Hydropower: Reducing Pollution, Saving Our Planet

Hydropower is a source of clean and renewable electricity. It does not require the burning of fossil fuels and harnesses the constantly running water cycle. However, the environmental impact of hydropower is complicated and depends on the lifecycle of a hydropower plant. While hydropower is generally considered to have a low global carbon footprint, there are concerns about its impact on wildlife habitats and migratory paths, as well as the release of greenhouse gases from reservoirs. The benefits of hydropower in reducing pollution depend on its geographic placement and the ratio of the reservoir size to electricity generated.

Hydropower's carbon footprint

Hydropower is a low-carbon source of renewable energy and a reliable and cost-effective alternative to electricity generation by fossil fuels. It generates more than 4,000 terawatt-hours of electricity globally every year, enough to supply over 1 billion people with clean energy. Independent research suggests that the use of hydropower has helped to avoid more than 100 billion tonnes of carbon dioxide in the past 50 years alone. This is roughly equivalent to the total annual carbon footprint of the United States for 20 years.

However, hydropower does have a carbon footprint. The creation of a reservoir can result in the release of greenhouse gases due to the decomposition of flooded organic material. The size of the reservoir created by a hydroelectric project can vary widely, depending on the size of the generators and the topography of the land. Hydroelectric plants in flat areas tend to require much more land than those in hilly areas or canyons. For example, the Balbina hydroelectric plant in Brazil flooded an area the size of Delaware (2,360 square kilometers) and only provides 250 MW of power-generating capacity. In contrast, a small 10 MW run-of-the-river plant in a hilly location can use as little as 2.5 acres.

The carbon footprint of hydropower reservoirs depends on several factors, including the reservoir's type, size, depth, shape, location, and wind speed. The water temperature in the reservoir also matters, as higher temperatures can lead to higher emissions. The creation of a reservoir can also lead to the destruction of forests, wildlife habitats, agricultural land, and scenic lands, as well as the relocation of communities.

The construction and operation of a reservoir can result in the emission of carbon dioxide and methane. These gases are released during the decomposition of organic matter, such as vegetation and soil, that has been flooded. Methane is a particularly potent greenhouse gas, with over 80 times the warming power of carbon dioxide in the first 20 years after its release. However, reservoirs can also act as carbon sinks, absorbing more emissions than they emit.

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's (IPCC) Fifth Assessment Report noted that only wind and nuclear power have lower median lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions than hydropower. The IPCC states that hydropower has a median greenhouse gas (GHG) emission intensity of 24 gCO₂-eq/kWh, compared to 490 gCO₂-eq/kWh for gas and 820 gCO₂-eq/kWh for coal.

While hydropower does have a carbon footprint, it is important to note that it is still a cleaner and more renewable energy source than many other alternatives.

Impact on wildlife habitats and migratory paths

Hydropower is a clean and renewable source of electricity. Unlike fossil fuels, it does not require the burning of fuel to generate power. However, the construction of hydropower plants can have a significant impact on wildlife habitats and migratory paths.

The construction of large storage or pumped storage hydropower plants involves blocking, diverting, or changing the natural course of river systems. This can have a detrimental effect on the migratory routes of fish, with many species depending on inland rivers for reproduction. By blocking the flow of rivers with dams, fish are unable to reach their breeding grounds, leading to a decline in fish populations over time. This has negative implications for both the health of river ecosystems and human food stocks. While some hydropower facilities have implemented fish ladders to aid fish populations in traversing dammed rivers, these structures are often insufficient to support large migrations.

In addition to blocking migratory routes, damming rivers can also reduce water and sediment flow to dangerous levels, impacting downstream wildlife populations. Low water flow and reduced nutrient flow can lead to habitat loss and a decrease in healthy water sources for animals. The creation of reservoirs for electricity generation can also result in upstream flooding, which can destroy wildlife habitats, scenic areas, and agricultural land. In some cases, human populations may even be forced to relocate due to flooding.

The physical changes caused by damming rivers and creating reservoirs can have far-reaching consequences for the surrounding landscape and wildlife. The water in reservoirs tends to be more stagnant than normal river water, leading to higher levels of sediments and nutrients. This can promote the growth of algae and aquatic weeds, which can crowd out other river animal and plant life. Additionally, water loss through evaporation in reservoirs is significantly higher than in flowing rivers, which can further impact downstream water levels and ecosystems.

To mitigate the impact on wildlife and migratory paths, careful planning of dam placement is essential. By avoiding the disruption of critical migration paths, the negative consequences for wildlife can be reduced. In some cases, removing old dams and restoring the natural flow of rivers can lead to habitat restoration for fish species.

Greenhouse gas emissions from reservoirs

Greenhouse gases (GHG) such as carbon dioxide and methane are produced in natural aquatic systems and in human-made water storage reservoirs. The production of these gases is a result of the aerobic and anaerobic decomposition of biomass in the water. The exact amount of GHG produced depends on several site-specific and regional factors.

