Apple's Pollution Problem: Environmental Impact Of Iphones And Macs

Apple is one of the world's most recognisable brands, with millions of iPhones and other devices manufactured every year. With this level of production, it is inevitable that the company's environmental impact is significant. While Apple has made efforts to reduce its environmental footprint, such as through recycling and using recycled materials, it has also faced criticism for its secretive supply chain, the short lifespans of its products, and the difficulty of repairing or upgrading them, all of which contribute to electronic waste. The company's manufacturing processes and those of its suppliers have been accused of causing pollution and poisoning workers, with Apple's offices and supply chain also contributing to climate change, which threatens the giant panda's habitat.

Apple's supply chain and the pollution it causes

Apple has been working towards reducing pollution and becoming carbon neutral across its whole value chain by the end of the decade. In its 2024 Environmental Progress Report, the company reported a cut in greenhouse gas emissions by more than 55% since 2015. Apple has also set targets for its suppliers to use renewable energy, with more than 16.5 GW of renewable energy supported globally through its Supplier Clean Energy Program.

However, Apple's supply chain is on a collision course with climate change. Apple's manufacturing footprint is in the same belt of the planet where natural disasters will intensify most rapidly due to global warming. Five of the 13 middle-income nations facing a GDP drop of at least two percentage points by 2037 on a 3 degrees Celsius warming pathway are countries where Apple has suppliers: India, Indonesia, the Philippines, Malaysia, and Cambodia.

Apple's vast supply chain comprises more than 400 facilities across 180 regions in nearly 30 countries, stretching from the Austrian Alps to Vietnam's Mekong Delta. The company's supply chain is largely based in Asia and the US, where temperatures have been rising. The manufacturing belt in Asia is seeing a rapid wave of migration to its cities, providing a workforce to assemble Apple's products. However, this demographic phenomenon is also contributing to a burst in energy demand, keeping emissions on the rise.

Apple has been striving to offset the environmental damage caused by its operations by adopting more environmentally sound practices. The company has been working towards using only recycled and renewable materials in its products and packaging and eliminating its reliance on mining. Apple has also been exploring the use of artificial intelligence, machine learning, robotics, and automation to improve recycling processes within its supply chain. In addition, Apple has been innovating to eliminate plastic from its packaging, using fibre-based alternatives.

Apple's waste has increased over the years

Apple's waste generation has indeed increased over the years. In 2012, the company sent 4.8 million pounds of waste to landfills, which rose to 13 million by 2015 and 36.5 million pounds (or 18,250 tons) in 2018. This increase is attributed to the company producing more devices, which inevitably leads to more waste.

Apple's total waste generation continued to rise in 2021, reaching 52,490 tonnes, an increase of 14.8% from 2020. While the company recycled 33,334 tonnes of waste and diverted 68% of its waste from landfills, it still landfilled 15,060 tonnes, a 28.6% increase from the previous year.

Apple's contribution to waste generation is part of a broader issue in the electronics industry. Electronic waste, or e-waste, is the fastest-growing form of domestic waste globally. The short lifespan of smartphones and the constant release of new, 'improved' versions encourage consumers to upgrade frequently, leading to more waste. Additionally, the production of consumer electronics involves environmentally detrimental processes such as mining, which disrupts ecological sites and renders land susceptible to erosion.

Apple has recognized the need to address waste management and environmental sustainability. The company has expanded its recycling programs, aiming to increase device longevity and divert waste from landfills. Apple has set an ambitious goal to be carbon neutral by 2030 and is taking steps toward using only recycled and renewable materials in its products and packaging. While these efforts are commendable, critics argue that they do not go far enough, and Apple's waste generation continues to be a significant concern.

Apple's environmental messaging is misleading

Apple has been striving to offset the environmental damage caused by its manufacturing processes by adopting more environmentally sound practices. The company's Environmental Responsibility Report, released in April 2019, showcases its efforts to become more ecologically friendly. While Apple's commitment to protecting the environment is commendable, there are several instances where their environmental messaging can be considered misleading.

One of the main issues is the discrepancy between Apple's sustainability ambitions and the reality of their practices. For example, Apple has made strides in keeping its devices supported for longer, which can help reduce e-waste. However, the natural degeneration of batteries, which can only be replaced by Apple or Apple-certified providers, often leads to consumers purchasing a new device instead of repairing the existing one. Additionally, Apple's decision to remove charging bricks from the iPhone 12 series packaging, positioned as an effort to reduce e-waste, actually resulted in increased carbon emissions due to separate packaging, delivery, and the need for consumers to purchase adapters.

