Congress' Successful Battle Against Pollution

Congress has taken several steps to reduce pollution and protect public health and the environment. In 1970, Congress established the basic structure of the Clean Air Act, which was then revised in 1977 and 1990 to improve its effectiveness and address emerging pollution problems such as acid rain and stratospheric ozone layer depletion. The Clean Air Act sets national ambient air quality standards and requires states to adopt plans to achieve and maintain these standards, while also minimizing pollution from motor vehicles and industrial plants. In addition, Congress passed the Pollution Prevention Act in 1990, which mandates that the Environmental Protection Agency establish a source reduction program to collect and disseminate information, provide financial assistance to states, and implement other activities to reduce pollution. These actions have led to significant reductions in air pollution and improvements in air quality, with dramatic reductions in key air pollutants and a decrease in the risks of premature death and other serious health effects for Americans.

The Clean Air Act

Congress designed the Clean Air Act to combat a variety of air pollution problems and address emerging pollution threats to protect public health and welfare from different types of air pollution caused by diverse sources. The Clean Air Act (CAA) is a comprehensive federal law regulating all sources of air emissions.

The 1970 CAA authorized the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to establish National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) to protect public health and the environment. The states were directed to develop State Implementation Plans (SIPs), which consist of emission reduction strategies, with the goal of achieving the NAAQS by the legislated date. The Act was amended in 1977 and 1990 to set new goals (dates) for achieving NAAQS, as many areas of the country had failed to meet the deadlines.

The 1990 amendments to the CAA aimed to address problems such as acid rain, ground-level ozone, stratospheric ozone depletion, visibility, and air toxics. The EPA's common air pollutants include nitrogen oxides (NOx), sulfur dioxide (SO2), particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5), carbon monoxide (CO), volatile organic compounds (VOC), ozone (O3), and lead (Pb).

The Pollution Prevention Act

The Act directs the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to establish an office within the agency to promote pollution prevention through source reduction. The Administrator is required to develop and implement a source reduction strategy, which includes establishing standard methods for measuring source reduction and coordinating and promoting source reduction activities in federal agencies and businesses. The strategy also aims to improve public access to data collected under federal environmental statutes and establish training programs on multimedia source reduction opportunities.

To support businesses in adopting source reduction techniques, the Administrator is authorized to provide matching grants to states for programs that promote source reduction. These grants are evaluated based on specific criteria, such as providing technical assistance, targeting businesses lacking information, and offering training in source reduction techniques. Federal funds for such programs are limited to 50% of the total funds available to a state each year.

The Act also mandates the establishment of a Source Reduction Clearinghouse, which compiles information on management, technical, and operational approaches to source reduction. This includes the development of a computer database accessible to the public. Owners or operators of facilities that are required to file annual toxic chemical release forms must include a toxic chemical source reduction and recycling report with each filing. The report details the quantity of chemicals released, recycled, or treated, as well as the source reduction practices employed.

The Administrator is required to submit biennial reports to Congress, detailing the actions taken to implement the source reduction strategy and the results achieved. The reports also include an analysis of data collected on an industry-by-industry basis, an evaluation of the usefulness and validity of the data, and the identification of regulatory and non-regulatory barriers to source reduction.

Reducing air pollution from transportation

Congress designed the Clean Air Act to protect public health and welfare from various types of air pollution caused by diverse pollution sources. The basic structure of the Clean Air Act was established in 1970, with major revisions in 1977 and 1990. The Act targets common pollutants, as well as specific issues such as hazardous air pollutants, acid rain, and chemical emissions that deplete the ozone layer.

To reduce air pollution from transportation, Congress can take several direct and indirect approaches. Firstly, encouraging the use of fuel-efficient vehicles is crucial. This can be done through incentives, subsidies, or regulations that promote the purchase and use of fuel-efficient vehicles, such as plug-in hybrid electric vehicles, hydrogen fuel cell vehicles, and cleaner-burning gasoline vehicles.

Secondly, reducing vehicle emissions is essential. This can be achieved by implementing stricter emission standards and fuel sulfur limits for vehicles, especially in designated emission control areas. Additionally, regular vehicle maintenance and tune-ups, as well as efficient driving practices, such as reducing idle time, can significantly reduce emissions.

Thirdly, promoting alternative transportation methods can help decrease transportation-related air pollution. This includes encouraging walking, biking, carpooling, and the use of public transit, ride-sharing services, and bike-share programs. Providing quality public transportation options is essential to the success of these initiatives.

Furthermore, optimizing deliveries and transportation routes can also reduce air pollution. This can be achieved by consolidating shipments, minimizing packaging, and allowing flexible delivery time windows to optimize routes and avoid unnecessary trips.

Lastly, addressing the impact of international transportation is vital. By working with international partners, Congress can reduce the environmental impact of international trade, especially in the aviation and maritime sectors, which rely heavily on petroleum-based fuels. Implementing stringent fuel quality and engine emissions standards for international transport can help reduce air pollution while maintaining uninterrupted international trade.

Reducing interstate air pollution

Congress has taken several actions to reduce interstate air pollution, which is a significant issue in the United States. One example is the Clean Air Act, which was established to protect public health and welfare from various types of air pollution caused by different sources. The Act requires the EPA to set national standards for common pollutants, and states must adopt plans to achieve and maintain these standards, including controlling emissions that drift into other states.

The Clean Air Act has been revised several times to improve its effectiveness and address emerging pollution problems. For instance, the 1990 amendments targeted acid rain and damage to the stratospheric ozone layer. The Act also contains provisions to address hazardous air pollutants, regional haze, and pollution problems that emerge over time, such as greenhouse gases.

To reduce cross-state air pollution, the EPA finalized an update to the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR) in 2016. This rule addresses the air quality impacts of ozone pollution that crosses state lines, particularly in the eastern United States. The rule requires power plants in 22 states to reduce nitrogen oxides (NOx) emissions during the summertime, providing benefits worth up to $880 million and improving air quality for millions of people.

Additionally, states can take action to reduce interstate air pollution under Sections 176A and 126 of the Clean Air Act. For instance, in 2013, nine Northeast and Mid-Atlantic states petitioned the EPA to require nine upwind states to reduce air pollution emissions that contribute to ozone formation downwind. The petition aimed to protect the health of residents in downwind states and level the playing field for businesses. While the EPA denied this particular petition, these sections of the Clean Air Act provide a mechanism for states to address interstate air pollution issues.

The Clean Power Plan

Each state was assigned a target for reducing carbon emissions within its borders, which could be accomplished as the states saw fit, but with the possibility of the EPA stepping in if a state refused to submit a plan. The plan aimed to reduce carbon dioxide emissions from electrical power generation by 32% by 2030 relative to 2005 levels. The plan focused on reducing emissions from coal-burning power plants and increasing the use of renewable energy, as well as promoting energy conservation.

Frequently asked questions