Animals' Resilience: Adapting To Human Pollution

Animals are vulnerable to harm from air pollution, which can affect wildlife in several ways. Pollutants such as acid rain, heavy metals, persistent organic compounds, and other toxic substances can contaminate the soil and water, making them uninhabitable for some species. Additionally, air pollution can harm wildlife by reducing the availability and quality of food sources. While animals can adapt to polluted environments, these changes may come at a cost, such as reduced reproductive success. For example, killifish from polluted areas have been found to be more tolerant of toxic compounds, but this adaptation may have negative consequences for other biological processes. As humans continue to impact the planet, the ability of animals to adapt to polluted habitats becomes increasingly crucial for their survival.

Animals' exposure to air pollution

Animals are persistently exposed to a cocktail of urban and industrial chemical by-products, which are released into the air as a result of human activity. Air pollution impacts animals through a variety of pathways, including direct inhalation of air toxics and the indirect consumption of polluted water and soil.

Air pollution can have detrimental effects on the health of animals, similar to the ways it affects humans. For example, air pollutants can harm the lungs and cardiovascular systems of animals. Additionally, air pollutants can enter the food chain and damage the supply and quality of food available to animals. Pollutants can collect and increase in concentration as they move up the food chain, a process known as bioaccumulation. Top predators, such as bears and eagles, are particularly susceptible to the bioaccumulation of air pollutants like mercury.

The impact of air pollution on animals can also be seen through its effects on aquatic environments, such as streams, lakes, and coastal waters. Acid rain, formed from nitrogen, sulfur, and other compounds, can increase the release of heavy metals like aluminum and mercury into water habitats, which are toxic to many animals, including fish. These heavy metals can be transported through the air and deposited into water sources, leading to bioaccumulation and health issues in aquatic wildlife.

While animals have shown some capacity to adapt to polluted environments, these changes can come at a cost. For example, killifish from polluted areas have developed a physiological adaptation that desensitizes the aryl-hydrocarbon receptor pathway, allowing them to tolerate toxic compounds. However, this adaptation can have negative consequences for reproductive success and long-term survival, highlighting the complex trade-offs that can arise in the process of adapting to pollution.

As humans continue to shape the planet, animals are facing the challenge of adapting to new polluted habitats. While some species may demonstrate resilience and rapid evolution in the face of pollution, the overall impact of air pollution on ecosystems and wildlife health remains a significant concern.

Pollutants entering food chains

Humans introduce chemicals to the environment, which can enter food chains and cause problems like bioaccumulation and eutrophication. Bioaccumulation refers to the build-up of toxins at higher trophic levels. For example, pollutants are washed into rivers and lakes, where they are absorbed by aquatic organisms at the producer level. As these contaminated organisms are consumed by predators, the pollutants accumulate, increasing in concentration as they move up the food chain. By the time they reach top carnivores, they can become toxic, leading to reduced fertility or even death. This was observed in birds of prey that consumed contaminated prey, resulting in weakened egg shells and population decline.

Pollutants can enter food chains through various pathways. Human-derived contaminants, such as those from industrial activities like mining, quarrying, oil and gas extraction, manufacturing, and transportation, can directly or indirectly affect the environment. Contaminants can enter through groundwater, surface runoff into water bodies, atmospheric deposition, industrial and wastewater discharges, oil spills, and contaminated sites.

Microplastics, for instance, are a significant concern. They can absorb organic pollutants and act as carriers of contaminants to terrestrial, marine, and freshwater environments. Microplastics are easily ingested by marine and terrestrial organisms, ultimately entering the human food chain. The use of plastic mulch and sludge in agriculture, as well as plastic debris in consumer items, contributes to microplastic pollution in aquatic ecosystems.

Additionally, certain pollutants can have specific impacts on food chains. For example, polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs), which are persistent organic pollutants, can be transported by air and water currents. PBDEs have been found to bioaccumulate in the fatty tissues of marine animals, leading to impaired brain development and behavioral issues.

It is worth noting that some animals have shown the ability to adapt to polluted environments. Killifish, for instance, have been found to tolerate a wide range of environmental challenges, including pollution. Genome sequencing has revealed evolutionary changes that allow them to survive in extremely polluted waters. However, even if some animals can initially survive in polluted environments, there may still be long-term consequences, such as reproductive issues, that are difficult to predict.

