Measuring Air Pollution: Farmers' Practical Strategies

Agriculture is a significant source of air pollution, with emissions from farms outweighing all other human sources of fine-particulate air pollution in much of the US, Europe, Russia, and China. The primary sources of agricultural air pollution are ammonia, which enters the air as a gas from heavily fertilized fields and livestock waste, and methane, which is a byproduct of enteric fermentation in livestock. To measure air pollution, farmers can refer to guides such as the Agricultural Air Quality Conservation Measures Reference Guide, which outlines methods for reducing emissions of various air pollutants on farms. Additionally, organizations like the US EPA and the European Commission provide resources and initiatives to help farmers monitor and reduce air emissions. For example, the US EPA has collaborated with farmers on nationwide studies of air emissions, while the European Commission's Common Agricultural Policy supports farmers in adopting sustainable practices that protect air quality.

Measuring ammonia emissions from agriculture

Agriculture is a major source of air pollution, and ammonia emissions from farms contribute significantly to this issue. Ammonia (NH3) is released into the atmosphere from heavily fertilized fields and livestock waste. It combines with pollutants from combustion, such as nitrogen oxides and sulfates from vehicles and industrial processes, to form tiny solid particles or aerosols, which are a significant health hazard. These fine particles, known as PM2.5, can penetrate deep into the lungs and cause serious respiratory issues, including reduced lung function, irritation to the throat and eyes, increased coughing, and even long-term illnesses such as Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and lung cancer.

To address the problem of ammonia emissions from agriculture, it is crucial to measure and monitor these emissions effectively. One method that has been employed is the use of portable ammonia detectors (PADs). PADs offer a rapid way to detect ammonia, typically taking less than 30 seconds to provide a reading. However, their use in agriculture has been limited due to previous models having a large detection limit and poor resolution. Newer PADs with improved detection limits and resolution show potential for monitoring ammonia emissions in agricultural settings.

Another technique for measuring ammonia emissions is the integrated horizontal flux (IHF) method, which is a micrometeorological approach. This method is particularly useful for lagoons, where wind flow and flux gradients are modified by berms and land-lagoon boundaries. The IHF method offers a simpler theoretical basis and fewer restrictions compared to other micrometeorological techniques. Additionally, the ZINST method, which requires measurement at a predetermined height, can be a more cost-effective alternative to the IHF method while still providing comparable results under uniform wind conditions.

Furthermore, aerial ammonia concentrations (Cg) can be measured using various tools such as acid scrubbers, filter packs, denuders, or optical methods. By combining Cg data with wind speed or airflow rate information, the ammonia emission rate or flux can be directly estimated using enclosures or micrometeorological methods. However, it is important to note that nitrogen (N) recovery is not recommended for measuring ammonia fluxes, as different gaseous N components cannot be easily separated.

While these methods provide valuable tools for measuring ammonia emissions, it is important to recognize that ammonia emissions are influenced by various factors. These factors include soil temperature, soil ammonium concentration, leaf area index, and wind patterns. Additionally, the type of crop and environmental conditions can impact ammonia emissions and their absorption by crop canopies. By gaining a comprehensive understanding of these factors and employing suitable measurement techniques, farmers and researchers can work towards reducing ammonia emissions and mitigating their negative impact on human health and the environment.

Assessing the impact of livestock farming

One study found that an increase in livestock population by 1000 units, leading to a 1% rise in bovine population and a 0.3% rise in swine population, resulted in a corresponding daily increase in NH3 and PM10 concentrations. These increases were more pronounced under certain meteorological conditions, such as northerly upwind conditions. The same study also suggested that bovine and swine farming could contribute to up to 25% of local pollution exposure, emphasizing the need for targeted strategies to mitigate these emissions.

The health impacts of livestock farming air pollution are a significant concern. Studies have shown that living near livestock farms is associated with decreased lung function and an increased risk of obstructive airways diseases, such as asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The emissions from livestock farms can also induce acute respiratory symptoms, airway hyperresponsiveness, airways obstruction, and airway inflammation. These impacts are not limited to adults, as children of farmers have also exhibited asthma-like symptoms.

To address these issues, organizations like the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) have developed guidelines and standards to reduce emissions from livestock farms. The EPA, in collaboration with universities and the livestock industry, has conducted studies to monitor and assess air emissions, with the goal of developing models for estimating hazardous air emissions from large-scale animal operations. However, there have been challenges along the way, including legislative changes that exempt farmers from reporting air emissions, hindering progress in mitigating the environmental and health impacts of livestock farming air pollution.

Evaluating the use of synthetic fertilisers

The use of synthetic fertilisers in agriculture has been a significant contributor to air pollution. The production of artificial fertilisers has increased from 20 million tons in 1950 to nearly 190 million tons today, with about a third of them being nitrogen-based. This heavy use of fertilisers has been a major contributor to fine-particulate air pollution in the United States, Europe, Russia, and China. The use of synthetic fertilisers releases nitrogen-based compounds, ammonia, and nitrogen oxides into the air, which can have detrimental effects on both human health and the environment.

