Air Pollution's Impact On Flights: A Hazardous Mix

Air pollution is a pressing issue that affects both human health and the planet. It refers to the release of pollutants into the air, which are detrimental to human health and the environment. Aircraft engines produce gases, noise, and particulates from fossil fuel combustion, which contribute to air pollution and have negative effects on the environment and human health.

The impact of air pollution on flight operations is a growing concern, as emissions from aviation are increasing faster than any other mode of transport. The release of pollutants from aircraft engines, including carbon dioxide, nitrogen oxides, water vapour, and particulate matter, can have a significant impact on flight operations and the aviation industry.

The effects of air pollution on flight operations include the potential for reduced visibility, disruption to aircraft systems, and increased maintenance requirements. Additionally, air pollution can impact the efficiency of aircraft engines, leading to higher fuel consumption and increased operating costs. In extreme cases, air pollution may even result in flight diversions or cancellations due to unsafe conditions.

Furthermore, air pollution can also have indirect effects on flight operations by impacting the health and performance of aircrew and ground personnel. This can lead to increased sick leave and reduced productivity, affecting the overall efficiency of flight operations.

Addressing the impact of air pollution on flight operations is crucial to ensure the safety and efficiency of air travel, as well as to mitigate the environmental and health consequences associated with aviation emissions.

Air pollution from aviation affects human health

Aviation air pollution has a significant impact on human health. Aircraft engines produce gases, noise, and particulates from fossil fuel combustion, which can have detrimental effects on both local air quality and the environment.

Ultrafine particles (UFPs) and particulate matter under 2.5 microns in diameter (PM2.5) are elevated in and around airports, with levels of PM2.5 particularly high within 20 kilometres of an airport. These particles can infiltrate indoor spaces and have been linked to a range of adverse health effects, including increased rates of premature death, pre-term births, decreased lung function, oxidative DNA damage, and childhood leukaemia. Exposure to UFPs and PM2.5 has also been associated with lung inflammation in individuals with asthma.

In addition to UFPs and PM2.5, aviation activities emit other pollutants such as nitrogen oxides (NOx), carbon monoxide (CO), sulfur dioxide (SO2), and black carbon. These pollutants can have both short-term and long-term impacts on human health. Short-term exposure to high levels of these pollutants can cause eye and respiratory tract irritation, reduced lung function, exacerbation of asthma, and heart failure. Long-term exposure has been linked to an increased risk of heart and lung disease, stroke, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, trachea, bronchus and lung cancers, aggravated asthma, and lower respiratory infections.

Certain groups of people are more vulnerable to the health impacts of aviation air pollution. These include children, pregnant women, the elderly, and individuals with pre-existing heart and lung disease. Additionally, people living in low socioeconomic neighbourhoods and communities near airports may be more vulnerable due to factors such as proximity to industrial sources of air pollution and underlying health problems.

To mitigate the health impacts of aviation air pollution, it is crucial to reduce air travel, optimise flight routes, cap emissions, restrict short-distance flights, and increase taxation on the aviation industry.

Air pollution from aviation contributes to climate change

Air pollution from aviation contributes significantly to climate change. Aircraft engines produce gases, noise, and particulates from fossil fuel combustion, which has both local and global environmental implications. Jet airliners, in particular, emit carbon dioxide (CO2), the most well-understood greenhouse gas, as well as nitrogen oxides, contrails, and particulates. The radiative forcing of these emissions is estimated to be 1.3-1.4 times that of CO2 alone, and aviation activities are responsible for 2.4% of all CO2 emissions globally.

The impact of aviation on climate change extends beyond CO2 emissions. Aircraft engines also release nitrogen oxides (NOx), which contribute to the formation of ozone (O3) in the upper troposphere, resulting in a greater global warming effect. Additionally, water vapor released during fuel burning can lead to the formation of contrails and cirrus clouds, which have a warming effect on the Earth's atmosphere.

The consequences of these non-CO2 emissions are significant. In 2018, non-CO2 effects from aviation contributed twice as much to global warming as CO2 emissions and were responsible for two-thirds of the sector's overall climate impact. Furthermore, aviation emissions are growing faster than any other mode of transport. Between 1990 and 2019, they more than doubled, and by 2050, they could double again compared to 2019 levels.

To address the climate impact of aviation, several strategies can be employed:

• Improving fuel economy in aircraft and optimizing air traffic control and flight routes to reduce non-CO2 effects.
• Using aviation biofuel, emissions trading, and carbon offsetting programs to lower CO2 emissions.
• Encouraging the use of hybrid electric, electric, or hydrogen-powered aircraft to replace fuel-powered planes.
• Reducing air travel and promoting alternative modes of transportation, such as high-speed rail.
• Implementing short-haul flight bans and restricting short-distance flights.
• Increasing taxation and decreasing subsidies for the aviation industry.