The creation of a reservoir through the flooding of land can have a significant impact on the environment. This is due to the destruction of forests, wildlife habitats, agricultural land, and scenic lands, as well as the relocation of communities. In addition, reservoirs can alter natural water temperatures, water chemistry, river flow characteristics, and silt loads, which can have negative effects on native plants and animals in and around the river.

The size of the reservoir created by a hydroelectric project can vary widely, depending on the size of the hydroelectric generators and the topography of the land. Large reservoirs, such as the Balbina hydroelectric plant in Brazil, can flood thousands of square kilometers of land. In contrast, smaller run-of-the-river plants in hilly locations can use a much smaller area.

The flooding of land for a reservoir can also impact the decomposition of vegetation and soil, releasing carbon dioxide and methane. The amount of emissions depends on the specific characteristics of the site, but estimates suggest that life-cycle emissions from reservoirs in tropical areas or temperate peatlands can be over 0.5 pounds of carbon dioxide equivalent per kilowatt-hour.

The temperature of reservoir water can also affect methane emissions, with higher temperatures resulting in greater emissions. Additionally, the ratio of the size of the reservoir to the amount of electricity generated can impact emissions, with larger reservoirs and lower power output resulting in disproportionate greenhouse gas emissions.

Overall, while hydropower is often considered a clean energy source, it is important to recognize that the creation and operation of reservoirs can result in the production of greenhouse gases, particularly methane, which has a much higher warming power than carbon dioxide.

The benefits of renewable energy use

Renewable energy sources such as wind, solar, geothermal, hydroelectric, and biomass provide substantial benefits for our climate, health, and economy. These sources do not rely on finite natural resources, such as fossil fuels, and are thus more sustainable and environmentally friendly. In particular, hydropower has been considered a "clean" energy source, as it does not directly emit air pollutants or burn fossil fuels. Instead, hydropower generators use water flow to spin turbines and generate electricity.

Hydropower is a reliable and cost-effective alternative to electricity generation by fossil fuels. According to the International Hydropower Association (IHA), the use of hydropower has helped to avoid more than 100 billion tonnes of carbon dioxide in the past 50 years, which is roughly equivalent to the total annual carbon footprint of the United States for 20 years. If hydropower was replaced with coal, the IHA estimates that global emissions would be at least 10% higher.

However, hydropower does have some environmental impacts. The construction of dams and reservoirs can obstruct fish migration, change water temperatures and chemistry, and impact the ecology and physical characteristics of rivers. Additionally, flooding land for reservoirs can destroy wildlife habitats, agricultural land, and even force communities to relocate. These negative impacts can be mitigated through careful planning, such as ensuring important migration paths are not disturbed, and the development of new technologies, such as "salmon cannons" that launch migrating fish over dams.

Moreover, reservoirs created by damming rivers can contribute to greenhouse gas emissions. When organic material, such as dead plants, is trapped in reservoirs, it breaks down and releases gases like carbon dioxide and methane. In certain cases, reservoirs may act as carbon sinks, absorbing more emissions than they emit. The amount of greenhouse gas emissions from a reservoir depends on various factors, including its type, size, location, depth, and shape.

Overall, while hydropower does have some environmental impacts, it is still a much cleaner and more sustainable energy source than fossil fuels. With continued improvements in technology and careful planning, hydropower can become an even more environmentally friendly source of electricity.

The future of hydropower

Hydropower is a source of clean and renewable electricity. No fossil fuels need to be burned to generate hydroelectricity, and the water cycle is constantly running naturally. However, there is a finite amount of water on Earth available to be harnessed, and many rivers have already been dammed.

To make hydropower more environmentally and socially sustainable, careful planning is necessary. This includes considering the placement of dams to avoid disrupting important migration paths and protecting the natural environment in river watersheds to reduce erosion and greenhouse gas emissions. Newer ways to harness power from water, such as tidal power and wave energy, tend to have a smaller environmental footprint than traditional storage hydropower systems.

The development of new hydropower facilities must also prioritize minimizing climate impacts. While hydropower facilities do not directly emit air pollutants, the reservoirs where water is stored can produce carbon dioxide and methane due to the decomposition of vegetation. In some cases, hydropower reservoirs can act as carbon sinks, absorbing more carbon than they emit. However, if minimizing climate impacts is not a priority in the design and construction of new facilities, electricity generation from hydropower could yield more warming than fossil fuels, especially in the near term.

Overall, the future of hydropower depends on addressing its environmental and social impacts and ensuring that new developments deliver climate benefits. With careful planning and the development of more sustainable technologies, hydropower can continue to be a significant source of renewable energy worldwide.

Frequently asked questions