Agricultural Pollution: Chesapeake Bay's Silent Killer

Agriculture is the largest source of pollution in the Chesapeake Bay. The Chesapeake Bay watershed covers 64,000 square miles, 40% of which is dedicated to farming. Farms are a major source of sediment pollution, and the use of manure and chemical fertilizers, as well as the storage and management of animal waste, contribute to high levels of nitrogen and phosphorus in the water. These nutrients fuel algal blooms, creating dead zones that deplete oxygen levels and suffocate aquatic life. While there have been efforts to implement more sustainable farming practices, such as regenerative agriculture, and there are signs of improving water quality in the Chesapeake Bay, agricultural pollution remains a complex issue that requires further attention and action.

Nitrogen and phosphorus pollution from fertilisers and manure

Nitrogen and phosphorus are essential nutrients for the growth of all living organisms in the Chesapeake Bay. However, they become pollutants when they enter waterways in excessive amounts. The Chesapeake Bay Foundation's health index, the State of the Bay Report, estimates that the bay's watershed rated 100 on a scale of 100 in the 1600s, but in 2018, the report rated the bay at 33 out of 100.

Agricultural pollution is the largest source of nitrogen and phosphorus pollution in the Chesapeake Bay. The Chesapeake Clean Water Blueprint outlines the maximum amount of nitrogen, phosphorus, and sediment each state in the bay's watershed can release into the bay.

• Excessive nitrogen and phosphorus degrade the bay's water quality, fuelling the growth of harmful algal blooms that block sunlight from reaching underwater grasses.
• When the algae die, they decompose and create "dead zones" of low or no oxygen that can stress and even kill fish and shellfish.
• The release of nitrogen and phosphorus into the bay is largely due to agricultural runoff, which includes fertilisers and manure.
• Manure deposited directly into waterways by cows with access to streams also contributes to nutrient pollution.
• Corn, the most widely grown crop in the bay's watershed, is a substantial source of nutrient pollution, as it requires large amounts of nitrogen and leaks nitrogen into the environment.
• The use of fertilisers and manure in agriculture can lead to excess nutrients in the soil, which can then be washed into waterways during rainfall or irrigation, contributing to nutrient pollution in the bay.

Reducing nitrogen and phosphorus pollution from fertilisers and manure is crucial for restoring the health of the Chesapeake Bay. This can be achieved through implementing conservation measures, such as nutrient management plans, cover crops, streamside fencing, and buffer strips, as well as reducing the use of fertilisers and improving manure management practices.

Algal blooms and dead zones

Agricultural pollution in the Chesapeake Bay has led to algal blooms and dead zones. Nutrient pollution from farms causes algae blooms that block sunlight from reaching underwater grasses and rob the water of oxygen as they decompose, creating "dead zones". Nitrogen and phosphorus from manure and chemical fertilizers fuel these algal blooms. When algae die, they sink to the bottom and are decomposed by bacteria, which consumes oxygen from the water, creating oxygen-starved "dead zones" that can stress and even suffocate fish and other aquatic animals.

The Chesapeake Bay Program, a partnership between governments, academia, nonprofits, and the private sector, has been working to address this issue. They found that since 2009, inputs of nitrogen entering the Bay have declined by 8%, sediment by 7%, and phosphorus by 20%. This progress is due to improving air quality, better wastewater management in cities, and farmers adopting practices that reduce polluted runoff.

However, agriculture remains the largest source of pollution in the Bay, and more efforts are needed to address the problem. Farms cover about 23% of the 64,000-square-mile Chesapeake watershed but contribute 58% of the sediment, 58% of the phosphorus, and 42% of the nitrogen pollution that reaches the Bay. The use of manure and chemical fertilizers, as well as the storage and management of animal waste, are major contributors to nutrient pollution in the Bay.

The impact of agricultural pollution is particularly evident in the Shenandoah Valley, where cattle grazing and poultry farming have led to harmful algal blooms and closed waterways to recreational activities. Despite conservation efforts, nutrient pollution in the region has increased due to intensified agricultural practices and growing animal populations.

Addressing agricultural pollution in the Chesapeake Bay is a complex issue that requires collaboration between farmers, government agencies, and other stakeholders. While progress has been made, more work is needed to reduce nutrient pollution and mitigate the formation of algal blooms and dead zones in the Bay.

