Incineration's Air Pollution: Is It A Real Concern?

Incineration is a waste treatment technology that involves burning commercial, residential, and hazardous waste, also known as municipal solid waste. It is often touted as a safe and environmentally friendly alternative to landfills, but does the process of incineration cause air pollution? The short answer is yes, incineration does release air pollutants, including nitrogen oxides, sulfur dioxides, particulate matter, lead, mercury, dioxins, and furans. These pollutants have serious public health effects, including increased cancer risk, respiratory illness, and cardiovascular and neurological problems. They also contribute to environmental inequalities and financial risks for host communities. While incinerator companies imply that their facilities are good neighbors offering a safe process, the reality is that burning trash harms the health, environment, and economy of many communities, particularly low-income communities and communities of color.

Incineration releases harmful chemicals and pollutants into the air, water and food supply

Incineration is a waste treatment technology that involves burning commercial, residential, and hazardous waste, also known as municipal solid waste. It is often touted as a landfill alternative, but the reality is that incineration releases harmful chemicals and pollutants into the air, water, and food supply.

The burning of trash poses significant risks to the health and environment of nearby communities and the broader public. Even the most advanced incinerators release thousands of pollutants that contaminate the air, soil, and water. These pollutants include nitrogen oxides, sulfur dioxides, particulate matter, lead, mercury, dioxins, and furans. These substances are known to have serious public health effects, including increased cancer risk, respiratory illness, cardiac disease, and reproductive, developmental, and neurological problems.

The impacts of incineration are far-reaching. Many of the emitted substances are considered persistent organic pollutants that do not break down, move across the globe, and accumulate in people and wildlife, causing harm to their health. For example, toxics like PFAS, dioxins, and mercury compounds have been found in the environment, people, and marine mammals in the Arctic, far from any industrial sources. Studies have also found that proximity to waste incineration may increase the risks of cancers, birth defects, and other adverse health impacts.

Air pollution control devices, such as air filters, can capture and concentrate some of the pollutants emitted by incinerators. However, they do not eliminate them, and the captured pollutants are simply transferred to other by-products such as ash and wastewater treatment sludge that are then deposited in landfills. Additionally, air filters still allow many hazardous emissions, such as ultra-fine particles, to escape into the air. These airborne particulates have been estimated to cause the deaths of over 2 million people worldwide each year.

Overall, incineration releases harmful chemicals and pollutants into the air, water, and food supply, posing risks to both the environment and public health. It is important to assess the impacts of incinerator emissions in the context of the total ambient concentration of pollutants in an area and to consider the potential for pollutants to move across long distances and affect areas beyond the immediate vicinity of the incinerator.

Incineration facilities emit gases containing nitrogen oxides, sulfur dioxides, and particulate matter

Incineration is a waste treatment technology that involves burning commercial, residential, and hazardous waste, also known as municipal solid waste. The process of incineration converts waste into bottom ash, fly ash, combustion gases, air pollutants, wastewater, wastewater treatment sludge, and heat.

The health impacts of incineration are not limited to respiratory issues. Research has shown that incinerators emit pollutants that have serious public health effects, including increased cancer risk, cardiac disease, and reproductive, developmental, and neurological problems. A 2013 study in Italy found a link between increased particulate emissions from incinerators and the occurrence of miscarriages in women aged 15-49 years.

In addition to the direct health impacts, incineration also contributes to environmental inequalities and financial risks for host communities. The ash and sludge produced by incinerators are eventually released into the environment when landfill systems break down, leading to contamination of soil, water, and food sources. This further exacerbates the health and environmental risks associated with incineration.

While air pollution control devices such as air filters can capture and concentrate some of the pollutants, they do not eliminate them. It is important to note that incineration facilities emit smaller amounts of pollutants compared to other sources, but even relatively small increments can have significant impacts, especially in areas where ambient concentrations are already close to or above environmental guidelines.

Incineration disproportionately affects low-income communities and communities of colour

Incineration is a false solution to waste management that causes air pollution and disproportionately affects low-income communities and communities of colour. The practice of burning garbage releases harmful chemicals and pollutants, including particulate matter, heavy metals such as lead and mercury, and toxic chemicals like PFAS and dioxins. These emissions contribute to lung and heart diseases, neurological issues, and cancer, with studies indicating that proximity to waste incineration may increase these risks.

The impact of incineration is exacerbated for marginalized communities, with nearly 80% of US incinerators located in low-income communities and/or communities of colour. This pattern is attributed to historical residential segregation and expulsive zoning laws that allowed predominantly white and affluent communities to exclude industrial operations and people of colour from their areas. As a result, minority and low-income communities bear the brunt of toxic emissions, facing inequitable living conditions and adverse health consequences.

