The Midwest Pollution Crisis: How Bad Is It?

The Midwest has a highly energy-intensive economy, with per capita emissions of greenhouse gases more than 20% higher than the national average. The region's air quality is affected by pollutants from coal-fired power plants and other industrial sources, which can be trapped by temperature inversions and wind patterns, impacting both nearby states and those hundreds of miles away. Climate change is also intensifying the challenges faced by the Midwest, with increases in heavy downpours contributing to the discharge of untreated sewage and putting further pressure on ecosystems and water quality. The health impacts of these pollutants include asthma, respiratory and cardiovascular illness, and premature death. Additionally, diesel exhaust contains toxic pollutants that can cause cancer, reproductive problems, and birth defects. While the Clean Air Act has driven pollution reduction for over 50 years, climate change is making it harder to maintain air quality improvements, with ozone pollution affecting the health of millions of Americans.

Midwest states criticised for constructing 500-foot smokestacks

The American Lung Association's "State of the Air" 2025 report reveals that 46% of Americans (approximately 156.1 million people) live in areas with poor air quality, a significant increase from the previous year's report. This is despite the Clean Air Act, which has driven pollution reduction for over 50 years. Climate change is exacerbating the problem, making it more challenging to maintain air quality and protect human health.

Midwestern states have been criticized for constructing 500-foot smokestacks that emit pollutants, impacting downwind states on the East Coast. Sen. Tom Carper (D-Del.) called on the Midwest to be better neighbors, as the pollution makes it harder for downwind states to meet standards for ground-level ozone and other pollutants. This criticism highlights the regional disparity in ozone levels, with wind patterns playing a role in the Midwest's pollution impact on eastern states.

The EPA's data shows that the Midwest had lower ozone levels than the Southwest in 2013 and 2014, with an average of 65 parts per billion. However, the tougher standard of 69 parts per billion proposed in 2014 has been challenging for many states, including those in the Southwest and Midwest, to meet. The debate over federal pollution standards has largely followed party lines, with some East Coast Democrats focusing on the impact of Midwest pollution on their states.

The construction of tall smokestacks, or dispersion techniques, is an older method for reducing the emission of sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides. While these smokestacks protect local air quality by releasing pollutants high into the atmosphere, they also increase the distance pollutants can travel, impacting areas far downwind. This has led to criticism of Midwest states, as their smokestacks impact the air quality of other states, making pollution regulation a federal issue.

Wind patterns send pollutants east

Wind patterns play a crucial role in the distribution and concentration of air pollution, and this is no different in the case of the Midwestern United States. According to the EPA, while the lower Midwestern states do not experience a significant downwind link to other states, they are responsible for sending pollutants eastward. This phenomenon is largely due to the wind pattern known as the westerlies, which blow air from the middle latitudes of the Earth, where most major cities are located, eastward, resulting in higher air pollution levels in the eastern sections of cities.

The impact of wind on pollution levels is evident in various regions, including the Midwestern United States. The wind carries pollutants emitted from sources such as the 500-foot smokestacks constructed in Midwestern states, transporting them hundreds of miles to downwind states on the East Coast. This long-range transport of pollution makes it challenging for downwind states to comply with standards for ground-level ozone and other pollutants, highlighting the interstate nature of air quality management.

The direction and speed of the wind are critical factors in understanding the dynamics of air pollution. By studying wind patterns, scientists can identify the sources of pollution and predict its dispersion. This knowledge is vital for making informed decisions to protect human health and the environment. For example, in the case of the Midwestern pollution debate, recognizing the impact of wind patterns could lead to collaborative efforts between Midwestern and Eastern states to address the issue effectively.

While wind can disperse pollution, certain atmospheric conditions can also trap pollutants near the ground, creating smog. This phenomenon, known as "winter inversion," occurs when cooler earth surfaces during winter prevent warm air from rising, leading to the accumulation of pollutants. The complex interplay of wind patterns, temperature, and air pressure influences the concentration and dispersion of pollution across regions.

The impact of wind on pollution is not limited to local or regional scales but also occurs on a global level. For instance, prevailing westerlies have contributed to the increase in ozone levels in the Western United States, with air pollution carried across the Pacific Ocean from Asia. As such, understanding wind patterns and their influence on pollution is essential for effective pollution control and the preservation of air quality on a global scale.

Midwest states have high per capita emissions of greenhouse gases

The Midwest states have been criticized for their contribution to air pollution, with their high per capita emissions of greenhouse gases. The region's energy-intensive economy has led to per capita emissions of greenhouse gases that are more than 20% higher than the national average. This has sparked concerns among East Coast Democrats, who have called on Midwestern states to address their impact on downwind states.