Agricultural practices and their impact on water quality

Agriculture is the largest source of pollution in the Chesapeake Bay. However, it is also the greatest opportunity to restore the waters. The way we farm has profound consequences for the health of our communities, our environment, and our local economies. Farms have the potential to serve as either critical filters or pathways for polluted runoff to our rivers and streams.

Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Sediment Pollution

Currently, the agricultural sector has the greatest opportunity to reduce nitrogen, phosphorus, and sediment pollution in the Chesapeake Bay. Agriculture also remains a significant source of climate-warming greenhouse gases, accounting for roughly 10% of U.S. emissions annually.

Conventional agricultural systems often consist of monocropping, heavy pesticide and herbicide use, and extensive tillage of the soil. These practices strip nutrients from the soil, erode topsoil, and lead to excess soil erosion and polluted runoff. Instead of acting as a natural sponge and filter for the ecosystem, the land becomes a funnel for fertilizers and pesticides to enter our rivers and streams.

Regenerative Agriculture

Regenerative agriculture describes holistic farming systems that improve water and air quality, enhance ecosystem biodiversity, produce nutrient-dense food, and store carbon to help mitigate the effects of climate change. The top five principles of regenerative agriculture include:

• Minimizing the physical, biological, and chemical disturbance of the soil
• Keeping the soil covered with vegetation or natural material
• Increasing plant diversity
• Keeping living roots in the soil as much as possible
• Integrating animals into the farm as much as possible

Conservation Programs and Practices

Conservation programs that establish on-the-ground projects can limit polluting runoff while improving farm health. Examples of conservation practices include:

• Stream buffers
• Continuous no-till
• Rotational grazing
• Conservation crop rotation
• Cover crops
• Silvopasture
• Nutrient management
• Streamside fencing

These practices also provide co-benefits such as increased soil health, sequestered carbon, and improved farm resiliency. When farming with these intentional practices, agriculture has the potential to not only sustain but regenerate the land, while also injecting money into the economy.

Challenges and Opportunities

Reducing water pollution from agricultural runoff is a complex and long-term process. It requires addressing the economic and social factors that drive farming practices, as well as the market demands that farmers face. Additionally, the scale and diversity of agriculture in the Chesapeake Bay watershed make it challenging to craft effective regulations.

However, there are success stories and signs of improvement. Farmers are adopting conservation and preservation measures, and progress is being made. By working together, farmers, government agencies, academia, nonprofits, and the private sector can improve water quality and restore the health of the Chesapeake Bay.

The role of farmers in reducing pollution

Agriculture is the largest source of pollution in the Chesapeake Bay, but it also presents the greatest opportunity to restore the waters. Farmers play a critical role in keeping the waters clean, and regenerative farming practices can improve the water quality of the Bay, rivers, and streams.

The Chesapeake Bay Foundation (CBF) advocates for conservation programs that establish on-the-ground projects to limit polluting runoff while improving farm health. These include stream buffers, continuous no-till, rotational grazing, conservation crop rotation, cover crops, silvopasture, nutrient management, streamside fencing, and other best management practices. These practices also provide co-benefits such as increased soil health, sequestered carbon, and improved farm resiliency.

Regenerative agriculture is a holistic farming system that improves water and air quality, enhances ecosystem biodiversity, produces nutrient-dense food, and stores carbon to help mitigate the effects of climate change. The top five principles of regenerative agriculture are: minimizing the disturbance of the soil; keeping the soil covered; increasing plant diversity; keeping living roots in the soil; and integrating animals into the farm as much as possible.

Farmers can adopt regenerative agricultural practices such as streamside forest buffers, converting cropland to pasture and rotational grazing, continuous no-till, conservation crop rotation, cover crops, silvopasture, nutrient management, and streamside fencing. These practices can help to reduce pollution and improve water quality.

One example of a successful regenerative agriculture project is CBF's Clagett Farm in Maryland. The 238-acre working farm practices regenerative agriculture to demonstrate its benefits for soil health, food production, and water quality. The farm includes a 20-acre organic vegetable operation, grass-fed beef cattle and sheep, and a native tree nursery.

