San Francisco's Water Pollution Mitigation Strategies: A Comprehensive Overview

San Francisco has faced a number of environmental and economic challenges in recent years, including water pollution. The San Francisco Bay is still not fully fishable, swimmable, or safe for aquatic life, with contaminants such as pesticides, heavy metals, and trash ending up in the water. Population growth, chemical usage, aging infrastructure, and climate change have exacerbated the impacts of an unhealthy bay. To address these issues, the city has implemented various measures, including upgrading infrastructure, advocating for legislation to reduce plastic pollution, and monitoring water quality through programs such as the Regional Monitoring Program (RMP) and the Clean Water Program. The Supreme Court has also sided with San Francisco, requiring the EPA to set specific targets for reducing water pollution.

San Francisco's water treatment plants

San Francisco faces several significant environmental and economic challenges, including water pollution. The San Francisco Bay Delta Watershed, which contains one of the world's largest water supply systems, is particularly vulnerable to the impacts of climate change, population growth, and increasing water demand.

San Francisco's water treatment infrastructure plays a crucial role in addressing these challenges. The city operates two 24-hour wastewater treatment plants that function year-round, and a third facility, called a wet-weather facility, that exclusively operates during rain events. The Southeast Treatment Plant (SEP), built in 1952, is the city's largest wastewater treatment facility, handling nearly 80% of San Francisco's combined stormwater and wastewater annually. However, many of its facilities have exceeded their operational lifespan, leading to unpleasant odors affecting the surrounding neighborhood.

To address these issues, the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission (SFPUC) is investing over $3 billion in critical upgrades to transform the SEP into a modern resource recovery center. This includes projects such as the Biosolids Digester Facilities Project (BDFP) and the New Headworks Facility Project, which began service in August 2024 and has since processed approximately 9 billion gallons of combined stormwater and sewer water flows. The SFPUC is also working on the Westside Enhanced Recycled Water Recycling Facility and investing $2 billion in upgrades to the Oceanside Treatment Plant.

The treatment processes at each plant are quite similar. Wastewater treatment is separated into liquid and solids processing components. When wastewater arrives at the plant, a screen is used to remove large objects. The liquid and solid components are then treated separately. These treatment plants play a vital role in protecting public health and the environment, ensuring that San Francisco's water is properly treated and safe for its residents and the surrounding ecosystems.

Reducing urban runoff

San Francisco has implemented various measures to reduce urban runoff and improve water quality in the Bay Area. Urban runoff occurs when stormwater washes off streets, parking lots, and other hard surfaces, carrying pollutants such as trash, pesticides, fertilizers, heavy metals, chemicals from tires, and oil and grease into storm drains and, ultimately, into the Bay.

One of the key approaches to reducing urban runoff is investing in infrastructure upgrades and green infrastructure. This includes installing trash capture devices and filtration systems to prevent pollutants from entering the Bay. Additionally, San Francisco has passed regulations on stormwater runoff and advocated for a zero-trash policy, with successful lobbying for legislation to limit single-use plastics. The city has also addressed construction dust control through health code articles, restricting the use of potable water for soil compaction and dust control.

The San Francisco Estuary Institute (SFEI) plays a crucial role in monitoring and improving water quality. They manage the Regional Monitoring Program (RMP), which brings together various stakeholders to address water quality issues. SFEI's unbiased data collection and interpretation have informed state policies to reduce plastic pollution, such as the 2015 ban on plastic microbeads in personal care products and the 2021 California Microplastics Strategy. Their work on emerging contaminants has led to statewide bans and enhanced protections for fish, wildlife, and human health.

The Bay Protection and Toxic Cleanup Program (BPTCP), which ran from 1990 to 1999, had four major goals: protecting beneficial uses of bay and estuarine waters, identifying and characterizing toxic hotspots, planning for pollution prevention, and developing remedial actions for existing toxic hotspots. The program aimed to prevent further pollution and ensure the health of the Bay's waters.

Additionally, the Clean Water Act of 1972 prohibits the discharge of pollutants without a permit into federally regulated bodies of water. San Francisco's Oceanside water treatment plant treats sewage and stormwater before discharging it into the Pacific Ocean. The plant must comply with permit requirements, including maintaining specific pH values for wastewater discharges, to ensure that treated water meets the required standards.

Monitoring and controlling harmful algal blooms

San Francisco has implemented several measures to monitor and control harmful algal blooms (HABs), which are a significant concern due to their impact on drinking water, recreation, and wildlife. HABs, caused by the overgrowth of algae or phytoplankton, can produce toxins that affect human and aquatic health, leading to illnesses and even mortality.