Air pollution from aviation disproportionately impacts marginalised communities

Air pollution from aviation activities disproportionately affects marginalised communities, who are often exposed to higher levels of dangerous air pollutants. These communities are often located near airports, subjecting them to harmful ultrafine particulate matter (UFP) and particulate matter under 2.5 microns in diameter (PM2.5).

Research has shown that racial and ethnic minorities, such as Blacks, Asians, Hispanics, and Latinos, as well as low-income populations, experience higher levels of air pollution than other groups. This disparity is evident in the United States, where certain racial and ethnic groups are more likely to live near major sources of pollution, including airports. For example, a study of several California airports found that over 65,000 students spent a significant portion of their day exposed to airport pollution, with a higher percentage of economically disadvantaged students impacted.

Additionally, people of colour and low-income individuals are more likely to reside in areas with higher exposures to particle pollution. This is due to various factors, including racism, class bias, housing market dynamics, and the location of pollution sources near disadvantaged communities. As a result, marginalised communities face greater health risks, such as increased rates of premature death, pre-term births, decreased lung function, and respiratory issues like asthma.

Furthermore, socioeconomic inequalities play a significant role in the disproportionate impact of aviation air pollution on marginalised communities. These communities often have limited access to healthcare, poorer job opportunities, and higher traffic exposure, exacerbating the health risks associated with air pollution.

Addressing these disparities requires strong and targeted air pollution reduction strategies that aim to reduce overall pollution levels and ensure equal protection for all communities, regardless of race or income.

Aviation is one of the fastest-growing sources of greenhouse gas emissions

Aviation is a highly energy-intensive sector. For example, a return flight from Lisbon to New York produces roughly the same level of emissions as an average EU citizen does by heating their home for a whole year. In 2022, aviation contributed 2% of global carbon dioxide emissions, experiencing faster growth in recent decades compared to rail, road, or shipping. According to the International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO), by 2050, international aviation emissions could triple compared to 2015.

The growth in aviation emissions is due to the hypermobility of air travel becoming available to a greater number of people worldwide, with rapid growth in aviation projected for developing nations and sustained growth in the large established aviation markets of developed countries. In 1960, 100 million passengers travelled by air, whereas, by 2019, the total annual worldwide passenger count was 4.56 billion.

Although aviation produced only 2.4% of total CO2 emissions in 2018, if global commercial aviation had been a country, it would have ranked sixth in the world for emissions, between Japan and Germany. Non-CO2 effects, such as warming induced by aircraft contrails, also add to aviation's total climate influence. Updated analysis in the journal Atmospheric Environment in January 2021 concluded that aviation's climate impact accounted for 3.5% of total anthropogenic warming in 2011 and was likely the same percentage in 2018.

To address this trend, various technical and operational measures are essential to mitigate the growth of emissions, reduce them in the coming decade, and contribute to the EU's overall climate neutrality target. These measures include the use of sustainable aviation fuels, improvements in airframes and engines, operational optimisations, and reducing the need for transport (e.g. through videoconferencing).

Aviation is the most carbon-intensive activity an individual can do

Aviation accounts for 2.5% of global CO2 emissions, but its contribution to global warming is higher at around 4%. This is because, in addition to CO2, aircraft engines emit other gases and pollutants, including nitrogen oxides (NOx), vapour trails, soot, sulfur dioxide (SO2), and water (H2O). These emissions affect atmospheric physical and chemical properties, resulting in an increase in greenhouse gases and the potential formation of persistent contrail cirrus clouds. The warming effect of these non-CO2 emissions may be up to three times worse than the warming caused by aviation's CO2 emissions.

The impact of aviation on global warming is significant, and it is essential to address this issue to mitigate climate change effectively. While improvements in fuel efficiency and aircraft technology have been made, the growth in demand for air travel has outpaced these advancements. As a result, global CO2 emissions from aviation have quadrupled since the 1960s, and emissions are projected to continue rising.

To reduce the carbon intensity of aviation, a combination of approaches is necessary. These include improving fuel efficiency, transitioning to low-carbon or zero-emission fuels, optimising flight routes, and demand management. Additionally, individuals can play a role by reducing air travel, choosing alternative modes of transportation, and supporting policies and initiatives that promote sustainable aviation.

Frequently asked questions