Spacex Launches: Pollution, Pros, And Cons

Elon Musk has been criticised for the pollution caused by his space launches, with the upper stage of one SpaceX rocket exploding and potentially releasing 45 metric tons of metal oxides and 40 metric tons of nitrogen oxides into the atmosphere. SpaceX's Starlink satellites, which are designed to be replaced every five years, also contribute to the problem, creating a steady stream of debris in the atmosphere. While most pollution from rocket launches is released in the stratosphere and mesosphere, reducing ground-level air quality impact, critics argue that the emissions from Musk's space tourism enterprise and private jet flights dwarf the planet-heating pollution caused by the average US household.

SpaceX's Starship rocket explosion

SpaceX's Starship rocket exploded in mid-air on March 6, 2025, marking the company's second launch in a row to conclude with an explosion. The incident, which occurred just minutes after the rocket's launch from Texas, prompted the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to halt air traffic in parts of Florida and as far south as the Bahamas and Turks and Caicos Islands. SpaceX's live stream showed the upper stage of the rocket spinning in space, with multiple engines shut down, before the company lost contact with the ship.

This explosion was the eighth Starship test flight and the second consecutive failure for Elon Musk's Mars rocket program. The 403-foot (123-metre) rocket is intended to play a central role in Musk's plan to send humans to Mars as early as the turn of the decade. However, the back-to-back mishaps indicate serious setbacks for a program that Musk has sought to expedite.

The FAA, which regulates private rocket launches, has opened an investigation into the incident, requiring SpaceX to examine the failure's cause and obtain the agency's approval before Starship can fly again. SpaceX has stated that there were no toxic materials among the debris. However, scientists have estimated that the explosion may have released approximately 45 metric tons of metal oxides and 40 metric tons of nitrogen oxides into the Earth's atmosphere.

The previous Starship explosion, which occurred on January 16, 2025, resulted in a loss of control of the upper stage, causing it to explode over the Turks and Caicos Islands and leaving a trail of burning red debris. SpaceX attributed this mishap to vibrations that caused a fuel leak in the aft section of the upper stage, leading to a fire that exceeded the Starship's venting capacity and ultimately resulted in a self-destruction sequence.

Rocket fuel emissions

One of the most popular rocket fuels is RP-1, a highly refined form of kerosene known for its stability, low cost, and high performance. However, RP-1 fuelled rockets produce soot and carbon dioxide, a greenhouse gas responsible for climate change. While the amount of pollution released may depend on both the fuel and the engine design, RP-1 fuelled engines are widely used and have contributed significantly to emissions.

To address the environmental impact of rocket launches, several alternatives to RP-1 are being explored. For example, Orbex's rocket uses bio-propane, a renewable biofuel created as a waste product from biodiesel production. This alternative fuel has the potential to significantly reduce emissions, with studies showing up to 90% less emissions compared to RP-1 fuelled rockets. Additionally, Orbex's rocket is expected to produce less soot, addressing the concern surrounding the possible effects on the temperature of the higher layers of the atmosphere.

Another alternative fuel being considered is methane, which, despite being a potent greenhouse gas, can be environmentally friendly due to its high burning efficiency. With careful handling, methane engines can achieve nearly complete combustion, resulting in minimal residues. However, there are concerns about potential leaks during transportation, and the impact of methane on global warming is estimated to be around 80 times greater than that of carbon dioxide.

While the space industry brings numerous benefits to the 21st-century world, the increase in rocket launches and the accumulation of rocket exhaust in the atmosphere is a cause for concern. As the industry continues to grow, it is important to prioritize sustainable practices, such as exploring alternative fuels and reducing carbon emissions, to minimize the environmental impact of rocket fuel emissions.

SpaceX's Starlink satellites

Starlink satellites are designed to be replaced about every five years, with older models guided back to Earth upon retirement. This has resulted in a notable increase in the number of spacecraft burning up in the atmosphere, with up to five space capsules from Starlink retiring daily. The disintegration of these satellites creates metallic vapours, including aluminium oxide, which deplete the ozone layer and can potentially disrupt flights. A 2023 study found that 10% of aerosols collected 60,000 feet over Alaska contained aluminium and other metals produced by satellite burn-up, with an eightfold increase in the presence of these compounds between 2016 and 2022.

