Air Pollution And Nafta: A Complex Relationship

The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) has been the subject of intense debate since its inception, with critics arguing that it would have negative consequences for the environment, including increased air pollution. These concerns have been particularly focused on the US-Mexico border region, where the agreement was predicted to result in water scarcity and increased pollution, ecosystem degradation, and adverse health impacts. While NAFTA included provisions for environmental protection and sustainable development, its implementation has had unintended consequences, such as the trafficking of drugs and the presence of organized crime in Mexico, which has led to illegal logging and increased mining operations, affecting air quality. Additionally, the agreement's impact on trade liberalization and the movement of companies to Mexico has resulted in increased air pollution from transportation and industrial activity. Despite some positive impacts, such as the clean-up of the US manufacturing sector, the overall legacy of NAFTA is perceived as more negative than positive by those in the region.

Air pollution from vehicles and industry

The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) has had a significant impact on air pollution from vehicles and industry in the 25 years since its inception. Initially, in the early 1990s, scholars and activists predicted that NAFTA would negatively impact the environment of the US-Mexico borderlands, increasing air pollution.

These predictions have proven accurate, with air pollution in the border region stemming from sources related to transportation and industry. The heavy concentration of vehicles and long delays at ports of entry are sources of air pollution clearly linked to expanded trade following NAFTA. The increased presence of trucks along the US-Mexico border has been responsible for spikes in respiratory diseases in border communities. The transportation equipment sector is a significant source of industrial pollution, particularly for volatile organic compounds and toxins released into the air in Canada and the United States.

The Mexican petroleum sector is also a notable contributor to air pollution. The elimination of tariffs on natural gas and oil products has encouraged foreign investment in Mexico's fossil fuel industry, which has resulted in increased air pollution in Mexico's urban areas, particularly in the north and central regions. The US base metals sector is another source of air pollution, with the greatest increases in carbon monoxide and sulfur dioxide emissions occurring in the United States.

While NAFTA has been linked to increased air pollution in specific sectors and regions, there is also evidence that it has had a positive impact on reducing certain types of pollution. For example, NAFTA has been credited with reducing emissions of PM10 and SO2 in US manufacturing plants, with trade liberalization leading to significant reductions in these pollutants.

Overall, NAFTA's impact on air pollution from vehicles and industry has been mixed, with both positive and negative outcomes observed in different contexts.

Environmental governance and trade

One of the main concerns regarding NAFTA and air pollution is the increase in transportation and trade, particularly in the US-Mexico border region. The heavy concentration of vehicles and long delays at ports of entry have been linked to expanded trade following NAFTA, contributing to air pollution in the border region. This includes an increase in trucks transporting goods across the border, leading to spikes in respiratory diseases in border communities.

The Mexican petroleum sector has also been identified as a significant source of air pollution. The elimination of tariffs on natural gas and oil products has encouraged foreign investment in Mexico's fossil fuel industry, which has contributed to increased air pollution in urban areas, particularly in the northern and central regions of the country. Additionally, the presence of maquiladoras and manufacturing jobs in Mexico has led to increased air pollution from industrial activity.

NAFTA has also had indirect effects on air pollution through its impact on other sectors. For example, the increase in mining operations has resulted in dust and mining waste affecting air quality and reaching water streams. The expansion of monocultures in the US Midwest has led to water pollution along the Mississippi River, creating "dead zones" that deplete oxygen and kill aquatic life.

Despite these negative impacts, some positive outcomes have been associated with NAFTA's environmental institutions. There has been an increase in public participation and infrastructure development, and potable water access in Mexican states adjacent to the border has improved. Additionally, NAFTA was one of the first trade deals to include environmental provisions and a focus on sustainable development. However, critics argue that NAFTA has lowered environmental standards and prompted polluting industries to move to Mexico to avoid stricter regulations in the US.

NAFTA's impact on water pollution

In the early 1990s, scholars and activists argued that the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) would negatively impact the US-Mexico border, causing water scarcity and increased water pollution, among other issues. These concerns prompted the creation of institutions to monitor the environment and improve environmental infrastructure in the region.

The Mexican petroleum sector has been identified as a significant source of industrial pollution, particularly air pollution. However, the transportation equipment sector and the chemical sector also contribute significantly to water pollution. NAFTA has been linked to increased industrial toxin pollution in these sectors, with toxins transmitted to water sources.

The impact of NAFTA on water pollution is also evident in the growth of mining and agricultural exports. This has led to serious regional water resource depletion and pollution, with negative consequences for the environment and public health. Mexico has faced challenges in enforcing its environmental laws and addressing the legacy of polluted waters left by rapid industrialization and population growth.

