Public Transport: Reducing Pollution, Improving Lives

Public transport is one of the most effective ways to reduce pollution and conserve energy. Transportation is the biggest contributor to greenhouse gas emissions, with over 90% of the fuel used for transportation being petroleum-based. Public transport can reduce CO2 emissions by 45% compared to driving alone, and a single person switching from a 20-mile commute by car to public transportation can reduce their annual CO2 emissions by more than 48,000 pounds. Public transport also reduces congestion, with research showing that in 2011, public transportation in the US saved 865 million hours in travel time. Additionally, public transport is more cost-effective and safer than private cars, and riders can work or relax while travelling.

Reduced CO2 emissions

The transportation sector is a major contributor to greenhouse gas emissions, with surface transportation being responsible for approximately 85% of these emissions. As such, improving public transport facilities can play a significant role in reducing CO2 emissions.

Public transportation is a highly effective way to reduce carbon emissions, as it takes multiple cars off the road and replaces them with a single mode of transport that can carry far more people. This simple switch from driving alone to taking public transportation can reduce CO2 emissions by 45%, which is a significant decrease in pollutants in the atmosphere and has a direct positive impact on air quality.

A single person switching from a 20-mile commute by car to public transportation can reduce their annual CO2 emissions by more than 48,000 pounds. This is equivalent to a 10% reduction in greenhouse gases produced by a typical two-adult, two-car household. If a person's daily commute is an 18-mile round trip, switching from a car to public transport can reduce their carbon footprint by two tonnes per year. This is a substantial change, as the average person has a four-tonne carbon footprint.

Public transport is especially effective at reducing emissions in high-density urban areas, where a large number of people can be moved by a single bus or train. In these areas, public transport is often the most convenient option for getting around, and so cities should encourage "transit-oriented development", allowing and encouraging abundant housing and businesses near train and bus stops. This creates a "virtuous feedback loop", where well-used stations bring in more riders, more businesses, and higher property values, leading to more tax revenues that can be used to improve public transport services.

Public transport is also a more cost-effective alternative in cities, where parking is often scarce and expensive, and in low-density areas where the cost of commuting across large travel zones and maintaining multiple vehicles is high.

Less air pollution

Public transport is one of the best solutions to address air pollution and climate change. Firstly, it reduces the number of private cars on the road, which are a major source of greenhouse gas emissions. Cars emit an average of one pound of CO2 per mile driven, and transportation accounts for over 90% of fuel usage, with the majority still being petroleum-based. By choosing public transport, individuals can reduce their carbon footprint and decrease pollutants in the atmosphere, leading to better air quality.

Public transportation use is a highly effective way for individuals to conserve energy and reduce their carbon emissions. Taking public transport instead of driving alone can lower CO2 emissions by 45%, and even a moderate increase in bicycle use can save millions of tons of carbon emissions annually. A single person switching from a 20-mile daily car commute to public transportation can reduce their annual CO2 emissions by more than 48,000 pounds. This is equivalent to a 10% reduction in greenhouse gases for a typical two-adult, two-car household.

On a larger scale, public transportation in the United States saves 37 million metric tons of carbon dioxide each year, which is comparable to the emissions from electricity generation for nearly five million households. Additionally, public transportation has a proven record of reducing congestion, saving 865 million hours in travel time in 2011 and preventing congestion costs from rising by $21 billion in 498 urban areas.

Buses and trains are far more efficient than private vehicles in terms of greenhouse gas emissions per passenger. They can reduce emissions by up to two-thirds per passenger per kilometer compared to cars. For example, a fully occupied bus emits only 160 grams of CO2 per passenger per mile, whereas a single-occupancy vehicle emits 350 grams of CO2 per mile. Therefore, shifting more trips to public transit is essential to curbing climate change and improving air quality.

Less congestion

Public transport has a proven record of reducing congestion on roads. In 2011, US public transportation use saved 865 million hours in travel time. Without public transportation, congestion costs in 2011 would have risen by nearly $21 billion from $121 billion to $142 billion in 498 urban areas.

