How Pollution Impacts The Global Peace Index

Gross Domestic Product (GDP) is the primary indicator used to measure a country's economic health, but it has been criticised for not taking into account externalities such as crime, pollution, inequality, depletion of natural resources, and other negative social and environmental aspects. This is where the Genuine Progress Indicator (GPI) comes in—it is a metric that measures the economic growth of a country and is considered a more holistic alternative to GDP as it accounts for externalities such as pollution. GPI counts initial pollution as a loss rather than a gain, equal to the amount it will cost to clean up later plus the cost of any negative impact the pollution will have in the meantime. Thus, GPI is considered a better measure of the sustainability of an economy when compared to GDP.

GPI counts initial pollution as a loss, equal to clean-up costs

The Genuine Progress Indicator (GPI) is an economic metric that accounts for externalities such as pollution, poverty, crime, depletion of natural resources, and other social and environmental factors. GPI is considered a more holistic approach to measuring economic growth and development than the traditional Gross Domestic Product (GDP) metric, which does not account for these externalities.

While GDP increases twice when pollution is created—once during the creation of the pollution as a byproduct of some valuable process and again when the pollution is cleaned up—GPI counts the initial pollution as a loss. This loss is generally considered equal to the cost of cleaning up the pollution and any negative impacts the pollution may have in the meantime. By accounting for these societal costs, GPI provides a more comprehensive understanding of the economic progress of a nation.

For example, in Finland, data from 1945 to 2011 showed that while GDP continued to grow after the economic recession of the early 1990s, GPI remained low. This indicates that the economic growth measured by GDP did not translate into improved welfare or well-being for the average Finn. Instead, sustainable economic welfare decreased due to accumulated environmental hazards.

Similarly, a Gallup Poll from 2008 and other data comparing GDP/capita with GPI/capita from 17 countries suggest that while GDP does increase overall well-being to a certain point, beyond $7,000 GDP/capita, the increase in GPI stagnates or decreases. This highlights the limitations of relying solely on GDP as an indicator of economic progress and well-being.

In summary, GPI provides a more nuanced understanding of economic progress by accounting for the initial pollution as a loss equal to the clean-up costs. This loss is considered a negative externality, and by including it in the calculation, GPI offers a more comprehensive view of the sustainability and well-being of a nation, beyond what is captured by GDP alone.

GPI accounts for societal costs to repair or control pollution

The Genuine Progress Indicator (GPI) is an economic tool used to measure the health of a nation's economy. It is an alternative to gross domestic product (GDP) and is designed to take a fuller account of the well-being of a nation, only partly pertaining to the size of the nation's economy. GPI incorporates environmental and social factors such as family structure, benefits from higher education, crime, and pollution, which are not considered in the GDP.

GPI accounts for the costs incurred by society as a whole to repair or control pollution and poverty. It balances GDP spending against external costs. GPI advocates claim that it can more reliably measure economic progress as it distinguishes between the overall "shift in the 'value basis' of a product, adding its ecological impacts into the equation".

The relationship between GDP and GPI is analogous to the relationship between gross profit and net profit in a company. The net profit is the gross profit minus the costs incurred, while the GPI is the GDP (value of all goods and services produced) minus the environmental and social costs. Thus, the GPI will be zero if the financial costs of poverty and pollution equal the financial gains from the production of goods and services, assuming all other factors are constant.

GPI quantifies the costs and benefits of environmental and social externalities, a task that is considered challenging. It assigns values to societal contributions, such as volunteering, which were previously ignored because they were difficult to quantify. GPI also accounts for the impact of events that create large societal costs from the resulting damages, such as pollution.

GPI is considered a better metric than GDP as it provides a full view of the health of a nation. It is based on the concept of sustainable income, which is the amount a person or an economy can consume during one period without decreasing consumption in the next period. GPI is calculated using 26 indicators, grouped into three main categories: economic, environmental, and social.

GDP increases twice due to pollution, unlike GPI

Gross Domestic Product (GDP) is the primary indicator used to measure a country's economic health. Increasing GDP is a sign of economic strength, and declining GDP indicates economic weakness. However, GDP can offer false information when it results from economic destruction—such as a car accident, a natural disaster, or a terrorist attack—rather than truly productive activity. This is because GDP is very susceptible to the "broken window fallacy", sending false signals of rising prosperity when obvious destruction has taken place.

GDP increases twice when pollution is created – once upon creation (as a side-effect of some valuable process) and again when the pollution is cleaned up. This is because GDP only concerns itself with the value of all goods and services, not the distribution of their proceeds.

