Trains' Impact: Air Pollution And Unhealthy Emissions

how do train pollute the air

Trains are a major source of air pollution, particularly in large cities with busy train stations. The pollution is caused by the use of diesel engines, with about 20% of Europe's rail traffic being hauled by diesel locomotives. Electric trains, on the other hand, are emission-free. The UK, Greece, Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania are among the countries highly dependent on diesel traction. The age of the trains is also a factor, with older diesel locomotives emitting more pollutants. In the UK, only 41% of train tracks are electrified, and diesel trains passing through major train stations in London and Edinburgh have been found to exceed EU thresholds for nitrogen dioxide (NO2) emissions. California is also facing challenges with locomotive pollution, with regulators aiming to replace old locomotives with zero-emission electric or fuel cell technology. While rail travel is generally considered one of the greenest modes of transportation, the transition to more energy-efficient models can be slow due to the long lifespan of trains.

Characteristics Values
Cause of train pollution Diesel engines
Rail transport's contribution to global emissions 0.8% between 1990 and 2009
Percentage of rail traffic hauled by diesel locomotives in Europe 20%
Percentage of electrified train tracks in the UK 41%
Pollutants emitted by diesel trains Nitrogen oxides, hydrocarbons, carbon monoxide, nitrogen dioxide
Stations with air pollution levels exceeding EU thresholds Waverley Station in Edinburgh, King's Cross in London
Percentage reduction in carbon-intensive diesel consumption by LNER 30%
Average CO2e emissions per passenger km for the most polluting trains 41g
Country with the highest share of energy from nuclear power France (66%)

shunwaste

Diesel trains emit large quantities of pollutants, including nitrogen dioxide

Research by Edinburgh University and King's College London revealed that concentrations of nitrogen dioxide inside Waverley Station in Edinburgh and King's Cross in London exceeded EU thresholds within a short period. This is concerning given the millions of people who use these stations daily. The high number of diesel trains passing through and the enclosed nature of the stations contribute to the poor air quality. While all intercity services in London now use electric trains, the same cannot be said for Edinburgh, where diesel trains are still prevalent.

The pollution produced by diesel trains includes the release of nitrogen oxides, particulate matter, hydrocarbons, and carbon monoxide. Diesel engines, in general, release a significant amount of carbon, contributing to their high pollution levels. The International Union of Railways has recognised this issue and proposed the Low Carbon Sustainable Rail Transport Challenge to reduce emissions. Additionally, California regulators are also taking steps to reduce locomotive pollution and transition to zero-emission technology.

To address the issue of diesel train pollution, it is essential to replace older diesel locomotives with more environmentally friendly alternatives. However, retrofitting existing trains with new engines that meet tighter emission limits can be economically and technically challenging. Therefore, the most feasible solution is to renew the fleet with modern electric or bi-mode trains, as demonstrated by LNER's successful retirement of old diesel high-speed trains.

shunwaste

Electric trains are emission-free, but the electricity source is important

Electric trains are emission-free at the point of use, but the source of their electricity is important to consider when assessing their environmental impact. While electric trains produce zero emissions when running, the electricity that powers them may be generated through renewable or non-renewable sources. If the electricity is produced by burning fossil fuels, the environmental benefits of electric trains are diminished.

The benefits of electric trains over diesel trains are clear. Diesel trains emit large quantities of pollutants, including nitrogen oxides, hydrocarbons, and carbon monoxide, which contribute to poor air quality and threaten the health of travellers and workers. Electric trains, on the other hand, emit no pollutants at the point of use, improving air quality, especially in enclosed stations and city centres.

The shift towards electric trains is gaining momentum. In the UK, the government has announced plans to electrify more railways across England and Wales, with similar initiatives being undertaken in Wales and Scotland. These efforts are expected to reduce carbon emissions and bring down fares. Additionally, electric trains have lower operating costs, making electrification an attractive option for high-demand routes.

However, the electrification of train tracks comes with its own set of challenges. Firstly, there are significant upfront costs associated with installing electrified tracks, particularly for freight rail. Secondly, the increased electrification of tracks will result in a higher demand for electricity, impacting the electricity grid. To address this, a shift towards renewable energy sources is crucial. As the electricity generation industry reduces its carbon levels and embraces renewables, the environmental benefits of electric trains will become even more pronounced.

In conclusion, while electric trains are indeed emission-free at the point of use, the transition towards a more sustainable railway system depends on the decarbonisation of the electricity grid. The shift to renewable energy sources for electricity production will play a pivotal role in realising the full potential of electric trains as a green mode of transportation.

shunwaste

Rail travel is one of the greenest modes of transportation

Trains are more environmentally friendly than cars or planes due to their greater energy efficiency. For example, high-speed rail in Japan, Shinkansen, has recently increased its speed and cut back its energy consumption by 40% by reducing the weight of the trains and redesigning the shape and length of the lead nose to be more aerodynamic. Similarly, Amtrak, the American national rail operator, has reduced its carbon footprint by installing lighter train cars and adopting energy-saving practices, such as regenerative braking and reducing idle time.

