Industries' Air Pollution: Understanding The Impact And Scale

Air pollution is a pressing issue that has various sources, including industrial emissions, vehicle emissions, and natural events. While it is challenging to pinpoint the exact extent of air pollution from industries, certain sectors are known to be major contributors. The burning of fossil fuels, primarily by motor vehicles, is the number one source of outdoor air pollution, with the transportation sector responsible for about one-fifth of global greenhouse gas emissions. The manufacturing industries, mining, and coal- and gas-fired power stations are also significant emitters. Additionally, the fashion industry, food retail, and agriculture sectors contribute to air pollution through their waste generation, carbon emissions, and livestock methane releases, respectively.

Fossil fuels

In 2022, 60% of electricity was generated by burning fossil fuels, mainly coal and natural gas. The transportation sector, which includes cars, trucks, ships, trains, and planes, relies heavily on fossil fuels and is a major source of direct greenhouse gas emissions. The commercial and residential sectors also contribute to air pollution by burning fossil fuels for heating and using gases for refrigeration and cooling.

The health impacts of fossil fuel pollution are significant. According to research by Harvard University and other institutions, air pollution from burning fossil fuels was responsible for approximately 8 million deaths worldwide in 2018, a much higher number than previously estimated. This accounts for about one out of every five deaths globally, with vulnerable populations, such as children and the elderly, being particularly at risk. Exposure to particulate matter, specifically PM 2.5, from burning fossil fuels has severe respiratory and cardiovascular health consequences.

Transitioning from fossil fuels to renewable energy sources is crucial to reducing air pollution and its associated health risks. This includes adopting renewable energy sources, such as wind and solar power, improving energy efficiency, and electrifying transportation. By taking these steps, we can reduce emissions, mitigate climate change, and improve air quality, leading to immediate health benefits and a more sustainable future.

Agriculture

Fertilizers, for example, have been shown to play a significant role in air pollution. The production of artificial fertilizers has skyrocketed from 20 million tons in 1950 to nearly 190 million tons today, with about a third of them being nitrogen-based. When used on fields, these fertilizers emit ammonia, which combines with pollutants from combustion, such as nitrogen oxides and sulfates from vehicles and power plants, to create solid particles or aerosols. These aerosols are harmful to human health and the environment, contributing to disease and death.

Livestock operations, such as cattle, pig, and chicken farms, also release methane, nitrous oxide, and ammonia into the air. These gases impact the environment and pose risks to human health. The manure produced by these animals is a significant source of ammonia and hydrogen sulfide. Additionally, the practice of keeping a large number of animals in one place concentrates the pollution they generate.

Agricultural burning, such as stubble burning and prescribed burning, is another source of air pollution. Stubble burning is common in Asia, where farmers burn the leftover stubble after harvesting to prepare for the next season's sowing. While stubble burning is prohibited in most countries, strong winds can carry the smoke over long distances, impacting areas far from the source of pollution. Prescribed burning, or the burning of land for agricultural and land management purposes, is also a contributor to air pollution.

The impact of agricultural air pollution is not limited to the immediate vicinity of farms or agricultural operations. Chemical drift with pesticides, herbicides, and fertilizers can occur, affecting nearby lands and neighborhoods and contributing to poor air quality in surrounding areas.

It is important to note that air pollution and agriculture have a bidirectional relationship. While agriculture contributes to air pollution, it is also affected by it. Poor air quality, such as high levels of ozone in the atmosphere, can inhibit plant growth and reduce crop yields. According to the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), ground-level ozone pollution from fuel burning and chemical use will reduce staple crop yields by 26% by 2030. Therefore, addressing agriculturally-caused air pollution is crucial for ensuring global food security.

Fashion

The fashion industry is a major contributor to global air pollution, with its supply chain being the third-largest polluting industry, after food and construction. It is responsible for around 8-10% of global CO2 emissions, or 4-5 billion tonnes annually, more than the shipping and aviation industries combined. The fashion industry's demand for cheap and disposable clothing has led to the rise of fast fashion, which has had devastating consequences for the environment.

