Moths: Unraveling The Impact Of Pollution On Their Lives

how does pollution affect moths

Light pollution is a growing concern for moths and other nocturnal insects. Artificial light at night is one of the most dramatic man-made changes on Earth, with streetlights and illuminated buildings significantly altering the environment for nocturnal animals. Moths are drawn to light, but artificial light can be disorienting for them, leading to exhaustion and confusion. This makes them more vulnerable to predators and interferes with their natural behaviours, such as feeding, breeding, and laying eggs. Research has shown that light pollution can reduce moth caterpillar numbers and disrupt their development. Additionally, industrial pollution has also been found to impact moths, with black moths becoming more common due to better camouflage in polluted environments, as seen in the classic example of the peppered moth.

Characteristics Values
Impact on moth populations Streetlights reduce moth populations by 33% in grass verges and 47% in hedgerows
Impact on caterpillar numbers 52% lower under LED streetlights in hedgerows and 43% lower on grass verges
Impact on moth behaviour Disrupts natural behaviour, moths are drawn to light sources but become disoriented, exhausted and trapped
Impact on moth predators Predators take advantage of moths' behaviour and higher numbers, leading to more moths being eaten
Impact on moth reproduction Exhausted and disoriented moths are less able to breed and lay eggs
Impact on plants May affect the quality of plants that caterpillars feed on and adult moths pollinate
Impact of light pollution on other insects Sharp decline in nocturnal insects, with similar attraction to light sources and vulnerability to predators
Impact of light pollution on ecosystems Threatens whole ecosystems, including birds, mammals, plants and other wildlife
Moth adaptation to light pollution Moths from highly light-polluted areas are less attracted to lights, suggesting they adapt over time

shunwaste

Light pollution impacts moth behaviour and development

Moths are nocturnal insects that are attracted to light sources. As light pollution increases annually due to urbanization and electrification, it poses a growing threat to moth populations. Research has shown that moth numbers in the UK have declined by an average of 33% since the 1960s, and light pollution is a contributing factor.

The presence of artificial light disrupts the natural behaviour of moths. Moths are drawn to artificial lights, such as streetlights, and may expend significant energy trying to reach them. Once there, moths can become confused, circling the light endlessly, leading to exhaustion or entrapment. This behaviour leaves them vulnerable to nocturnal predators like bats, increasing the likelihood of predation. Exhausted or disoriented moths may also struggle to feed, breed, or lay eggs, impacting their ability to survive and reproduce.

Light pollution also affects moth caterpillars. Artificial light can attract caterpillars, exposing them to similar risks as adult moths. Additionally, light pollution interferes with the diapause induction process, where caterpillars pause their development to wait for favourable conditions. The excess light at night confuses their seasonal cues, leading to inappropriate development.

The impact of light pollution extends beyond moths. Moth caterpillars rely on certain plants for food and shelter, and adult moths play a role in pollinating these plants. Light pollution may alter the behaviour of adult moths, reducing their pollination activities. Some studies suggest that artificial light can also affect the quality and nutritional value of these plants, potentially impacting the development of caterpillars that feed on them.

While moths may adapt to light pollution over time, the ecological risks are significant. Light pollution disrupts the natural cycle of day and night, affecting hunting and foraging behaviours, mating, and reproduction in various wild animals. It is important to recognize the far-reaching consequences of light pollution on ecosystems and take steps to minimize its impact.

shunwaste

Artificial light affects moth reproduction

Artificial light at night has a significant impact on moth reproduction, affecting both their mating and feeding behaviours.

Moths are naturally attracted to light, and artificial light sources can be disorienting for them. Moths may spend a lot of energy and time reaching an artificial light source, which takes them away from essential activities such as feeding, breeding, and laying eggs. This exhaustion can leave them vulnerable to predators and affect their survival and reproduction.

Research has shown that artificial light reduces the feeding frequency of moths, with the shortest feeding time occurring under light conditions rich in short-wavelength radiation, such as ultraviolet, blue, and green light. This reduction in feeding leads to shorter longevity and a shorter effective reproduction period for both male and female moths. For example, starved female moths of the species Cydia pomonella laid fewer eggs than well-fed females. Additionally, reduced feeding in female moths can result in lower fertility, while in male moths, it can decrease their ability to disperse and spread their genes.

The use of artificial light with different spectral compositions, such as red light, which contains mainly long-wavelength radiation, has been suggested as a potential mitigation strategy. However, it is important to note that even low levels of artificial light can disrupt the life histories of moths and interfere with their natural cues for seasonal timing, such as the initiation of pupal diapause.

The effects of artificial light on moth reproduction are complex and far-reaching, and further studies are needed to fully understand their impact on moth populations and the broader ecosystem.

shunwaste

Industrial pollution changes moth colour

Industrial pollution has been found to change the colour of moths, specifically in the case of the peppered moth. This moth, found throughout Eurasia and North America, can be either white or black. During the Industrial Revolution, people noticed that white moths became rarer, while black moths became more common.

