The Politics Of Pollution: Who's Responsible?

Pollution has been a problem since the emergence of our earliest ancestors, but it became a political issue in the 19th century when episodes of smog in cities like New York and London resulted in many deaths. Air pollution continued to be a significant problem through the 20th century, with the Cuyahoga River in Cleveland, Ohio, becoming so polluted that the water caught fire in 1969. This incident, along with the Donora incident in 1948, led to the creation of the Air Pollution Control Act of 1955, the first federal attempt to control air pollution. Since then, clean air legislation has been revised and strengthened, with the Clean Air Act of 1990 setting limits on the discharge of air pollutants from industrial facilities and motor vehicles. Today, pollution remains a political issue, with people's views on climate change and effective ways to address it influenced by their political orientation and personal concerns.

Air pollution's impact on voting decisions

Air pollution has been a problem since the emergence of our earliest ancestors, with human populations contributing to more bacteria and disease. In the 19th century, cities like London and New York experienced "smog", a combination of smoke and fog, which resulted in many deaths. Air pollution continued to be a significant issue through the middle of the 20th century, with severe episodes such as the 1948 Donora incident in Pennsylvania, and the 1969 Cuyahoga River fire, prompting the creation of the Air Pollution Control Act of 1955 and the Clean Water Act in 1972, respectively. Despite legislative efforts, air pollution persists and has evolved into a critical political topic with profound societal implications.

Research indicates that air pollution influences the decision-making process of the general population, including consequential political choices. Specifically, higher levels of air pollution on election day tend to shift votes away from incumbent parties toward opposition parties. German election data from 2000 to 2018 support this trend, revealing that increased local air pollution corresponds to a shift in votes from established parties to their challengers. This shift may be attributed to the negative emotions, such as anger, worry, and unhappiness, that arise from poor air quality, leading to reduced support for the political status quo.

The impact of air pollution on voting decisions is not limited to a specific country or region. For instance, in the United States, climate change and fossil fuel energy issues are strongly linked to party and ideological differences. Liberal Democrats tend to place more trust in climate scientists and their research, while conservative Republicans exhibit more negative views toward climate change and related policies. This partisan divide influences how individuals interpret scientific discussions and proposed solutions, with personal concerns and political orientation playing a significant role in shaping these perspectives.

Moreover, air pollution is a contributing factor to climate change, primarily due to the increase in carbon dioxide levels caused by burning fossil fuels and mass deforestation. As a result, the greenhouse effect intensifies, impacting climate patterns and sea levels worldwide. The consequences of climate change include rising global temperatures, social and economic disruptions, and the displacement of people from areas that can no longer sustain them. These impacts have led to increased public concern and resistance to decisive action on climate change, as evidenced by the challenging politics surrounding the issue.

In conclusion, air pollution has emerged as a critical political topic due to its impact on voting decisions and its role in climate change. The negative emotions evoked by poor air quality influence voters' support for incumbent parties, while the complexities of climate change and partisan divides further shape public opinion and political choices. Addressing air pollution and climate change requires collective efforts from concerned citizens, legislators, and environmental organizations to implement effective solutions and drive political action.

Water pollution and the Clean Water Act

Water pollution has been a long-standing issue, with the mid-1940s seeing outbreaks of waterborne diseases, degradation of fishing and recreational waters, rapid wartime industrial development, and population growth, all contributing to a renewed focus on water pollution control. The Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1948 was the first major US law to address water pollution, but it was in 1972 that the law was significantly reorganized and expanded upon, becoming commonly known as the Clean Water Act (CWA).

The Clean Water Act was enacted due to growing public awareness and concern regarding water pollution. It established a basic structure for regulating discharges of pollutants into US waters and set quality standards for surface waters. The CWA made it unlawful to discharge any pollutant from a point source into navigable waters without a permit. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) was given the authority to implement pollution control programs and set wastewater standards for industry.

The CWA also funded the construction of sewage treatment plants and recognized the need to address critical problems caused by nonpoint source pollution. It established conditions and permitting for pollutant discharges under the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES). The EPA issues permits through the NPDES program, controlling discharges and ensuring compliance with the CWA.

Over the years, the Clean Water Act has undergone several amendments and changes. For instance, the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 amended the CWA, increasing penalties for non-compliance and broadening the federal government's response and enforcement authorities. Additionally, the Great Lakes Critical Programs Act of 1990 implemented parts of the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement, requiring the EPA to establish water quality criteria to address toxic pollutants in the Great Lakes.

Water pollution remains a significant issue today, with nearly half of US rivers and streams and over a third of lakes being polluted and unfit for various purposes. Nutrient pollution, including nitrates and phosphates, is a leading contaminant, along with farm waste, fertilizer runoff, and municipal and industrial waste discharges. Ocean acidification, caused by carbon pollution from burning fossil fuels, is another pressing concern, impacting marine life and ecosystems.

