Nuclear Energy: Air Pollution Friend Or Foe?

Nuclear energy is a topic that often sparks debate, with some arguing that it is a clean and safe alternative to fossil fuels, while others highlight the risks of accidents and the challenge of nuclear waste management. In the context of air pollution, it is essential to understand the environmental and health impacts of nuclear power. While nuclear power plants have the potential to cause widespread air contamination in the event of a disaster, the risk of such incidents occurring in well-regulated countries is relatively low due to safety measures and skilled personnel. Compared to fossil fuels, nuclear energy has significantly lower greenhouse gas emissions, producing approximately 10 grams of carbon dioxide per kilowatt-hour compared to 500 for fossil gas and 1000 for coal. However, the nuclear fuel chain involves various stages that contribute to carbon dioxide emissions and conventional pollutants.

Nuclear energy has low greenhouse gas emissions

Nuclear energy is widely recognised as a clean energy source with low greenhouse gas emissions. Nuclear power plants produce no direct greenhouse gas emissions during operation, and over their entire life cycle, they produce similar carbon dioxide emissions per unit of electricity as wind power, and one-third of the emissions compared to solar power. This makes nuclear energy a viable option for reducing the world's dependency on fossil fuels and their associated emissions.

Nuclear energy has the potential to be a catalyst for delivering sustainable energy transitions. For example, France generates over 70% of its electricity from nuclear power, and its electricity sector emissions are one-sixth of the European average. This demonstrates that nuclear energy can be rapidly scaled up to combat climate change effectively. Nuclear energy is also reliable and affordable, making it a practical option for providing electricity to a growing global population.

While nuclear energy does not directly increase greenhouse gas emissions, there are certain risks associated with its use. One of the most significant dangers is the potential for nuclear accidents, such as the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant disaster in 2011, caused by an earthquake and tsunami. Additionally, the management and disposal of nuclear waste can be challenging, as evidenced by the lack of a permanent disposal facility for high-level nuclear waste in the United States.

Despite these concerns, nuclear energy remains an important part of the global energy mix. It is a proven technology that can be deployed on a large scale to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and combat climate change. By investing in nuclear energy and extending the lifetime of existing plants, countries can effectively mitigate their carbon emissions and work towards achieving international climate targets, such as the Paris Agreement's goal of keeping the rise in global temperatures well below 2°C.

Nuclear power plants are potential targets for terrorist attacks

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has implemented safety measures, such as requiring states within the 10-mile emergency planning zone of a nuclear power plant to consider potassium iodide (KI) as a protective measure. While the laws of physics make it impossible to turn a nuclear reactor into a bomb, there are still risks associated with nuclear waste dumps and power plants. For instance, terrorists could potentially steal spent nuclear fuel or create a "dirty" bomb capable of widespread contamination and deaths from radiation.

To address these concerns, mock raids have been conducted to test the security of nuclear power plants and weapons research sites, leading to the identification of areas requiring maximum protection and independent oversight. These sites have been placed under the highest security since September 11. Additionally, sixteen plants have converted to dry cask storage, which is safer than waste pools as it involves entombing a single bundle of rods in a thick concrete cylinder designed to withstand powerful impacts.

While the possibility of a terrorist attack on a nuclear power plant cannot be entirely ruled out, the combination of security measures, regulatory oversight, and technological advancements in nuclear waste storage significantly mitigates the risk.

Nuclear energy has lower environmental and health costs than fossil fuels

Nuclear energy has been identified as a potential catalyst for delivering sustainable energy transitions. Unlike fossil fuels, nuclear reactors do not produce air pollution or carbon dioxide while operating. Nuclear energy is low-carbon and can be deployed on a large scale, supplying the world with clean, reliable, and affordable electricity.

France, for example, generates over 70% of its electricity from nuclear power, and its electricity sector emissions are one-sixth of the European average. This demonstrates that nuclear energy can be expanded quickly and effectively to combat climate change. The United Nations has identified climate change as "the defining issue of our time," and the central aim of the 2015 Paris Agreement is to keep the rise in global temperatures well below 2 °C compared to pre-industrial levels.