To address these issues, Mexico has reorganized its environmental agencies and implemented programs such as voluntary environmental audits to improve environmental compliance. Binational working groups have also been established to address water-related issues, and the International Water Boundary Commission (IBWC) manages water rights and infrastructure along the border.

While NAFTA has been associated with increased water pollution in certain sectors, it is difficult to attribute all environmental changes solely to the agreement due to various confounding factors, including pre-existing shifts towards neoliberal policies and the rise of other economic powers.

The role of the Commission for Environmental Cooperation

The Commission for Environmental Cooperation (CEC) was established in 1994 by the governments of Canada, Mexico, and the United States through the North American Agreement on Environmental Cooperation (NAAEC), a parallel environmental agreement to NAFTA. The CEC brings together a wide range of stakeholders, including the general public, Indigenous people, youth, nongovernmental organizations, academia, and the business sector. Its role is to seek solutions to protect North America's shared environment while supporting sustainable development for the benefit of present and future generations.

The CEC's work is recognized and maintained by the Environmental Cooperation Agreement, which runs in parallel with the new Free Trade Agreement of North America. The CEC's governing body, the Council, is composed of the highest-ranking environmental officials from Canada, the United States, and Mexico. The CEC has a Secretariat that administers the processes set out in Articles 14 and 15 of the NAAEC, which allow the public to submit assertions regarding a NAAEC Party's (Canada, Mexico, or the US) effective enforcement of environmental law.

One example of the CEC's role in addressing air pollution issues is the Sumidero Canyon II submission. In this case, the Secretariat of the CEC recommended an investigation into the alleged irregular operation of a quarry and the protection of the Sumidero Canyon National Park in Chiapas, Mexico. The Secretariat reviewed the submission in light of Mexico's response and found that there were central open questions related to applicable air emissions approvals, noise produced by the company's activities, and the obtaining of environmental impact approval, among other issues. The CEC also delivered a "factual record" on environmental pollution in Hermosillo II, filed in 2005, which asserted that Mexico was failing to effectively enforce provisions and official standards under Mexican law regarding the prevention, monitoring, oversight, and control of air pollution in the city of Hermosillo, Sonora.

The CEC also holds annual meetings, such as the Joint Public Advisory Council (JPAC), to address environmental issues linked to increased commerce, including air pollution. The CEC Youth Innovation Challenge encourages youth to submit innovative solutions to advance sustainability and green growth.

NAFTA's effect on industrial toxin pollution

The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) has had a complex impact on industrial toxin pollution in the region. While it has facilitated trade and economic growth, its environmental consequences have been mixed, with both positive and negative outcomes.

One of the most significant effects of NAFTA on industrial toxin pollution has been the increase in specific sectors, particularly petroleum, base metals, and transportation equipment. The Mexican petroleum sector, for instance, has been a major contributor to air pollution. The transportation equipment sector in Canada and the US has also been linked to the release of volatile organic compounds and toxins into the air. Similarly, the US base metals sector has been responsible for significant toxin emissions to land and air. The chemical sector in the US and Mexico is another significant source of industrial toxin pollution, as highlighted by Grossman and Krueger in 1993.

NAFTA's impact on air pollution in the border regions is also notable. The expansion of trade following NAFTA has led to increased traffic and long delays at ports of entry, resulting in higher air pollution levels. Additionally, the presence of maquiladoras and manufacturing jobs in Mexico has contributed to air pollution in urban areas, particularly in the northern and central regions. However, it is important to note that NAFTA has also driven reductions in certain pollutants, such as PM10 and SO2 emissions from US manufacturing plants, indicating a cleaner US manufacturing sector.

The agreement has also had indirect effects on industrial toxin pollution. For example, NAFTA has unintentionally enabled drug trafficking and the presence of organized crime in Mexico, which has led to illegal logging and threatened indigenous communities. The increased presence of mining operations due to NAFTA has harmed local biodiversity and contributed to air and water pollution through dust and waste. NAFTA has also been associated with water resource depletion and pollution, particularly in the US Midwest, due to monocultural agricultural practices.

While NAFTA was one of the first trade deals to include environmental provisions, its implementation has resulted in unintended consequences. Critics argue that it has lowered environmental standards and prioritised economic interests over environmental protection. However, supporters of NAFTA point to the creation of governance institutions, such as the Commission for Environmental Cooperation, which monitors the environment and funds improvements to environmental infrastructure.

Frequently asked questions