Steam Vs Diesel Engines: Which Pollutes More?

Steam engines and diesel engines have been pitted against each other for decades, with the former being phased out in the 1960s due to the rise of diesel and electric trains. However, with the recent push for more environmentally friendly options, the question of which engine is worse for the environment has come to the forefront once again. Steam engines burn coal, which is a dirty fuel, but some argue that the type of pollution produced is more natural and less damaging than the greenhouse gases produced by diesel engines.

Steam engines burn coal, releasing carbon into the atmosphere

Steam engines, particularly those burning coal, have been associated with the release of carbon into the atmosphere. This carbon is in the form of carbon dioxide (CO2), a greenhouse gas that contributes to the greenhouse effect and global warming. The burning of fossil fuels, including coal, has significantly increased since the introduction of coal-fired steam engines in the 1700s, leading to a substantial rise in atmospheric CO2 levels.

While steam engines burning coal release carbon emissions, there are ongoing discussions and advancements exploring the potential of using carbon dioxide as an alternative to steam. Engineers are investigating the possibility of replacing steam with supercritical carbon dioxide, which could offer up to 50% greater thermal efficiency with a smaller and more cost-effective turbine. This technology would involve using carbon dioxide above its critical temperature and pressure, resulting in a density similar to its liquid state while retaining the behaviour of a gas.

In the context of transportation, steam-powered vehicles have been considered as a potential solution to reduce carbon emissions. Early steam-powered automobiles, such as those manufactured by the Stanley brothers, faced challenges due to their weight and the time required to generate sufficient steam. However, advancements in technology have addressed some of these issues, and there has been a resurgence of interest in steam power as a means to combat air pollution.

It is important to note that steam-powered vehicles do not inherently reduce carbon emissions unless they are paired with energy sources that do not emit carbon dioxide. Steam boilers can burn fuel more efficiently than internal combustion engines, resulting in cleaner exhaust composed primarily of water and carbon dioxide. However, if these steam-powered engines continue to rely on burning fossil fuels or gasoline, the overall carbon emissions will not be significantly reduced.

To achieve substantial reductions in carbon emissions, a comprehensive approach is necessary. This includes transitioning to alternative energy sources, such as electricity generated by wind turbines, solar panels, or other carbon-neutral methods. Additionally, improvements in battery technology have extended the range of electric vehicles, making them a more viable alternative to fossil fuel-powered transportation. By combining innovative technologies with sustainable energy sources, we can make significant strides toward reducing carbon emissions and mitigating the impacts of climate change.

Diesel engines produce greenhouse gases that remain in the atmosphere

Diesel engines are a major source of harmful pollutants. They produce greenhouse gases that remain in the atmosphere, contributing to climate change and global warming. Diesel fuel, derived from crude oil, releases various pollutants when burned, including ground-level ozone and particulate matter. While Ultra-Low-Sulfur Diesel (ULSD) fuel has helped to reduce emissions, diesel engines still emit significant carbon dioxide (CO2), which has risen from 278 parts per million (ppm) to over 417 ppm in the atmosphere—a 50% increase. This excess CO2 traps heat, causing climate shifts and temperature increases, impacting various environmental cycles.

Diesel engines, like other internal combustion engines, convert fuel energy into mechanical power. During ideal combustion, diesel engines produce CO2, water vapour (H2O), and unused engine charge air. However, incomplete combustion can lead to unburned hydrocarbons (HC), carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen oxides (NOx), and particulate matter (PM). These emissions have adverse health and environmental effects, including reduced visibility, crop damage, and increased cancer risk. Additionally, catalysts used in emission control can lead to the formation of new, highly toxic emissions.

The wearing down of brakes, clutches, tires, and road surfaces also contributes to non-exhaust particle emissions, which can be significant even in zero tailpipe emission vehicles. While newer diesel engines with particulate filters and advanced exhaust emission control systems can reduce particulate emissions by up to 90%, older diesel engines still contribute to air pollution. In 2022, diesel fuel consumption accounted for about 25% of the US transportation sector's CO2 emissions and 10% of total US energy-related CO2 emissions.

Compared to diesel engines, steam engines may have the potential to be less polluting. While steam engines burn coal and release carbon into the atmosphere, they do not produce the same type of greenhouse gases that diesel engines do. With modern advancements, steam engines could potentially have electronic control over fuel delivery, allowing for more perfect combustion and reduced emissions. However, the practicality and cost of steam engines may hinder their comeback.

Steam engines may be less polluting with modern fuel-delivery controls

Steam engines and diesel engines have been compared for their polluting effects, and there are arguments for and against both. Steam engines burn coal, which is a dirty fuel, and this is a significant drawback. However, it is argued that steam engines could be less polluting than diesel engines with modern fuel-delivery controls.

