Trains Vs Cars: Who's The Bigger Polluter?

Trains and cars are two of the most common modes of transportation. With the ongoing climate crisis, it is important to understand the environmental impact of both. Trains are generally considered to be more environmentally friendly than cars as they reduce the number of vehicles on the road and offer a more efficient method of commuting. However, the carbon footprint of trains and cars depends on various factors, such as the type of energy consumed and the country of operation. For instance, electric trains in France are likely to have a lower carbon footprint than those in the UK due to France's greater reliance on nuclear power and renewable energy sources. On the other hand, freight trains, which make up the majority of trains, run on diesel and emit harmful pollutants, including particulate matter and nitrogen oxides, which have been linked to serious health issues.

Passenger trains are more climate-smart than freight trains

Trains are generally considered to be a more environmentally friendly mode of transport than cars. However, this is not always the case, especially when comparing passenger trains with freight trains. While passenger trains are often seen as a more climate-smart form of transportation, freight trains can have a significant environmental impact.

Passenger trains are typically more regulated than freight trains, and the latter often run on diesel, accelerating climate change and emitting harmful pollutants. In the United States, freight trains are a vehicle of the fossil fuel industry, transporting coal and oil, and their routes often run through or parallel to communities of colour and low-income communities, subjecting them to toxic pollution and health issues.

The carbon footprint of passenger trains can vary depending on factors such as energy consumption and class of ticket. For example, the Eurostar, which is transitioning to renewable energy sources, produces only 6g CO2e per passenger km, while less efficient national rail services that rely on diesel power can produce an average of 41g CO2e per passenger km.

On the other hand, freight railroads are investing in sustainable business practices and technologies to reduce their carbon footprint. They are developing and implementing new technologies, such as hydrogen-powered locomotives, and working with their supply chain partners to reduce GHG emissions. Freight trains are also more fuel-efficient than road transport, being able to carry one ton of freight nearly 500 miles on one gallon of fuel.

While passenger trains are generally more climate-smart than freight trains, the latter is making strides towards sustainability. With continued investment in sustainable practices and the development of new technologies, freight trains can become a greener mode of transport.

Trains reduce the number of cars on the road

While trains are often regarded as a more environmentally friendly mode of transport than cars, the reality is more nuanced. Various factors influence the carbon footprint of train and car travel, such as the type of energy consumed and the class of train ticket. Nevertheless, trains have the potential to significantly reduce the number of cars on the road, alleviating road congestion and offering environmental benefits.

Trains are more fuel-efficient than trucks, capable of moving one ton of freight over 480 miles on just one gallon of fuel. This efficiency translates to a substantially lower carbon footprint, up to 75% less than trucks. Additionally, a single rail car can carry three to four truckloads of freight, equating to the capacity of 300 trucks in a single train. This directly results in fewer vehicles on the road, reducing traffic congestion and the environmental impact of road transportation.

The use of trains for freight transportation can significantly reduce greenhouse gas emissions. It is estimated that transferring just 10% of freight from trucks to rail could cut emissions by over 17 million tons annually, which is equivalent to removing 3.35 million cars from highways. This reduction in the number of cars on the road has a considerable environmental impact, contributing to lower carbon emissions and improved air quality.

Furthermore, trains are becoming increasingly environmentally friendly over time. The emergence of electric trains and the transition to renewable energy sources, such as the Eurostar, are positive steps towards reducing the carbon footprint of train travel. In contrast, cars tend to have a shorter lifespan, facilitating the quicker adoption of new technologies and the replacement of older, polluting models with greener electric alternatives.

While trains have the potential to reduce the number of cars on the road and offer environmental advantages, it is important to acknowledge the impact of freight trains on communities, particularly low-income and minority neighbourhoods. Freight trains emit toxic pollution, including particulate matter (PM) and nitrogen oxides, contributing to health issues and poor air quality for those living nearby. Therefore, while trains can reduce the number of cars, addressing the pollution generated by freight trains is crucial to ensuring the overall environmental and health benefits of train transportation.

