Ocean Pollution's Impact On The Global Economy

how is the economy affected by ocean pollution

Marine plastic pollution has significant economic and societal repercussions. Industries like tourism, fishing, and real estate are dependent on healthy marine environments, and pollution can severely impact these economic opportunities. Marine debris can deter tourists from visiting beaches, reduce commercial catches, and compete with active fishing gear. The presence of plastic pollution on beaches can lead to decreased tourism revenue and local job losses. Additionally, plastic pollution poses a threat to the cultural heritage and history preserved by communities, further exacerbating the economic and social impacts. The economic losses due to marine plastic pollution are substantial, with estimates ranging from $13 billion to $2.5 trillion annually. These costs include the impact on fisheries, tourism, and the cultural value of marine ecosystems.

Characteristics Values
Annual economic loss caused by plastic pollution $19 billion (UNEP)
Financial loss caused by plastic pollution $13 billion (UNEP)
Loss in tourism revenue in Alabama due to marine debris $113 million
Increase in tourism revenue in Ohio due to reduction in marine debris $217 million
Loss in tourism revenue in Orange County, California due to marine debris $414 million
Loss in tourism revenue caused by plastic pollution $255 million (Deloitte)
Drop in real estate prices due to polluted waters 25% (EPA)
Loss of marine ecosystem services due to plastic pollution 1-5%
Loss in revenue due to plastic pollution $500 billion to $2.5 trillion per year
Loss per metric ton of plastic pollution $33,000

shunwaste

Marine debris impacts tourism and recreation, reducing jobs and revenue

Marine debris has a significant impact on tourism and recreation, which in turn affects local economies and employment. In the United States, the tourism and recreation sector is the largest employer in the ocean and Great Lakes economy, with tourism and recreation in coastal areas contributing $124 billion to the country's GDP.

The presence of marine debris on beaches can deter tourists, reducing the number of days they spend on those beaches and, consequently, the amount of money they spend in local communities. This has a direct impact on local businesses and employment, with fewer tourists translating to decreased revenue and job losses.

A NOAA-funded study found that doubling the amount of marine debris on beaches in coastal Alabama led to an estimated decrease of 1 million visitor days, resulting in a loss of $113 million in tourism spending and a reduction of nearly 2,200 jobs. Conversely, reducing marine debris can have a positive impact on local economies. The same study found that eliminating marine debris on Lake Erie beaches in Ohio could result in an additional 2.8 million visits, an extra $217 million in tourism spending, and the creation of over 3,700 jobs.

The impact of marine debris on tourism preferences was also observed in a study of residents in Orange County, California. The study found that the presence of debris on beaches influenced participants' decisions to visit a beach, with most respondents indicating they would prefer to travel farther and spend more money to find a cleaner beach. This behaviour results in additional costs for beachgoers and can lead to losses of millions of dollars every year.

The issue of marine debris is not limited to the United States. Islands in the Pacific and Caribbean, such as those involved in the Plastic Waste Free Islands project, are particularly vulnerable as they are heavily dependent on tourism. Marine plastic pollution not only reduces economic opportunities for these islands but also poses a threat to their cultural heritage and history.

shunwaste

Marine pollution affects fishing industries and catches

Marine pollution has a detrimental impact on fishing industries and catches. The fishing industry is directly dependent on marine environments for its operations and economic opportunities. When marine pollution is introduced into the equation, these opportunities are significantly hindered.

One of the primary ways in which marine pollution affects fishing industries is by reducing fish populations. Fish ingest plastic pollution, which can lead to health issues and mortality. This, in turn, decreases the number of fish available for commercial fishing, resulting in financial losses for fishers and a potential decline in the industry as a whole.

Additionally, marine debris can compete with active fishing gear and hinder fishing operations. Lost or derelict fishing gear, such as lines, nets, and traps, not only degrades sensitive habitats but also continues to catch species, a process known as "ghost fishing." This results in lost catch opportunities and financial losses for fishers, as they also have to incur the cost of replacing the lost gear.

The presence of marine debris can also create safety and navigation hazards for fishing vessels, further impacting their efficiency and profitability. Moreover, the time and resources spent on cleaning and repairing nets due to fouling incidents and entanglement with marine debris contribute to the economic burden on the fishing industry.

The impact of marine pollution on fishing industries and catches extends beyond the immediate financial losses. It can also have societal and cultural repercussions. Fishing communities rely on the marine environment for their livelihoods, and when pollution reduces these opportunities, it can disrupt the social fabric of these communities. Additionally, marine ecosystems often hold immense cultural significance, and plastic pollution poses a threat to the preservation of cultural heritage and history.

shunwaste

Real estate prices can drop due to polluted waters

Ocean pollution can have a detrimental effect on the economy, impacting industries such as tourism and fishing, as well as communities that rely on the marine environment for their livelihoods. Marine debris and plastic pollution can drive tourists away from beaches, reducing tourism revenue and local jobs. A study found that an increase in marine debris on beaches in coastal Alabama led to a decrease of 1 million visitor days and a loss of $113 million in tourism spending, along with a decrease of 2,200 jobs.

Real estate prices are sensitive to the state of the environment, and polluted waters can indeed cause property values to drop. This is especially true for coastal properties, which are highly sought-after for their desirable views and proximity to the ocean. However, with rising concerns about climate change and sea-level rise, the risks associated with coastal living are becoming more apparent, and this is reflected in property prices.

Research suggests that the impact of polluted waters on real estate prices can be significant. For example, a study by the First Street Foundation found that climate change concerns have resulted in nearly $16 billion in lost appreciation of property values along the Eastern Seaboard and Gulf Coast of the United States since 2005. Coastal homes in certain areas, such as Salisbury, Massachusetts, would be worth $200,000 to $300,000 more if not for frequent tidal flooding and powerful coastal storms.

