Dead Body Cremation: Pollution And Health Risks

The act of burning dead bodies, also known as cremation, has been a topic of debate due to its environmental implications. While cremation is often considered a more eco-friendly alternative to traditional burial, it still contributes to air pollution and has led to concerns about the release of toxic chemicals and emissions. The process of cremating a body requires a significant amount of fuel and results in the emission of pollutants such as carbon monoxide, nitrous oxide, sulphur dioxide, and heavy metals. These emissions contribute to air pollution and can have negative effects on human health and the environment. Additionally, the ash produced during cremation can contaminate soil and water sources, further exacerbating the environmental impact. As a result, there is a growing interest in exploring more sustainable end-of-life options, such as natural burials or alternative methods like alkaline hydrolysis, also known as water cremation or aquamation.

Cremation releases harmful gases, including carbon monoxide, nitrous oxide, and sulphur dioxide

Cremation is a combustion process that incinerates human remains at high temperatures in a closed chamber. This process releases harmful gases, including carbon monoxide, nitrous oxide, and sulphur dioxide, which can have detrimental effects on the environment and human health.

Carbon monoxide (CO) is a toxic gas released during the cremation process. It is formed through the incomplete combustion of fossil fuels, such as gas, which is commonly used to fuel crematoria. Carbon monoxide can pose serious health risks, including headaches, dizziness, and confusion, and in extreme cases, it can be fatal.

Nitrous oxide (N2O) is another gas emitted during cremation. It is produced during the combustion of fossil fuels and solid waste. Nitrous oxide is a potent greenhouse gas that contributes to global warming and climate change. Additionally, nitrous oxide can have negative effects on human health, including respiratory problems and irritation to the eyes and nose.

Sulfur dioxide (SO2) is also released during the cremation process. It is a byproduct of burning fossil fuels and other combustible materials. Sulfur dioxide is a harmful air pollutant that can aggravate respiratory issues, such as asthma and emphysema. It also contributes to environmental issues, including acid rain and the formation of harmful particulate matter in the atmosphere.

The release of these gases during cremation has raised environmental and health concerns. While cremation is often considered more environmentally friendly than traditional burial practices, the emissions produced can still have a significant impact. Efforts are being made to mitigate these effects, such as the use of flue gas post-treatment systems, which can effectively reduce gaseous pollutants.

Additionally, alternative methods such as alkaline hydrolysis, or water cremation, are being explored as more eco-friendly options. Alkaline hydrolysis has a significantly lower carbon footprint than conventional cremation and produces no emissions from the body itself. This method is gaining popularity as individuals seek more sustainable end-of-life options.

Burial uses toxic embalming chemicals, such as formaldehyde, which can pollute water supplies

Formaldehyde, a common embalming chemical, is classified as a toxic substance under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act. It is readily soluble in water and can bond with moisture in the atmosphere, eventually raining down onto plants, animals, and water supplies. The concentration of formaldehyde in precipitation can range from 110 to 1380 micrograms per liter. This means that formaldehyde released from the cremation of embalmed bodies can have widespread environmental impacts.

The use of embalming chemicals can also lead to soil and groundwater contamination. Studies have investigated the environmental effects of embalmed bodies buried in cemeteries, finding that toxic chemicals from the embalming process can leach into the soil and groundwater. These chemicals can then enter the human food chain through crops and livestock, posing potential health risks to humans and animals.

Furthermore, the funeral industry has been identified as a hotspot for toxic chemicals and contaminants. In addition to embalming products, funeral homes, cemeteries, and crematoria can contain persistent organic pollutants, synthetic pesticides, pharmaceuticals, personal care products, and illicit drugs. These contaminants can be released into the environment during the embalming process, contributing to water pollution.

The impact of embalming chemicals on water supplies is a serious environmental concern. While formaldehyde is biodegradable by sunlight, bacteria, and soil, its widespread use in embalming can still have detrimental effects on water quality and ecosystems. As a result, some people are opting for green burials that do not use aldehyde-based chemicals or forgo the embalming process altogether.

Burial uses hardwood or metal caskets, which do not decompose and seal corpses from the ecosystem

Burial often uses hardwood or metal caskets, which are sealed and do not decompose, thus separating the corpse from the ecosystem. The rate at which caskets decompose varies based on their composition. Metal caskets, such as stainless steel, bronze, and copper, take the longest to break down, with an estimated lifespan of 50 to over 100 years. On the other hand, wooden caskets, like those made of pine and oak, have a shorter lifespan, lasting around 5 to 10 years in damp soil. Hardwood caskets can endure for an additional 10 to 15 years.

