Biological control is the use of an organism to reduce the population density of another organism, and can be used to manage animals, weeds, and diseases. It is a key component of integrated pest management, which aims to reduce reliance on chemical control methods such as pesticides. By exploiting natural control mechanisms, biological control can suppress pest species populations over long periods without eradicating them. This approach has been successfully applied in agriculture, forestry, and greenhouse horticulture to manage pests, with a highly favourable cost-benefit ratio compared to chemical control methods. As such, biological control offers an effective means of reducing environmental pollution by minimising the use of pesticides and their associated negative impacts.
Characteristics | Values |
---|---|
Definition | The use of an organism to reduce the population density of another organism |
Purpose | To reduce the population density of animals, weeds and diseases |
Benefits | More cost-effective than pesticides; natural enemies are more cost-effective than pesticides; reduces environmental costs (health problems and environmental damage) |
Reduces financial costs (waste management and cleanup) | |
No adverse effects on the activity or function of predators or parasitoids used in biological control | |
Can be a key component of a 'systems approach' to integrated pest management | |
Can be used to counteract insecticide-resistant pests | |
Can minimize the usage of pesticides | |
Can increase biodiversity | |
Drawbacks | Can be slow to suppress pest populations |
Development costs can be high | |
May require repeated releases or additional methods to achieve an adequate level of control |
What You'll Learn
Using biological control to reduce the need for chemical pesticides
Biological control is a method of pest management that can be used as an alternative to chemical pesticides. It involves the use of an organism to reduce the population density of another organism, such as the use of predatory insects and mites, insects that parasitize other insects (known as parasitoids), or microbial agents such as bacteria, viruses and fungi. This approach has been successfully applied against a range of pests in agriculture, forestry and greenhouse horticulture.
One example of biological control is the use of ladybirds to control the citrus pest *Icerya purchasi* in Mediterranean Europe. The ladybird, *Rodolia cardinalis*, was imported from the country of origin of the pest and successfully reduced its population within two years. This is an example of classical biological control, where a natural enemy species is collected from the region of origin of the pest and introduced into the new environment.
Another example is the use of parasitoids, such as in the control of whiteflies, leafminers, thrips, aphids and mites in greenhouses. This is an example of seasonal inoculative control, where natural enemies are mass-reared in the laboratory and periodically released into short-term crops.
Biological control has several advantages over chemical pesticides. It is more cost-effective, with lower development costs and higher returns in the long term. It is also more environmentally friendly, as it does not harm non-target species or cause environmental pollution. Additionally, resistance is unlikely to develop against natural enemies, making it a more sustainable solution.
However, one limitation of biological control is that it may take longer to suppress pest populations compared to chemical pesticides. There may also be challenges in mass-producing and distributing natural enemies, as well as in establishing them in new environments.
Overall, biological control offers a promising approach to reduce the need for chemical pesticides and can contribute to sustainable agriculture and increased biodiversity.
Reducing Air Pollution: Strategies for Cleaner City Air
You may want to see also
The cost-effectiveness of biological control
Biological control is a highly cost-effective method of pest control. The cost-benefit ratio for classical biological control is highly favourable (1:250) and for augmentative control is similar to that of insecticides (1:2–1:5), with much lower development costs.
The cost of a classical biological control project may be calculated by summing the cost of the baseline research, foreign exploration, shipping, quarantine processing, mass rearing, field releases and post-release evaluation. The last cost must be evaluated carefully, as pursuing academic interests may push these costs beyond those required by the practical problem at hand.
The cost of augmentative biological control is similar to that of insecticides, but with much lower development costs. The development costs of biological control are sometimes described as 'high', but these costs are much lower than the equivalent synthesis, toxicological evaluation and marketing of a new pesticide. Substantial profits can be achieved with long-term, effective natural enemies.
Biological control is a key component of a 'systems approach' to integrated pest management, to counteract insecticide-resistant pests, the withdrawal of chemicals, and to minimize the usage of pesticides.
Air Pollution: A Declining Global Threat?
You may want to see also
The role of biological control in sustainable agriculture
Biological control is a critical component of sustainable agriculture, offering an environmentally friendly and cost-effective alternative to chemical pesticides. By utilising natural predators, parasites and pathogens, biological control helps manage pest populations while minimising harm to the environment. This approach has been successfully employed for centuries, predating the modern era of synthetic pesticides.
Benefits of Biological Control
Biological control offers several advantages over chemical pesticides. Firstly, it is a natural process where certain organisms consume or reduce the population of others, leading to a drastic decrease in the number of pests. This method does not aim to eradicate pests entirely but maintains their population at low levels. Secondly, biological control is highly specific, targeting only the intended pests without affecting non-target species, thus preserving biodiversity. Additionally, biological control agents actively seek out their prey and can adapt to changing conditions over time, making them more effective and resilient.
Furthermore, biological control is often more cost-effective than chemical pesticides. While the development costs for biological control agents may be high, the long-term benefits outweigh the initial investment. The cost-benefit ratio for classical biological control is highly favourable, and the use of these agents can lead to substantial profits for farmers.
Types of Biological Control
There are three main techniques of biological control: classical, augmentative, and conservation control. Classical biological control involves the introduction of natural enemies, usually in small numbers, from the pest's original region to a new environment where the pest has become established. This method is particularly effective for perennial crops, as it allows the natural enemy-pest relationship to fully develop over time.
