations in aircraft parking areas, endangering maintenance personnel. UFPs can worsen lung and heart conditions, increase blood pressure, and even lead to blocked arteries. Research at Amsterdam Schiphol Airport found that exposure to UFPs was associated with decreased lung function and prolonged corrected QT (a measure of ventricular repolarization).

The health risks associated with airport pollution are not limited to those working in and around airports but also affect nearby residential communities. In the United States, 40 million people live near major airports, and these communities are exposed to harmful ultrafine particle pollution. A study of SeaTac Airport in Seattle found that people living nearby had a lower life expectancy and an increased risk of various health problems, including stroke, heart disease, and respiratory issues. Similarly, a study of California airports found that increased pollution levels, driven by runway traffic congestion, were associated with adverse health outcomes, including increased hospital admissions for respiratory and heart-related issues.

In addition to the health risks posed by UFPs, the noise pollution generated by airports can also have negative health consequences. High-intensity noise from aircraft can cause stress and health problems for people living in the vicinity of airports and for airport employees.

Given the health risks associated with airport pollution, controlling and mitigating these emissions is vital. Some airports have implemented policies to reduce emission levels, such as providing electric power and air supplies at terminal gates to reduce fuel burn and pollutants. Additionally, individuals living near airports can take steps to improve their indoor air quality, such as investing in air purifiers and installing air filters in HVAC systems.

shunwaste

Pollution from ground vehicles at airports

Commercial airport activity can have a detrimental impact on air quality in the surrounding areas, and millions of people live close to major airports. Aircraft emissions play a significant role in this, independent of noise and traffic-related pollution. Ultrafine particulate matter (UFP) is elevated in and around airports, and can have adverse health effects on those exposed. Studies have linked UFP to lung inflammation in individuals with asthma and decreased lung function in healthy adults. Aircraft exhaust contains ultrafine particles that can worsen lung and heart conditions and even lead to blocked arteries.

While aircraft emissions are a major contributor to air pollution around airports, ground vehicles also play a significant role. Diesel and petrol vehicles used for ground services, such as baggage handling, refuelling, and aircraft security, emit harmful pollutants. In addition, ground support equipment and motor vehicles contribute to nitrogen oxide (NOx), carbon monoxide (CO), and sulfur dioxide (SO2) emissions. The impact of ground vehicle emissions is particularly notable when compared to aircraft emissions. In some cases, up to 95% of local particulate matter comes from ground vehicles rather than aircraft.

To mitigate the pollution from ground vehicles, airports are exploring alternative fuels and technologies. Some airports have transitioned to using liquid petroleum gas, compressed natural gas, hydrogen, electricity, and even compressed air for their ground fleets. Providing electric power and air supplies at terminal gates allows aircraft to turn off their auxiliary power units, reducing fuel burn and pollutants. Additionally, improving ground traffic flow and encouraging cleaner transportation to and from the airport can help reduce emissions.

The pollution from ground vehicles at airports is a serious health risk for airport employees and individuals living in the surrounding areas. It contributes to the overall air quality issues associated with airports and can lead to adverse health effects, particularly respiratory and cardiovascular issues. It is important for airports to continue implementing measures to reduce emissions from ground vehicles and for nearby residents to take steps to improve their indoor air quality, such as using air purifiers and filters.

While progress is being made, lowering pollution levels at airports remains challenging. Airports are complex environments with various emission sources, and a systematic approach to studying and addressing these issues is necessary. The impact of ground vehicle emissions on air quality near airports underscores the need for further research and the implementation of sustainable practices to reduce their environmental footprint.

Frequently asked questions

Areas close to airports are considered hotspots for pollutants such as ultrafine particulate matter (UFP), black carbon, nitrogen oxide, and other criteria pollutants. These pollutants are known to have adverse effects on the health of people living in these areas, including respiratory and cardiovascular issues.

The main sources of pollution in areas near airports are aircraft emissions and ground traffic. Aircraft emissions, including Jet A1 fuel, produce ultrafine particles that can worsen lung and heart conditions and contribute to climate change. Ground traffic, such as vehicles used for baggage handling and refuelling, also contributes to the pollution with diesel emissions.

Airport pollution can spread much further than previously thought. Studies have found elevated particle levels up to 10 miles away from airports, affecting residential areas and causing health problems for people who may be unaware of the risk.

To mitigate pollution in areas near airports, some airports have implemented measures such as providing electric power and air supplies at terminal gates to reduce fuel burn and pollutants. Additionally, alternative fuels, such as liquid petroleum gas and compressed natural gas, are being explored for vehicles used on the tarmac. Individuals living near airports can also invest in air purifiers and air filters to improve their indoor air quality.

Written by
Reviewed by

Explore related products

Share this post
Print
Did this article help you?

Leave a comment