To evaluate the use of synthetic fertilisers, it is essential to consider their impact on air pollution and explore alternative methods. Firstly, it is crucial to acknowledge the role of nitrogen in synthetic fertilisers. While nitrogen is a primary building block for plants, its excessive use can lead to environmental concerns. When nitrogen is not fully utilised by plants, it can be lost from farm fields, negatively impacting air quality. This excess nitrogen contributes to the formation of ground-level ozone, higher amounts of greenhouse gases, and the thinning of the protective ozone layer. Additionally, excess nitrogen has been linked to acid rain, polluted drinking water, and the creation of ""dead zones" in water bodies, causing harm to aquatic life.

Farmers can play a crucial role in mitigating the negative impacts of synthetic fertiliser use. By adopting nutrient management techniques, farmers can ensure that nutrients are applied in the right amounts, at the right time of year, and with the correct methods. This includes the use of organic and mineral fertilisers, which provide nutrients to plants while reducing the emission of synthetic derivatives that pollute the soil, water, and air. Implementing conservation tillage practices, such as reducing the frequency and intensity of tilling, can also help improve soil health and reduce nutrient runoff into waterways.

Transitioning towards more sustainable agricultural practices is essential. Terrace, row, or spiral cultivation methods have been shown to benefit both farmers and the environment by improving soil composition and water optimisation. Encouraging the use of organic or ecological fertilisers, which do not rely on synthetic nitrogen compounds, can help tackle the pollution caused by synthetic fertilisers. Additionally, practices such as crop rotation and organic farming can reduce the presence of fertiliser residues in crops, contributing to more sustainable agriculture.

While the use of synthetic fertilisers has contributed to increased crop production, it is important to balance this with the environmental and health impacts. By adopting alternative methods, farmers can play a leadership role in reducing air pollution, protecting both human health and the planet's well-being.

Monitoring air quality near farms

Agricultural activities and equipment can release various pollutants into the atmosphere, including particulate matter, ammonia, nitrogen oxides, and sulfates. Particulate matter refers to solid or liquid particles in the air, such as soot or smoke, which can be large and dark or so small that they can only be detected with an electron microscope. These particles can penetrate deep into the lungs and cause serious health issues.

Ammonia emissions from nitrogen-rich fertilizers and animal waste are a significant contributor to air pollution from farms. When ammonia combines with pollutants from combustion, primarily from vehicles, power plants, and industrial processes, it forms tiny solid particles or aerosols. These aerosols are no more than 2.5 micrometers across, small enough to be inhaled and cause respiratory issues.

To address this issue, organizations like the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) collaborate with farmers to study emissions and develop federal standards to limit them. The EPA's Air Monitoring at Agricultural Operations site provides information on common practices to reduce emissions from crop and animal farms. Additionally, the EPA has conducted nationwide studies on air emissions from animal feeding operations (AFOs), working with researchers from universities to measure emission levels and develop frameworks for farmers to participate in monitoring studies.

Furthermore, the Clean Air Act requires each state to develop a State Implementation Plan (SIP) to identify sources of air pollution and determine the necessary reductions to meet federal air quality standards. These plans consider the location-specific nature of farming practices and include regulations to reduce air pollution. While challenges and delays have occurred in implementing and enforcing these regulations, the data gathered through monitoring studies is crucial for informing policy decisions and protecting public health.

Studying the effects of combustion emissions

Understanding the Sources of Combustion Emissions:

Recognizing the primary sources of combustion emissions is essential. Internal combustion engines (ICEs), which burn fossil fuels like gas or diesel, are a major source. ICEs are commonly used in vehicles, contributing significantly to transportation's substantial share of greenhouse gas emissions. Other sources include industrial processes, power plants, and agricultural activities, such as the use of nitrogen-rich fertilizers and combustion of livestock waste.

Measuring and Monitoring Emissions:

Measuring and monitoring combustion emissions is crucial for assessing their impact. This can be done through various methods, such as using air quality monitors or "Pods" to collect data on emissions from vehicles and other sources. Individual vehicle testing, roadway monitors, and stationary monitors also help quantify and compare emissions from different sources.

Health Impact Studies:

Combustion emissions have significant health effects. Studies have linked exposure to combustion by-products, particularly from diesel and gasoline engines, with respiratory and cardiovascular health issues. The complex mixture of pollutants in combustion emissions, including particulate matter, gases, and heavy metals, contributes to these adverse health outcomes.

Emissions Reduction Technologies:

There is a continuous pursuit of technologies and innovations to reduce combustion emissions. This includes the development of new combustion systems, such as Kubota's TVCR, and the improvement of electronic control systems. Additionally, the transition to electric drive and carbon-neutral solutions is an active area of exploration to achieve zero-emission operations.

Regulatory and Collaborative Efforts:

Regulating emissions is vital to drive change. Organizations like the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) collaborate with farmers and universities to study air emissions from agricultural operations and establish federal standards to limit emissions. The EPA's Air Monitoring at Agricultural Operations site provides guidance on reducing emissions from crop and animal farms.

Frequently asked questions