Ethanol Burning: Clean Or Polluting?

The use of ethanol as a biofuel has been a topic of debate due to its potential impact on air pollution. While some argue that ethanol reduces emissions and improves air quality, others claim that the process of producing ethanol, particularly from corn and sugarcane, can lead to higher levels of air pollution and negative environmental consequences. The burning of sugarcane fields and the growing of corn for ethanol production have been associated with a range of issues, from declining bee populations to increased carbon emissions and adverse respiratory effects. With the increasing use of ethanol biofuels and its impact on rainwater and atmospheric ethanol concentrations, further research is needed to fully understand its environmental implications.

Does burning ethanol cause air pollution?

Burning sugarcane fields for ethanol production can cause air pollution

Brazil, the world's top producer of sugarcane ethanol, continues to burn more than half of its sugarcane croplands. This leads to a reduction in air quality, which can offset the benefits of ethanol over petroleum fuels that emit more greenhouse gases. The burning of sugarcane fields can create more pollution than previously thought, as it releases particles into the air that can have detrimental health effects. For example, scientific evidence shows that ethanol-based particles in the air can kill or cause illness in humans.

The use of ethanol biofuels has doubled in the past decade, leading to increased concentrations of ethanol in rainwater and the atmosphere. This has impacted air quality and other atmospheric processes. As a result, the potential environmental impacts of ethanol biofuels require further examination. While ethanol is produced from food/feed-based substrates, its application as an energy source may not be suitable for the long term due to increasing fuel, food, and feed demands.

Sugarcane residues, sugarcane bagasse, and straw are potential feedstocks for second-generation ethanol production. These raw materials are rich in carbohydrates, renewable, and do not compete with food or feed demands. However, the efficient bioconversion of these feedstocks for commercial cellulosic ethanol production remains challenging. In Brazil, sugarcane mills are often integrated with sugar and bioethanol production capacities, which can lower the need for external energy and improve the net energy balance.

Ethanol-based particles in the air can be harmful to human health

Research has shown that ethanol-based particles in the air can kill people and make them sick. A study found that the decline in bee populations is greatest in areas of intense agriculture, which has potentially catastrophic implications for many high-value agricultural crops that depend on bees for pollination.

Ethanol is created from corn, and the process of harvesting and producing corn-based ethanol creates more harmful emissions than normal gasoline. The amount of farmland required to grow corn crops and the tillage associated with it contribute to ethanol being more carbon-intensive than gasoline. However, some argue that corn ethanol produces fewer emissions than gasoline, and that improved farming techniques will reduce the environmental costs of increased corn production.

The use of ethanol biofuels has doubled in the past decade, and concentrations of ethanol in rainwater and the atmosphere have increased fourfold between 2010 and 2017. This suggests that current sinks are insufficient in removing ethanol at the rate at which it is being added, impacting air quality.

While some studies have shown that increasing the ethanol content of gasoline can reduce harmful volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions, displace cancer-causing emissions, and reduce smog-forming potential, other studies have found that higher-ethanol blends still produce significant levels of air pollution. The impact of ethanol combustion is complex, and more research is needed to fully examine its environmental impacts.

Ethanol emissions impact the oxidizing capacity of the atmosphere

Ethanol emissions have a significant impact on the oxidizing capacity of the atmosphere. The increase in ethanol use as a biofuel has led to higher concentrations of ethanol in both rainwater and the atmosphere. From 2010 to 2017, an eight-year study observed a fourfold increase in atmospheric and rainwater ethanol levels in Wilmington, North Carolina. This trend is attributed to the increased production and utilization of ethanol as a biofuel, with concentrations closely mirroring those found in the local atmosphere.

Ethanol emissions are of particular concern due to their reactivity with hydroxyl radicals, leading to the formation of acetaldehyde. This process is a significant contributor to the production of ozone and smog, including peroxyacetyl nitrate (PAN). The combustion of ethanol, however, presents a more complex scenario. While it can reduce emissions of acetaldehyde precursors such as alkenes, the overall impact remains uncertain due to the potential for higher emissions of other harmful substances.

The environmental impact of ethanol is a subject of ongoing research and debate. Some studies indicate that ethanol, particularly grain-based or corn ethanol, can significantly reduce greenhouse gas emissions compared to gasoline. For instance, the Department of Energy's Argonne National Laboratory found that grain-based ethanol reduces greenhouse gas emissions by 44-52% compared to gasoline. Similarly, researchers from Harvard, MIT, and Tufts concluded that corn ethanol provides an average GHG reduction of 46% compared to gasoline.

On the other hand, critics argue that the environmental costs of increased corn production for ethanol cannot be overlooked. Growing corn for fuel has a substantial environmental impact, and expanding corn ethanol reliance is expected to exacerbate these issues. Additionally, ethanol-based particles in the air have been linked to adverse health effects, including respiratory problems and an increased risk of cancer.

Ethanol biofuel use has doubled in the past decade

The use of ethanol biofuels has been encouraged by some as a way to reduce transport-related greenhouse gas emissions. However, the impact of increased ethanol concentrations on the environment is complex and remains largely unquantified. While the combustion of ethanol can lower emissions of acetaldehyde precursors, it also contributes to air pollution through the production of ozone and, in high NOx regions, peroxyacetyl nitrate (PAN).

The criticism of ethanol by environmentalists is that its production and use have negative environmental impacts. Firstly, the growing of corn for ethanol in the US has a significant environmental impact, with some arguing that it inevitably leads to higher prices for this staple food crop. Secondly, higher-ethanol blends produce air pollution, reduce fuel efficiency, and damage engines. Thirdly, ethanol-based particles in the air can kill people and make them sick, and have also been linked to declining bee populations, which could have catastrophic implications for many high-value agricultural crops.

Despite these criticisms, some argue that ethanol is not as bad for the environment as critics suggest. They contend that improved agricultural methods are reducing the use of chemicals and fertilizers on cornfields, and that increasing the amount of corn ethanol in US gasoline would reduce air pollution and lower greenhouse gas emissions.

Ethanol is worse for climate change than gasoline

Ethanol, which is often derived from corn, has been a popular alternative to gasoline. However, several studies have found that ethanol is worse for climate change than gasoline due to the emissions resulting from land use changes, processing, and combustion.

A 2019 study by the USDA found that ethanol's carbon intensity was 39% lower than gasoline, partly because of carbon sequestration when planting new cropland. However, this study has been criticized for underestimating the emissions impact of land conversion. A more recent study by Dr. Tyler Lark, an assistant scientist at the University of Wisconsin-Madison Center for Sustainability and the Global Environment, found that ethanol is likely at least 24% more carbon-intensive than gasoline. This is because corn cultivation expanded in the U.S. into nearly 7 million additional acres of land between 2008 and 2016, which involved tilling the land and using fertilizers, both of which release carbon and emissions.

The production of ethanol from sugarcane has also been criticized for creating air pollution. The burning of sugarcane fields before harvest for ethanol production can create more pollution than previously thought, reducing the benefits of this alternative fuel source.

Furthermore, ethanol-based particles in the air can have negative health impacts on humans, and have been linked to the declining bee population, which could have catastrophic implications for many agricultural crops that depend on bees for pollination.

While some argue that improved agricultural methods and increased corn ethanol in gasoline can reduce air pollution and lower greenhouse gas emissions, others point to the environmental impacts of growing corn for fuel, including higher food prices, damage to engines, and increased levels of air pollution.

Frequently asked questions