Space Exploration's Dark Side: Pollution And Its Causes

Space exploration has long been considered a government-focused industry, dominated by NASA. However, the rise of private space companies has led to a new space race, with billionaires like Richard Branson, Jeff Bezos, and Elon Musk vying for dominance. This shift has brought with it a host of environmental concerns, with space launches contributing to pollution and ozone depletion. The burning of fossil fuels and the release of soot and other chemicals into the upper atmosphere have detrimental effects on Earth's climate and ozone layer. As the number of launches increases, the environmental impact becomes more significant, with space tourism in particular causing a potential surge in black carbon emissions.

Rocket launches emit carbon dioxide and other chemicals into the upper atmosphere

Rocket engines release trace gases and particles of soot into the upper atmosphere, which contribute to ozone depletion. The impact of space launches on the ozone layer is a growing concern, as an increase in launches could expose people in the Northern Hemisphere to higher levels of harmful UV radiation. Research has shown that the stratosphere is sensitive to even small amounts of black carbon injections, and the increased pollution from space launches could disrupt atmospheric circulation and enhance the warming of the climate.

The type of fuel used in rockets can also impact the environment. For example, the fuel UDMH (unsymmetrical dimethylhydrazine), which was used in many early rocket launches, was highly carcinogenic and was blamed for turning an area of grassland in Kazakhstan into an ecological disaster zone. More recently, companies have been experimenting with alternative fuels, such as bio-propane, a renewable biofuel, and Ecosene, made from non-recyclable plastics, which are expected to produce fewer emissions.

While the overall impact of rocket launches on the environment may seem insignificant compared to other industries, the growing space industry and the projected increase in space travel highlight the need to address these environmental concerns. The impact of space launches on the ozone layer and the potential risks to Earth's atmosphere are areas that require further research and understanding.

Rocket fuels contribute to ozone depletion

Rocket fuel emissions are currently unregulated, both internationally and in nations like Aotearoa New Zealand. The unregulated nature of these emissions is concerning given the projected increase in space travel and the potential for this to damage the ozone layer.

Rocket engines release trace gases and particulates into the upper atmosphere that contribute to ozone depletion. These include reactive chlorine, black carbon, and nitrogen oxides. Chlorine is the greatest contributor to ozone loss resulting from rocket plumes, with every chlorine atom deposited in a rocket’s plume consuming, on average, over five to ten molecules of ozone. Chlorine is recycled in a continuous cycle, enabling it to destroy another ozone molecule. The catalytic cycle of destruction caused by chlorine means that it causes significantly more damage to the ozone layer than other rocket fuel components.

Solid rocket fuels are considered more harmful to the ozone layer than liquid rocket fuels. Solid-fuelled rockets contribute negligibly to ozone depletion on a global scale, but with the increasing abundance of space exploration, their use will need to be reconsidered. Solid rocket motors cause over sixty times more damage to the ozone layer compared to liquid rocket engines.

The use of chlorine-free rocket fuels is a potential solution to mitigate the impact of rocket launches on the ozone layer. Eliminating chlorine from rocket fuel could have a large impact on protecting the ozone layer from future rocket launches.

Space tourism may have unforeseen effects on the climate

A study by researchers from University College London (UCL), the University of Cambridge, and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) found that black carbon emissions will more than double after just three additional years of space tourism launches. This is due to the use of kerosene by SpaceX and hybrid synthetic rubber fuels by Virgin Galactic. Black carbon, which comes from burning fossil fuels or biomass, absorbs light from the sun and releases thermal energy, making it a powerful climate-warming agent.

Furthermore, while the current loss of total ozone due to rockets is small, current growth trends around space tourism indicate the potential for future depletion of the upper stratospheric ozone layer in the Arctic in spring. This is because pollutants from solid-fuel rockets and re-entering spacecraft and debris are particularly harmful to stratospheric ozone.

The soot particles from rocket launches have a much larger climate effect than aircraft and other Earth-bound sources. Soot from space tourism is 500 times more damaging to the climate than soot from all other sources combined. It is of particular concern as when the soot particles are directly injected into the upper atmosphere, they have a much greater effect on climate than other soot sources.

The space tourism industry could soon fuel significant global warming and ozone depletion if left unregulated. While companies specializing in space tourism have routinely played down the impact that the industry will have on the environment, comparing it to the aircraft industry, this comparison has been deemed erroneous by researchers.

Solid rocket fuels have a hefty carbon footprint

Solid rocket fuels have a significant carbon footprint. Rocket launches are a source of pollution, and the burning of solid rocket fuels contributes to this. The production of hydrogen fuel, for instance, can lead to notable carbon emissions. While liquid hydrogen fuel produces 'clean' water vapour exhaust, the process of making hydrogen results in significant carbon emissions.

Rocket engines release trace gases and particles of soot into the upper atmosphere, which contribute to ozone depletion. Soot particles, or black carbon, can remain in the higher layers of the atmosphere indefinitely, affecting how the atmosphere absorbs heat. The warming effect of these particles is estimated to be 500 times more than all other sources of soot combined. This has a detrimental impact on the climate, with the potential to disrupt atmospheric circulation and enhance warming.

The type of fuel used in rockets has a significant impact on the environment. Unsymmetrical Dimethylhydrazine (UDMH), also known as "devil's venom", has been described as highly carcinogenic, and it is blamed for causing ecological disaster in the Kazakh Steppe, the site of the world's oldest spaceport. The toxic rocket fuel has poisoned the soil for decades.

The choice of rocket fuel can also influence the amount of soot produced. RP-1, a highly refined form of kerosene, is a popular choice due to its low cost and stability, but it generates a significant amount of soot. On the other hand, bio-propane, a renewable biofuel, can reduce emissions by up to 90% compared to RP-1, and it produces less soot.

Startups are experimenting with sustainable alternatives, such as fuel made from waste plastic, biomass, or agricultural waste, which could reduce emissions and protect the environment. These alternatives are important as the number of rocket launches is expected to increase, leading to more emissions and potential damage to the ozone layer.

Space junk is a growing concern

The accumulation of space junk poses several risks and challenges. Firstly, it increases the chances of collisions with operational spacecraft and satellites, potentially generating more debris and endangering active missions. Additionally, the debris can interfere with astronomical observations, as the objects can reflect sunlight or block the view of distant celestial bodies. The presence of space junk also poses a threat to spacecraft re-entering the atmosphere, as the high-velocity debris can cause significant damage during re-entry.

The issue of space junk is not limited to the objects themselves but also includes the pollutants emitted by rocket launches. Rocket engines release trace gases and particles of soot into the upper atmosphere, contributing to ozone depletion and enhancing the warming climate effect. The impact of these emissions is amplified by the long residence time of the pollutants in the upper atmosphere, where they can remain for years, affecting atmospheric circulation and global climate patterns.

Furthermore, the projected increase in rocket launches, particularly those utilizing hydrocarbon-fueled engines, is expected to expose people in the Northern Hemisphere to increased harmful UV radiation due to the degradation of the protective ozone layer. This potential consequence underscores the urgency of addressing space junk and rocket emissions as a growing environmental concern.

While the space industry has recognized the need for more sustainable practices, the implementation of solutions is still ongoing. Companies like Orbex are exploring the use of renewable biofuels, such as bio-propane, which can significantly reduce emissions compared to traditional fuels. Additionally, alternative methods of launching satellites, such as horizontal launches or slingshot mechanisms, are being investigated to mitigate the environmental impact of conventional launches. As the space industry continues to evolve, addressing space junk and reducing the environmental footprint of launches will be crucial to ensuring the sustainable exploration and utilization of space.

Frequently asked questions