The Long Battle Against Air Pollution

The fight against air pollution has been a long and ongoing battle, with evidence of air pollution dating back to ancient Rome and even earlier. The residents of ancient Rome referred to the polluted air as gravioris caeli and infamis aer, with the philosopher Seneca writing about the oppressive atmosphere and poisonous fumes of the city. Despite this early recognition of air pollution, it was the Industrial Revolution and the shift to fossil fuels that marked the beginning of large-scale air pollution, with centralized factories and the burning of coal releasing unprecedented levels of pollutants into the atmosphere. The link between air pollution and human health was further established in the 1950s and 60s when hundreds of people in New York City died from exposure to air pollution, sparking the modern environmental movement and leading to the first Earth Day in 1970. Since then, various regulations and policies have been implemented worldwide to combat air pollution, including the Clean Air Act in the US and the 1979 Convention on Long-range Transboundary Air Pollution (LRTAP). While significant progress has been made in reducing certain pollutants, air pollution remains a critical issue, especially in developing countries, and continues to be a major focus of environmental efforts worldwide.

Air pollution recognised as a threat to human health since 400 BC

Air pollution has been recognised as a threat to human health for millennia. As early as 400 BC, Hippocrates noted the health effects of air pollution, writing about the health implications of smoke inhalation and the impact of environmental factors on human health. Ancient Roman writers, such as Cicero, also commented on the negative effects of air pollution on human health and the environment.

However, it was not until the Industrial Revolution that air pollution became a widespread and pressing issue. The large-scale burning of fossil fuels, the emergence of factories, and the rapid urbanisation led to a significant decline in air quality, particularly in industrialised cities. The situation was so severe that in 1952, London experienced a catastrophic event known as the "Great Smog", which caused respiratory problems for thousands of people and led to the first modern air pollution laws.

In the United States, the Clean Air Act was passed in 1963, followed by the establishment of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in 1970. The EPA has since played a crucial role in researching and regulating air pollution, with a focus on protecting public health and the environment. The Clean Air Act Amendments of 1970 led to the nation's first air quality standards and the regulation of pollutants from vehicles, power plants, and other industrial sources.

Despite these efforts, air pollution remains a significant challenge today. Developing nations, in particular, struggle with air pollution due to their reliance on fossil fuels and solid fuels, and the lack of resources to combat pollution and its health impacts. Additionally, new pollutants continue to be discovered, posing threats to human health and the environment.

To address these challenges, there is a growing emphasis on smart technology and interdisciplinary research to better understand the complex interactions between multiple pollutants and their collective impacts. There is also a continued push for stronger clean air standards, lower emissions, and the adoption of renewable energy sources to mitigate the effects of air pollution and reduce its economic burden, which currently costs countries around the world USD$5 trillion every year.

The Clean Air Act, 1956, led to reduced emissions and closure of polluting infrastructure

The Clean Air Act of 1956 was a response to the 'Great Smog' of 1952, which blanketed London in thick fog and led to a dramatic increase in deaths, with over 4,000 people dying in the immediate aftermath and a further 8,000 in the following weeks and months. This smog was identified as being caused by pollution from solid fuels, and it brought the health effects of air pollution into sharp focus.

The Clean Air Act of 1956 was a crucial step in reducing emissions and addressing the problem of air pollution. The Act gave local authorities the power to regulate and control emissions of smoke, grit, dust, and fumes from industrial sources, such as furnaces and boilers. It also allowed for the creation of "'smoke control areas' in towns and cities, where only smokeless fuels could be burned. This shift towards cleaner fuels, such as electricity and gas, reduced smoke pollution and sulphur dioxide emissions from household fires.

The Act had wide-reaching implications, as it prohibited certain activities of private households, sparking debates about public regulation, public health, and the role of government intervention. It also led to the closure of many urban power stations and other polluting industrial infrastructure, further reducing emissions in urban areas.

The Clean Air Act of 1956 was a significant step in the right direction, but it was not enough to solve the problem of air pollution entirely. It was extended and built upon by subsequent legislation, such as the Clean Air Act of 1968, which made it an offence to emit dark smoke from chimneys and provided a framework for controlling chimney height and position. These acts were consolidated and further extended by the Clean Air Act of 1993, demonstrating the ongoing need to tackle air pollution and its associated health and environmental issues.

Despite these efforts, air pollution remains a pressing environmental issue. While there have been successes, such as a 90% decline in SO2 emissions in Europe and North America from their peak in the 1970s, new pollutants continue to be discovered, causing millions of premature deaths and health issues worldwide. The fight against air pollution continues, with organizations like the American Lung Association advocating for stronger clean air standards, lower power plant emissions, and the adoption of cleaner fuels and vehicles.

California's pioneering efforts to reduce air pollutants since the 1940s

California's efforts to combat air pollution have been ongoing for several decades, with the state taking a proactive approach to address this pressing issue. Here is a detailed look at California's pioneering efforts to reduce air pollutants since the 1940s:

The first recognised episodes of smog, a combination of smoke and fog, occurred in Los Angeles during the summer of 1943. This marked the beginning of California's journey towards tackling air pollution. By the 1960s, the state started taking significant actions to address this growing problem. In 1960, California adopted the first industrial emission controls, limiting smoke emissions from factories and restricting sulfur compounds. This was a crucial step in regulating emissions from industrial sources.

