Air Pollution: People Vs Industries

Air pollution is a pressing health and environmental issue worldwide, with indoor and outdoor pollution contributing to various adverse health effects. While indoor pollution is prevalent in low-income countries due to solid fuel usage for cooking, outdoor pollution increases with industrialization. Various sources contribute to air pollution, including residential energy use, vehicles, power generation, agriculture, waste incineration, and industries such as fossil fuels, fashion, food retail, and transportation. The impact of air pollution on health includes respiratory diseases, cardiovascular issues, neurological damage, and cancer. Addressing air pollution requires interventions in energy, transport, housing, and industrial sectors, along with sustainable practices to reduce emissions and improve air quality.

Fossil fuels, the most polluting sector, emit carbon dioxide and other pollutants

Fossil fuels are the most polluting sector, emitting carbon dioxide and other pollutants. The burning of oil, coal, and natural gas releases carbon dioxide, methane, and other greenhouse gases, which contribute to global warming and climate change. In 2023, carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuels reached record levels, with a 1.1% increase from 2022, resulting in 36.8 billion metric tons of carbon dioxide emitted. The United States, in particular, has seen an increase in greenhouse gas emissions due to a rise in CO2 emissions from fossil fuel combustion.

The transportation sector is the largest contributor to direct greenhouse gas emissions, with over 94% of fuel used for transportation being petroleum-based, including gasoline and diesel. The industrial sector, including electricity production, also plays a significant role, with 60% of electricity generated in 2022 coming from burning fossil fuels. Additionally, the commercial and residential sectors contribute to emissions through the burning of fossil fuels for heating and cooling.

Fossil fuel combustion produces a range of harmful air pollutants, such as sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, and particulate matter, which have negative impacts on human health and the environment. These pollutants are associated with respiratory diseases and other health issues, contributing to morbidity and mortality. The World Health Organization (WHO) has reported that 99% of the global population breathes air that exceeds the recommended limits for pollutant levels, with low- and middle-income countries experiencing the highest exposures.

While carbon capture and storage (CCS) technologies exist to collect and store carbon emitted by the fossil fuel sector, this does not address the full range of pollutants released. Additionally, the changing climate, including extreme heat, drought, and wildfires, is making it more challenging to maintain air quality and protect public health.

To address these issues, policies and investments that support sustainable land use, cleaner energy sources, improved waste management, and energy-efficient practices in industries, transportation, and residential sectors are necessary. These measures will help reduce air pollution, mitigate climate change, and improve public health outcomes.

Agriculture contributes 18% of greenhouse gases, largely from livestock

Agriculture contributes 18% of global greenhouse gases, with livestock being the largest contributor. The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations estimates that livestock produces 12% of global greenhouse gas emissions, while other studies place the figure at up to 19.6%. Livestock farming is a significant source of methane emissions, which have a much greater warming effect than carbon dioxide. Cattle are a major driver of global warming, contributing 21% of global methane emissions. The digestive processes of ruminant livestock, such as cattle and sheep, produce methane through enteric fermentation. While cow flatulence is often referenced, over 90% of methane from cattle is emitted through burping.

The impact of livestock on global warming is further exacerbated when forests and woodlands are cleared to create pastures for grazing. Deforestation increases the albedo of the affected area, leading to warming or cooling effects, and also impacts regional carbon reuptake, potentially increasing CO2 concentrations. Additionally, the burning of biomatter during land clearing releases greenhouse gases and particulate matter into the air.

Livestock manure management is another significant source of methane emissions. Methane is formed during the decomposition of manure, and the use of devices called anaerobic digesters can help capture the resulting biogas for energy use. However, these digesters come with high capital costs.

The consumption of monogastric animals, such as pigs and poultry, may yield lower emissions as they have higher feed-conversion efficiency and produce less methane. A 2023 study found that adopting a vegan diet could reduce emissions by 75%.

Agriculture's contribution to greenhouse gases extends beyond livestock. Crop production, land use, and supply chains also play a role, accounting for 27%, 24%, and 18% of emissions, respectively, within the global food system. Carbon dioxide emissions from agriculture arise from the tilling of fields, planting of crops, and shipment of products. However, certain farm practices, such as reduced tillage, better land management, and the use of cover crops, can help mitigate these emissions.

Fashion produces 8-10% of CO2 emissions and 92 million tonnes of waste annually

The fashion industry is a major contributor to air pollution, with its fast-paced and mass-production nature leading to significant environmental consequences. The industry is responsible for 8-10% of global CO2 emissions, a striking figure that underscores the urgent need for sustainable practices.

CO2 emissions are closely tied to the fashion industry's reliance on fossil fuels and its position as the second-biggest consumer of water. The production of synthetic fibres, which now account for a substantial portion of textiles, has significantly impacted the environment. The development and widespread adoption of synthetic fibres like polyester and nylon have transformed the industry since World War II. In 2020, synthetic fibres made up approximately 64% of global fibre production, with an estimated 60% of clothing and 70% of household textiles containing these plastic-based materials.