The environmental justice movement seeks to address these disparities by advocating for sustainable and inclusive policies that promote a cooperative and equitable future for all. Activists highlight how environmental racism, rooted in the institution of slavery, has subjected communities of colour to dangerous pollution and substandard living conditions. This is evident in the placement of incinerators, with states classifying incineration as a renewable energy source to obtain subsidies, often in direct competition with truly renewable projects.

The consequences of incinerator emissions are wide-reaching, affecting not only the air but also the water and food supply. Mercury and dioxin released by incinerators can bioaccumulate in aquatic species, contaminating the traditional food sources of low-income communities, communities of colour, tribes, and indigenous peoples. Furthermore, the costs of incinerator operations and maintenance are substantial, often relying on government subsidies, which could otherwise be reinvested in community development and improvement initiatives.

To mitigate the disproportionate impact of incineration on marginalized communities, local governments can play a pivotal role. Strategies such as "Pay As You Throw" pricing, organics recycling, and community composting can help reduce waste and divert it from incineration. Additionally, investments in distributed renewable resources, like solar power, provide communities with more control over their energy systems and contribute to a more sustainable future.

Incineration releases more toxic pollution than coal-fired power plants per unit of energy

Incineration is a process that involves burning waste, and it releases harmful chemicals and pollutants, including air pollutants, heavy metals, and toxic chemicals. While incineration is sometimes marketed as a form of "waste-to-energy" or "chemical recycling," it is a significant contributor to air pollution and has detrimental effects on human health and the environment.

Trash incinerators emit more pollution than coal-fired power plants per unit of energy produced, even when accounting for air pollution control equipment. A 2011 analysis by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation found that the state's trash incinerators were dirtier than its coal-burning power plants in terms of emissions. Specifically, the trash incinerators released higher amounts of nitrogen oxides, carbon monoxide, hydrochloric acid, mercury, lead, and cadmium.

Mercury emissions from trash incineration are of particular concern. According to national data from 2018, trash incinerators released 5.3 times as much mercury as coal plants per unit of energy produced. This is a significant issue, as mercury is a potent neurotoxin that accumulates in the fatty tissue of fish and can have detrimental effects on human health, including potential ties to decreases in intelligence and increases in violent behavior.

Dioxins are another significant pollutant released from trash incinerators. Between 2000 and 2005, new dioxin emissions limits were implemented, requiring the worst-polluting incinerators to clean up or shut down. Despite these efforts, trash incinerators still release 28 times as many dioxins as coal-fired power plants per unit of energy produced. Dioxins are persistent organic pollutants that do not break down and can have far-reaching impacts, affecting people and wildlife even in remote regions like the Arctic.

In summary, trash incineration releases more toxic pollution than coal-fired power plants per unit of energy produced. This includes higher emissions of mercury, lead, cadmium, and dioxins, which have significant detrimental effects on human health and the environment. While coal-fired power plants have also been a major source of air pollution, the shift away from coal and towards natural gas and renewable energy sources in recent years has contributed to lower CO2 emissions and improved air quality.

Incineration is a poor alternative to landfills as residual ash still requires landfilling

Incineration is a process that involves burning waste to reduce its volume and using it as a source of energy. While this may seem like an attractive alternative to landfilling, it is important to consider the environmental and health impacts of this process, specifically the residual ash that is produced.

Waste incineration produces two types of ash: bottom ash (IBA) and fly ash (APC). IBA is the denser ash that settles at the bottom of the incinerator and often contains valuable materials such as glass, porcelain, and metals that can be reclaimed through further processing. APC, on the other hand, is lighter and can easily escape through the facility's smokestacks, contributing to air pollution.

The problem with incineration lies in the toxic nature of the residual ash. Even after reclaiming valuable materials from IBA, a significant amount of toxic ash remains, which is ultimately disposed of in landfills. This ash contains harmful chemicals and pollutants, including heavy metals such as lead, mercury, and arsenic, as well as toxic compounds like PFAS and dioxins. These toxins can leach out of the landfill, contaminating the soil and groundwater, and threatening the health of nearby communities and wildlife.

While some argue that incineration reduces waste-to-landfill conversion, the reality is that it merely transforms the waste into a more toxic form that still requires landfilling. The production of ash during incineration is significant, typically amounting to approximately 10% of the volume and 30% of the mass of the original waste. This means that incineration does not eliminate the need for landfills but instead creates a new challenge of disposing of toxic ash residue.

In conclusion, incineration is a poor alternative to landfilling as it does not address the issue of waste disposal but instead transforms it into a more harmful form. The residual ash from incineration is toxic and requires safe disposal, often in landfills. Therefore, the environmental and health risks associated with landfilling are not mitigated by incineration but are instead compounded by the additional challenges of air pollution and toxic ash residue.

Frequently asked questions