Incinerators: How Much Do They Pollute Our Air?

Incinerators are a source of energy, but they are also a source of pollution. The combustion process releases carbon dioxide, which escapes into the air, and creates ash that contains heavy metals and toxic compounds. These pollutants enter the air, water, and food supply near incinerators, affecting people's health and the environment. The impact is far-reaching, with persistent organic pollutants being found in people, wildlife, and the environment far from industrial sources. The question of whether incineration is an effective way to treat waste depends on various factors, and the answer is not a simple yes or no. While modern incinerators have improved in addressing release problems, the only way to completely stop incinerators from polluting the air may be to shut them down.

Incinerators emit toxic pollutants, including heavy metals, dioxins, and furans

Incinerators are a source of energy, with the combustion process delivering significant amounts of steam that can be used to generate electricity. However, the process of incineration also releases toxic pollutants, including heavy metals, dioxins, and furans, which can have adverse effects on the environment and human health.

Dioxins are a group of chemically related compounds that are persistent environmental pollutants (POPs). They are mainly by-products of industrial processes but can also result from natural processes such as volcanic eruptions and forest fires. Dioxins are highly toxic and can cause reproductive and developmental problems, damage the immune system, interfere with hormones, and cause cancer. They are often released into the environment due to incomplete burning in uncontrolled waste incinerators.

Furan emissions are also a concern, as they are one of the most toxic chemicals known. They are formed under inefficient combustion conditions and can build up in the environment and human tissue.

Heavy metals, such as cadmium, lead, mercury, and arsenic, are another pollutant released from incinerators. These metals are persistent and tend to accumulate in the environment, entering the food chain. Even at relatively low doses, they can pose toxic characteristics, leading to various health issues such as skin lesions, neurological disorders, learning disabilities, and adverse respiratory effects.

The release of these toxic pollutants from incinerators can have far-reaching consequences, impacting the air, water, and food supply near incinerators. Studies have shown that proximity to waste incineration may increase the risks of cancers, birth defects, and other adverse health impacts, with low-income and minority communities often bearing the brunt of this toxic burden.

While modern incinerators have better control systems to minimize toxicity, it is impossible to completely eliminate the release of these pollutants. As such, it is crucial to prioritize effective waste reduction, recycling, and sustainable practices to reduce the need for incineration and mitigate its environmental and health impacts.

These pollutants enter the air, water, and food supply, causing adverse health effects

Incinerators emit toxic pollutants that contaminate the air, water, and food supplies, causing adverse health effects. These pollutants include dioxins, lead, and mercury, which are released into the atmosphere and can travel long distances, affecting people and wildlife far from the source.

Dioxins, one of the most toxic chemicals known to science, can cause cancer and brain damage and are harmful to many of the body's regulatory systems. Lead and mercury emissions are unsafe to breathe at any level and have been linked to high blood lead levels and asthma rates in residents living near incinerators.

In addition to these toxins, incinerators also release heavy metals such as cadmium (Cd), mercury (Hg), and lead (Pb), which can accumulate in the environment and enter the food chain. These metals have been associated with skin lesions, neurological disorders, learning disabilities, and adverse respiratory effects. They also possess potential carcinogenic, mutagenic, and teratogenic properties.

The pollution from incinerators is not limited to air emissions. Ash and wastewater treatment sludge produced by incinerators are deposited in landfills and can leach into groundwater and rivers, contaminating water sources. The ash contains heavy metals and toxic compounds that can pollute the air, soil, and water when released from landfill systems.

Furthermore, the combustion process of incinerators releases carbon dioxide, a greenhouse gas that contributes to climate change. While carbon dioxide is considered less problematic than methane from biodegradation in landfills, it still has an impact on the environment.

The adverse health effects of incinerator pollution are particularly pronounced in low-income communities and communities of color, who disproportionately bear the burden of toxic exposures. These communities are often located near incinerators and face higher risks of cancers, birth defects, and other health issues due to the proximity to waste incineration.

They are linked to increased risks of cancers, birth defects, and other health issues

Incinerators have been linked to an increased risk of cancers, birth defects, and other health issues. The pollutants and chemicals released by incinerators can enter the air, water, and food supply, which can then be ingested by people through breathing, drinking, and eating.

One of the most significant concerns with incinerators is the release of dioxins, which are considered one of the most toxic chemicals known. Dioxins have been linked to a range of health issues, including birth defects, cancer, and damage to lung, liver, and brain development. Studies have shown that babies in the womb and young children exposed to incinerator dioxins are at the highest risk as dioxins are passed through the placenta and breastfeeding.

