Aircraft Carriers: Polluting Our Oceans And Skies?

Aircraft carriers are a significant source of pollution, with emissions contributing to climate change and air pollution that endangers public health and welfare. The environmental impact of aviation includes the release of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, nitrous oxides (NOx), sulfur dioxide (SO2), ultrafine particles (UFPs), and ozone, which has respiratory health hazards. Aviation activities also generate water pollution and noise pollution, affecting sleep, education, and potentially increasing cardiovascular risk. Airports' handling of jet fuel, lubricants, and other chemicals contributes to water contamination. While there have been efforts to reduce emissions, such as the adoption of new technologies and sustainable fuels, the sector's emissions are soaring, and aviation is projected to consume a significant portion of the remaining carbon budget by 2050.

Aircraft carriers' CO2 emissions

Aircraft carriers are significant contributors to climate change, emitting large amounts of CO2 and other gases such as nitrous oxides (NOx), sulfur dioxide (SO2), and soot. While CO2 emissions contribute to the greenhouse effect, non-CO2 emissions from aircraft engines, when released at high altitudes, can have an even greater impact on the atmosphere, affecting its physical and chemical properties. These non-CO2 emissions can lead to the formation of persistent contrail cirrus clouds, which trap heat and have a net warming effect that may be up to three times worse than the warming caused by CO2 emissions from aviation.

The environmental impact of aircraft carriers is not limited to their direct CO2 emissions. Airports and aircraft handling contribute to water pollution due to the extensive use and handling of jet fuel, lubricants, de-icing chemicals, and other toxic substances. If not properly contained, these chemicals can contaminate nearby water bodies. Additionally, aviation activities emit ozone and ultrafine particles, which pose health hazards to those exposed.

The demand for air transport has more than doubled since 2000, and emissions from aviation have been growing faster than any other mode of transport. In 2023, aviation accounted for 2.5% of global energy-related CO2 emissions, and this number is projected to increase. By 2050, aviation's negative impact on the climate could be mitigated by improving fuel efficiency and reducing NOx emissions through advanced aircraft technologies, operational procedures, and the use of renewable alternative fuels.

To address the environmental impact of aircraft carriers, several measures can be considered. Firstly, reducing corporate and personal air travel can significantly lower aviation emissions. This can be achieved by opting for more sustainable modes of transport, such as trains, or choosing destinations that can be reached by less climate-intensive means. Additionally, technological innovations are necessary, including the development of low-emission fuels, improvements in aircraft and engines, and operational optimization. Policy changes and fiscal support are crucial to drive improvements in energy efficiency and stimulate investment in low-emission technologies.

Aircraft noise pollution

The impact of aircraft noise pollution is far-reaching. It can cause community annoyance, sleep disorders, and increased stress levels. Research has also linked aircraft noise to cardiovascular disorders, including hypertension and ischemic heart disease. These health risks are not limited to adults; children's cognitive development and academic performance can also suffer due to aircraft noise, with studies showing associations between aircraft noise and poorer reading comprehension and recognition memory.

The noise levels of different aircraft vary significantly. Older aircraft, such as the Boeing 727 and 747-200, produced noise levels above 100 dB, while modern aircraft like the Airbus A350 and Boeing 787 have noise levels around 90 dB. Aircraft manufacturers and aviation authorities have recognized the issue, and advancements in engine technologies and aerodynamics have led to a notable decrease in noise levels. For instance, NASA expects a 20–30 dB reduction below Stage 4 limits by 2026–2031.

Addressing aircraft noise pollution requires collaboration between various stakeholders, including aviation authorities, aircraft manufacturers, airports, local communities, and elected officials. Efforts to mitigate noise include conducting research, adopting advanced technologies, and implementing operational practices that balance aviation needs with the well-being of surrounding communities.

Water pollution from airports

Airports are among the largest sources of air pollution in the United States. For example, Los Angeles International Airport is the largest source of carbon monoxide (CO) in the state of California. This air pollution has a direct impact on the health of those living in the vicinity of airports, with studies showing that relatively small amounts of ambient air pollution can have substantial effects on the incidence of local respiratory illness.

However, the prompt specifically asks about water pollution from airports. Water bodies can be contaminated by substances discharged during aircraft operations, including de-icing chemicals, fuel, and lubricants. Airports located in cold climates that experience icy conditions are required to perform aircraft and airfield pavement deicing and anti-icing to ensure the safety of passengers and cargo operations. While necessary, these operations can degrade nearby water bodies if performed without discharge controls in place.

