Bombs And Pollution: A Deadly Combination

The use of explosive weapons in populated areas has raised concerns about the environmental and humanitarian impact of bombing. Bombing can cause pollution by releasing toxic chemicals and hazardous materials, contaminating water resources, and damaging infrastructure. The debris generated from bombing can also hinder recovery efforts and recycling, leading to further contamination. In addition, bombing has been linked to the release of radioactive material, causing radioactive pollution and increasing the incidence of cancer. The use of nuclear weapons is of particular concern due to their potential to cause mass destruction and accelerate climate change. The impact of bombing on the environment and public health is significant, and there are calls to strengthen the language on the environment in political declarations addressing explosive weapons.

Bombing causes air pollution

Oil facilities, industrial units, and infrastructure are often targeted during conflicts, releasing harmful chemicals and contaminating the surrounding environment. For example, the burning of oil wells in Qayyarah generated air pollution and released hazardous chemicals, impacting human health. Similarly, the shelling of a pig farm in Ukraine's Donbas region resulted in animal waste polluting water sources, causing the death and sickness of local cattle.

The destruction of buildings and infrastructure generates large volumes of debris, which may contain hazardous materials such as explosives and asbestos. The cleanup process can take years and generate additional emissions and pollution, further degrading air quality. For instance, the removal of debris from the collapse of the World Trade Centre in 2001 required 108,342 truck journeys over nine months.

The environmental impact of bombing extends beyond immediate air pollution. It disrupts ecosystems, contaminates soil, and affects water resources. The release of toxic chemicals and the destruction of trees and agricultural land have long-term consequences for the recovery of affected areas, impacting the livelihoods of civilians who depend on these environmental resources.

To address the issue of conflict pollution, it is crucial to curtail the use of explosive weapons in populated areas and improve impact monitoring to understand the environmental risks and damage caused. The United Nations and other stakeholders are working to implement good practices in the assessment and management of conflict debris and pollution, with a focus on aligning with relevant resolutions and declarations addressing these issues.

Bombing causes water pollution

Secondly, bombing can cause physical damage to water supply and wastewater sanitation facilities, leading to water pollution. This was evident in a 2019 survey conducted in Iraq, which identified 74 oil-polluted sites from conflict, with four clusters of particular concern due to their scale and severity. Oil facilities are frequent targets during conflicts, and their sabotage can have lasting impacts on local water bodies and habitats.

Bombing can also generate massive amounts of debris, which may contain hazardous materials such as ERW (explosive remnants of war). The improper management of this debris, often due to collapsed local governance, can lead to uncontrolled dumping and open burning, further contributing to water pollution. For example, the cleanup of Aleppo and Homs in Syria would require over a million truckloads of debris, a process that would generate emissions and pollution.

Additionally, bombing ranges and military bases have been associated with water pollution. At bomb-making plants and testing ranges, explosives like RDX have contaminated water supplies, affecting areas like the Holston River and drinking water aquifers in the United States. Military installations often practice open burn and detonation, which contributes to extreme pollution without proper emissions controls.

Overall, bombing causes water pollution through the release of toxic chemicals, damage to water infrastructure, the creation of massive debris, and the contamination of water sources by military activities. These impacts have severe consequences for human health and the environment, underscoring the importance of addressing conflict pollution and implementing environmentally sound waste management practices.

Bombing causes soil pollution

Soil pollution from bombing can also occur through the corrosion of abandoned unexploded projectiles. Over time, the metallic capsules of these projectiles corrode, gradually releasing explosives and other toxic substances into the soil. This type of pollution can persist for many years, as evidenced by the presence of TNT derivatives in soils nearly 90 years after the Battle of Verdun.

Bombings can also cause physical disturbances to soil, a process known as "bombturbation." Explosions can create craters and hollows in the earth, displacing and mixing soil horizons, and resulting in significant topographical changes. The soil in these hollows is often compacted, perturbed, and contaminated by metallic fragments, ash, and residues of explosives. Additionally, the construction of underground tunnels and the emplacement of mines can also contribute to soil disturbance and contamination.