Genetic variation in crops

Genetic diversity is the driving force behind the selection and evolution of populations. It is the product of the recombination of genetic material (DNA) during the inheritance process, mutations, gene flow, and genetic drift. In crops, genetic diversity is essential for a healthy population as it helps maintain different genes that can lead to resistance to pests, diseases, or other stress conditions. It also enables crops to adapt to various biotic and abiotic stresses.

Genetic diversity can be observed at three levels: diversity between species, diversity between populations within one species, and diversity between individuals within one species. It is referred to as the diversity present within different genotypes of the same species, due to contrasting alleles of a gene in different individuals producing contrasting phenotypes.

Genetic diversity in plant species occurs due to genetic variation in the nucleotide sequence of DNA, chromosome mutations, and recombination during sexual reproduction. The offspring of two genetically diverse parents will possess genetic variations because of recombination during meiosis.

Crop breeding programs work to develop new cultivars for commercial production. Most breeding programs work exclusively with elite material and pay little attention to unadapted or wild relatives. Traditionally, chemical or physical agents like radiation and ethyl methane sulfonate (EMS) were used to induce mutations in crop genomes. However, these mutagens can cause non-targeted mutations and require intensive resources to achieve homozygosity and phenotype for traits of interest.

Genetic drift, unlike natural selection, is neutral to adaptation. It can occur when a chance event, such as a forest fire, reduces the number of one species, allowing another species to leave more offspring and evolve over time.

Evolutionary trade-offs

Animals are incredibly vulnerable to harm from pollution, especially air pollution. Pollutants such as acid rain, heavy metals, persistent organic compounds, and other toxic substances can have devastating effects on wildlife. As a result, animals are now in a race to adapt to the changes that humans are inflicting on the planet.

While animals can adapt to polluted environments, these changes may come at a cost, known as evolutionary trade-offs. For example, killifish from polluted areas have become more tolerant of a large class of persistent toxic compounds. They have achieved this through the desensitization of the aryl-hydrocarbon receptor pathway, an important detoxifying pathway. However, this desensitization may have negative consequences. The normal activation of this pathway helps to break down pollutants, so by shutting it down, the fish are preventing cell death in the short term but could be causing issues further down the line.

Similarly, while the peppered moth evolved to turn black and camouflage itself on soot-covered trees, this evolutionary adaptation may have come with trade-offs. The original light color of the peppered moth may have served other purposes, such as heat absorption or social signaling, which are now lost.

Another example of a potential trade-off is seen in the case of pollution-tolerant plants. Some populations of grasses and herbs have evolved tolerances to sulphur dioxide, and some sulphur dioxide-tolerant lichens have invaded inner-city areas. However, this tolerance may come at the cost of reduced growth or reproduction, or increased susceptibility to other environmental factors such as temperature or water availability.

In addition, the accumulation of pollutants in animal tissues through bioaccumulation can have long-term consequences that are difficult to predict. Even if animals can initially survive in polluted environments, they may face challenges with reproductive success, organ injury, increased vulnerability to stresses and diseases, and potential population decline.

Animals adapting to extreme environments

Animals are vulnerable to harm from pollution, which can affect them in several ways. For instance, air pollution can affect the quality of the environment or habitat in which they live, as well as the availability and quality of their food supply. Water bodies can become too acidic for some animals to survive or carry out their normal physiological functions. Pollutants can also enter the food chain, damaging the supply and quality of food.

Despite this, animals have been found to adapt to polluted environments and persist in places that are inhospitable to most living things. For example, killifish from polluted areas are far more tolerant of a large class of persistent toxic compounds like polyaromatic hydrocarbons, polychlorinated biphenyl, and dioxins. They have also been found to survive in waters with thousands of times the usual lethal levels of pollutants. This is due to dozens of evolutionary changes that have allowed them to survive in such conditions.

Similarly, in southern Mexico, the sulfur-rich springs are not all that different from a polluted killifish environment. Here, animals are persistently exposed to a cocktail of urban and industrial chemical by-products. In such cases, evolution marches on, as has been the case for thousands of lineages over millions of years.

However, adapting to polluted environments can cause evolutionary trade-offs. While the ideal solution for one problem (like pollution) can be found, it can lead to terrible consequences in another process (like reproductive success). This means that, even if animals are able to initially survive in polluted environments, they may still have to contend with long-term consequences that are difficult to predict and could ultimately lead to their decline.

Frequently asked questions