Augmentative biological control, on the other hand, involves the periodic introduction of natural enemies and often requires commercial production of the agents. This approach aims to create a significant imbalance in favour of the natural enemy by releasing large numbers of them. However, this type of control is usually transient and requires repeated releases.
Conservation biological control focuses on enhancing the abundance or activity of indigenous predators and parasitoids. This can be achieved through various measures such as manipulating the crop microclimate, creating overwintering refuges, and providing alternative food sources for the natural enemies.
Challenges and Future Directions
While biological control has numerous benefits, there are also some challenges and limitations. One of the main challenges is the slower speed of pest suppression compared to chemical pesticides. Additionally, establishing effective biological control requires extensive research and understanding of the pest-natural enemy complex and their respective ecologies.
The future of sustainable agriculture relies on a combination of biological control methods and other sustainable practices. This includes integrated pest management (IPM), cultural control, host-plant resistance, and the manipulation of the agricultural landscape to promote natural pest control.
In conclusion, biological control plays a crucial role in sustainable agriculture by providing an effective, environmentally friendly, and cost-efficient means of managing pest populations. With the growing awareness of the negative impacts of chemical pesticides, biological control offers a promising alternative that contributes to the long-term sustainability and biodiversity of agricultural ecosystems.
Reducing Coal Pollution: Strategies for a Cleaner Future
You may want to see also
The environmental impact of biological control
Biological control is a method of pest management that has been used for over 100 years, predating the modern pesticide era. It involves the use of an organism to reduce the population density of another organism, including the control of animals, weeds, and diseases. This method exploits the natural tendency of most organisms to be consumed by other organisms, which often leads to drastic reductions in the population of the prey species.
- Reduced Environmental Pollution: Biological control can help minimize the usage of chemical pesticides, which have been associated with environmental pollution, bioaccumulation through food chains, and risks to human health.
- Conservation of Natural Predators: Biological control schemes often utilize natural predators, parasitoids, and pathogens to target pest species. This approach helps maintain ecological balance and can increase biodiversity.
- Long-Term Pest Suppression: Unlike chemical pesticides, biological control aims to suppress pest populations over the long term rather than eradicating them. This means that pest species are kept at low densities, reducing the need for frequent applications.
- Cost-Effectiveness: Biological control is often more cost-effective than chemical pesticides, with lower development costs and greater long-term profitability. This makes it a more sustainable and economically viable option.
- Target Specificity: Biological control agents are typically highly specific, targeting only one or a few related species of prey. This reduces the risk of harmful side effects on non-target species, which is a common issue with chemical pesticides.
- Reduced Resistance: Biological control agents are less likely to face resistance issues compared to chemical pesticides. Pests are unlikely to develop resistance to natural enemies, ensuring the continued effectiveness of this method.
- Environmental Safety: Biological control agents do not pollute water, soil, or air. They are safer for the environment and do not pose the same risks as chemical pesticides, which can contaminate these natural resources.
Overall, the environmental impact of biological control is largely positive, offering a more sustainable, cost-effective, and environmentally friendly approach to pest management. By utilizing natural predators and parasites, this method helps reduce pollution, conserve natural resources, and protect human health.
Autonomous Cars: Cleaner Air, Greener Future
You may want to see also
The history of biological control
- Ancient Times: Even in ancient times, humans recognised the importance of controlling pests to protect their crops. As early as 300 AD, predatory ants were used to control pests in citrus orchards.
- 19th Century: During the 19th century, the first major successes in biological control were achieved through the use of natural enemy species collected from the country or region of origin of the pest, known as "classical control". This approach was particularly effective against exotic pests.
- 20th Century: In the 20th century, the intensification of agriculture and increased international trade led to the spread of pest species globally. The first biological control programmes pre-date the modern pesticide era, but the widespread use of pesticides in the mid-20th century led to a decline in biological control methods. However, the emergence of pest resistance to insecticides and the negative environmental impacts of chemical control prompted a revival of interest in biological control.
- Late 20th Century: In the late 20th century, there was a growing awareness of the environmental and health impacts of chemical pesticides. This led to the development of integrated pest management (IPM) approaches, which combine biological control with other methods such as resistant plants, cultural techniques, and physical barriers.
- 21st Century: In the 21st century, biological control continues to play a crucial role in sustainable agriculture. It is seen as a key component of IPM strategies and is increasingly recognised for its potential to reduce pesticide use and minimise environmental pollution. However, there are still challenges and limitations to the widespread adoption of biological control, including economic and regulatory hurdles.
Tesla's Impact: Reducing Air Pollution, Improving Our Future
You may want to see also
Frequently asked questions
Biological control is the use of an organism to reduce the population density of another organism, and includes the control of animals, weeds, and diseases.
Biological control reduces environmental pollution by decreasing the need for chemical pesticides, which can have harmful effects on the environment and human health. It also helps to restore the ecosystem function of pest management, reducing the impact of pests on crops and the environment.
One example is the control of the cottony-cushion scale insect on citrus crops in California in the 1880s. The insect was controlled by importing a ladybird, the vedalia beetle, and a dipteran parasitoid from Australia, the insect's country of origin. Another example is the control of the cassava mealy bug in Africa by introducing a parasitoid, Epidinocarsis lopezi, which was also found in the pest's country of origin, South America.