Steel Production Cuts: Impact On Pollution Levels

Steel is one of the most widely used materials in the world, contributing to economic and social development. However, its production has a significant environmental impact. With that in mind, how does reducing the production of steel affect pollution?

Reducing air pollution: fewer emissions of particulate matter, nitrogen oxides, and sulphur dioxide

Reducing steel production will have a positive impact on air quality, specifically in reducing emissions of particulate matter, nitrogen oxides, and sulphur dioxide.

Particulate matter, or fine particles of solid or liquid matter suspended in the air, is a significant concern in the steel industry. These particles are released during the machining and smelting processes and can have detrimental effects on air quality and public health. They contribute to smog formation and can be carried by wind to areas far from the steel production sites, making it a pervasive issue. By reducing steel production, the emission of particulate matter can be decreased, leading to improved air quality and a reduction in respiratory problems for people living near industrial plants.

Nitrogen oxides (NOx) are another major pollutant emitted during steel production. These gases contribute to the formation of smog and can have adverse effects on both human health and the environment. Acid rain, resulting from NOx emissions, impacts soil composition, water bodies, and vegetation. By curbing steel production, the release of nitrogen oxides can be minimised, leading to improved air quality and reduced environmental degradation.

Sulphur dioxide (SO2) is also released during steel manufacturing. It is a colourless gas with an irritating odour that can cause respiratory issues. Sulphur dioxide emissions contribute to acid rain and have negative effects on both the natural environment and human health. Lowering steel production will help reduce the emission of sulphur dioxide, leading to improved air quality and a decrease in the adverse impacts of acid rain.

Overall, reducing steel production will have a direct and positive impact on decreasing the emission of particulate matter, nitrogen oxides, and sulphur dioxide. This, in turn, will improve air quality, mitigate environmental degradation, and reduce the incidence of respiratory and health issues for people living in proximity to steel plants.

Lessening climate change impacts: lowering greenhouse gas emissions, volatile organic compounds, and carbon monoxide

Steel production has a significant impact on the environment, and reducing its production can help lessen its adverse effects on the planet. Here are some ways in which decreasing steel production can contribute to lessening climate change impacts by lowering greenhouse gas emissions, volatile organic compounds, and carbon monoxide:

Lowering Greenhouse Gas Emissions

The steel industry is one of the biggest producers of carbon dioxide, with 6.5% of global CO2 emissions deriving from iron and steel production. The energy-intensive process of transforming iron ore into steel relies on fossil fuels, primarily coal, resulting in high carbon dioxide emissions. In fact, for every tonne of steel produced, an average of 1.85 tonnes of carbon dioxide is emitted. By reducing the production of steel, we can significantly decrease these emissions and move towards a more sustainable future.

Reducing Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)

Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are emitted during various stages of steel production, particularly from coke ovens. These compounds, such as coke oven gas, naphthalene, ammonium compounds, crude light oil, and sulfur, contribute to air pollution and have harmful effects on both human health and the environment. By curbing steel production, we can effectively lower VOC emissions and mitigate their negative consequences.

Decreasing Carbon Monoxide

Carbon monoxide (CO) is another significant pollutant released during the steelmaking process, especially from coke production and iron ore smelting. The chemical reaction between carbon (in the form of coke) and oxygen results in the release of carbon monoxide. By reducing the production of steel and implementing more sustainable practices, we can minimize carbon monoxide emissions and their associated environmental impacts.

Transitioning to Sustainable Practices

The transition to more sustainable steel production methods is crucial. This includes adopting hydrogen-based steelmaking, increasing the use of electric arc furnaces (EAF) that rely on recycled scrap steel, and optimizing blast furnace efficiency to reduce coal usage. Additionally, carbon capture technology can play a vital role in reducing emissions from existing steel plants. By investing in these sustainable practices, the steel industry can decrease its environmental footprint and contribute to the global efforts to combat climate change.

In summary, reducing the production of steel can have a significant positive impact on lessening climate change impacts. By lowering greenhouse gas emissions, volatile organic compounds, and carbon monoxide associated with steel production, we can move towards a greener and more sustainable future.

Improving public health: reducing respiratory issues and long-term health problems caused by steel production pollutants

Steel production is a major source of air, water, and soil pollution, with far-reaching consequences for public health. Reducing steel production will have a direct impact on lowering these emissions, improving air quality, and reducing the incidence of respiratory issues and other long-term health problems in the surrounding communities.

Air pollution from steel production, particularly fine particulate matter (PM2.5), has been linked to an increased risk of respiratory diseases, including asthma, bronchitis, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). A study in Piquiá de Baixo, Brazil, found that 28% of the population suffered from respiratory issues, with an increased prevalence of respiratory symptoms such as cough, phlegm, and shortness of breath. Similar studies in other countries reported lower rates, ranging from 4.6% to 14.5%. The high rate in Piquiá de Baixo is attributed to the proximity of residential areas to steel plants and the lack of adequate pollution control measures.

Additionally, the processing of iron and other heavy metals during steel manufacturing releases dust emissions with heavy polluting consequences. Studies have shown that occupational exposure to dust and toxic gases in the steel industry is a risk factor for pulmonary diseases, including pneumoconiosis, bronchial asthma, COPD, and cancers. The respiratory symptoms associated with these exposures include prolonged cough, phlegm production, wheezing, and shortness of breath.

