Vehicles' Impact: Water Pollution And The Automotive Industry

Vehicles are a major contributor to water pollution, both directly and indirectly. The construction of roads, parking lots, and driveways has led to the loss of natural habitats and reduced filtration systems for water-bound pollution. Vehicle emissions, including carbon monoxide, nitrous oxides, and polyaromatic hydrocarbons, contribute to air pollution, which eventually finds its way into water sources through rainfall and runoff. Additionally, vehicles leak various fluids such as oil, gas, and brake fluid, which can contaminate groundwater. Furthermore, the vast amount of gasoline consumed by vehicles in the United States contributes to the pollution and damage caused by the oil industry, including oil spills and refinery pollution. The environmental impact of vehicle transportation on water quality is significant, with cleanup costs estimated to be in the billions of dollars.

Leaking underground storage tanks

The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has identified specific pollutants of concern, including methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE), which has already contaminated 80% of Santa Monica, California's local water supply. Since 2005, oil companies responsible for this pollution have had to purchase replacement water at a cost of over $3 million per year. The annualized cost of cleaning up leaking underground storage tanks is estimated to range from $0.8 billion to $2.1 billion per year over 10 years.

To address this nationwide issue, Congress authorized a leak prevention, detection, and cleanup program in 1984 under Subtitle I of the Solid Waste Disposal Act. In 1986, the Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST) Trust Fund was established to provide financial support for remediation efforts. This fund is primarily sourced from a 0.1 cent-per-gallon motor fuels tax. The EPA and states have used these funds to oversee LUST cleanup activities, leading to a marked decline in the frequency and severity of leaks from USTs.

While progress has been made, disparities exist in the spatial distribution of LUSTs based on socioeconomic status (SES) and race/ethnicity. Studies in South Carolina revealed that as the percentage of Black residents increased, the distance to the nearest LUST decreased. Additionally, Black or non-white individuals and those with low SES were more likely to live in LUST host areas. These inequalities highlight the environmental injustice associated with LUSTs and the need for continued improvement in prevention, detection, and cleanup efforts.

Highway runoff

The impact of highway runoff on water quality is complex and challenging to assess comprehensively. However, studies have estimated the costs of controlling and mitigating this type of pollution. The annualized costs of managing highway runoff in the United States are substantial, ranging from $2.9 billion to $15.6 billion per year over 20 years. This accounts for 1.6% to 8.3% of annual highway transportation expenditures.

Several factors contribute to highway runoff pollution. Firstly, tire and pavement wear are significant sources, accounting for about a third of the particulates in highway runoff. Engine and brake wear contribute about 20%, while exhaust emissions make up about 8%. In addition, improper disposal of used motor oil pollutes streams, lakes, and coastal areas. One gallon of used oil has the potential to contaminate one million gallons of water.

To address highway runoff pollution, various management practices and regulations have been implemented. The Clean Water Act of 1987 established the Nonpoint Source Management Program to help states tackle runoff pollution by identifying affected waters and implementing control measures. The Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA) of 1991 also includes provisions for mitigating water pollution due to highway runoff, allowing states to use federal funding for runoff pollution control devices and best management practices (BMPs).

Oil spills and refinery pollution

Oil spills commonly occur due to accidents involving tankers, barges, pipelines, refineries, drilling rigs, and storage facilities. These incidents can contaminate soil and water, leading to irreversible environmental damage. The Exxon Valdez oil spill in Prince William Sound, Alaska, in 1989, and the Deep Horizon drilling rig explosion in the Gulf of America in 2010 are notable examples of major oil spills that had catastrophic ecological and economic impacts. In response to these incidents, stricter regulations, such as the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 and double-hull standards for oil tankers, have been implemented to prevent and mitigate the effects of oil spills.

The process of extracting, transporting, and refining oil also contributes to water pollution. Underground storage tanks (USTs) have been identified as a significant source of contamination, with more than 450,000 confirmed fuel leaks in the US, resulting in communities having to find alternative sources of freshwater. Additionally, highway runoff and the improper disposal of used oil, waste coolant/antifreeze, and metal dust from brake pads contribute to water pollution associated with motor vehicles.

Refineries, which process crude oil into various petroleum products, generate significant water pollution through routine emissions, accidental releases, and wastewater disposal. Deep-injection wells used by some refineries to dispose of wastewater can contaminate aquifers and groundwater, posing risks to water quality and human health. The Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) aims to control and regulate wastewater in refineries, but the complex nature of the refinery process means that wastewater often comes into contact with multiple sources of contamination.