Starlink's large constellation of satellites has also led to concerns about light pollution. Astronomers and astrophotographers have expressed dismay over the streaks of light that appear in long-exposure images, disrupting their observations and altering the night sky. SpaceX has acknowledged the issue and is taking steps to mitigate light pollution, including adjusting the solar panel angle and adding sunshades to the satellites.

While Starlink has faced criticism for its environmental impact, it is important to note that the company is addressing these concerns. Additionally, the service has been praised for its potential to revolutionise global communications and provide internet access to underserved regions. However, there are also concerns about the potential military use of Starlink, with Chinese military researchers publishing a strategy to destroy the constellation if it threatens national security.

In conclusion, while SpaceX's Starlink satellites have contributed to atmospheric and light pollution, the company is working to reduce its environmental impact. The service's potential benefits to global communications and internet accessibility must be balanced against these concerns, with ongoing discussions about the appropriate use and regulation of satellite technology.

Musk's private jet flights

Elon Musk's private jet usage has attracted criticism from environmentalists who argue that his frequent flights contribute significantly to planet-heating emissions. Musk's private jets, which include a \$70 million Gulfstream jet with 19 seats and a kitchen, have been tracked by various sources, including jet-tracking services like JetSpy and social media accounts like ElonJet.

In 2024, Musk's private jets made 355 flights, according to JetSpy. These flights spanned a global network, including destinations such as France, Poland, Germany, Portugal, Indonesia, China, and the UK, and the United States. The jets spent about 881 hours in the air, consuming approximately \$2.5 million worth of fuel and emitting nearly 4,000 metric tons of carbon dioxide. This emission figure is about 250 times what the average person in the US emits over their lifetime.

The year 2024 saw a decrease in Musk's private jet usage compared to 2023, when his planes logged 456 flights. However, the impact of these flights on the environment remains significant. Over half of the trips in 2024 were to or from the Palm Beach area, near Mar-a-Lago, indicating a potential connection to Musk's growing political ties with Donald Trump.

Musk's private jet usage has been a topic of public interest, with social media accounts like ElonJet, created by Jack Sweeney, tracking the real-time usage of Musk's private jets using publicly available flight data. This has led to debates around privacy and safety, with Musk expressing concerns about stalking and the potential risks associated with sharing real-time location information.

In summary, Musk's private jet flights have drawn attention for their environmental impact, with emissions dwarfing those of the average US household. The jets' travel patterns also provide insights into Musk's political connections and global business interests. The tracking of these flights by various entities has sparked discussions around privacy, safety, and the right to publicly available information.

Tesla's electric car emissions

While electric vehicles are often touted as a more environmentally friendly alternative to traditional gasoline-powered cars, the production and operation of electric cars, including Teslas, do contribute to emissions and pollution.

The manufacturing of electric vehicles, including Teslas, can generate carbon emissions and pollution. For instance, the production of lithium-ion batteries, which are commonly used in electric vehicles, can result in the emission of greenhouse gases and the contamination of water sources. Additionally, the mining and refining of rare earth materials used in electric vehicle components can lead to environmental damage and hidden emissions. The production of an electric vehicle battery, for instance, can result in higher carbon emissions compared to the construction of a conventional car engine.

However, it is important to note that the use of electric vehicles can significantly reduce carbon emissions compared to gasoline-powered cars. The Department of Energy data suggests that a Tesla Model S consumes in 20 miles of driving the same amount of energy it takes to produce a gallon of gasoline. Overall, electric vehicles have significantly lower CO2 emissions per mile than their gasoline-powered counterparts.

Moreover, the environmental impact of electric vehicles extends beyond their carbon emissions. Electric cars often contain rare and high-performing metals, such as lithium, which have their own environmental costs. The extraction and processing of these metals can result in pollution and habitat destruction.

In terms of operational emissions, electric vehicles do not produce tailpipe emissions like gasoline-powered cars. However, the electricity used to power electric vehicles may still come from fossil fuels, contributing to indirect emissions. The true environmental impact of electric vehicles depends on the energy mix used to charge them.

It is worth noting that the discussion around Tesla's electric car emissions is often tied to the company's revenue from carbon credits. Tesla has accumulated and sold carbon credits to companies that do not meet emissions standards, earning billions of dollars. However, recent reports suggest that Tesla's avoided emissions may be overstated by up to 49%, which could impact its carbon credit sales and industry credibility.

Frequently asked questions