Electric Cars: Air Polluters In Disguise?

Electric vehicles (EVs) are often touted as a more sustainable alternative to traditional petrol and diesel cars, but do they really solve the problem of air pollution? While it is true that electric cars do not emit exhaust gases and produce fewer tailpipe emissions, there are other factors to consider when assessing their environmental impact. For instance, the weight of electric cars can lead to increased pollution from brake, tyre, and road wear. Additionally, the production and disposal of electric car batteries can also contribute to pollution. Furthermore, the electricity used to power these vehicles may come from fossil fuels, which have their own emissions. Despite these concerns, studies suggest that electric cars still emit fewer pollutants overall and contribute to improved air quality, particularly in urban areas.

Electric cars are heavier, causing faster tyre deterioration and releasing harmful chemicals

Electric vehicles (EVs) are heavier than their petrol or diesel counterparts, and this additional weight can cause tyres to deteriorate faster, releasing harmful chemicals into the environment.

The weight of an electric vehicle is largely due to the battery pack, with EVs weighing an average of 200kg to 300kg more than a petrol car. This extra weight puts more pressure on the tyres, leading to increased wear and tear. The higher torque of electric vehicles, or the twisting power that launches a car from a standing start, also contributes to greater tyre deterioration. As a result, tyres on electric vehicles may wear out up to 50% faster than those on conventional cars, according to Goodyear.

The process of tyre deterioration releases tiny particles of rubber, known as tyre particulate matter, into the atmosphere. These particles, ranging from larger pieces to nanoparticles, can have negative effects on both human health and the environment. The larger pieces may be washed off the road by rain, eventually finding their way into rivers, sewage, and the ocean. The smaller particles, on the other hand, can be inhaled by humans and animals, reaching deep into the lungs and causing respiratory issues.

In addition to the health concerns, tyre particulate matter also contributes to environmental pollution. A report from Imperial College London estimates that tyre wear particles account for six million tonnes of pollution released globally each year. This form of microplastic pollution can have toxic effects on wildlife, with compounds settling on the ground and leaching toxic chemicals into the soil and water.

While electric vehicles offer significant benefits in terms of reducing tailpipe emissions, their increased weight can lead to faster tyre deterioration and the release of harmful chemicals. This highlights the importance of considering both exhaust and non-exhaust emissions when evaluating the environmental impact of vehicles.

Tyre wear emissions from an electric vehicle can be over 400 times higher than exhaust emissions from a petrol car

Electric vehicles (EVs) are often touted as a more sustainable alternative to traditional petrol or diesel cars, and for good reason. By eliminating tailpipe emissions, EVs significantly reduce air pollution, especially in urban areas. However, it's important to consider other sources of pollution, such as tyre wear, to fully understand the environmental impact of EVs.

Tyre wear emissions, or non-exhaust emissions, have come under increasing scrutiny in recent years. While EVs produce zero tailpipe emissions, they may contribute to air pollution through tyre wear, especially if they are heavier than traditional petrol or diesel cars. This is because heavier vehicles tend to wear out their tyres more quickly, and tyre wear generates particulate matter pollution, which can have serious health consequences.

A study by Emissions Analytics, an independent testing company, found that tyre wear emissions can be up to 1,000 times higher than exhaust emissions from a petrol car. This is due to the lack of regulation around tyre wear pollution, while exhaust emissions have been tightly controlled by European emissions standards. The study also noted that budget tyres, underinflated tyres, and rough road surfaces could further increase tyre wear emissions.

Another study, by UK-based Emissions Analytics, tested more than 250 different types of tyres and found that tyre wear emissions were nearly 2,000 times higher than exhaust emissions from modern cars. Specifically, they found that used tyres produce 36 milligrams of particles per kilometre, compared to an average of 0.02 milligrams per kilometre from exhausts. This is particularly concerning given that battery electric vehicles (BEVs) tend to be heavier than conventional cars due to their batteries, which can result in significantly more tyre wear.

While the exact emission rates may vary, it is clear that tyre wear emissions from EVs can be significantly higher than exhaust emissions from petrol cars. This highlights the need for further research and potential regulation to address this issue. Additionally, it underscores the importance of considering the full life cycle of a vehicle, including production, usage, and disposal, when assessing its environmental impact.

To reduce tyre wear emissions, several measures can be implemented. Firstly, fitting high-quality tyres and ensuring proper tyre inflation can help minimise tyre wear. Secondly, reducing vehicle weight can also lower tyre wear, although this may be challenging with BEVs due to their heavy batteries. Finally, tyre manufacturers can develop tyres specifically for EVs that offer greater efficiency, reduced wear, and lower emissions without compromising grip.

Particles from brake wear can enter the bloodstream and cause health issues

Electric vehicles are often touted as a more sustainable alternative to petrol and diesel cars, and for good reason. They improve air quality by eliminating tailpipe emissions of harmful gases like carbon dioxide, nitrogen oxide, and fine particulate matter. However, electric cars are not without their environmental and health impacts, particularly when it comes to brake wear.

Brake pads in all vehicles, including electric cars, are pressed against brake discs when slowing down, emitting fine particulate matter dust in the process. This brake dust can contain a range of hazardous substances, including metals and organic compounds, which can have adverse effects on human health. These nanoparticles are so small that they waste no time in entering the bloodstream, leading to serious health consequences such as inflammation and, in severe cases, even cancer.