Moreover, steel production is among the most carbon-intensive manufacturing processes, contributing about 7% of global carbon dioxide emissions. These emissions trap heat in the atmosphere, leading to global warming and climate change. By reducing steel production, we can lower these emissions, mitigate climate change, and improve public health outcomes.

To protect public health and reduce respiratory issues, it is crucial to implement stricter environmental and health policies regulating the steel industry. This includes improving industrial production standards, adopting cleaner technologies, and ensuring proper safety measures and protective equipment for workers.

By addressing these issues, we can significantly improve air quality, reduce respiratory problems, and promote long-term health and well-being for communities living near steel production facilities.

Minimising water pollution: treating and reusing quenching water, reducing water consumption, and improving wastewater quality

Minimising water pollution in the steel industry

Water is used in the steel industry for processes, cooling, descaling, and dust scrubbing. However, the steel industry is also associated with large-scale pollution. To minimise water pollution, several measures can be taken, including treating and reusing quenching water, reducing water consumption, and improving wastewater quality.

Treating and reusing quenching water

Water quenching is a heat treatment process in which heated metal components are rapidly cooled by immersion in a water-based quenchant. There are four types of water-based quenching media: caustic, brine, water, and polymer. After quenching, the water becomes contaminated with coke breezes and other compounds. While the volume of contaminated water can be large, it is fairly easy to reuse. Most pollutants can be removed by filtration, and newer techniques like membrane separation show great promise in completely remediating water for reclamation.

Reducing water consumption

While water use in the steel industry is high, actual consumption is low, with most water being reused or discharged. For instance, the overall water consumption per metric ton of steel produced in India is 1.6-3.3 m3. Water loss mainly occurs through evaporation, and 90% of water is discharged after cooling and treatment, commonly being used by other utilities. To reduce water consumption, updated water treatment technology can be employed, combining methods such as membrane separation, chemical treatments, reverse osmosis, and ultrafiltration, to produce a high level of contaminant removal and deliver reusable effluents.

Improving wastewater quality

Wastewater in the steel industry often contains hazardous compounds, such as benzene toluene xylene (BTX) and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH), cyanide, ammonia, thiocyanate, phenols, and cresols. To improve wastewater quality, advanced oxidation processes (APOs) can be employed for disinfection and reduction of total dissolved solids (TDS). These include ultraviolet photolysis, hydrogen peroxide oxidation, photo-Fenton’s oxidation, electrochemical oxidation, and ozonation. Additionally, specific treatments such as phenol-specific adsorption are used for the removal of certain pollutants like cyanide. Implementing a traditional activated sludge stage in tertiary treatment can also help reduce the load of organic material in wastewater.

Advancing towards a decarbonised economy: adopting renewable energy and green hydrogen, and optimising industrial processes

The transition to a decarbonised economy is crucial to combat climate change and achieve net-zero emissions by 2050. This involves reducing greenhouse gas emissions, particularly those from the combustion of fossil fuels, and can be achieved through the adoption of renewable energy sources and the optimisation of industrial processes.

One of the key sectors contributing to greenhouse gas emissions is the production of steel, which accounts for 6.5% of global CO2 emissions. To reduce these emissions, advancements in renewable energy and green hydrogen offer promising solutions.

Renewable energy sources such as wind, solar, hydropower, geothermal, and biomass are now more economical and widely adopted, comprising one-third of global power capacity. By replacing fossil fuels in power generation, these renewable sources can significantly reduce carbon emissions. Additionally, the prices of solar energy and wind power have dropped significantly in the last decade, making them more accessible and cost-effective.

Green hydrogen, produced by splitting water into hydrogen and oxygen using renewable electricity, is another crucial component of the decarbonisation strategy. It has the potential to become a primary industrial fuel in the 21st century and play a significant role in strengthening energy security. However, the current high cost of green hydrogen is a challenge that needs to be addressed.

To optimise industrial processes, such as steel production, several approaches can be considered:

• Electrification of heat: Furnaces can be powered by electricity instead of burning fossil fuels, but this requires significant changes to infrastructure and a large amount of energy.
• Hydrogen as fuel: Hydrogen can be used as a fuel source in furnaces or as a feedstock in chemical processes, offering a cleaner alternative to fossil fuels.
• Biomass utilisation: Replacing coal with bio-coal or gas with bio-gas, such as charcoal, provides a renewable and carbon-neutral option.
• Carbon capture and storage/usage: By separating and capturing greenhouse gases, they can be stored underground or transformed into useful products like ethanol or raw materials for the chemical industry.

It is important to note that these technologies are still in the early stages of development and can be costly. However, with continued innovation and investment, they hold the key to achieving a decarbonised economy.

Furthermore, recycling plays a vital role in reducing the environmental impact of steel production. By reusing steel, the initial carbon-intensive step of transforming iron ore into steel can be avoided, contributing to a more sustainable and circular economy.

In conclusion, advancing towards a decarbonised economy requires a multifaceted approach. The adoption of renewable energy sources and green hydrogen, along with the optimisation of industrial processes, are crucial steps in reducing pollution and mitigating climate change. By embracing these technologies and implementing policy changes, we can create a more sustainable future for generations to come.

Frequently asked questions