Hydrogen's Impact: Air Pollution Or Clean Energy?

Hydrogen has been touted as a possible energy carrier for future energy systems, with the potential to reduce air pollution. However, the impact of large-scale hydrogen use on the atmosphere is uncertain. Hydrogen can be produced from diverse domestic resources, including renewable sources, with near-zero greenhouse gas emissions. When used in fuel cells, hydrogen produces only water and oxygen-depleted air as exhaust products, with no harmful emissions. On the other hand, when hydrogen is combusted, it can generate significant NOx emissions, which are hazardous air pollutants. The gas and utility industries in the US have recently decided to use hydrogen through combustion, which has raised concerns about harmful NOx emissions and potential air pollution impacts. The overall impact of hydrogen on air pollution depends on various factors, including the production process, end-use applications, and leakage rates.

Hydrogen combustion may increase air pollution

Hydrogen is mostly used in refineries and fertiliser production. It is produced via a process that relies on fossil gas as feedstock and emits a significant amount of carbon pollution. However, hydrogen can be produced in a ""green" version using renewable energy and water. Green hydrogen has the potential to replace fossil fuels in vehicles and industrial processes.

While hydrogen is not toxic, unlike conventional fuels, and is generally safer to handle, it can still pose some risks. Hydrogen combustion may increase air pollution in the form of oxides of nitrogen or NOx, which include nitric oxide (NO) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2). These are hazardous air pollutants. The burning of hydrogen can lead to the thermal formation of nitrogen oxides (NOx) via a mechanism that also applies to the combustion of fossil fuels. NO2 is a key air pollutant that is harmful and is a precursor to other pollutants of concern such as fine particulate matter and ozone.

The risk of increased air pollution from hydrogen combustion is highlighted in an article in The Economist, which notes that combustion for aircraft propulsion can increase pollution in the form of oxides of nitrogen, partially negating the environmental benefits of burning hydrogen. Similarly, the Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS) has expressed concern over the potential for significant NOx emissions when hydrogen is combusted rather than used in a fuel cell.

The Clean Energy Group (CEG) has also raised concerns about harmful NOx emissions from industry plans to burn hydrogen in fossil fuel power plants. They have called for a pause in permitting proposals until independent public health investigations are conducted to study the potential air pollution impacts, particularly in environmental justice communities.

While hydrogen combustion may increase air pollution in the form of NOx emissions, it is important to note that multiple mitigation strategies exist to prevent or reduce these emissions. For example, flue gas treatment approaches can convert harmful emissions into less harmful compounds, similar to the processes used in catalytic converters for gasoline and diesel-powered vehicles. Additionally, hydrogen has a larger stable combustion temperature range, allowing for a higher ratio of air to fuel, which can dilute the hydrogen and result in lower-temperature combustion, thereby reducing NOx emissions.

Hydrogen fuel cells reduce air pollution

Hydrogen fuel cells are a clean and efficient alternative to conventional power sources. They convert the stored energy in hydrogen into electrical power through an electrochemical process, without combustion. This process produces only water vapour and heat as exhaust, making hydrogen fuel cells a zero-emission power source.

The use of hydrogen fuel cells can significantly reduce emissions, including nitrogen oxides (NOx) and sulfur oxides (SOx), which are hazardous air pollutants. This is particularly important as conventional energy sources contribute significantly to global greenhouse gas emissions and air pollution. Hydrogen fuel cells also have the advantage of operating quietly and requiring minimal space, reducing visual and noise pollution, making them suitable for urban and residential areas.

Additionally, hydrogen fuel cells can provide a pathway to energy independence for rural and remote areas that are often underserved by traditional power grids. They can harness locally available renewable resources, such as solar and wind power, to produce hydrogen, reducing reliance on fossil fuel imports. This supports sustainable development and allows communities to store energy efficiently, generating electricity on demand.

While there are concerns about NOx emissions from hydrogen combustion, multiple mitigation strategies exist to prevent or reduce these emissions. For example, flue gas treatment can convert harmful emissions into less harmful compounds, similar to the process used in catalytic converters for gasoline and diesel vehicles.

Overall, hydrogen fuel cells offer a promising solution to reduce air pollution, improve local air quality, and contribute to a cleaner and healthier environment.

Hydrogen production methods can be polluting

Hydrogen is mostly used in refineries and fertiliser production. Currently, it is produced via a polluting process that relies on fossil fuels as feedstock and emits a significant amount of carbon pollution. However, hydrogen can also be produced in a green way using renewable energy and water.