In Europe, trains are the primary mode of intercity and international travel, and many of the European lines are slower, regional trains that make frequent stops. While high-speed rail is faster, it requires more fuel and is less energy-efficient. Additionally, train stations are typically centrally located within cities, eliminating the need for travellers to use a second mode of transportation to reach their final destination, as is often the case with airports.

However, it is important to note that pollution from trains, particularly those using diesel engines, can still negatively impact air quality, especially in enclosed stations. In the UK, where the mean age of rolling stock is 18 years, many trains were deployed before EU emissions regulations took effect. As a result, diesel trains emit large quantities of pollutants, threatening the well-being of travellers and workers. To address this issue, the UK rail industry is working towards fleet renewal, aiming to meet the EU's goal of reducing emissions by 2030.

shunwaste

The age of trains impacts emissions, with older trains being less efficient

The age of trains has a significant impact on emissions, with older trains being less efficient and more polluting. In the UK, the average age of trains is 18 years, and a large portion of these trains were deployed before EU emissions regulations came into effect. As a result, these older trains emit higher levels of pollutants, particularly when operating in enclosed stations, leading to poor air quality and potential health risks for travellers and workers.

Diesel locomotives, which make up about 20% of Europe's rail traffic, are a major contributor to climate pollution, smog, and other harmful emissions such as particulate matter, nitrogen oxides, hydrocarbons, sulfur dioxide, and carbon monoxide. Older diesel trains are often subject to less stringent emissions standards, and retrofitting or replacing them with newer, more efficient models can be economically and technically challenging.

Research has shown that major train stations in English and Scottish capitals, such as King's Cross in London and Waverley Station in Edinburgh, have poor air quality due to the high number of diesel trains passing through. These stations have been found to exceed EU thresholds for nitrogen dioxide (NO2) levels, which is concerning given the millions of people who use these stations daily.

However, it's important to note that railway travel is still considered one of the greenest modes of transportation. While the entire transport sector contributes about 22% of global emissions, rail accounts for only 0.8% of that between 1990 and 2009, according to the European Environment Agency (EEA). Nonetheless, there is a growing consensus that the rail industry needs to do more to reduce its environmental impact, especially with the increasing volume of train cargo and rail traffic worldwide.

To meet emission reduction goals, fleet renewal and electrification of rail networks are being prioritized. As of 2013, 53% of the EEA-33 area's rail network was electrified, but approximately half of Europe's train lines remain non-electrified. Upgrading to newer, more efficient trains and transitioning from diesel to electric power are crucial steps in reducing emissions and improving air quality, especially in enclosed stations.

shunwaste

The UK has a high number of diesel trains, especially in Scotland

The UK has a relatively high number of diesel trains, with 29% of the country's fleet being diesel-powered. This is despite the fact that diesel trains are highly polluting, especially in enclosed stations. The UK's high number of diesel trains is particularly notable in Scotland, where Edinburgh still relies on diesel trains, unlike London, where all intercity services now use electric trains.

The UK's diesel trains contribute to air pollution, which is a significant issue in the country, with Public Health England estimating that 29,000 deaths a year in the UK are caused by poor air quality. While trains are one of the most environmentally friendly forms of mass transport, emitting only 1% of the UK's carbon emissions, the presence of diesel trains in the fleet increases their environmental impact.

There have been efforts to reduce the number of diesel trains in the UK, with the government announcing plans to phase out diesel-only trains by 2040. This will involve further electrification of the rail network, which currently stands at only 41-42% electrified tracks. The introduction of bi-mode trains, which can switch between electrified and non-electrified tracks, is also being explored, although these trains emit higher levels of CO2 in diesel mode than diesel-only trains.

The UK is also exploring alternative power sources for trains, such as hydrogen and battery-powered trains. However, hydrogen has a low energy density, requiring a large amount of space to store the fuel, and the infrastructure to produce and deploy it in the UK is currently lacking. Battery-powered trains are also in their infancy, and it is challenging to power trains that need to pull a large number of wagons.

Overall, while the UK has a high number of diesel trains, particularly in Scotland, there are efforts to reduce their number and find alternative power sources to decrease the environmental impact of the country's rail network.

Frequently asked questions

Trains pollute the air through the use of diesel engines. While electric trains are emission-free, diesel trains emit large quantities of pollutants, including nitrogen dioxide (NO2) and diesel fumes.

Areas near railyards, ports, and freight corridors, such as Commerce, Colton, and San Bernardino in California, as well as Edinburgh and London in the UK, are particularly vulnerable to train pollution due to the high number of diesel trains passing through.

Train pollution has been linked to increased cancer risk, shortened life expectancy, and worsened smog in affected areas. Poor air quality inside train stations and nearby communities can have significant impacts on the health and well-being of frequent travellers, workers, and residents.

Efforts are being made to transition to more sustainable energy sources and reduce emissions. California, for example, is considering regulations to force the rail industry to replace old locomotives with cleaner diesel models and eventually adopt zero-emission technology. The UK is also working towards improving air quality, despite challenges with older diesel locomotives and a lack of legislative framework.

Written by
Reviewed by
Share this post
Print
Did this article help you?

Leave a comment