To address these issues, there has been a push for better environmental regulations and enforcement, as well as the development of new technologies to reduce the environmental impact of oil exploration, production, and transportation. While these efforts have led to a reduction in oil spills and refinery emissions, the oil and gas industry continues to be a significant contributor to air and water pollution, with adverse effects on human health and the environment.

Air pollution from emissions

Cars and trucks are one of the leading causes of air pollution. Passenger vehicles and heavy-duty trucks are a major source of ozone, particulate matter, and other smog-forming emissions. These emissions include pollutants such as nitrogen oxides, carbon monoxide, and other harmful substances.

Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

Nitrogen oxides are primary pollutants that can irritate the lungs and weaken the body's defenses against respiratory infections. NOx emissions contribute to the formation of smog and poor air quality, which can have serious health impacts, especially on children, the elderly, and people with asthma.

Carbon Monoxide (CO)

Carbon monoxide is a colorless, odorless, and poisonous gas formed by the combustion of fossil fuels, such as gasoline. It is emitted primarily from cars and trucks. When inhaled, carbon monoxide blocks oxygen from reaching the brain, heart, and other vital organs, posing a significant health risk.

Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)

Sulfur dioxide is a pollutant created by burning sulfur-containing fuels, especially diesel and coal. Motor vehicles, including cars, trucks, and buses, emit sulfur dioxide, which can react in the atmosphere to form fine particles. These fine particles pose health risks, particularly to young children and asthmatics.

Particulate Matter (PM)

Particulate matter, such as soot from vehicle exhaust, is another significant pollutant. These fine particles, smaller than one-tenth of the diameter of a human hair, can penetrate deep into the lungs and cause serious health issues. Diesel exhaust is a major contributor to PM pollution.

Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)

Volatile organic compounds react with nitrogen oxides in the presence of sunlight to form ground-level ozone, a key component of smog. While ozone in the upper atmosphere is beneficial, ground-level ozone irritates the respiratory system, leading to coughing, choking, and reduced lung capacity.

Greenhouse Gases

Motor vehicles emit greenhouse gases, predominantly carbon dioxide, which contribute to global climate change. Tailpipe emissions from cars, trucks, and buses account for a significant portion of global warming pollution. Climate change, driven by these heat-trapping emissions, affects people's health and the well-being of communities, leading to more frequent heat waves, sea-level rise, flooding, drought, and wildfires.

Land clearance for transport infrastructure

Land clearance, also known as site clearance, is a necessary process in preparing a site for new construction or infrastructure development. This process involves removing trees, shrubs, debris, old buildings, and other obstructions to make way for transport infrastructure such as roads, bridges, or railways. While land clearance is crucial for development, it can have significant environmental implications, including water pollution, that need to be carefully managed.

One of the main ways land clearance contributes to water pollution is through the loss of vegetation and habitat. Clearing large areas of land can destroy wildlife habitats and lead to a reduction in biodiversity. This, in turn, can impact the water cycle and natural water filtration processes. For example, removing vegetation can lead to soil erosion, increasing sediment runoff into nearby water bodies and affecting water quality. Implementing erosion control measures, such as silt fences and retaining walls, is essential to mitigate these effects.

Additionally, land clearance activities can generate a significant amount of waste, including construction and demolition debris, concrete, metals, and wood. Improper disposal of this waste can result in pollution of nearby water sources. Hazardous materials, such as asbestos and lead paint, commonly found on construction sites, pose a significant risk to water quality if not managed and disposed of properly. Dust from demolition activities can also carry pollutants into water bodies, affecting both surface and groundwater. Using dust suppression techniques and following proper waste management practices can help reduce these impacts.

Furthermore, land clearance for transport infrastructure can have indirect effects on water pollution. The construction of roads or highways, for example, can alter natural drainage patterns and increase runoff, potentially carrying pollutants into nearby waterways. Effective runoff management and the implementation of retention ponds or permeable surfaces can help mitigate these impacts.

To minimize the environmental impacts of land clearance for transport infrastructure, careful planning and management are essential. This includes assessing and mitigating potential effects on wildlife habitats, implementing erosion control measures, practicing sustainable waste management, and using dust suppression techniques. By addressing these considerations, the development of transport infrastructure can be more environmentally sustainable and help reduce its contribution to water pollution.

Frequently asked questions