Jet Fuel's Impact On Air Pollution And Quality

Jet fuel is a dirty liquid that has a significant impact on the environment. Aircraft engines emit gases, noise, and particulates from fossil fuel combustion, which have a warming effect on the climate. In addition to carbon dioxide, aircraft engines emit nitrous oxides, sulfur dioxide, water vapour, and particulate matter (soot). These emissions have a climate impact, commonly referred to as non-CO2 effects, which are estimated to account for two-thirds of the climate impact of flying.

The combustion of aromatics and sulphur contained in conventional fossil jet fuel results in soot particle emissions, which are responsible for the formation of persistent contrails. These emissions also affect human health, with up to 33 million people living within a 20km radius of the top-20 airports in Europe facing higher risks of high blood pressure, heart attack, and diabetes due to air pollution induced by aviation particle emissions.

The use of jet fuel has been linked to adverse health effects, including skin irritation, neurotoxicity, nephrotoxicity, and renal carcinogenicity in rats. Exposure to jet engine emissions has been associated with increased biomarkers of exposure and effect among airport personnel, especially those in ground-support functions. Proximity to running jet engines or airports has also been linked to increased exposure and risk of disease, increased hospital admissions, and self-reported lung symptoms.

To reduce the environmental and health impacts of jet fuel, effective solutions such as cleaning up the fuel and using alternative fuels have been proposed.

Jet fuel is a dirty liquid that affects human health

The combustion of aromatics, which are present in conventional fossil jet fuel, results in soot particle emissions that contribute to the formation of persistent contrails. These contrails have an important warming effect on the planet. Additionally, the aromatics and sulphur in jet fuel trigger ultrafine particle emissions, which have serious health impacts. Up to 33 million people living within a 20km radius of the top 20 airports in Europe are at higher risk of high blood pressure, heart attacks, and diabetes due to air pollution induced by aviation particle emissions.

The health effects of jet fuel emissions are not limited to those living near airports. Aircraft engines emit ultrafine particles (UFPs) in and near airports, and ground support equipment also contributes to these emissions. Exposure to UFPs has been linked to increased biomarkers of exposure and effect among airport personnel, especially those in ground-support functions. Proximity to running jet engines or airports has been associated with increased exposure, increased risk of disease, increased hospital admissions, and self-reported lung symptoms.

The toxicity of jet fuel has been studied since the early 1950s, and major toxic effects reported include skin irritation, neurotoxicity, nephrotoxicity, and renal carcinogenicity in rats. In humans, exposure to jet fuel emissions has been associated with increased levels of biomarkers of genotoxicity, such as increased levels of sister chromatid exchange (SCE) and DNA strand breaks. Additionally, occupational studies have reported increased levels of self-reported respiratory complaints, including cough and dyspnea, among airport workers.

Overall, jet fuel is a dirty liquid that has significant impacts on both the climate and human health. The combustion of jet fuel releases harmful substances into the atmosphere, leading to increased air pollution and negative health outcomes for those exposed.

Jet fuel contains aromatics and sulphur, which trigger ultrafine particle emissions

Aromatics and sulphur are present in conventional jet fuel, and their combustion results in the emission of ultrafine particles, which have been linked to serious health issues. These ultrafine particles are a major contributor to the health risks faced by people living near airports. Up to 33 million people living within a 20km radius of the top 20 airports in Europe are at higher risk of high blood pressure, heart attacks, and diabetes due to air pollution caused by aviation particle emissions.

The aromatics in jet fuel are responsible for the formation of soot particles, which, in turn, lead to the creation of persistent contrails. These contrails have a significant warming effect on the climate. However, these effects are short-lived compared to the impact of carbon dioxide. Therefore, addressing non-CO2 emissions, such as those caused by aromatics and sulphur in jet fuel, could be a quick way to reduce the climate impact of the aviation industry.

To reduce the emission of ultrafine particles, the aromatic and sulphur content of jet fuel can be lowered through a refining process called hydrotreatment. This process, which is already used to produce road diesel, involves adding hydrogen to refinery products at specific temperatures and pressures to modify their composition. By reducing the aromatic content of jet fuel, the number of ultrafine particles emitted can be significantly decreased, improving both climate change mitigation and air quality.