Bernard Kettlewell, a research fellow at the University of Oxford, was among the first to investigate this change. He conducted experiments during the 1950s to test whether soot and pollution from industrialization made it easier for black moths to camouflage, while white moths became more vulnerable to predation by birds.

Kettlewell's experiments supported his predictions. He found that black moths were indeed better camouflaged in the soot-covered areas, leading to reduced predation by birds compared to the now exposed white moths. This provided evidence for Charles Darwin's theory of natural selection.

Michael Majerus from the University of Cambridge conducted further studies in the early 2000s to address criticisms of Kettlewell's work. Majerus's experiments, conducted at an unpolluted site, yielded similar results. They demonstrated that the colour of peppered moths was indeed influenced by predatory preference, which depended on the local environmental conditions.

The work of Kettlewell and Majerus provides a compelling example of how industrial pollution can drive natural selection and change the colour of moth populations over time.

shunwaste

Predators take advantage of moths' attraction to light

The attraction of moths to artificial light sources has been well-documented, and this behaviour has been leveraged by researchers to study the impact of light pollution on moth populations. Moths are drawn to artificial lights, but these lights can be disorienting for them. Moths may spend a lot of energy reaching these light sources, potentially taking them away from food sources or refuge. Once moths reach the light source, they may become confused and circle the light, leading to exhaustion or entrapment. This behaviour makes them easy targets for predators.

Predators, such as bats, take advantage of the congregation of moths at artificial light sources. The high numbers of moths in one place, combined with their visible, disoriented, or exhausted state, make them more vulnerable to predation. This can lead to an increase in the number of moths being eaten by nocturnal predators.

The impact of light pollution on moth populations is significant. Research has shown that moth caterpillar numbers under LED streetlights were significantly lower than in unlit areas. The white LED streetlights that are becoming more common across the UK have been found to have an even more detrimental impact on moth populations compared to the older sodium lamps.

The decline in moth populations due to light pollution has broader ecological implications. Moths play a crucial role in food webs and the pollination of plants. Their disappearance can have a ripple effect on other species, including birds, mammals, and other wildlife that rely on them.

While some studies suggest that moths may adapt to light pollution over time by evolving a reduced tendency to fly towards artificial light sources, the ecological risks of light pollution remain substantial. It continues to interfere with the natural cycle of day and night, affecting the hunting and foraging behaviours of wild animals, with potential consequences for mating and reproduction.

shunwaste

Light pollution affects moth populations

Secondly, light pollution affects moth caterpillars. Research has shown that moth caterpillar numbers are significantly lower under LED streetlights compared to unlit areas. Artificial light can attract caterpillars, exposing them to predation and exhaustion. It also interferes with their diapause induction process, which they use to pause development and wait for better conditions. Excess light at night confuses this process, leading to unideal development conditions.

Thirdly, light pollution can have indirect effects on moth populations by impacting the plants they rely on. Moths play a crucial role in pollinating plants, but when drawn to artificial light, they may neglect their usual pollinating activities. Some studies suggest that artificial light can also affect the quality and nutritional value of these plants, which could have knock-on effects on the development of caterpillars that feed on them.

The decline in moth populations due to light pollution has broader ecological implications. Moths are a food source for other organisms, so their reduction in numbers can impact the populations of birds, mammals, and other wildlife. Light pollution, therefore, has the potential to disrupt entire ecosystems.

While some studies suggest that moth populations may adapt over time to light pollution, showing a reduced tendency to fly towards artificial light sources, this behavioural change may be accompanied by negative physiological changes. For example, moths may develop smaller or less sensitive eyes, or their ability to travel and pollinate plants could be impaired.

Frequently asked questions

Light pollution interferes with a moth's natural behaviour, attracting them to artificial light sources and disrupting their feeding, breeding, and laying eggs. It also makes them more vulnerable to predators.

Moths can spend a lot of energy getting to an artificial light source, taking them away from food sources or refuge. They may then circle the light, leaving them exhausted, trapped, or more vulnerable to predators like bats.

Yes, industrial pollution has been observed to affect moths. During the Industrial Revolution, white moths became rarer while black moths became more common, as the soot and pollution helped the black moths camouflage.

Moth populations in the UK have fallen by 33% since the 1960s, and light pollution is a significant threat. A study found that moth caterpillar numbers were 52% lower in hedgerows and 43% lower on grass verges under LED streetlights compared to unlit areas.

Moths may be able to adapt to light pollution over time. A 2016 study found that moths from highly light-polluted areas were less attracted to lights, suggesting that their behaviour can adjust. However, this change in behaviour may be accompanied by changes in physiology, such as smaller eyes or a lowered ability to travel, which could have further negative consequences.

Written by
Reviewed by
Share this post
Print
Did this article help you?

Leave a comment