To address this issue, the San Francisco Estuary Institute, in collaboration with the Nutrient Management Strategy team, is studying the causes of HABs and working to characterise specific blooms. This includes tracking the progression of blooms, understanding their response to biological, geological, and chemical factors, and identifying factors contributing to their expansion and eventual decline. The development of DNA-sequencing techniques for specific algal species is also aiding in the early detection and characterisation of HABs.

The California state government maintains a Harmful Algal Bloom Monitoring and Alert Program (HABMAP), which collects weekly phytoplankton and water quality data at ten locations along the California coast, including San Francisco. This program helps monitor and provide alerts for potential HAB-related illnesses or deaths, with suspected HABs being reported to the Water Boards via an online form or a dedicated hotline.

Additionally, the San Francisco Bay Water Board has implemented the Nutrient Management Strategy, which involves collaboration with researchers, dischargers, and agencies to study the impacts of nutrients on the Bay and evaluate potential management actions to control nutrient inputs and prevent adverse effects. This strategy is funded by municipal wastewater treatment plants that discharge into San Francisco Bay, contributing $2.2 million per year to the budget.

The San Francisco Estuary Institute also plays a crucial role in monitoring and controlling HABs by conducting studies and collaborating with various partners, including regulators, dischargers, industry representatives, community activists, and scientists, to measure water quality in the estuary.

The role of the EPA

The San Francisco Bay Delta Watershed is facing a multitude of environmental and economic challenges, including water pollution. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) plays a crucial role in addressing these issues and protecting the region's water resources.

One of the primary roles of the EPA in the San Francisco Bay Area is to regulate and control water pollution. The agency works to ensure compliance with the Clean Water Act, which prohibits the "discharge of a pollutant" into federally regulated water bodies without a permit. The EPA issues permits with specific limitations on the amount and type of pollutants that can be discharged. For example, the EPA sets standard effluent limitations that dictate how clean a discharger's waste stream must be, including numeric targets for pH values.

The EPA is also responsible for identifying and addressing toxic hotspots in the region. Through the Bay Protection and Toxic Cleanup Program (BPTCP), the EPA works to protect bay and estuarine waters, identify toxic areas, and plan for the prevention and control of further pollution. The agency collaborates with various partners, including regulators, dischargers, industry representatives, community activists, and scientists, to measure and regulate water quality in the estuary.

Additionally, the EPA supports planning and initiatives to safeguard water resources from the potential impacts of climate change. The agency has published a Climate Change Handbook for Regional Water Planning and a technical report exploring a new way to measure vulnerability to climate change using the San Francisco Bay's ecosystem as a demonstration. The EPA's Climate Ready Estuaries Program aims to protect water resources from damage and loss due to climate-related challenges.

The EPA also plays a role in monitoring and addressing harmful algal blooms (HABs) in the San Francisco Bay Region. HABs can produce toxins that impact drinking water, recreation, and fish and wildlife. The agency collaborates with local agencies, lake and reservoir managers, health officials, and other organizations to manage the risks associated with HABs through improved monitoring, educational outreach, and remediation.

Furthermore, the EPA has the authority to issue permits for the discharge of pollutants under certain conditions. For example, the EPA permitted San Francisco to discharge pollutants from its combined sewer system into the Pacific Ocean, provided that the discharge does not contribute to a violation of applicable water quality standards.

While there have been legal disputes between San Francisco and the EPA regarding the specificity of water pollution permits, the EPA's role remains crucial in protecting the San Francisco Bay Area's water resources and ensuring compliance with environmental regulations.

The Clean Water Act

In the case of San Francisco, the EPA and the San Francisco Regional Water Quality Control Board are responsible for issuing NPDES permits that specify the quantities, rates, and concentrations of pollutants that can be discharged into the Pacific Ocean or San Francisco Bay. This ensures that water quality standards are met and helps protect the environment and public health.

The implementation of the CWA has been a subject of legal debate, as seen in the recent San Francisco v. EPA case. In this case, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the EPA cannot impose generic prohibitions against violating water quality standards. The Court's decision reaffirmed the CWA and instructed the EPA to issue clear water discharge permits that prevent water pollution before it occurs. San Francisco has invested significantly in upgrading its wastewater treatment systems to comply with the CWA and protect the Bay and the Pacific Ocean.

The CWA has had a significant impact on reducing water pollution in San Francisco. By setting clear standards and requirements, the Act helps to ensure that pollutants are controlled at their source. However, challenges remain, such as urban runoff, where stormwater washes pollutants from city streets into the Bay. To address this, San Francisco has passed regulations on stormwater runoff and advocated for legislation to reduce single-use plastic pollution.

In summary, the Clean Water Act plays a crucial role in reducing water pollution in San Francisco by providing a regulatory framework for pollution control and discharge permits. The Act has been interpreted and enforced through legal cases, such as San Francisco v. EPA, which have clarified the responsibilities of the city and the EPA in maintaining water quality.

Frequently asked questions