In 1962, California opened five air monitoring stations to measure air pollution in the ambient air, providing valuable data for decision-making. The state's commitment to combating air pollution led to the formation of the Motor Vehicle Pollution Control Board (MVPCB), later renamed the California Air Resources Board (CARB) in 1967. Governor Ronald Reagan approved the Mulford-Carrell Air Resources Act, establishing CARB to address air pollution through a unified statewide approach.

The same year, the Federal Air Quality Act of 1967 was enacted, granting California the authority to set its own stringent air quality standards due to its unique geographical, climatic, and demographic factors. This recognition of California's exceptional circumstances allowed the state to implement stricter-than-federal vehicle emissions regulations, acknowledging the challenges posed by its growing population and number of vehicles.

In 1966, California took the lead in establishing the nation's first tailpipe emissions standards for hydrocarbons and carbon monoxide. This was followed by the implementation of emissions standards for oxides of nitrogen in 1971 and particulate matter from diesel fuel. CARB's innovative vehicle emission control strategies played a pivotal role in improving air quality in California, setting a precedent for other states and countries.

California's aggressive air pollution control programs have led to continued improvements in air quality, even with the state's increasing population and vehicle count. The state's efforts have resulted in the development and implementation of effective air pollution control strategies, serving as a model for others to follow. However, California still faces challenges, particularly with its persistent smog problem, and must continue striving towards ensuring clean air for all its residents and mitigating the impacts of climate change.

EPA's 2006 adoption of a 24-hour fine particle standard

The fight against air pollution has been ongoing for several decades, with countries taking action to stop the spread of certain chemicals believed to be the cause of air pollution. Despite these efforts, air pollution remains a pressing environmental issue.

In 2006, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) adopted a 24-hour fine particle standard, known as the PM2.5 standard, as part of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). This standard focused on particulate matter with a diameter of 2.5 micrometres or less, which can be emitted directly into the atmosphere as solid or liquid particles or formed in the atmosphere through chemical reactions from precursor emissions. The EPA's adoption of this standard was a significant step towards improving air quality and protecting public health.

The 2006 PM2.5 standard built upon the existing 1997 fine particle annual standard. However, the Lung Association and other environmental groups believed that the annual standard was not stringent enough as it was well above the level recommended by the EPA's science advisors. As a result, they took legal action to require the EPA to review the standard. Despite this pushback, the EPA maintained the 1997 annual standard while implementing the new 24-hour standard.

Following the adoption of the 2006 PM2.5 standard, the EPA took several actions to address air quality issues across the United States. In 2008, the EPA modified the Baltimore nonattainment area to include Montgomery and Prince George's Counties, indicating that these areas were not meeting the PM2.5 standard. Additionally, the EPA approved West Virginia's request to redesignate the Charleston area and the state's portion of the Steubenville-Weirton area as attainment areas for the PM2.5 standard in 2014.

While the EPA's adoption of the 24-hour fine particle standard in 2006 was a positive step forward, challenges and discrepancies remained. In 2020, it was determined that the Los Angeles-South Coast Air Basin nonattainment area failed to attain the PM2.5 standard by the set deadline. This highlighted the ongoing struggle to meet air quality standards in certain regions.

Developing nations' reliance on fossil fuels and solid fuels

The world has been fighting air pollution for decades, with the first major air-related issue identified in the 1960s as acid rain. Since then, countries have taken action to stop the spread of certain chemicals believed to cause air pollution, but the issue remains pressing. One of the key challenges in the fight against air pollution is the reliance of developing nations on fossil fuels and solid fuels.

Developing nations are rich in fossil fuels, and coal power plants remain prevalent in these regions. These countries have a higher proportion of their national wealth tied to fossil fuels, and they face challenges in diversifying their economies and sources of government revenue. They also often lack the technologies and economic resources to combat air pollution effectively, including adequate health systems to address pollution-related diseases. Additionally, developing countries may have weaker environmental laws and policies, such as less stringent vehicle emission standards.

Developing nations heavily rely on solid fuels like wood, crop wastes, charcoal, coal, and kerosene for cooking, heating, and lighting. These solid fuels are responsible for severe indoor air pollution, contributing to the overall air quality issues in these regions. For instance, six out of the ten most polluted cities in 2021 were in India, with air pollution costing the Indian economy nearly USD 150 billion annually.

The transition away from fossil fuels and towards renewable energy sources is essential to combat air pollution and climate change. However, this transition presents economic challenges for developing countries rich in fossil fuels. If the world successfully addresses climate change, these countries may face a sharp decline in the value of their coal, gas, and oil deposits. On the other hand, if climate change goes unchecked, these countries will likely suffer disproportionately from the impacts of floods, droughts, and other weather-related problems.

To support developing nations in their transition to cleaner energy sources, wealthy countries have provided climate financing through funds like the Green Climate Fund. However, some developing countries have pressured rich nations to fund fossil gas projects, arguing that natural gas serves as a bridge fuel between fossil fuel generation and clean energy. While natural gas is cleaner than coal, its production leaks methane, a highly potent greenhouse gas.

Frequently asked questions