Cattle's Impact: Air Pollution And Its Environmental Cost

Cattle and other livestock are a significant source of air pollution, contributing to thousands of air quality-related deaths annually. According to a study, beef production alone corresponds to 4,000 air pollution-related deaths every year, while pork and dairy production add to this number, resulting in a total of 9,100 deaths annually. In addition to the direct impact on human health, air pollution from cattle farming also affects milk production and the health of the cattle themselves. The main sources of air pollution from cattle include methane emissions from enteric fermentation, manure management, and feed production. Other factors such as land use change and energy use in animal production also contribute to air pollution. While grass-fed beef is considered more humane, it has been associated with higher greenhouse gas emissions and ecological damage. To reduce the impact of cattle farming on air pollution, it is essential to adopt sustainable practices, improve manure management systems, and reduce methane emissions.

Cattle manure and waste

The burning of pastureland and the use of dung as fuel for cooking and heating also contribute to air pollution, emitting black carbon. Methane, a powerful greenhouse gas, is released from liquid manure in storage, and different manure management systems generate varying levels of emissions. Methane emissions are typically highest when manure is stored in liquid systems, such as manure lagoons. Additionally, manure management practices can impact the environment; improper management can lead to increased emissions and problems with manure collection, storage, treatment, and utilization.

To address these issues, organizations like the Climate and Clean Air Coalition promote integrated manure and urine management practices. These practices aim to prevent harmful short-lived climate pollutant emissions while benefiting farmers through cost savings and additional income. The Coalition supports a comprehensive approach that considers all aspects of manure and urine management, from excretion and collection to treatment and application.

Furthermore, initiatives like the Alternative Manure Management Program (AMMP) in California offer non-biodigester solutions. By separating solids from manure before depositing the liquid portion into lagoons, farmers can more effectively manage waste and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. The use of anaerobic digesters has also been shown to decrease GHG emissions from manure management, although they can be costly to implement and maintain.

Research is also underway to reduce the environmental impact of cattle waste. Studies are exploring the use of chemical or biological additives in cow feed and manure to reduce methane emissions and the presence of nitrogen and phosphorus in manure. These efforts are crucial in mitigating the air pollution caused by cattle manure and waste.

Cattle burping and flatulence

Agriculture is a major source of air pollution, causing an estimated 17,900 deaths in the US annually. Animal products like meat, dairy, and eggs are responsible for 80% of these deaths. Beef alone corresponds to 4,000 air pollution-related deaths per year, and when pork and dairy production are added, the number rises to 9,100.

Cattle are a significant contributor to air pollution, and their burps and flatulence are a major concern. While it is commonly believed that cow flatulence is the primary source of methane emissions from cattle, it is actually their belching that contributes the most. According to the U.S. Dairy Council and NASA, 97% of the methane gas from a cow is released through belching, with only 3% coming from flatulence. Methane is a potent greenhouse gas, capable of trapping heat in the atmosphere more effectively than carbon dioxide. It accounts for about 20% of global greenhouse gas emissions, and cattle release 231 billion pounds of methane annually.

The large amount of methane produced by cattle is a result of their digestive process, known as enteric fermentation. In this process, sugars are broken down into simpler molecules for absorption into the bloodstream, and methane is produced as a byproduct. The fermentation process occurs in the cow's stomach, where microorganisms break down the hardy fibers of the grass they eat. This buildup of pressure in the cow's stomach leads to the release of methane through belching.

To address the issue of methane emissions from cattle, a Seattle-based company, Lumen Bioscience, has proposed a solution. They have discovered a way to neutralize the methane-producing organism in a cow's stomach using a patented mix of enzymes that can be added to the food of beef and dairy cows. This additive is expected to reduce the overall greenhouse gas emissions pumped into the atmosphere. Lumen Bioscience was awarded the Wilkes Center Climate Prize, receiving $1.5 million in funding to further develop and test their method.