A real-life example of this took place in Los Angeles in 2003, when the region's transit system was shut down due to a strike. Researchers found that traffic delay increased by 47% during the strike. For freeways that ran parallel to transit lines, the average delay increased to between 53% and 90%. This demonstrates that the availability of public transport options significantly reduces traffic congestion, increasing regional productivity and economic output.

The Texas Transportation Institute's 2010 Urban Mobility Report also highlights the importance of public transportation in reducing congestion. The report found that without public transportation services, travelers would have experienced an additional 785 million hours of delay and consumed 640 million more gallons of fuel. This would have resulted in a $19 billion increase in congestion costs for the 439 urban areas studied.

While it is true that new drivers may fill the space on roads that are freed up by people switching to public transit, high-quality transit that directly parallels a severely congested road can provide a viable alternative to driving and put a ceiling on how bad congestion can get. Ultimately, public transportation can help reduce congestion, even if it doesn't completely eliminate it.

Less fuel dependency

Public transportation use saves the US the equivalent of 4.2 billion gallons of gasoline annually and more than 11 million gallons of gasoline per day. This is because public transport is more efficient than private transport. While cars usually carry just one or two people at a time, a bus can carry 50 or more, and a train in a large city may carry thousands. This means that public transport is one of the most effective actions individuals can take to conserve energy.

According to the International Energy Agency, cars emit between 57 and 322 gCO2-eq/pkm, compared to buses at just 22-92 gCO2-eq/pkm, and trains at 6-118 gCO2-eq/pkm.

A single person who switches from a 20-mile commute alone by car to existing public transportation can reduce their annual CO2 emissions by 20 pounds per day, or more than 48,000 pounds in a year. That is equal to a 10% reduction in all greenhouse gases produced by a typical two-adult, two-car household. By eliminating one car and taking public transportation instead of driving, a saving of 30% of carbon dioxide emissions can be achieved.

Public transport also has a proven record of reducing congestion. In 2011, US public transportation use saved 865 million hours in travel time. Without public transportation, congestion costs in 2011 would have risen by nearly $21 billion from $121 billion to $142 billion in 498 urban areas.

More efficient use of space

The shift from private vehicles to public transport can lead to a more efficient use of space in several ways. Firstly, public transportation systems such as buses and trains can carry a larger number of passengers compared to private cars, which typically carry only one or two people. This reduces the number of vehicles on the road, decreasing congestion and the need for more roads to be built. This is especially beneficial in urban areas where space is limited.

For example, a bus with a capacity of 50 passengers can replace 25 private cars, assuming an average car occupancy of two people. This not only reduces the number of vehicles on the road but also frees up space that would have been occupied by parked cars. According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, vehicles emit an average of 350 grams of CO2 per mile driven, while a fully occupied bus emits only 160 grams per passenger per mile.

In addition to reducing congestion, efficient use of space through public transportation can also lead to the development of transit-oriented communities. This means that residential and commercial areas are located close to public transportation hubs, such as train stations and bus stops. This encourages people to live and work in areas served by public transportation, reducing the need for long commutes and further contributing to a more efficient use of space.

The implementation of bus-only lanes is another way to improve the efficiency of space. While these lanes may slow down other traffic, they allow buses to make faster and more frequent trips, improving the overall flow of traffic. Additionally, policies such as congestion pricing, where cars are charged a fee to enter high-traffic areas, can discourage car use and further reduce congestion.

Furthermore, public transportation systems can be integrated with active transportation options such as bicycles. This creates a synergy between different modes of transportation, providing commuters with a range of options to choose from. For example, individuals can choose to cycle to a train station and then take the train for the longer part of their commute, reducing the need for car usage.

By encouraging the use of public transportation and active transportation, cities can reduce the number of cars on the road and create more space for other purposes, such as parks, pedestrian pathways, and community spaces. This not only improves the efficiency of space but also contributes to a healthier and more sustainable urban environment.

Frequently asked questions