Climate change and political action

Public concern about environmental issues has been a driving force behind political action on climate change. People are increasingly worried about the impact of pollution on their health and the planet, with visible forms of pollution such as water, soil, and air pollution being top concerns. As scientific studies in the 1950s and 1960s began to establish the link between pollution and human health, the public demanded that governments take action. This led to the creation of environmental protection agencies and the implementation of federal legislation aimed at reducing pollution and protecting natural resources.

The political spectrum plays a significant role in shaping views on climate change and the resulting policy responses. In the United States, for example, liberal Democrats are more likely to trust climate science and believe in the effectiveness of policy interventions, while conservative Republicans exhibit more scepticism and negative views towards climate change news coverage. These ideological differences influence the development and implementation of climate policies, with conservative governments often prioritising economic growth over environmental protection.

The inherent complexity of climate change and its cause-and-effect relationships pose challenges for political action. The public's understanding of climate science is crucial for garnering support for policy interventions. Efforts by individuals like Al Gore, who actively disseminated knowledge about climate change through various mediums, played an important role in raising awareness and building public understanding. However, the complex nature of the issue remains a hurdle, requiring continuous education and outreach.

Jurisdictional issues also complicate political action on climate change. The concept of jurisdiction, deeply rooted in modern governance, is tied to geography and territory over which a government or agency exercises its power. Climate change, however, is a global issue that transcends national borders, making it difficult to assign clear accountability and coordinate effective responses across nations.

Despite these challenges, there have been notable examples of political action on climate change. The Clean Water Act, the Clean Air Act, and various federal environmental protection acts in the United States are testament to the impact of public pressure and scientific evidence on policy-making. As the climate crisis becomes more urgent and apparent, public opinion and scientific consensus will continue to shape political agendas and drive international cooperation to address this existential threat.

Fossil fuels and political ideology

Fossil fuels have long been a politically contentious issue, with a range of ideologies and interests influencing how different groups and individuals view and utilise them.

One perspective on fossil fuels is rooted in capitalism and economic growth. Fossil fuels have been integral to the capitalist system, powering industrialisation, consumerism, and economic development. Nations across the political spectrum have historically viewed economic growth fuelled by cheap and abundant energy sources as a key measure of national strength. This perspective often prioritises short-term economic gains over environmental concerns, resisting significant shifts away from fossil fuels due to fears of economic disruption.

Another ideological dimension involves the concentration of political and economic power. Fossil fuel industries have often been criticised for their immense influence on politics, with corporations wielding significant control over governments and regulatory policies. This dynamic creates a "democratic deficit", where the interests of industry supersede those of the populace, perpetuating the reliance on fossil fuels and hindering the transition to renewable energy sources.

The transition to renewable energy sources is inherently political, challenging dominant systems of energy power. Distributed renewable energy sources are associated with distributed political power, potentially leading to more democratic energy futures. However, this transition faces resistance from those with vested interests in maintaining the status quo, including fossil fuel companies and their allies in politics and advisory roles.

The complexity of climate change, caused in large part by fossil fuels, further complicates political action. The intricate interplay of causes and effects can be challenging to communicate effectively, requiring continuous education and advocacy. Additionally, issues of jurisdiction and accountability arise, as climate change transcends national boundaries, demanding coordinated global responses that can be politically challenging to achieve.

Finally, public opinion plays a role in shaping political ideologies and agendas. Visible pollution problems, such as water, soil, and air pollution, tend to elicit stronger public concern and political action than more complex issues like climate change. Poor air quality can influence voting decisions, shifting support away from incumbent parties, as seen in studies of German election data.

Environmental reform and federal legislation

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), established by President Nixon in 1970, played a pivotal role in enforcing new standards and coordinating states' implementation plans. This was a crucial step towards consolidating federal regulation and driving environmental reform. The Clean Water Act of 1972, also known as the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, provided funding to improve sewage treatment plants and set limits on industrial discharges into the water.

The Clean Air Act of 1990 further strengthened legislation by addressing acid rain, ozone depletion, and limiting air pollutants from industrial facilities and motor vehicles. The Oil Pollution Act of 1990 also prohibited the discharge of oil into navigable rivers. These laws have significantly curbed pollution and demonstrated a commitment to environmental reform.

Other notable federal environmental legislation includes the Endangered Species Act of 1973, the Solid Waste Disposal Act of 1976, and the Toxic Substances Control Act of 1976. These laws reflect a growing recognition of the need to protect the environment and address the consequences of pollution, which affect people across state lines and international borders.

While pollution has become a political issue, with divisions between liberal Democrats and conservative Republicans in the US, it is important to note that public concern and scientific understanding also play a significant role in driving environmental reform and federal legislation. As public awareness of the visible and tangible effects of pollution increases, there is greater pressure on politicians to act and implement effective policies to address these issues.

Frequently asked questions