Fast fashion companies produce clothes at an incredibly rapid pace, often reproducing items as soon as an influencer is seen wearing a new outfit. This has led to a substantial increase in textile production, with the global per capita production of textiles increasing from 5.9kg per year to 13kg per year from 1975 to 2018. The fashion industry's reliance on unsustainable plastic fabrics and synthetic materials, such as polyester, has led to the release of large amounts of carbon emissions and the proliferation of microplastics in the environment.

The production of clothing also requires a significant amount of energy, with an estimated 80% of the energy used in the fashion industry going towards textile manufacturing. This energy is often produced by burning coal, a major source of greenhouse gas emissions. The fashion industry is also a large consumer of water, with fashion brands bulk-ordering far more clothes than can be sold or worn, leading to water waste. The industry is responsible for around 20% of industrial wastewater pollution worldwide and is the second-largest consumer of the world's water supply.

The social and environmental costs of the fashion industry have led to a growing movement towards slow fashion and sustainable fashion practices. Slow fashion encourages the purchase of clothing made from local sources, as opposed to large brands, as these locally-made pieces are often of higher quality and produced in a more environmentally sustainable manner. Sustainable fashion practices aim to reduce waste, improve energy and water efficiency, and use primarily eco-friendly materials such as linen, hemp, silk, ramie, organic cotton, and sustainable wool or recycled fabrics.

Food waste

The environmental impact of food waste extends beyond methane emissions. Food production requires substantial land and water resources, and when food is wasted, these resources are also wasted. Agriculture is a significant driver of habitat loss, and food waste contributes to this loss by requiring more land for cultivation. In the United States alone, about 80 million acres of land are used to produce wasted food. This land could have been used to restore natural habitats and protect biodiversity.

Water is another critical resource wasted due to food waste. Agriculture is responsible for 70% of the world's water use, and when food is thrown away, so is the water used in its production. For example, discarding one kilogram of beef is equivalent to wasting 25,000 liters of water. Food waste also contributes to water pollution, as the runoff from agricultural activities can contaminate waterways, leading to eutrophication.

The economic and social costs of food waste are also significant. In the United States, consumers, businesses, and farms spend $218 billion, or 1.3% of their gross domestic product, on food that is never eaten. This waste could have been used to address food insecurity and feed hungry people. According to the World Food Programme, 343 million people face acute hunger globally, and reducing food waste could help address this issue.

To mitigate the impact of food waste, several measures can be implemented. Firstly, raising awareness about food waste and educating consumers can help prevent waste and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Additionally, proper waste management practices, such as composting and diverting food waste from landfills, can reduce methane emissions. Finally, reducing overproduction, improving supply chain efficiency, and donating unsold food can also minimize food waste and its associated environmental and social costs.

Chemical manufacturing

The chemicals released in the largest quantities by the chemical manufacturing industry include ammonia and ethylene. Facilities that manufacture nitrogen-based fertilizers accounted for 42% of ammonia air releases. These ammonia emissions, along with emissions from livestock manure, comprise 95% of ammonia emissions, which, in turn, account for 58% of the particulate matter air pollution in European cities.

To address the issue of air pollution from chemical manufacturing, businesses in this sector must comply with legal obligations and obtain the necessary permits. For instance, if a company supplies or handles ozone-depleting substances (ODS) or F-gases, they must adhere to specific regulations. Additionally, businesses must take measures to reduce dust, odours, and fumes to minimize air pollution. This includes proper storage of oil and chemicals in sealed containers and ensuring that equipment seals are in good condition.

The impact of the chemical manufacturing industry on air pollution is significant, and efforts are being made to regulate and reduce their emissions. By implementing pollution prevention and control (PPC) measures and adhering to legal obligations, the industry can work towards minimizing its environmental and health impacts.

Frequently asked questions