Air Pollution Control: Employment Impact And Opportunities

Air pollution is a pressing issue that not only affects the environment but also has far-reaching implications for human health and economic productivity. The impact of air pollution on employment is a growing area of research, with studies exploring how it influences job choices, labour mobility, and overall employment levels.

Air pollution has been linked to various health issues, including respiratory problems, heart disease, and premature mortality. These health risks can affect employees' ability to work and, consequently, impact businesses' operations and performance.

Research has shown that air pollution can influence individuals' employment location choices, with higher pollution levels reducing the probability of workers selecting certain cities or regions as their preferred work destinations. This effect is particularly pronounced among individuals with higher education levels, outdoor jobs, relatively higher incomes, and young children.

Additionally, air pollution has been found to have a negative impact on employment levels in certain industries. For example, the implementation of pollution control measures in US power plants contributed to labour-saving technical changes, resulting in reduced employment without significantly affecting power generation.

The relationship between air pollution and employment is complex and multifaceted, and it is an area that requires further investigation to fully understand its scope and develop effective mitigation strategies.

Air pollution control can reduce employment in power plants

In the United States, the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments required the installation of "reasonably available control technology" (RACT) for nitrogen oxides (NOx) emissions from major stationary sources in the Ozone Transport Region and in more stringently classified ozone nonattainment areas.

The implementation of these new NOx RACT requirements negatively impacted power plant employment. There was a significant relative decline in employment in power plants located in ozone nonattainment areas and in the Ozone Transport Region (OTR) subject to the new NOx provisions. This decline began after 1990 and became statistically significant after 1993.

The negative impact on employment was particularly pronounced in power plants that were required to install NOx RACT. These plants experienced a reduction in employment of approximately 13% relative to control plants, when comparing the 1993-1998 period to the 1987-1989 pre-treatment period.

The decrease in employment was not accompanied by a significant decline in power generation, suggesting that the installation of pollution controls contributed to labour-saving technical changes at affected sources.

Overall, the findings indicate that air pollution control measures, specifically the installation of NOx RACT, can lead to reduced employment in power plants.

Air pollution can cause labour-saving technological change

Air pollution has been linked to a reduction in worker productivity, even when air quality is generally low. This is true for both indoor and outdoor environments and across varying levels of worker skill.

In the US, the Clean Air Act has cut pollution as the economy has grown. The Act requires that when new industrial facilities are designed and built, good pollution control must be part of the design. This means that as new, cleaner facilities are built, the country's industrial base becomes cleaner overall.

In the agricultural sector, a study found that increases in ozone led to significant decreases in productivity. Workers picked less fruit on days when ozone was higher.

In the manufacturing sector, a study found that increases in PM2.5 significantly reduce the number of boxes workers pack. As with the previous study, the authors also found that PM2.5 did not affect labour supply. PM2.5 also had effects on productivity at levels below air quality standards, with effects arising at 20–25 μg/m3.

In the service sector, a study found that increases in pollution lead to significant decreases in worker productivity. On high-pollution days, workers reduced the number of calls they placed or received, with this being largely driven by an increase in the number of breaks taken throughout the day.

These effects arise at levels of pollution well within current air quality standards and guidelines.

Poor air quality can impact talent recruitment

Poor air quality can have a significant impact on talent recruitment, making it more challenging for businesses to attract skilled workers and top talent. Here are some ways in which poor air quality influences the recruitment process:

Unfavourable Locations: Cities and regions with severe air pollution are often viewed as less desirable places to live and work. Job seekers, especially those with high skill levels and greater mobility, may be reluctant to relocate to areas with poor air quality, opting instead for locations that offer cleaner air and a healthier environment. This can limit the pool of talented candidates for businesses operating in polluted areas.

Compensation Demands: In some cases, companies may need to offer additional incentives or compensation packages to attract talent to polluted areas. For example, in 2014, Panasonic became the first international company to provide hardship-posting compensation to foreign employees in China due to the country's poor air quality. Such additional costs can impact a company's bottom line and competitiveness.

