How Pollution Escapes Earth And Reaches Space

Space pollution, also known as space junk, space debris, space trash, or cosmic debris, refers to defunct human-made objects in space that no longer serve a useful function. These include derelict spacecraft, mission-related debris, and fragmentation debris from the breakup of rocket bodies and spacecraft. Space pollution poses a significant threat to future space exploration and can also have detrimental effects on Earth's environment. The accumulation of space junk increases the risk of collisions with functioning satellites, which can result in thousands of new pieces of dangerous debris. As of 2020, there were approximately 2,200 operational satellites and 34,000 pieces of debris larger than 10 cm in diameter orbiting the Earth. While most space debris burns up in the atmosphere, larger objects can reach the ground intact, contributing to air pollution. Addressing space pollution is challenging due to the lack of comprehensive legal frameworks and the potential for removing junk to be interpreted as a hostile act.

Space junk/debris

Space junk, also known as space debris, is any piece of machinery or man-made debris left by humans in space. It can refer to large objects such as dead or inactive satellites that have failed or been left in orbit at the end of their mission. It can also refer to smaller things, like bits of debris or paint flecks that have fallen off a rocket.

Space junk is the result of humans launching objects from Earth, and it remains in orbit until it re-enters the Earth's atmosphere. Some objects in lower orbits of a few hundred kilometres can return quickly and often re-enter the atmosphere after a few years, burning up in the process. However, debris or satellites left at higher altitudes of 36,000 kilometres can continue to circle the Earth for hundreds or even thousands of years.

There are about 2,000 active satellites orbiting the Earth, with 3,000 dead ones littering space. It is estimated that there are about 200,000 pieces of space junk between 1 and 10 cm across, and there could be millions of pieces smaller than 1 cm. The accumulation of space junk poses a threat to future space exploration due to the increased risk of collision with and damage to functioning satellites.

To tackle the problem of space junk, various methods have been proposed, including removing dead satellites from orbit and dragging them back into the atmosphere, where they will burn up. Some of the proposed methods include using a harpoon, a huge net, magnets, or lasers to heat up the satellite and increase its atmospheric drag. In 2019, the European Space Agency awarded a €120 million contract for the ClearSpace-1 mission, slated to launch in 2026, to remove a 94 kg satellite from orbit using robotic arms.

Despite the efforts to address the issue, space junk continues to be a concern. The introduction of mega-constellations, or mass groupings of artificial satellites, into low Earth orbit is expected to further exacerbate the problem. The risk of collision with space junk has already led to hundreds of collision avoidance manoeuvres by satellites each year, including by the International Space Station (ISS).

Pollution in Low Earth Orbit

Space debris, also known as space junk, space pollution, space waste, space trash, space garbage, or cosmic debris, refers to defunct human-made objects in space that no longer serve a useful function. This includes derelict spacecraft, mission-related debris, and fragmentation debris from the breakup of rocket bodies and spacecraft. Space debris is typically found in Earth orbit and can pose risks to functioning spacecraft and satellites.

Low Earth Orbit (LEO), at an orbital altitude of less than 2,000 km, has traditionally had few "universal orbits" for spacecraft. However, in recent years, several companies have started deploying satellite constellations in LEO, increasing the number of satellites in this region. As of 2019, there was an estimated 85% pollution in LEO.

The accumulation of space junk in LEO and other orbits poses a significant threat to space exploration and the environment. There are approximately 34,000 objects larger than 10 cm in length and around 900,000 objects between 1 cm and 10 cm in size. These objects can travel at speeds of up to 5 miles per second, posing a serious collision risk to functioning spacecraft and satellites. In 2009, the collision between two satellites, Cosmos 2251 and Iridium 33, above Siberia, resulted in thousands of pieces of debris entering Earth's atmosphere.

To address the issue of space junk, various technical approaches and policies have been proposed and implemented. NASA's orbital debris mitigation policy and guidelines, the U.S. National Space Policy, and the Inter-Agency Space Debris Coordination Committee's guidelines aim to reduce the creation of artificial space debris and mitigate its impact. Additionally, companies are developing methods to remove dead satellites from orbit, such as using harpoons, nets, magnets, or lasers to bring them back into the atmosphere where they will burn up. Despite these efforts, the lack of comprehensive legal regimes and cost assignment structures has hindered the effective reduction of space debris.

The impact of space pollution on space exploration

Space pollution, also known as space junk, space debris, space waste, space trash, space garbage, or cosmic debris, refers to defunct human-made objects in space that no longer serve a useful function. This includes derelict spacecraft, mission-related debris, and fragmentation debris from the breakup of rocket bodies and spacecraft. The accumulation of space junk poses a significant threat to space exploration and humankind's future in space.

One of the primary impacts of space pollution on space exploration is the increased risk of collisions with functioning satellites and spacecraft. With approximately 34,000 pieces of space debris larger than 10 cm and millions of smaller pieces orbiting the Earth, the potential for high-speed collisions is significant. These collisions can generate thousands of new pieces of debris, creating a dangerous environment for satellites and spacecraft. In 2009, the collision between an inactive Russian satellite and an active American communication satellite resulted in approximately 2,000 large pieces of debris and thousands of smaller pieces, highlighting the severity of the issue.