In Florida's Miami-Dade County, higher-elevation properties are appreciating faster than lower-lying ones as buyers increasingly consider climate change risks. A study by the University of Colorado Boulder's School of Business found that coastal properties most vulnerable to sea-level rise sold for approximately 7% less than similar properties less threatened by rising waters.

The impact of polluted waters on real estate prices can be influenced by various factors, including the severity of pollution, the effectiveness of mitigation efforts, and the level of risk perceived by buyers. Additionally, the presence of noise pollution, such as from nearby airports, roads, or industrial activities, can further compound the issue, as noise is also known to negatively affect property values.

Overall, the potential drop in real estate prices due to polluted waters can have far-reaching consequences for homeowners, communities, and local economies. It underscores the importance of addressing ocean pollution and implementing effective measures to protect and preserve the marine environment, not only for ecological reasons but also for economic stability.

shunwaste

Marine ecosystems are culturally significant, and plastic pollution threatens heritage

Marine ecosystems are culturally significant in a multitude of ways. They provide aesthetic pleasure, with their awe-inspiring beauty, diverse flora and fauna, vibrant coral reefs, and magnificent seascapes. This beauty inspires a sense of wonder and tranquility, resonating deeply within us.

They are also a source of cultural diversity, with coastal communities around the world developing unique traditions, knowledge, and practices intertwined with the sea. Marine ecosystems are repositories of ancient stories, legends, and traditional ecological knowledge, especially for indigenous communities, whose cultural heritage is tied to sustainable practices and conservation efforts.

The vastness and mysteries of the oceans spark creativity in artists, writers, and musicians, leading to works that capture the essence of the sea and evoke powerful emotions. Marine ecosystems also offer recreational and ecotourism opportunities, such as snorkeling, scuba diving, and wildlife watching, which contribute to local economies.

The ocean holds deep spiritual and religious significance for many cultures, inspiring rituals, ceremonies, and practices that honor the natural world. It evokes a profound sense of place, shaping the identities of coastal communities worldwide. Furthermore, marine ecosystems foster social cohesion, with activities like fishing and beach gatherings bringing people together and strengthening community bonds.

The cultural significance of marine ecosystems is under threat from plastic pollution. Plastic-infested seafood could harm fisheries, and the suffering of "charismatic" animals like turtles and whales due to plastic pollution can negatively impact human well-being. The presence of plastic litter on beaches can deter tourists, reducing the economic benefits of tourism for coastal communities.

To preserve the cultural heritage and economic opportunities associated with marine ecosystems, it is crucial to address plastic pollution through waste reduction, recycling, and the implementation of a "social cost of plastic" to reflect the true impact of plastic pollution on society and the economy.

shunwaste

Marine debris removal and prevention can increase tourism and jobs

Marine debris can have a detrimental impact on the economies of coastal communities. Marine debris can deter tourists from visiting beaches, which can result in a loss of revenue for local businesses and a decline in tourism jobs. A study by the NOAA Marine Debris Program (MDP) found that reducing marine debris on beaches in Ohio to almost zero would generate an additional $217 million in tourism spending and create over 3,700 jobs. Similarly, in Orange County, California, it is estimated that removing marine debris could lead to an increase of 2.1 million visitor days, $187 million in tourism spending, and 1,900 jobs.

The presence of marine debris on beaches can also impact the fishing industry, which is a significant source of income for many coastal communities. Marine debris can interfere with fishing gear, reduce commercial catches, and increase the time and cost of cleaning nets. For example, a study found that removing derelict crab pots from the Chesapeake Bay could increase the harvest of blue crabs by 38 million pounds, resulting in an additional $33.5 million in revenue.

The negative impact of marine debris on tourism and fisheries can be mitigated through prevention and removal measures. By preventing marine debris from entering the marine environment and removing existing debris from shorelines and coastal areas, communities can maintain the aesthetic quality of their beaches and oceans, attracting tourists and supporting local businesses.

Additionally, marine debris prevention and removal can have a positive impact on the environment and create new job opportunities. For example, the MDP funds projects that work with local commercial fishers to remove derelict fishing gear. These projects provide income for fishers outside of the regular fishing season while also benefiting the environment.

Overall, marine debris removal and prevention can increase tourism and create jobs in coastal communities, contributing to the economic well-being of these areas. By addressing the issue of marine debris, local businesses, fisheries, and tourism industries can thrive, and new job opportunities can be created.

Frequently asked questions

Marine pollution has a detrimental impact on the economy, with losses of up to $2.5 trillion estimated globally each year. Marine debris and plastic pollution affect industries like tourism, fishing, and real estate, eradicating economic opportunities and causing clean-up costs.

Marine pollution discourages tourists from visiting beaches, reducing tourism revenue and local jobs. A study found that doubling marine debris on beaches in coastal Alabama led to a loss of $113 million in tourism spending and 2,200 jobs.

Ocean pollution impacts fisheries through lost catch opportunities and financial losses. Fish ingest plastic pollution, posing perceived health threats to humans. Marine debris also competes with active fishing gear, damages habitats, and continues to catch species through "ghost fishing".

Coastal communities that rely on tourism and fishing for their livelihoods are vulnerable to economic losses from marine pollution. A cleaner ocean is essential for the well-being, biodiversity, and cultural heritage of these communities.

Decreasing marine debris can increase tourism-related spending and jobs. For example, reducing marine debris in Ohio was estimated to generate an additional $217 million in tourism revenue and over 3,700 jobs. Prevention and clean-up efforts are crucial to mitigating the economic impacts of ocean pollution.

Written by
Reviewed by
Share this post
Print
Did this article help you?

Leave a comment