The environmental impacts of bombing on soil pollution are significant and can have long-lasting effects. The cleanup and recovery efforts in affected areas can be challenging and time-consuming, further hindering the recovery of the environment and the health of civilians who depend on these resources. It is important to address the harm caused by bombing-induced soil pollution and to work towards reducing the deployment of explosive weapons in populated areas to minimize their environmental and humanitarian impacts.

Bombing causes radioactive pollution

The use of explosive weapons in conflict zones has raised concerns about the environmental impact of bombing. Bombing can cause pollution through the release of toxic and hazardous chemicals, soil and water contamination, and the destruction of infrastructure.

One of the most significant consequences of bombing is radioactive pollution, which has devastating effects on human health and the environment. Radioactive pollution is primarily associated with the use of nuclear weapons and the testing and handling of nuclear materials. Nuclear weapons are considered the most destructive and inhumane weapons ever created due to their ability to cause widespread devastation and leave behind radioactive fallout. The bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki are stark reminders of the catastrophic impact of nuclear weapons, with long-term health consequences, including cancer and genetic damage, still affecting the survivors and the environment.

The production, testing, and use of nuclear weapons result in radioactive pollution. The detonation of a nuclear bomb releases vast amounts of energy in the form of blast, heat, and radiation. This radiation, known as ionizing radiation, persists in the environment, causing radioactive fallout in neighbouring territories and resulting in radiation sickness, cancer, and genetic diseases. The radioactive fallout from nuclear explosions can spread over a wide area, causing additional casualties and destruction beyond the initial blast radius.

In addition to the direct impact of nuclear explosions, the production and testing of nuclear weapons also contribute to radioactive pollution. For example, the underground nuclear tests conducted in French Polynesia between 1966 and 1996 led to a radioactive leak into the ocean, contaminating the soil and causing long-lasting environmental damage. Similarly, the handling and storage of nuclear waste pose significant risks, as evident in the case of the Marshall Islands, where rising sea levels threaten to crack the concrete dome containing radioactive waste, endangering the surrounding marine life and human populations.

Furthermore, the threat of dirty bombs, which combine radioactive material with conventional explosives, adds another dimension to the problem of radioactive pollution caused by bombing. While dirty bombs have not been used in actual conflicts, their potential for causing radioactive contamination and spreading hazardous radioactive materials over a wide area is a serious concern.

Bombing causes climate change

Bombing and other explosive weapons have a detrimental impact on the environment, causing climate change and hindering adaptation efforts. The use of explosive weapons in populated areas (EWIPA) results in harmful pollution and destruction, with long-lasting effects on the environment and public health.

The immediate consequences of bombing include air and water pollution, as well as soil contamination. The burning of buildings and infrastructure releases toxic smoke and hazardous chemicals, affecting air quality and human health. Bombing can also lead to the destruction of water supply systems, resulting in contaminated water sources. In addition, the debris generated from bombed buildings and infrastructure can contain hazardous materials, hindering recycling efforts and causing further contamination during cleanup.

The impact of bombing on climate change is significant. The manufacture and use of weapons contribute to emissions and pollution. For example, the production of metal casings for bombs results in far more emissions than their deployment. The use of military fuel, such as jet fuel and diesel, and the release of methane gases and toxic heavy metals from damaged industrial facilities further exacerbate emissions.

Bombing can also set back efforts to adapt to and mitigate climate change. For instance, the destruction of buildings with solar panels in Gaza undermines the region's ability to secure clean energy and adapt to a changing climate. Similarly, the collapse of solid waste infrastructure and uncontrolled dumping of debris can lead to open burning of waste, releasing additional pollutants into the atmosphere.

The environmental consequences of bombing are interconnected with climate change, exacerbating risks and impacts. The destruction caused by bombing affects public health and long-term recovery, particularly in vulnerable communities. It diverts resources that could be used to combat climate change and contributes to global instability, increasing the danger of nuclear conflict. As climate change intensifies, the risks of environmental catastrophe from nuclear weapons testing and waste also grow.

Frequently asked questions