The production and processing of synthetic fibres contribute to greenhouse gas emissions and other pollutants. The fashion industry's water consumption is also notable, with the creation of a single cotton t-shirt requiring 2,700 litres of freshwater, enough to meet one person's drinking needs for 2.5 years. The water-intensive nature of textile production has significant implications for water degradation and land use.

The issue of waste is another critical aspect of the fashion industry's environmental impact. Each year, 92 million tonnes of waste are generated, with items often ending up in landfills due to the high cost of putting them back into circulation. The rise of "fast fashion," characterised by low prices and high sales volumes, has exacerbated the waste problem. Consumers now buy 60% more garments than in 2000 but keep them for half as long, leading to a dramatic increase in pre- and post-production textile waste.

The consequences of the fashion industry's air pollution are far-reaching, contributing to climate change and public health risks. Greenhouse gas emissions from the industry trap heat in the atmosphere, leading to rising temperatures, sea levels, and more extreme weather. Additionally, the release of pollutants affects local ecosystems and the health of nearby residents and workers.

To address these pressing issues, strategies such as developing new business models for clothing rental, promoting circular fashion, and encouraging consumers to invest in higher-quality, longer-lasting garments are being proposed. The European Commission, for instance, has presented a strategy that includes ecodesign requirements, clearer information, and calls for companies to minimise their carbon and environmental footprints. By implementing such initiatives, the goal is to reduce the fashion industry's environmental footprint and mitigate the adverse effects of air pollution on both the planet and human health.

Poor waste management leads to landfill overuse and air pollution

Poor waste management is a pressing issue that leads to landfill overuse and air pollution. Landfills are one of the most common waste management methods, and their overuse has significant environmental and social impacts. The degradation process in landfills releases large amounts of methane, carbon dioxide, and carbon IV oxide, making them one of the leading contributors to global greenhouse gas emissions.

The issue of landfill overuse is particularly severe in densely populated urban-industrial centers of developed countries. In these areas, landfills can reach their maximum capacity, leading to the release of harmful gases and pollutants into the atmosphere. Poor waste management practices, such as open dumping and uncontrolled "landfills" (often referred to as open dumpsites), further exacerbate the problem. These practices are prevalent in many developing countries, adding to the global air pollution crisis.

The consequences of landfill overuse go beyond environmental concerns. Living near a landfill site poses significant health risks to nearby residents. Studies have shown an increased risk of congenital malformations in children born to families residing within close proximity to hazardous waste landfills. Additionally, landfills are associated with water pollution, as the produced landfill leachate can contaminate underground water sources, leading to severe health issues such as infectious diseases, cancer, birth defects, and asthma.

The complex nature of waste management, coupled with a growing population and industrial development, presents a challenging situation. To reduce the reliance on landfills and mitigate their negative impacts, it is essential to promote sustainable practices. This includes encouraging recycling, composting, and living a zero-waste lifestyle. By implementing policies that support sustainable land use, cleaner energy sources, and improved waste management technologies, we can effectively reduce the overuse of landfills and the associated air pollution.

Furthermore, it is important to address the disproportionate impact of landfill overuse on minority and low-income areas. These communities are more likely to host landfills and hazardous waste sites due to limited resources to oppose their placement. Ensuring equitable distribution of landfills and providing support to vulnerable communities can help alleviate the burden of air pollution on these populations.

People of colour are disproportionately affected by air pollution

Air pollution is caused by a variety of human and natural activities, including residential energy use, cooking, heating, vehicles, power generation, agriculture, waste incineration, industry, and forest fires. While air pollution affects everyone, people of color are disproportionately impacted by it. This disparity is evident across income levels and regions in the United States.

Research has consistently shown that communities of color are exposed to higher levels of air pollution and are more vulnerable to its adverse health effects. For example, a 2021 study by the EPA-funded Center for Air, Climate, and Energy Solutions found that people of color in the United States breathe more particulate air pollution, specifically fine particulate matter (PM2.5), on average. This finding is significant because exposure to PM2.5 is linked to serious health issues such as lung and heart problems, especially for those with pre-existing chronic conditions.

The reasons for this disparity are complex and rooted in systemic racism and environmental injustice. Historical housing policies and other factors have contributed to people of color being pushed into areas with higher pollution levels. Additionally, pollution sources, such as industrial facilities and major roads, tend to be located near disadvantaged communities, further increasing exposure to harmful pollutants for people of color.

Furthermore, socioeconomic factors play a role in the disproportionate impact of air pollution on people of color. Low-income communities, which often overlap with communities of color, may have limited access to healthcare, healthy food options, and good jobs. They may also experience dirtier workplaces and higher traffic exposure, all of which can exacerbate the health risks associated with air pollution.

The environmental justice movement aims to address these disparities by advocating for equitable and sustainable policies that protect the right to a clean and healthy environment for all. Organizations like the NAACP and the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) are working to rectify past injustices and create a more sustainable and just future for communities that have been disproportionately affected by air pollution.

Frequently asked questions