On the other hand, the Genuine Progress Indicator (GPI) is an alternative metric to GDP that accounts for externalities such as pollution, crime, inequality, depletion of natural resources, and other negative (and costly) social and environmental aspects of existence. GPI counts the initial pollution as a loss rather than a gain, generally equal to the amount it will cost to clean up later plus the cost of any negative impact the pollution will have in the meantime. GPI advocates claim that it can more reliably measure economic progress as it distinguishes between the overall "shift in the 'value basis' of a product, adding its ecological impacts into the equation".

GPI is designed to take fuller account of the well-being of a nation, only a part of which pertains to the size of the nation's economy, by incorporating environmental and social factors which are not measured by GDP. For instance, some models of GPI decrease in value when the poverty rate increases. GPI separates the concept of societal progress from economic growth. It is used in ecological economics, "green" economics, sustainability and more inclusive types of economics. It factors in environmental and carbon footprints that businesses produce or eliminate, including in the forms of resource depletion, pollution and long-term environmental damage.

GPI is adjusted upward when a greater percentage of the nation's income goes to the poor, usually during an income increase since that provides a tangible benefit to the poor. GPI is adjusted downward when the majority of a nation's increased income goes to the rich.

GPI is a better measure of sustainability than GDP

The Genuine Progress Indicator (GPI) is a metric that measures the economic growth of a country and is an alternative to gross domestic product (GDP). GDP tends to be synonymous with economic progress, but it has its limitations. GDP is susceptible to the broken window fallacy, which means that obvious destruction, such as a car accident or a natural disaster, can be interpreted as rising prosperity. GDP also fails to account for externalities such as crime, pollution, inequality, depletion of natural resources, and other negative (and costly) social and environmental aspects of existence.

GPI, on the other hand, accounts for these externalities and is considered a better measure of growth from the perspective of green or social economics. It provides a full view of the health of a nation by measuring economic indicators that the GDP doesn't. GPI is the GDP minus the environmental and social costs. For instance, while GDP increases twice when pollution is created (once upon creation and again when it is cleaned up), GPI counts the initial pollution as a loss rather than a gain, equal to the amount it will cost to clean up later plus the cost of any negative impacts.

GPI also distinguishes between the overall "shift in the 'value basis' of a product, adding its ecological impacts into the equation." This means that GPI can more reliably measure economic progress. For example, in Finland, the GDP continued to grow after the economic recession of the early 1990s, but the GPI stayed on a lower level, indicating a widening gap between the trends of GDP and GPI. This shows that, while GDP may have increased, sustainable economic welfare had actually decreased due to environmental hazards.

GPI also takes into account the distribution of income. It is adjusted upward when a greater percentage of a nation's income goes to the poor, and downward when the majority of a nation's increased income goes to the rich. GPI also factors in the value of labor that goes into housework and volunteering, as well as the benefit of an increasingly educated populace.

Overall, GPI is considered a better measure of sustainability than GDP as it provides a more holistic assessment of a nation's progress and well-being, taking into account economic, social, and environmental factors.

GDP is susceptible to the broken window fallacy

The Genuine Progress Indicator (GPI) is an alternative metric to GDP that accounts for externalities such as pollution, poverty, crime, inequality, depletion of natural resources, and other negative social and environmental aspects. GPI is considered a better measure of growth from the perspective of green or social economics, as it provides a full view of the well-being and health of a nation.

For example, if a window is broken, the opportunity cost of repairing it is that individuals cannot spend money on other goods or services. While the glazier may benefit from the repair work, other industries may suffer. The broken window might stimulate the local economy in the short term, but it does not create any new value or productivity in the long run. It merely shifts the economy from productive output to maintenance and repair.

GDP can increase after a car accident, a natural disaster, or a terrorist attack, as the rebuilding efforts and repairs may boost economic activity. However, this does not account for the negative social and environmental aspects of such events and can give false signals of rising prosperity when obvious destruction has taken place. GPI, on the other hand, counts the initial pollution or destruction as a loss rather than a gain, considering the financial costs of repairing the damage.

The relationship between GDP and GPI can be likened to the relationship between gross profit and net profit in a company. GDP represents the gross profit, the total value of all goods and services produced, while GPI accounts for the environmental and social costs, similar to how net profit is calculated after deducting the costs incurred. Therefore, GPI provides a more holistic measurement of economic progress by incorporating these external costs.

Frequently asked questions