De-icing chemicals, such as urea, glycol-based products, and alkali-metal-salt-based products, are often used to clear frozen deposits from runways, taxiways, and aprons. While effective in maintaining surface friction and braking action, these chemicals can pose an environmental hazard if they enter nearby water sources. Airports are required to obtain stormwater discharge permits and ensure that wastes from deicing operations are properly collected and treated to mitigate this issue.

New airports with 10,000 annual departures located in certain cold climate zones are mandated to collect 60% of aircraft deicing fluid after deicing. Additionally, airports that discharge collected aircraft deicing fluid directly into US waters must meet numeric discharge requirements for chemical oxygen demand. These regulations aim to reduce the impact of deicing operations on water pollution.

Ozone and ultrafine particle emissions

Aircraft carriers are a significant contributor to climate change and ozone depletion. Aircraft engines emit gases and particles directly into the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere, where they alter the concentration of atmospheric greenhouse gases, including carbon dioxide (CO2), ozone (O3), methane (CH4), nitrogen oxides (NOx), sulfur oxides (SOxO), water vapour, and soot. These emissions have both direct and indirect effects on climate change and ozone chemistry.

Ozone (O3) is a key component of the Earth's atmosphere, protecting the surface from harmful ultraviolet (UV) radiation. However, aircraft-emitted NOx gases participate in ozone chemistry, leading to both increases and decreases in ozone levels depending on the altitude of injection. At higher altitudes, increases in NOx lead to a decrease in the stratospheric ozone layer, contributing to ozone depletion.

Ultrafine particles (UFP) are another significant emission from aircraft engines. These particles have aerodynamic diameters smaller than 100 nm and are known to cause several-fold increases in ground-level particle number concentrations (PNC) over large areas downwind of airports. Studies have found elevated UFP concentrations in communities near airports and under flight paths, indicating that aviation emissions can have a substantial impact on air quality in these regions. The spatial extent and magnitude of the impact vary depending on factors such as wind direction, speed, runway use patterns, and flight activity.

The formation of condensation trails (contrails) and contrail-induced cirrus clouds is another important aspect of aviation emissions. These lingering clouds trap infrared rays, producing a warming effect that can be up to three times more potent than the CO2 emitted by aircraft. While contrail cirrus clouds have a short lifespan, their collective influence from thousands of flights has a significant warming effect on the planet.

While new aircraft models are becoming more fuel-efficient and compliant with emission standards, the rapid growth of the aviation industry continues to drive an increase in overall emissions. As a result, there is a growing need for more ambitious and effective measures to reduce aviation's climate impact, particularly in the absence of regional or global regulations for non-CO2 emissions.

Plastic pollution in oceans

Plastic pollution in the oceans is a pressing global crisis. It is estimated that about 8 million metric tons of plastic entered the ocean in 2010, and the problem has only grown since. With the pervasive presence of plastic in our daily lives, from our homes to our vehicles, it is no surprise that plastic pollution has reached unprecedented levels.

The impact of plastic pollution on marine life is devastating. It is estimated that thousands of seabirds, sea turtles, seals, and other marine mammals perish each year due to ingesting plastic or becoming entangled in it. The problem is so severe that even critically endangered species, such as Hawaiian monk seals, are affected. Plastic ingestion can lead to internal injuries, choking, and starvation as it reduces the storage volume in the stomach. Research indicates that half of the sea turtles worldwide have ingested plastic, and it is predicted that by 2050, 99% of seabird species will have consumed plastic.

The sources of plastic pollution in the oceans are diverse. One significant contributor is abandoned fishing gear, such as nets and lines. These items can entangle marine life, leading to injury or death. Microplastics, which include microfibers from synthetic clothing, beads from personal care products, and fragments of larger items, are another major concern. These tiny particles can absorb harmful pollutants like pesticides and then release them into the ocean, contaminating the water and affecting marine life.

To address this crisis, urgent action is needed. The Center for Biological Diversity has petitioned the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to regulate plastics as hazardous pollutants under the Clean Water Act. They are also working to stop plastic pollution at its source and pushing for better control of runoff from companies that produce plastic consumer goods. Additionally, individuals can play a crucial role in reducing plastic pollution by reducing their plastic use, reusing and recycling plastic items, and properly disposing of waste to prevent it from ending up in the ocean.

While some efforts have been made to mitigate plastic pollution, such as bans on plastic bags and straws, these measures are not enough to address the scale of the problem. A 2020 report, "Breaking the Plastic Wave," projected that without ambitious action, the inflow of plastic into the oceans will increase to 29 million metric tons per year by 2040. To effectively tackle this crisis, large-scale systemic change is required, with governments and businesses taking the lead.

Frequently asked questions