While nuclear energy does produce radioactive waste, which can remain dangerous for thousands of years, this waste is subject to strict regulations that govern its handling, transportation, storage, and disposal to protect human health and the environment. These regulations help ensure that the potential risks of nuclear energy are carefully managed.

In contrast, the social, health, and environmental costs of fossil fuels are significant. Air pollution, for example, is a leading cause of respiratory diseases, with the World Health Organization estimating that more than 7 million people die annually due to exposure to polluted air. By reducing our dependence on fossil fuels and transitioning to nuclear energy, we can lower these health and environmental costs and work towards a more sustainable future.

Uranium mining can be hazardous, with many accidents and fatalities

Uranium mining can be highly hazardous, with a long history of accidents and fatalities. Uranium is a naturally radioactive metal that can be processed to provide fuel for nuclear reactors. Mining and processing it is a dangerous practice, with many health risks for miners and the public.

Uranium mining has been linked to various health issues, including lung cancer, caused by exposure to radon gas and its decay products. Radon is a colourless, odourless, and radioactive gas that occurs naturally in uranium mines. Uranium miners are at risk of inhaling radon, leading to severe health consequences. In 1967, a Washington Post article brought attention to the issue by highlighting the case of John Morrill, a uranium miner dying of lung cancer due to radon exposure. This incident sparked a crisis and prompted the US Department of Labor to take action, recognising their responsibility for protecting uranium miners' health and safety.

The dangers of uranium mining are not limited to radon exposure. There are also risks associated with silica exposure, leading to silicosis, a potentially fatal respiratory disease. Studies have shown that uranium miners exposed to silica dust experienced earlier and more severe cases of silicosis compared to other miners.

Furthermore, as mine operators shift from diesel-powered equipment to electric alternatives, the risk of electrical accidents increases. Electrical accidents in mines are rare but often fatal, accounting for a significant number of deaths between 2000 and 2009.

The processing and reclamation of uranium also pose environmental and health risks. The release of radon and its decay products into the atmosphere can contaminate the air and increase the risk of cancer for nearby residents. While the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) sets release rates to minimise public exposure, there is still a chance of latent cancer fatalities.

Overall, uranium mining has historically been a hazardous industry, with miners facing risks of radiation exposure, silica-related diseases, and electrical accidents. These issues have driven the implementation of safety regulations and health legislation to protect miners and the public from the potential consequences of uranium mining.

The risk of uncontrolled nuclear reactions is small due to diverse safety systems

Nuclear energy does not cause air pollution in the same way that fossil fuels do. However, an uncontrolled nuclear reaction in a nuclear reactor could result in widespread contamination of air and water. The risk of this happening is small due to diverse safety systems and barriers in place at nuclear power plants.

Nuclear plants in the western world operate using a 'defence-in-depth' approach, with multiple safety systems supplementing the natural features of the reactor core. This includes high-quality design and construction, equipment to prevent operational disturbances or human failures, comprehensive monitoring, and redundant and diverse systems to control damage to the fuel.

One of the most important safety components is the reactor core structure, which ensures that no spontaneous increase of the fission reaction above optimal values takes place. Control rods that contain a neutron absorber are used to control the fission reaction by inserting or withdrawing them from the reactor core. In the event of an emergency, shutoff rods can be used to stop the fission reaction altogether.

Another key safety feature is the containment building, which is designed to prevent or mitigate the uncontrolled release of radioactive material to the environment in operational states and accident conditions. This includes the use of filtered containment ventilation systems (FCVSs) to avoid the catastrophic failure of the containment structure by discharging steam, air, and gases to the atmosphere.

Nuclear reactors in the United States may also have large concrete domes covering the reactor, which are required to contain accidental releases of radiation. These diverse safety systems and barriers help to ensure that the risk of uncontrolled nuclear reactions is small.

Frequently asked questions