Space pollution also affects space exploration by hindering the success of future launches. The presence of space junk means that new missions must navigate through a field of potential hazards, increasing the complexity and risk of launching spacecraft into orbit. Additionally, space junk can release various chemicals into the atmosphere, contributing to the depletion of the ozone layer and impacting the Earth's environment. The introduction of mega-constellations, or mass groupings of artificial satellites, further increases the risk of collisions and the need for careful debris management.

To mitigate the impact of space pollution on space exploration, various technical approaches and guidelines have been proposed. NASA's orbital debris mitigation policy, the U.S. National Space Policy, and the Inter-Agency Space Debris Coordination Committee's guidelines aim to reduce the creation of artificial space debris and manage its disposal. Companies have also proposed innovative solutions, such as removing dead satellites from orbit using nets, magnets, or lasers. However, enforcing these practices and addressing the lack of commercial incentive to act remain challenging.

In conclusion, space pollution poses a significant challenge to space exploration by increasing the risk of collisions, hindering future launches, and impacting the Earth's environment. Addressing space pollution through mitigation strategies, debris removal technologies, and international cooperation is imperative to ensure the safe and sustainable exploration of space.

The financial and intelligence cost of space pollution

Space pollution, also known as space junk, space waste, space trash, or cosmic debris, refers to defunct human-made objects in space that no longer serve a useful function. These include derelict spacecraft, mission-related debris, and fragmentation debris from the breakup of rocket bodies and spacecraft. While most space debris burns up in the atmosphere, larger objects can reach the ground intact, and even smaller pieces can pose a significant threat to functioning spacecraft and satellites.

The financial and intelligence costs of space pollution are significant and multifaceted. Firstly, there is the cost of dealing with the debris itself. As of 2014, there was no comprehensive business plan for space debris reduction, and institutional factors such as political, legal, economic, and cultural norms were identified as impediments to cleanup efforts. The financial burden of removing dead satellites and other space junk typically falls on the companies that launched them, and there is little commercial incentive to act when costs are not assigned to polluters.

Secondly, space pollution poses a severe threat to functioning satellites and spacecraft, which can result in substantial financial losses. Collisions between satellites and space debris can generate thousands of new pieces of debris, damaging or destroying valuable equipment. In 2009, the collision between two satellites, Cosmos 2251 and Iridium 33, resulted in approximately 2,000 large pieces of debris and thousands of smaller ones, with over 50% of Iridium 33's debris expected to remain in orbit for at least a century. Such collisions also lead to costly collision avoidance maneuvers, with the International Space Station (ISS) frequently having to adjust its orbit to avoid space junk.

Additionally, space pollution contributes to air pollution and has detrimental effects on the environment, particularly the ozone layer. Spacecraft combustion and emissions from thrusters release pollutants that contribute to global warming and ozone depletion. The introduction of mega-constellations, or mass groupings of artificial satellites, is expected to exacerbate this issue. Efforts to mitigate these environmental impacts include the development of green fuel alternatives for spacecraft, which would reduce air pollutant emissions and have a positive impact on the climate.

Finally, space travel and rocket launches have been criticized for their carbon emissions, with some reports highlighting the extreme pollution associated with wealth inequality. For example, Jeff Bezos' 9-minute flight to the edge of space was estimated to have created more carbon emissions than what a person at the lowest end of the financial spectrum would produce in their lifetime.

In conclusion, the financial and intelligence costs of space pollution are far-reaching. They encompass the direct expenses of debris removal and collision avoidance, the indirect costs associated with satellite damage and environmental impacts, and the broader societal implications of carbon emissions and wealth inequality. Addressing these challenges requires a combination of technological innovation, regulatory frameworks, and equitable policies to ensure the sustainable exploration and utilization of space.

The cultural and heritage value of spacecraft

Space debris, also known as space junk, is a growing concern for humankind's future exploration of space. It includes defunct human-made objects in space that no longer serve a useful function, such as derelict spacecraft, mission-related debris, and fragmentation debris from rocket bodies and spacecraft. While most space debris burns up in the atmosphere, larger objects can reach the ground intact, contributing to air pollution.

The accumulation of space junk poses a significant threat to functioning spacecraft and satellites due to the increased risk of collisions. As of 2025, there are about 2,000 active satellites orbiting the Earth, alongside 3,000 dead ones and approximately 34,000 pieces of space junk larger than 10 centimetres. The risk of collision is further exacerbated by the creation of thousands of new pieces of debris from satellite tests and collisions.

Despite the dangers posed by space junk, some spacecraft hold cultural and heritage value. Protecting these culturally significant spacecraft is essential for fostering a sense of connection between people on Earth and space as a shared heritage of humanity. For instance, the Vanguard Adrift Twitter account, as part of Project Adrift, is a multimedia artwork based on space junk, including Nigeria's first telecommunications satellite, NigComSat 1.

Additionally, certain spacecraft have enabled significant advancements in astronomy. The Hubble Space Telescope, for instance, has provided detailed observations of deep space, while the Chandra spacecraft (X-ray Observatory) has made notable contributions to high-energy astrophysics. Other notable spacecraft include Luna 3, which transmitted the first photographs of the far side of the Moon, and the Eagle module, which facilitated the first manned lunar landing as part of the Apollo programme.

To address the complex challenge of preserving space heritage, a systemic approach is necessary. This involves considering the diverse attributes of value, such as the scientific, technological, and civil engineering legacies associated with launch pads and the historical context of human progress in space exploration. Furthermore, international agreements on mitigating orbital debris and preserving heritage relating to human activity in space are crucial.

Frequently asked questions