Health and Productivity Concerns: Air pollution can negatively affect the health and well-being of employees, leading to increased sickness, reduced cognitive performance, and higher rates of absenteeism. Prospective employees may be deterred by the potential health risks associated with working in polluted areas, particularly if adequate health protections are not in place.

Environmental Awareness: With growing awareness about environmental issues, job seekers are increasingly considering the environmental impact of their career choices. Some candidates may be hesitant to work for companies that contribute to air pollution or are perceived as environmentally irresponsible. This can make it challenging for businesses in highly polluted areas to attract top talent, especially if they are not actively addressing sustainability and pollution reduction.

Impact on Quality of Life: Poor air quality can affect the overall quality of life for individuals and their families. This includes respiratory and cardiovascular health issues, higher stress levels, and reduced opportunities for outdoor activities. Prospective employees may consider these factors when deciding whether to accept a job offer in a polluted area, especially if they have families or plan to start one.

Addressing air pollution and demonstrating a commitment to sustainability can help businesses mitigate these challenges and enhance their ability to attract and retain top talent. Implementing measures to improve air quality, both within their operations and in collaboration with local communities, can make businesses more attractive to potential employees who value environmental responsibility and a healthy work environment.

Air pollution disproportionately affects low-income communities and minorities

African Americans and low-income communities are disproportionately affected by air pollution in the US. For example, more than one million African Americans live within half a mile of natural gas facilities, and over six million live in the 91 US counties with oil refineries. African Americans are 75% more likely than white people to live in "fence-line" communities, which are areas near commercial facilities that produce noise, odor, traffic, or emissions that directly affect the population.

A 2016 study of New Jersey residents found that the risk of dying early from long-term exposure to particle pollution was higher in communities with larger African American populations, lower home values, and lower median incomes. A study of Atlanta, Georgia, found that particle pollution increased the risk of asthma attacks in zip codes where poverty was high and among people eligible for Medicaid.

Socioeconomic status also appears to be tied to greater harm from air pollution. Multiple large studies show evidence of this link. Low socioeconomic status consistently increased the risk of premature death from fine particle pollution among 13.2 million Medicare recipients studied in the largest examination of particle pollution-related mortality nationwide.

The reasons for these disparities are threefold. Firstly, groups may face greater exposure to pollution because of factors ranging from racism to class bias to housing market dynamics and land costs. Secondly, low social position may make some groups more susceptible to health threats because of factors related to their disadvantage, such as lack of access to healthcare, poorer job opportunities, and higher traffic exposure. Finally, existing health conditions, behaviors, or traits may predispose some groups to greater risk. For example, people of color are among the groups most at risk from air pollutants, and African Americans have a higher incidence of diabetes.

Air pollution can affect productivity

Air pollution can have a significant impact on productivity, affecting the health and performance of employees. Poor air quality can increase the likelihood of employees getting sick and experiencing reduced cognitive abilities. For example, in 2019, India's economy suffered a loss of $95 billion due to reduced productivity, work absences, and premature deaths caused by air pollution.

Additionally, air pollution can influence talent recruitment, as cities with severe air pollution are often viewed as less desirable places to work. This can make it challenging for businesses to attract top talent and may even lead to additional costs, such as hardship-posting compensation for foreign employees.

Furthermore, air pollution can impact the productivity of outdoor workers more severely. For instance, farmers working outdoors may experience reduced productivity due to elevated ozone concentrations, even at levels below federal air quality standards. Similarly, carbon monoxide exposure has been linked to increased school absences, affecting the productivity of students and their future career prospects.

The effects of air pollution on productivity also vary based on individual characteristics. Research suggests that those with higher education levels, outdoor occupations, relatively higher incomes, and young children are more sensitive to air pollution when choosing their employment locations.

Overall, air pollution can have a direct impact on the productivity of today's workforce and the future productivity of the next generation.

Frequently asked questions