The two most common methods for producing hydrogen are steam-methane reforming and electrolysis (splitting water with electricity). Steam-methane reforming is the cheapest, most efficient, and most common method. It accounts for the majority of hydrogen produced in the United States annually. In this process, natural gas is reacted with high-temperature steam to produce a mixture of hydrogen, carbon monoxide, and a small amount of carbon dioxide. While electrolysis, on the other hand, does not produce any byproducts or emissions other than hydrogen and oxygen.

Other hydrogen production methods are in development, such as microbial biomass conversion, thermochemical water splitting, photobiological water splitting, and photoelectrochemical water splitting. These methods use renewable energy sources like solar energy and biomass to produce hydrogen.

The environmental impact and energy efficiency of hydrogen depend on how it is produced and used. For example, burning hydrogen in fossil fuel power plants can lead to harmful NOx emissions. However, when used in a fuel cell, hydrogen can generate electricity without any harmful emissions, emitting only water vapour and oxygen-depleted air as exhaust products.

There are also concerns about hydrogen leakage across the value chain, which can lead to emissions during the production and consumption of both green and blue hydrogen.

Hydrogen leaks may influence atmospheric chemistry

Hydrogen is being adopted as a clean source of energy to combat emissions and climate change resulting from fossil fuels. However, hydrogen can be a source of air pollution under certain conditions.

Firstly, hydrogen can be combusted to generate electricity or for industrial heating applications. This combustion can produce NOx emissions, which are hazardous air pollutants. NOx emissions include nitric oxide and nitrogen dioxide. However, hydrogen has a larger stable combustion temperature range, meaning a higher ratio of air to fuel can be used. This additional air dilutes the hydrogen, cooling the flame and reducing the amount of NOx emissions produced.

Secondly, hydrogen leaks can influence atmospheric chemistry. Hydrogen losses to the atmosphere impact atmospheric chemistry, including positive feedback on methane (CH4), the second most important greenhouse gas. The oxidation of hydrogen in the atmosphere is possible, and the reaction of hydrogen with O3 is thermodynamically favoured over its reaction with the OH radical. This O3-initiated reaction of hydrogen has a longer lifetime in the atmosphere compared to OH-initiated reactions. Furthermore, high leakage situations can cause hydrogen emissions to yield nearly twice as much warming in the first five years after replacing fossil fuels.

Despite the potential for hydrogen to contribute to climate change, it is important to note that hydrogen is not toxic, unlike conventional fuels. A hydrogen leak will not contaminate the environment or threaten human or wildlife health. Hydrogen is also 14 times lighter than air, so when released, it will typically rise and disperse rapidly, reducing the risk of ignition at ground level.

In conclusion, while hydrogen leaks may influence atmospheric chemistry, it is still a much cleaner energy source than conventional fossil fuels. However, to maximize the climate benefits of hydrogen, it is crucial to minimize hydrogen leakage and conduct more research on its warming effects.

Hydrogen is safer than conventional fuels

Hydrogen is a promising alternative to conventional fuels, offering several safety advantages. Firstly, hydrogen is non-toxic, while many conventional fuels are toxic or contain toxic substances, including carcinogens, which pose significant health risks. In contrast, hydrogen leaks or spills do not contaminate the environment or endanger human or wildlife health. This is because hydrogen is 14 times lighter than air, allowing it to rise and disperse quickly, reducing the risk of ground-level ignition. Additionally, hydrogen has a lower radiant heat than conventional gasoline, resulting in a lower risk of secondary fires.

Another key advantage of hydrogen is its reduced environmental impact. Hydrogen fuel cells produce only water and oxygen-depleted air as exhaust products, with no harmful emissions. This is particularly beneficial for improving local air quality, especially when used in heavy trucks, trains, and ships, as a zero-emissions alternative to fossil fuels. However, it is important to note that when hydrogen is combusted, it can produce nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions, which are hazardous air pollutants. Nevertheless, these emissions can be mitigated using existing and emerging technologies, such as flue gas treatment approaches.

The safety of hydrogen as a fuel is further enhanced by its handling and storage characteristics. Hydrogen has been safely utilized in various applications for decades, allowing for the development and implementation of stringent safety protocols. Modern pressurized hydrogen storage tanks are designed to prevent ignition sources from contacting the fuel. Additionally, safety systems during hydrogen production include integrated leak sensors, adequate ventilation, and flame detectors. Hydrogen fueling stations are also subject to strict safety regulations, comparable to those for gasoline stations.

While hydrogen presents certain risks, such as flammability and the potential for explosions, these risks are not unique to hydrogen and are carefully managed through established safety measures. Hydrogen's unique properties, such as its lighter-than-air quality and lower radiant heat, further contribute to its overall safety profile. As a result, hydrogen is generally considered safer to handle than conventional fuels when managed responsibly, making it a promising option for a clean and thriving economy.

Frequently asked questions