The use of these non-decomposable caskets has environmental implications. The sheer amount of casket wood required equates to approximately 4 million acres of forest, contributing to significant land usage. Moreover, the preservation process involves toxic chemicals like formaldehyde, which can contaminate the soil and groundwater as the casket decomposes.

The burial process also includes placing the casket in a thin concrete vault within a "memorial park." These parks, with their pristine lawns, demand excessive water, chemical fertilizers, and pesticides, which can harm wildlife and seep into water supplies. The vast expanse of cemeteries in the US covers about 1 million acres of land.

To address these environmental concerns, eco-friendly casket options are becoming more popular. These sustainable caskets are designed to decompose faster and more naturally, without the use of metal parts or chemical treatments. They may be crafted from biodegradable materials like bamboo, paper, cardboard, wool, banana leaf, or willow. Some individuals opt for encasing their body in a pod that transforms into a tree or sealing their ashes in a concrete ball that nourishes coral reefs.

While the ritual of burying the dead is deeply ingrained in many cultures, the environmental impact of sealing corpses in non-decomposable caskets is significant. The use of toxic chemicals, land consumption, and water pollution associated with traditional burial practices have spurred the exploration of greener alternatives that aim to reduce ecological harm and promote sustainability for future generations.

Cremation requires a lot of fuel, contributing to air pollution and carbon emissions

Cremation is a fossil fuel-driven process that requires a lot of fuel and produces high carbon emissions. The cremation process involves temperatures of between 1,200 and 2,000°F, and the average cremation takes around two hours. This requires a significant amount of energy to create and maintain. The combustion of fossil fuels causes the emission of carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxides, and sulfur dioxide, as well as fine soot and mercury.

The cremation process contributes to air pollution, with the emission of various harmful air pollutants. These pollutants include volatile organic compounds (VOCs), particulate matter (PM), and gaseous pollutants such as SO2, NOx, CO, and VOCs. The concentration of these pollutants in the flue gas can be reduced through the use of post-treatment systems, such as flue gas cooling, deacidification, deodorization, and dedusting devices. However, the use of a flue gas post-treatment system can also lead to an increase in NOx emission levels.

The type of fuel used also affects the emission levels of pollutants. For example, oil-fired cremators have higher emission levels of pollutants than gas-fired cremators during the initial discharge of air pollutants. The structure of the furnace and the operational maintenance also play a role in the emission concentrations of harmful air pollutants.

In addition to the environmental impact, the cremation process also has economic considerations. The average U.S. cremation uses about the same amount of energy and emits the same amount of emissions as two tanks of gas in an average car. This contributes to the overall fuel consumption and carbon emissions associated with cremations.

There are alternative options to traditional cremation that are more environmentally friendly. Alkaline hydrolysis, also known as water cremation or aquamation, has about a tenth of the carbon footprint of conventional cremation. This process uses water to dissolve the body and creates a lot of organic liquid that can be used as fertilizer. Another alternative is soil transformation, which is similar in concept to cremation but avoids the significant emissions and has a positive environmental impact through the use of nutrient-rich soil.

Open-air cremations require cutting down trees and contribute to air and river pollution

The process of cremating a corpse generates numerous harmful air pollutants, including particulate matter (PM), sulfur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen oxides (NOx), volatile organic compounds (VOCs), carbon monoxide (CO), heavy metals, and mercury. While cremation is less harmful than embalming a body with formaldehyde and burying it in a coffin, it still has environmental impacts. Cremation requires a lot of fuel and produces millions of tons of carbon dioxide emissions per year.

In India, Hindus have traditionally cremated their relatives on open-air pyres. This practice requires cutting down millions of trees, and it contributes to air and river pollution since most pyre cremations occur near water. To curb this pollution, the nonprofit Mokshda Green Cremation System has been providing communities with more fuel-efficient cremation structures. These structures use a metal tray heated with firewood, which reduces the amount of wood needed for a conventional cremation by up to three-quarters.

Open-air cremations also take place in Crestone, Colorado, where the Crestone End of Life Project (CEOLP) has established a legal, permanent cement pyre for residents of the community. While advocates of open-air cremation cite its environmental sustainability, there are concerns about the amount of CO2 and metals burned in these open flames, as well as the particulate matter produced.

As an alternative to traditional cremation, alkaline hydrolysis, also known as "resomation" or "bio-cremation," is a more environmentally friendly option. This process, which has been used for veterinary and medical research remains, places the body in a pressurized stainless steel chamber with a solution of superheated water and an alkaline solution of potassium hydroxide (KOH). It has about a tenth of the carbon footprint of conventional cremation and produces no emissions from the body itself.

Frequently asked questions