Jet fuel is burned at high altitudes, affecting atmospheric physical and chemical properties

The impact of these emissions extends beyond climate change, as they also pose risks to human health. Ultrafine particle emissions, triggered by aromatics and sulphur in conventional jet fuel, have been linked to increased health risks for people living near airports. These health risks include high blood pressure, heart attacks, and diabetes.

The effects of jet fuel emissions on both the climate and human health highlight the importance of mitigating these issues. Solutions include using cleaner fuels with reduced aromatic and sulphur content, as well as avoiding flying through regions with cold and humid conditions that are conducive to contrail formation.

Jet fuel is a fossil fuel that releases CO2 emissions

The combustion of jet fuel results in the formation of soot particles, which are responsible for the creation of persistent contrails. Contrails are line-shaped clouds that form when water vapour condenses at high altitudes. They have a warming effect on the planet, which may be up to three times greater than the warming caused by CO2 emissions alone.

The aromatics and sulphur contained in conventional jet fuel also trigger ultrafine particle emissions, which have serious health impacts. Up to 33 million people living within a 20km radius of the top 20 airports in Europe are at higher risk of high blood pressure, heart attacks, and diabetes due to air pollution induced by aviation particle emissions.

While jet fuel is a major contributor to climate change and air pollution, there are efforts to mitigate its environmental impact. These include improving fuel efficiency, optimising flight routes, using sustainable aviation fuels, and reducing air travel demand.

Jet fuel is not getting any cleaner

Jet fuel is a dirty liquid that powers aircraft engines, contributing significantly to air pollution and climate change. While the aviation industry has made some efforts to improve fuel efficiency, the overall environmental impact of jet fuel remains a significant concern. Here are some key points to consider:

Climate Change and Greenhouse Gas Emissions

• Aviation accounts for 2.5% of global CO2 emissions, but its contribution to global warming is higher due to non-CO2 effects, such as nitrogen oxides (NOx), water vapour, and particulate matter (soot).
• These non-CO2 emissions have a warming effect that is twice as strong as CO2 emissions from aviation and are responsible for two-thirds of aviation's climate impact.
• The bulk of aviation's non-CO2 effects is driven by the aromatics contained in conventional fossil jet fuel. The combustion of these molecules results in soot particle emissions that lead to the formation of persistent contrails, which have a significant warming effect.
• Reducing the aromatic content of jet fuel through processes like hydrotreatment could be an effective way to mitigate non-CO2 effects and improve air quality.

Health Impact

• Aviation particle emissions have serious health impacts on people living near airports. Up to 33 million people within a 20km radius of the top 20 airports in Europe are at higher risk of high blood pressure, heart attack, and diabetes due to air pollution induced by aviation particle emissions.
• Aircraft engines emit ultrafine particles (UFPs) that have been linked to adverse health effects, including respiratory issues and increased hospital admissions for people living near airports.
• Jet engine emissions contain large amounts of nano-sized particles that can reach the lower airways upon inhalation and have been associated with an increased risk of disease, hospital admissions, and self-reported lung symptoms.

Environmental Impact

• Aviation's environmental footprint extends beyond climate change and air quality. Airports and aircraft handling generate significant water pollution due to the use and handling of jet fuel, lubricants, and de-icing chemicals.
• Aircraft noise pollution can disrupt sleep, affect children's education, and increase cardiovascular risk for people living near airports.
• Piston engines used in general aviation burn Avgas, releasing toxic lead into the atmosphere.

Lack of Progress

• Despite the known health and environmental impacts of jet fuel, the industry has been slow to address these issues. Precious time has been lost in the fight to reduce aviation's climate impact, and the lives of millions of people have been put at risk.
• While there are technological solutions and policy measures available to mitigate the impact of jet fuel, such as improving fuel quality, optimizing flight routes, and reducing short-distance flights, the aviation industry has been slow to adopt these changes.
• The International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) has set targets for improving fuel efficiency and capping emissions, but the lack of binding regulations and slow progress mean that aviation's environmental impact is not decreasing as needed.

In conclusion, jet fuel is a significant contributor to air pollution and climate change, and the situation is not improving. While there are solutions available, the aviation industry's slow response to these issues means that jet fuel is not getting any cleaner, and the environmental and health impacts will continue to be felt by communities worldwide.

Frequently asked questions