Trains are more energy-efficient than cars

While the assumption is that trains are better for the environment than cars, the reality is more complex. Trains are generally more energy-efficient than cars, but this is not always the case.

Firstly, it is important to consider the type of energy that the train or car consumes. Electric trains are more efficient than internal combustion engines, but the power generation in thermal power plants is limited to Carnot efficiency, and there are transmission losses from the plant to the train. In countries like France, where nuclear power and renewable energy sources provide most of the energy for electric trains, the carbon footprint of a train is likely to be lower than in countries with fewer renewable energy sources.

The efficiency of trains and cars also depends on their passenger load. Trains tend to be more efficient when they are full, and their efficiency decreases when they are run with empty seats. Cars, on the other hand, are often driven by a single person, and having multiple passengers can increase their energy efficiency per person. However, cars require more space for parking and roads, and they need to be replaced more frequently, which can lead to more waste.

In terms of emissions, trains are responsible for a lot less pollution than cars in absolute terms. However, this comparison becomes more complicated when considering the number of passengers. Some of the most energy-efficient trains, like the Eurostar, produce 6g CO2e per passenger km, while the least efficient trains produce 41g CO2e per passenger km.

Additionally, the manufacturing impact of trains and cars should be considered. Electric vehicles may have a lower carbon footprint during their use, but the mining of materials and battery production can also contribute significantly to their overall emissions.

Overall, while trains are generally more energy-efficient than cars, the specific circumstances, such as energy sources, passenger loads, and manufacturing processes, can impact the comparison.

Trains emit less carbon than cars

Public transportation in the form of trains helps to reduce the impact of CO2 emissions on the environment. High-speed rails are especially effective in this regard. Additionally, trains can reduce noise pollution, which has been linked to increased stress levels and adverse effects on cardiovascular health.

The carbon footprint of travel via car or train depends on various factors, such as the type of energy consumed and the class of train ticket. For example, some energy-efficient trains, like the Eurostar, produce as little as 6g CO2e per passenger km, while more polluting trains can average 41g CO2e per passenger km.

While trains are generally more environmentally friendly, the situation is complex. The freight rail system, for instance, emits more carbon pollution than many states, and the locomotive exhaust contains pollutants like particulate matter (PM) and nitrogen oxides, which have severe health impacts on nearby communities. Furthermore, the pace of technological advancement in the car industry, such as the emergence of electric vehicles, is faster than the transition to more energy-efficient trains.

Trains produce less noise pollution than cars

Trains and cars have long been compared in terms of their environmental impact. While trains are typically considered a more environmentally friendly mode of transport, the reality is more nuanced.

When it comes to noise pollution, trains produce less noise pollution than cars. This is due to several factors. Firstly, trains operate on fixed tracks, which means that their noise impact is generally confined to the areas surrounding the tracks. In contrast, cars are driven on roads that often run through residential neighbourhoods, exposing a larger number of people to noise pollution. Additionally, the rubber wheels of cars travelling on asphalt roads create more friction and, consequently, more noise than the steel wheels of trains running on steel tracks.

The type of fuel used by trains and cars also contributes to their noise pollution levels. Diesel trains, for example, are known to emit a loud chugging sound as they accelerate, which can be disruptive to nearby communities. Electric trains, on the other hand, are generally quieter and produce less noise pollution. Cars, particularly older models with internal combustion engines, can be noisier than trains, especially when accelerating or travelling at high speeds.

It is worth noting that the noise pollution levels of trains and cars can vary depending on various factors such as the age of the vehicle, the quality of the tracks or roads, and the surrounding environment. However, on average, trains produce less noise pollution than cars.

While the focus here is on noise pollution, it is worth noting that when it comes to carbon emissions, the comparison is more complex. While trains typically have a lower carbon footprint per passenger kilometre, the situation changes when we consider passenger-to-passenger comparisons. The carbon footprint of car or train travel depends on factors such as the type of fuel used, the energy mix of the country, and the class of train ticket.

Frequently asked questions