Another example of farmers taking action to reduce pollution is the Showcase Watersheds program, which includes Smith Creek in Virginia's Rockingham County as one of its sites. The USDA selected this watershed to demonstrate how accelerated farm conservation actions could improve water quality. Farmers in the area have implemented various best management practices, such as manure storage facilities, nutrient-absorbing cover crops, streamside buffers, grazing plans, and stream fencing. While nutrient pollution has increased in the watershed, these practices have improved stream health for aquatic insects.

In conclusion, farmers play a crucial role in reducing pollution and improving water quality in the Chesapeake Bay. By adopting regenerative agriculture practices and participating in conservation programs, farmers can help to reduce nitrogen, phosphorus, and sediment pollution, while also improving the resiliency and economic viability of their farms.

The cost of implementing pollution-reducing practices

The Chesapeake Bay is North America's largest and most biologically diverse estuary, covering 64,000 square miles across six states and home to over 17 million people. Agriculture is the largest source of pollution to the bay, contributing about 38% of the bay's nitrogen loads, 45% of its phosphorus, and 60% of its sediment loads.

The Cost of Pollution-Reducing Practices

The costs of implementing pollution-reducing practices in agriculture can vary depending on the specific measures taken and the size of the farm. Some common practices include:

• Nutrient Management Plans (NMPs): Involves properly managing animal waste and optimising the use of fertilisers to reduce nutrient runoff.
• Multi-Species Cover Crops: Help to absorb excess phosphorus and nitrogen, reduce nutrient pollution runoff, manage soil erosion, improve soil quality, and increase water infiltration.
• Forested Buffers: Trees and vegetation act as natural filters, reducing agricultural waste and nutrient pollution in waterways.
• Streamside Fencing: Preventing livestock from accessing streams directly helps reduce waste deposition and improves water quality.
• Rotational Grazing: Moving livestock between multiple pastures allows plants to regenerate, build organic matter, and create healthier soil.
• Conservation Crop Rotation and Cover Crops: These practices can reduce soil erosion, improve soil health, and minimise the use of fertilisers.

While these practices offer environmental benefits, they can also come with economic costs for farmers. For example, streamside buffers may require taking land out of production, and the construction and maintenance of fences and alternative watering systems incur upfront costs. Additionally, practices like nutrient management plans and cover crops may require additional labour and resources for proper implementation and maintenance.

Financial Support for Farmers

Recognising the financial burden on farmers, various organisations offer financial and technical assistance to support the implementation of conservation practices. The Chesapeake Bay Foundation (CBF), for instance, has been working closely with farmers to secure funding and implement pollution-reducing measures. Federal and state governments also play a crucial role in providing funding and incentives to farmers. The Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP) and the Conservation Stewardship Program are examples of federal initiatives that provide financial and technical assistance to farmers.

Performance-Based Policies

Performance-based policies offer a potential solution to reduce costs by tying incentives to the amount of pollution reduction achieved. These policies allow farmers to decide how to reduce pollution, encouraging them to combine inputs effectively to achieve environmental goals. While these policies can be challenging to implement due to the difficulty of measuring and assigning responsibility for nonpoint-source pollution, they offer a more flexible and cost-effective approach.

Targeted Conservation Practices

Another strategy to improve cost-effectiveness is to target conservation practices to specific fields or regions with the highest treatment needs or those at risk of pollutant loss. For example, focusing on cropland with high treatment needs or fields adjacent to water sources can provide the lowest-cost option for meeting water quality goals. This approach ensures that resources are allocated efficiently, reducing the total cost of implementing pollution-reducing practices across the Chesapeake Bay watershed.

Manure Management

Manure management is a significant issue, especially for confined animal operations that produce more manure than their cropland can utilise. Transporting excess manure to other croplands or using it for non-cropland purposes can be costly, with estimated costs of between $18 million and $30 million per year for the Chesapeake Bay watershed. Alternative solutions, such as using manure as an energy source, may provide environmental benefits but could also increase costs for crop producers who rely on manure as a low-cost nutrient source.

While implementing pollution-reducing practices in agriculture comes at a cost, it is a necessary investment to protect the health and biodiversity of the Chesapeake Bay. By providing financial support, offering performance-based incentives, and targeting conservation practices efficiently, the economic burden on farmers can be reduced. These strategies not only help improve water quality but also contribute to the long-term sustainability and resilience of agricultural operations in the region.

Frequently asked questions