Apple's messaging around recycling and waste reduction is also misleading. While the company has made progress in diverting waste from landfills, it is producing significantly more waste than in previous years due to increased device production. Apple's hazardous waste nearly doubled from 2017 to 2018, and its total waste sent to landfills rose from 4.8 million pounds in 2012 to 36.5 million pounds in 2018. This indicates that while Apple is taking steps to recycle and reuse materials, the overall increase in waste generation undermines the effectiveness of these initiatives.

Furthermore, Apple's environmental messaging often overlooks the inherently environmentally detrimental nature of electronics manufacturing. Around 80% of the carbon emissions from electronic devices are produced during the manufacturing process, and mining for rare earth minerals and metals disrupts ecological sites and renders land susceptible to erosion and water contamination. While Apple has initiatives to prioritize recycled materials and reduce reliance on mining, the scale of their production continues to contribute significantly to these environmental issues.

In conclusion, while Apple has made progress in certain areas of environmental sustainability, their messaging can be misleading by omitting critical context. Apple's efforts to reduce waste, recycle materials, and improve device longevity are commendable, but they are overshadowed by the company's increasing waste generation, unsustainable production rates, and environmentally detrimental manufacturing processes. To align their practices with their messaging, Apple needs to address these systemic issues and take more substantial steps towards environmental responsibility.

Apple's products are non-upgradable and non-maintainable

Apple's products have been criticised for being non-upgradable and non-maintainable, with some claiming that this contributes to pollution. Apple's laptops, iMacs, and Mac computers have soldered components that cannot be upgraded or replaced by the user or even, in some cases, by Apple technicians. This is said to be in line with Steve Jobs's vision of Macs as "appliances that were a closed box".

The non-upgradability of Apple products has been a concern for some time, with forum discussions dating back to at least 2012. Some professional users have expressed disappointment, stating that they prefer hardware that can be upgraded over time. This is especially important for pro users, who may require specific hardware configurations for their work.

In addition to being non-upgradable, Apple products have also been criticised for their short lifespan, which contributes to the growing problem of electronic waste (e-waste). Apple has been accused of planned obsolescence, releasing 'improved' versions of iPhones annually and encouraging users to upgrade through various means, including end-of-contract timing and brand loyalty. This results in many users upgrading their devices, even if their current ones are still functional.

Apple has made some efforts to address the issue of e-waste, such as deciding not to supply charging bricks with the iPhone 12 series, positioning it as an environmental move. However, this decision has been criticised as doing more harm than good, as users who are not upgrading from an iPhone 11 have to purchase a compatible adapter separately, resulting in additional packaging, carbon footprint, and delivery.

While Apple has taken steps towards sustainability, such as striving to use recycled and renewable materials, there is still room for improvement. The company's environmental responsibility reports show that Apple is producing more waste than in previous years, with a significant increase in hazardous waste. This is largely due to the increased production of devices, which inherently generates more waste.

In summary, Apple's products are largely non-upgradable and non-maintainable, which has been a concern for some users, particularly professionals. This, coupled with the short lifespan of Apple devices and the issue of planned obsolescence, contributes to the growing problem of e-waste. While Apple has made some efforts towards sustainability, there is a need for further improvement to reduce the environmental impact of their products.

Apple's manufacturing processes are environmentally detrimental

One of the main issues is the short lifespan of iPhones and other Apple products. Apple releases new and 'improved' versions of its products annually, leading many users to upgrade. This results in a high volume of electronic waste, as old devices are discarded. Apple has been criticized for making devices that are difficult to repair or upgrade, further contributing to the waste problem. Additionally, Apple's recycling efforts have been questioned, as only a fraction of the materials in a typical gadget can be recovered, and recycled devices still contribute to environmental damage during the manufacturing process.

The manufacturing of electronics inherently has a negative environmental impact. According to Greenpeace, around 80% of the carbon emissions caused by electronic devices are produced during the manufacturing process. Apple's supply chain, particularly in China, has been accused of polluting and poisoning the environment. The factories that supply Apple with parts such as batteries, chipboards, phone casings, and screens produce a significant amount of pollution. Apple has also been criticized for its lack of transparency regarding its supply chain and its impact on the environment.

Mining is another environmentally detrimental process in electronics production. The electronics industry is the second-largest consumer of copper, and rare earth minerals are used in smartphones. Mining disrupts ecological sites through deforestation and habitat destruction, and it renders the land susceptible to erosion. Ores and minerals can leach into the soil and groundwater, contaminating the water table near mining sites and making drinking water unsafe.

Apple's manufacturing processes have improved in terms of environmental sustainability, but there is still a long way to go. The company needs to address the issues of waste generation, supply chain transparency, and the environmental impact of mining to truly mitigate the environmental damage caused by its manufacturing processes.

Frequently asked questions