Corporations' Impact On Pollution: A Global Concern

Corporations play a significant role in driving climate change and pollution. A small number of fossil fuel producers, including ExxonMobil, Shell, BP, and Chevron, are responsible for a large proportion of global industrial emissions. These companies prioritize profits over environmental concerns and often block measures to reduce emissions. Additionally, large corporations in various sectors, such as energy, utilities, transportation, and manufacturing, contribute significantly to climate change pollution, which could significantly impact their profits if they were required to pay damages. The fashion industry, for example, is the second-biggest industrial polluter, responsible for 10% of global emissions. While consumer choices are important, corporations have a greater responsibility and ability to make significant changes to reduce their environmental impact.

Corporations are responsible for 71% of global emissions since 1988

Corporations are responsible for a large proportion of global emissions, with 100 companies causing 71% of global greenhouse gas emissions since 1988. This figure includes emissions from the extraction, use, and combustion of fossil fuels. The main culprits are fossil fuel producers, with ExxonMobil, Shell, BP, and Chevron identified as the highest emitters since that time.

The Carbon Majors Report, published by the non-profit CDP in collaboration with the Climate Accountability Institute, highlights the role of companies and investors in tackling climate change. The report found that over half of global industrial emissions since 1988 could be traced to just 25 corporate and state-owned entities, with the scale of their historical emissions significantly contributing to climate change.

The issue of corporate emissions is not limited to the energy sector. For example, the top 15 US food and beverage companies generate nearly 630 million metric tons of greenhouse gases annually, more than Australia, the world's 15th largest annual source. Procter and Gamble (P&G), a leading consumer goods company, has been criticised for its climate commitment, which only addresses a small fraction of its total emissions.

The fashion industry is another major contributor to climate change, responsible for 10% of global emissions. However, it is often the working-class consumers who are blamed for buying from fast fashion brands, rather than the companies themselves.

Corporations have the power to drive policy change, shape consumer preferences, and respond to the necessities of climate change. While individual actions are important, corporations must also take accountability for their large part in the climate crisis. They have an obligation to acknowledge their impact and make meaningful changes to reduce their emissions.

The energy sector is a major contributor to corporate pollution

The energy sector's contribution to corporate pollution is significant, particularly in the area of electricity production. In 2022, 60% of electricity in the United States came from burning fossil fuels, mainly coal and natural gas. The transportation sector is also a major contributor, with over 94% of fuel used for transportation being petroleum-based.

The impact of the energy sector's pollution is far-reaching. If fossil fuel extraction continues at the current rate, global average temperatures are predicted to rise by 4 degrees Celsius by the end of the century. This will likely result in catastrophic consequences, including substantial species extinction and global food scarcity risks.

Some energy companies have started to invest in renewable energy sources, such as Shell's $1.7 billion investment in a renewables arm in 2015. However, the pace and scale of change are often criticized as insufficient to address the urgent need to reduce emissions.

Corporations often prioritise profits over the environment

One notable example is Exxon, a multinational gas and oil company that was aware of climate change for decades but chose to block measures to reduce emissions. Similarly, BP, an oil and gas company, advertised its cleaner natural gas and low-carbon energy while allocating over 96% of its funds to oil and gas. These instances highlight a pattern of greenwashing, where corporations use sustainability as a marketing tactic rather than a genuine commitment.

The fashion industry is another major contributor to climate change, with fast fashion being highly affordable and accessible to consumers. However, the blame is often placed on working-class consumers who lack the funds to buy from sustainable brands, rather than the companies producing cheap, environmentally detrimental products. This demonstrates a systemic issue where corporations shift responsibility onto consumers, who are limited by financial constraints and a lack of accessible alternatives.

While some corporations have taken steps towards sustainability, such as Unilever and Samsung, they are still the minority. Many corporations hide behind consumer choice and individual actions, failing to address the substantial emissions associated with their products' life cycles. This includes upstream emissions from raw material production and downstream emissions from product use and disposal. As a result, corporations can claim climate commitments while only addressing a fraction of their total emissions.

To address this issue, it is crucial to adjust how profit is defined. Currently, GDP (gross domestic product) is the primary measure of economic success, ignoring the environment. By prioritising GEP (gross ecosystem product), which values environmental assets, nations and industry leaders can make more informed decisions that balance economic and environmental impacts.

Governments can play a role in reducing corporate pollution

Corporations are the main drivers of climate change, with just 100 companies responsible for 71% of global emissions since 1988. However, governments can play a crucial role in reducing corporate pollution and its detrimental impact on the planet.

Firstly, governments can implement regulations and policies to reduce emissions and hold corporations accountable. For example, the United States' Clean Air Act of 1970 has successfully reduced air pollution while growing the economy, demonstrating that economic growth and environmental protection can go hand in hand. The Act established national air quality standards and state implementation plans, with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) working alongside state, local, and tribal governments to lower air pollution levels. Similar regulations can be implemented globally to reduce corporate pollution.

Secondly, governments can provide incentives and support for corporations to adopt more sustainable practices. For instance, the Pollution Prevention Act of 1990 in the US aims to reduce pollution at its source by promoting cost-effective changes in production and the use of non-toxic substances. The Act also provides financial assistance to states and businesses to implement these changes. Governments can offer grants, subsidies, and tax breaks to companies that reduce their emissions, encouraging a shift towards greener practices.

Thirdly, governments can increase transparency and disclosure requirements for corporations. Many companies set targets to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, but these often exclude upstream and downstream emissions associated with the full life cycle of their products. By mandating more comprehensive emissions reporting and disclosure, governments can ensure that corporations take responsibility for the full extent of their climate impact. This would enable consumers, investors, and the public to make more informed decisions and hold corporations accountable for their environmental practices.

Additionally, governments can lead by example and reduce their own contributions to pollution. For instance, after the Cop26 climate summit in Glasgow, politicians and leaders should opt for more sustainable travel options instead of taking private jets. Governments can also encourage and support sustainable practices within their countries, such as by investing in renewable energy infrastructure and promoting green consumer choices.

Finally, governments can collaborate internationally to address corporate pollution on a global scale. By working together, nations can establish and enforce international agreements and standards to reduce emissions and hold corporations accountable across borders. This can include agreements on carbon emissions reductions, as well as regulations on international trade and supply chains to ensure that corporations are not simply outsourcing their pollution to other countries.

Individuals are often blamed for pollution, but corporations are the main culprits

Corporations have the power and agency to make significant changes to reduce pollution and their environmental impact. They can choose to make their products and operations greener and more sustainable. However, many corporations prioritize short-term profitability over the urgent need to reduce emissions. They also shape the public narrative and influence how people perceive their role in climate change. For example, the concept of a "carbon footprint" was popularized by a BP media campaign, shifting the blame onto individuals for their consumption choices.

While individual actions, such as recycling or choosing sustainable products, are important, they should not be the primary solution to tackling climate change. These actions often carry additional costs or require specific living conditions, making them inaccessible to many, especially those from lower socioeconomic backgrounds. Instead, the focus should be on corporations and their responsibility to drive systemic change.

Additionally, the fashion industry, as the second-biggest industrial polluter, responsible for 10% of global emissions, is often overlooked. Fast fashion brands offer affordable and accessible options for consumers, and it is important to recognize that overconsumption is driven by those who can afford to buy from more sustainable brands. Blaming consumers, especially those from lower socioeconomic backgrounds, ignores the role and influence of corporations in driving climate change.

Corporations must take accountability for their contributions to the climate crisis and work towards reducing their environmental impact. They hold the key to creating systemic change and should not shift the blame onto individuals.

Frequently asked questions