In addition to dioxins, incinerators also release heavy metals, which can accumulate in the environment and enter the food chain. These metals have been associated with various diseases, including skin lesions, neurological disorders, learning disabilities, and adverse respiratory effects. Some metals, such as arsenic, cadmium, mercury, and lead, have also been linked to potential carcinogenicity, mutagenicity, and teratogenicity.

While modern and well-regulated incinerators may have a minimal impact on nearby residents, studies have found a small increased risk for certain birth defects, such as heart defects and genital anomalies, in children living within close proximity to incinerators. However, it is important to note that the findings on birth defects are inconclusive, and more research is needed to establish a direct link between incinerators and these health issues.

The impact of incinerators on public health is a complex issue, and it is challenging to provide a definitive answer regarding their safety. While incinerators may reduce the volume of solid waste, they do not eliminate the toxic substances within it. As such, it is crucial to consider the potential health risks associated with incinerators and prioritize waste reduction, recycling, and sustainable practices to minimize their use.

Incinerators are often located in low-income communities and communities of colour

Incinerators are a major source of air pollution, releasing toxic pollutants such as dioxins, dibenzofurans, heavy metals, mercury, lead, and small particles of soot into the atmosphere. These pollutants have severe ecological and health impacts, including an increased risk of cancers, birth defects, asthma, heart disease, miscarriage, and other adverse health effects.

The issue of incinerator-caused pollution is further exacerbated by their frequent location in low-income communities and communities of colour. According to research, 79-85% of incinerators in the United States are situated in these marginalized areas, with 4.4-4.5 million people exposed to the pollution they generate. This pattern of environmental injustice is not a coincidence but a result of historical residential segregation and expulsive zoning laws that allowed wealthier, predominantly white communities to exclude industrial activities and people of colour from their areas. As a result, communities of colour and low-income populations bear the brunt of the toxic burden, facing higher health risks and a decreased quality of life.

The report by the Tishman Environment and Design Center at the New School highlights the vulnerability of these communities, with many already suffering from excess pollution from other industrial sources. The cumulative impacts of multiple pollution sources can be detrimental, yet regulators often fail to consider this when setting emissions regulations. This lack of consideration further endangers the health and well-being of those living near incinerators, who are already more likely to face social and economic challenges.

The placement of incinerators in these communities is a significant concern, as it contributes to environmental injustice and the creation of "sacrifice zones," where housing values decrease and disease rates rise. The toxic emissions from incinerators can lead to a decline in the overall quality of life for residents, with potential long-term consequences for their health and well-being.

Furthermore, the construction and operation of incinerators are costly, often relying on government subsidies. This raises financial concerns, especially given the volatile revenue streams in the industry. The high costs and potential health risks associated with incinerators have led many cities to move away from incineration, opting instead for zero-waste solutions that promote responsible production, consumption, reuse, and recovery.

Alternatives to incineration include recycling, composting, and anaerobic digestion

Incinerators are a major source of air pollution, releasing toxic pollutants such as dioxins, furans, and heavy metals into the atmosphere. These pollutants can have serious adverse health effects on nearby populations, increasing the risk of cancers, birth defects, and other health issues. The impact is often disproportionately felt by low-income communities and communities of colour, who are more likely to live near incinerators.

Given the negative consequences of incineration, it is important to explore alternative waste management methods. Alternatives to incineration include recycling, composting, and anaerobic digestion. Recycling, for instance, can be done through traditional mechanical processes or organic methods like composting. Paper, in particular, can be recycled multiple times, reducing energy consumption and pollution. Composting, on the other hand, is effective for managing organic waste and can be combined with landfill disposal to reduce environmental impacts.

Anaerobic digestion is another alternative that breaks down waste using bacteria without oxygen, producing biogas for energy and reducing greenhouse gas emissions. It is particularly suitable for organic waste with a high solids content and sewage sludge. Compared to incineration, anaerobic digestion is often a better environmental choice, especially when combined with composting. This combination has been shown to have the least environmental impact due to energy recovery from anaerobic digestion.

While incineration may have its advantages in certain scenarios, such as economic performance for drier wastes, the overall trend is towards exploring more sustainable alternatives. These alternatives aim to reduce waste production, minimise plastic use, and embrace proven methods of recycling and organic waste management. By adopting these alternatives, we can move towards a circular and sustainable economy that minimises pollution and protects public health.

Frequently asked questions