While electric vehicles generally produce less brake wear due to regenerative braking, they are often heavier than traditional cars. This additional weight can result in higher wheel torque, leading to increased production of brake wear particles. As a result, pollution from tire and brake wear is expected to become the primary source of vehicle emissions by 2030, surpassing exhaust emissions.

The health risks associated with brake wear particles are significant. Epidemiological studies have shown that exposure to these particles can lead to harmful effects, including inflammation and, in severe cases, cancer. The particles are small enough to penetrate organs through the bloodstream, with potential environmental and health risks.

To address this issue, researchers have proposed several solutions, including the development of high-friction brake pads, onboard particle capture and collection systems, and vehicle control modulation to reduce tire particle emissions. Additionally, the use of brake drums, which are enclosed and prevent the release of particulates into the environment, can also help mitigate the issue.

In conclusion, while electric vehicles offer significant environmental and health benefits, the issue of brake wear particles entering the bloodstream and causing health issues cannot be overlooked. Further research and the implementation of proposed solutions are necessary to fully address this problem.

Power plants used to charge electric vehicles may generate emissions

Electric vehicles (EVs) are often touted as a more sustainable alternative to traditional fuel-powered cars. While they do offer significant environmental benefits, it is important to acknowledge that they are not entirely emission-free, especially when considering the broader context of their energy sources. One aspect that is often overlooked is the role of power plants in charging EVs and the associated emissions they may generate.

Power plants used to charge electric vehicles can indeed generate emissions, and the extent of these emissions depends on the type of energy sources employed for electricity generation. For instance, power plants that rely on coal or natural gas as fuel will emit carbon pollution, whereas renewable energy sources like wind or solar power do not produce such emissions. This variation in electricity generation methods can significantly impact the overall emissions associated with EVs.

The impact of power plants on EV emissions becomes evident when considering the life cycle emissions of these vehicles. Life cycle emissions encompass both fuel-cycle emissions ("well to wheels") and vehicle-cycle emissions (production, use, and end-of-life). While EVs themselves produce zero tailpipe emissions, the process of generating electricity used to charge them can contribute to their overall life cycle emissions. This is particularly relevant in regions that heavily depend on conventional electricity generation methods.

In geographic areas that rely predominantly on low-polluting energy sources, such as renewable options, EVs tend to have a significant life cycle emissions advantage over conventional gasoline or diesel vehicles. On the other hand, in regions where electricity is generated through higher-emission methods, the life cycle emissions benefit of EVs may not be as pronounced. This disparity underscores the importance of considering the broader context of energy generation when assessing the environmental impact of EVs.

It is worth noting that the electricity generation landscape is evolving. Many countries are actively transitioning towards cleaner energy sources, and this will have a positive impact on the emissions associated with EV charging. For example, countries like Norway and Sweden, which have rapidly adopted EVs, primarily generate electricity from clean sources, resulting in minimal emissions from power generation. Additionally, countries like the US have set targets to fully decarbonize their electricity grids by 2035, which will further reduce emissions from power plants used to charge EVs.

In summary, while EVs offer undeniable advantages in terms of local air quality and tailpipe emissions, the broader context of power plant emissions cannot be ignored. The type of energy sources used for electricity generation plays a crucial role in determining the overall emissions associated with charging EVs. As countries work towards decarbonizing their electricity grids, the environmental benefits of EVs are expected to become even more pronounced, contributing to improved air quality and public health.

The production of electric car batteries requires the extraction of materials, which creates a carbon footprint

Electric cars are often touted as a more sustainable alternative to traditional combustion engines. While it is true that electric vehicles do not emit exhaust gases, the production of their batteries requires the extraction of materials, which creates a carbon footprint.

The manufacturing process for electric car batteries is more material-intensive than that of traditional combustion engines. Lithium-ion batteries, in particular, require a significant amount of energy to extract and process lithium from hard rock mines or underground brine reservoirs. This process often relies on fossil fuels, which emit carbon dioxide (CO2) and other greenhouse gases. Additionally, mining the raw materials for these batteries, such as lithium, cobalt, and nickel, is labour-intensive and requires large amounts of water, often sourced from areas where water is scarce.

The environmental impact of battery production is further exacerbated by the toxic fumes and waste released during the mining process. For example, in 2016, protesters in Tagong, Tibet, brought attention to the unethical practices of a local lithium mine, which was polluting the local ecosystem through toxic chemical leaks. Similar concerns have been raised about the production of lithium in China's Yichun city, where an investigation revealed the presence of toxic pollutants in the main source of residential water.

The carbon footprint of battery production is not limited to the mining and extraction process. The manufacturing process itself adds to the eco-footprint of these batteries. To synthesize the materials needed for production, heat between 800 to 1,000 degrees Celsius is required, which can only be cost-effectively achieved by burning fossil fuels, further contributing to CO2 emissions. The specific environmental impact of battery manufacturing varies depending on the materials used, their source, and the energy sources employed. For instance, in China, where most lithium-ion batteries are produced, coal is the primary energy source, resulting in higher greenhouse gas emissions.

While electric car batteries contribute to carbon emissions, it is important to consider the broader context of their lifecycle and compare them to the emissions associated with traditional combustion engines. Studies have shown that electric vehicles typically have significantly lower lifecycle carbon emissions than their gasoline-powered counterparts. This difference is expected to increase as the electricity grid continues to decarbonize and incorporate more renewable energy sources.

Frequently asked questions