The issue is partly attributed to wind patterns, as the lower Midwestern states have no significant downwind connections to other states, allowing pollutants to travel east. Additionally, the construction of 500-foot smokestacks in the Midwest has been criticized for emitting pollutants that spread across state lines, hindering downwind states' compliance with ground-level ozone standards.

The Midwest Clean Diesel Initiative by the US EPA identifies hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) from mobile sources, such as diesel exhaust, which contains known carcinogens like benzene and formaldehyde. These air toxic pollutants have severe health implications, including respiratory and cardiovascular illnesses and increased risks of cancer, reproductive problems, and birth defects.

Climate change further exacerbates the pollution challenges in the Midwest. Changes in precipitation patterns, such as increased heavy downpours, contribute to the discharge of untreated sewage and nutrient pollution. The region's forests, which play a crucial role in absorbing carbon, are also at risk due to disruptions in forest ecosystems caused by climate change. The urban-centric population of the Midwest also faces intensified atmospheric pollution, heat island effects, and water cycle variability due to climate change.

Urban dwellers at risk from climate change

Urban areas are major contributors to climate change, accounting for 71-76% of CO2 emissions from global final energy use. The effects of climate change are expected to have disastrous impacts on cities, with hundreds of millions of urban dwellers at risk. Rising sea levels, increased precipitation, inland floods, stronger cyclones, and more frequent and intense heatwaves are among the challenges that urban areas will face in the coming decades.

In the United States, the "State of the Air" 2025 report revealed that 46% of Americans (approximately 156.1 million people) live in places with unhealthy levels of ozone or particle pollution. This issue is particularly acute in the Midwest, where states like West Virginia, Ohio, Kentucky, Tennessee, Indiana, Illinois, and Missouri have struggled with ozone levels. The American Lung Association's report also highlights that more than 42 million people reside in counties that received an F for all three air pollution measures.

Ozone pollution irritates the lungs, causing inflammation similar to a bad sunburn. Climate change exacerbates the conditions for ozone formation and complicates cleanup efforts in communities with high ozone levels. Urban areas in the Southeast, such as New Orleans, Raleigh, and Birmingham, are experiencing a greater increase in the timing, frequency, intensity, and duration of heatwaves than the national average. Warmer nights can impair people's ability to recover from high daytime temperatures, increasing the risk of heat-related illnesses and deaths, especially among vulnerable groups such as the elderly and those with chronic conditions.

Additionally, climate change may negatively impact urban infrastructure and access to basic services, disproportionately affecting the urban poor, such as slum dwellers in developing countries. These individuals often live in areas prone to natural disasters like landslides, earthquakes, and floods, and they may lack the resources to adapt to changing conditions. Urban planning and policies must address these socioeconomic inequalities to ensure that all residents can protect themselves from the health risks associated with climate change.

To build resilience, cities can implement urban designs that facilitate air movement and adopt higher standards for insulation to keep buildings cooler. Renewable energy sources, cleaner production techniques, and regulations limiting industrial emissions can also help reduce local pollution and improve air quality for urban dwellers. By addressing these challenges and implementing coordinated solutions, cities can play a crucial role in mitigating the impacts of climate change and protecting the health and well-being of their residents.

Midwest states face pressure from invasive species

The Midwest region of the United States is facing significant pressure from invasive species, which are causing ecological disruption and contributing to pollution issues. With over 450 plant species considered invasive in the region, the impact on native ecosystems and natural resources is profound.

The Great Lakes Region, spanning four states and encompassing diverse aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems, is particularly vulnerable. The introduction of invasive species through human activity and maintenance has threatened rare and globally significant ecosystems. To address this, the Great Lakes IPMT provides support to 12 national parks, balancing long-term control and restoration efforts with early detection and eradication of nascent invasive populations.

In Missouri, the Heartland Network IPMT manages invasive plant projects across 15 parks, focusing on protecting high-quality park resources. Similarly, the Northern Great Plains IPMT works with 14 partner parks in four states to manage the spread of invasive plants and restore native plant communities. This includes the use of prescribed fire as a restoration tool.

The Midwest Invasive Species Information Network (MISIN) is a crucial initiative led by Michigan State University in collaboration with partners. It provides early detection and response resources, aiding experts and citizen scientists in identifying and managing invasive species. The MISIN smartphone app enables the capture of invasive species field observation data, empowering citizens to contribute to conservation efforts.

The impact of invasive species in the Midwest extends beyond ecological disruption. The introduction of non-native species can hinder native plant growth, alter vegetation composition, and impact the region's natural beauty and recreational value. Additionally, the management of invasive species is challenging, often requiring repeated and strategic interventions to ensure long-term success. Midwest states are facing pressure to address these issues and protect their natural heritage, while also navigating the complex dynamics of federal pollution standards and interstate relations.

Frequently asked questions