While efforts are being made to reduce methane emissions from cattle, it is important to note that the agriculture industry's impact on air pollution extends beyond cattle alone. Large-scale industrialized farms, for example, emit hazardous pollutants such as ammonia and hydrogen sulfide. However, due to exemptions granted by lawmakers, farmers and ranchers are often not required to report air emissions to federal agencies, making it challenging to fully understand and address the extent of the problem.

Dairy production

Dairy operations also emit other gases and pollutants, including ammonia, hydrogen sulfide, volatile organic compounds, and hazardous air pollutants. These emissions can have detrimental effects on both environmental and human health. For example, ammonia has a direct toxic impact on vegetation, disrupting ecosystems and causing algae blooms in water bodies. Hydrogen sulfide, while not directly harmful to the environment, has a strong and unpleasant odour, often described as smelling like rotten eggs, which has led to numerous complaints from those living near dairy farms.

The production of milk also impacts air quality. Studies have shown that exposure to air pollution, including fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and ozone (O3), is associated with morbidity and mortality in mammals, including dairy cows. Higher temperatures and humidity in the summer contribute to increased O3 levels, and PM2.5 may be elevated due to wildfire smoke. These factors can lead to decreased milk yield and increased somatic cell count (SCC) in dairy cows, indicating underlying health issues.

Furthermore, dairy production can drive the conversion of natural habitats into agricultural land due to the increasing demand for feed crops. This can lead to soil degradation, water pollution, and contribute to climate change. However, it is important to note that dairy cows can also contribute to healthy habitats through well-managed grazing practices, and farmers can adopt better management techniques and technologies to reduce their environmental impact.

Overall, dairy production has a complex relationship with air pollution, and while it contributes to air pollution through various means, there are also opportunities to mitigate these impacts and create more sustainable practices.

Feed production

The type of feed given to cattle also impacts air pollution levels. Most studies show that grass-fed cows produce more methane per animal than those on an intensive diet. The methane emissions from grass-fed cows are further exacerbated by the need to supplement their diets with water-intensive crops like alfalfa. However, grass-fed cattle kept in extensive production units are generally considered more humane and environmentally friendly than intensive production units.

The environmental impact of feed production for cattle is not limited to air pollution. The expansion of pasture for grazing animals and cropland for growing feed crops leads to deforestation, damaging wildlife habitats, and disrupting natural processes. This ecological havoc wreaked on riparian areas, rivers, deserts, grasslands, and forests contributes to significant harm to species and their ecosystems.

To reduce the environmental impact of feed production, several strategies can be employed. These include improving breeding practices, using feed additives, and adopting technologies and practices that reduce methane emissions. For example, feed additives like red seaweed and 3-NOP have proven effective in reducing enteric methane emissions when incorporated into an animal's diet. By implementing such measures, it is estimated that about 6.4 gigatons of CO2-warming equivalent could be eliminated from 2019 to 2039, which is 4.5 times larger than the effect calculated using conventional GWP-100 values.

Land use change

According to the World Resources Institute, approximately 45 million hectares of forest, an area roughly the size of Canada, was converted into pasture between 2001 and 2015. This large-scale conversion of land for livestock and feed crop production has a significant impact on the environment and air quality.

The production of livestock and the crops required to feed them have been linked to air pollution-related deaths. A study found that beef production alone corresponds to 4,000 air pollution-related deaths annually, and when pork and dairy production are included, the number rises to 9,100 deaths per year.

To address the issue of air pollution caused by land use change, efforts should focus on reducing CO2 emissions related to land-use change and limiting the conversion of forests to pasture or cropland for growing feed crops. Sustainable grazing practices, such as those implemented at the Van Vleck ranch, can help offset methane production by cattle. Proper cattle grazing management can even aid in mitigating climate change.

Additionally, individuals can play a role in reducing air pollution by adopting dietary changes. A national dietary shift away from red meat towards poultry, or adopting vegetarian, vegan, or flexitarian diets, can significantly reduce air pollution-related deaths.

Frequently asked questions