Steam engines are furnaces, and if built with modern technology, they could have electronic control of fuel delivery, which would monitor exhaust gases and produce perfect combustion. This would mean that the gases would not need to be fired and exhausted multiple times a minute, as is the case with diesel engines.

In addition, steam engines burning sustainably sourced fuel would be more environmentally friendly than diesel because the fuel would be carbon neutral. However, this would require a new industry to power the non-electrified rail network, and running costs would increase.

The total amount of carbon emitted by steam engines is minimal, and almost all of its pollution is outside towns. Steam engines also do not produce the same type of greenhouse gases as diesel engines, which remain in the atmosphere.

While diesel engines are considered more efficient and modern, steam engines may have the potential to be less polluting with the right advancements and fuel sources.

Steam engines are less popular than diesel, so they are less of a concern

Steam engines are less popular than diesel engines, so they are less of a concern when it comes to pollution. While steam engines burn coal and release carbon into the atmosphere, the total amount of carbon emitted is relatively minimal, and most of this pollution occurs outside of towns and populated areas. In addition, steam engines do not produce the same type of greenhouse gases as diesel engines, which remain in the atmosphere and contribute to global warming.

The popularity of diesel engines means that they are a more significant contributor to pollution than steam engines. Diesel engines are used in a variety of vehicles, from trains to cars, and are a major source of air pollution. In fact, diesel engines have been blamed for a large portion of the air pollution in California, with tourists avoiding diesel trains due to their lack of beauty and soul.

However, it is important to note that the pollution caused by steam engines can still have negative impacts on health. The smoke produced by burning coal can be harmful if inhaled regularly, and in hot and dry weather, there is an increased risk of line-side fires starting from stray sparks. As a result, steam train services may be suspended or replaced with diesel trains during these conditions.

Despite the concerns about pollution and health risks, some people advocate for the return of steam engines as a replacement for diesel. They argue that steam engines could be less polluting than diesel if they were built with modern technology, including electronic control of fuel delivery to monitor exhaust gases and produce perfect combustion. Additionally, if steam engines used sustainably sourced fuel, they could be more environmentally friendly than diesel engines, which are not known for being "green".

While the popularity of diesel engines makes them a more pressing concern when it comes to pollution, the potential for steam engines to make a comeback means that their environmental impact cannot be ignored. However, with only a small number of steam engines in operation compared to diesel, they currently pose less of a pollution problem.

Steam engines could use sustainable fuel to be more environmentally friendly

Steam engines have been a source of fascination for many, with their historical charm and distinctive character. Traditionally, these engines have been associated with burning coal, releasing carbon emissions into the atmosphere. However, the conversation around steam engines is evolving, with a growing focus on sustainability and environmental concerns.

The development of carbon-neutral solid biofuel and modern steam locomotive technology has opened new possibilities for steam engines. The Coalition for Sustainable Rail (CSR), a collaboration between the University of Minnesota's Institute on the Environment (IonE) and Sustainable Rail International (SRI), aims to create the world's first carbon-neutral, high-speed steam locomotive. This initiative, known as CSR Project 130, seeks to develop the cleanest and most powerful passenger locomotive, showcasing the potential of solid biofuel and modern steam technology.

To achieve sustainability in steam generation, a shift from fossil fuels to renewable energy sources is essential. Biomass steam generation, for example, utilizes organic materials such as wood chips, agricultural and food residues, or dedicated energy crops to produce steam. Burning biomass reduces carbon emissions as it releases only the carbon absorbed during the plant's growth. Another sustainable option is Concentrated Solar Power (CSP), which harnesses sunlight to generate steam through mirrors or lenses that concentrate solar energy, providing an emission-free heat source.

Additionally, steam engines can be powered by electricity, transitioning from gas-fired to electric boilers. While this may incur higher operational costs in the near term, it aligns with the broader shift towards renewable electricity, as demonstrated by initiatives like the UK's National Health Service ensuring 100% renewable electricity across its buildings.

By embracing these sustainable practices and exploring technologies like Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS), which captures and stores carbon dioxide emissions underground, steam engines can become more environmentally friendly. This transformation can contribute to a greener and more sustainable future, reducing greenhouse gas emissions and improving energy efficiency.

In summary, while traditional steam engines have been associated with carbon emissions, the exploration of sustainable fuels and technologies offers a promising path towards environmentally friendly steam power. With initiatives like CSR Project 130 and the adoption of renewable energy sources, steam engines can play a role in a more sustainable future.

Frequently asked questions