Speed Bumps: Pollution Solution Or Problem?

Speed bumps are commonly used to regulate vehicle speed in residential areas and towns. While they are effective in reducing traffic accidents, their impact on the environment is a topic of debate. Some argue that speed bumps cause drivers to accelerate and decelerate frequently, leading to increased fuel consumption and emissions. Others suggest that poorly designed speed bumps can contribute to pollution and noise levels. However, proponents of speed bumps believe that they encourage safer driving and can help reduce traffic speeds, especially in areas with high congestion. The debate around speed bumps and their impact on pollution highlights the challenge of balancing road safety with environmental concerns.

Speed bumps can increase emissions due to stop-start driving

Speed bumps are designed to regulate the speed of traffic, particularly in residential areas and towns. While they are effective in reducing the speed of vehicles, they can also contribute to increased emissions and air pollution.

The placement of speed bumps often encourages drivers to accelerate between them and slow down right before crossing, leading to greater changes in acceleration and increased fuel consumption. This stop-start driving style results in higher emissions as fuel is burned during the acceleration phase after each bump. The braking process also contributes to emissions, as the forward momentum of the vehicle is converted into heat, requiring additional fuel to regain speed.

Research by GOFAR found that emissions increased by 60% on roads with speed bumps compared to similar roads without them. The experiment, conducted using a 1.4L 2005 Mazda 3, highlighted the impact of speed bumps on emissions due to the stop-start driving pattern they create.

The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) has acknowledged the role of speed bump design in emissions. They recommend redesigning speed bumps to facilitate smoother driving, reducing carbon emissions and other contaminants released into the atmosphere. Improperly designed speed bumps, often found in private car parks, can be challenging to navigate for certain vehicles, leading to increased emissions during acceleration and braking.

To address the issue of increased emissions, some cities are considering alternative solutions. For example, Mexico City plans to remove up to 30,000 speed bumps to improve traffic flow and air quality. In London, flat speed bumps painted to look like traditional ones are being tested. These innovative designs aim to maintain safety while reducing the environmental impact associated with stop-start driving caused by conventional speed bumps.

Poorly designed speed bumps can cause increased emissions and vehicle damage

Speed bumps can also cause damage to vehicles, particularly when approached at high speeds or from an awkward angle. The shock absorbers in a car are designed to smooth out minor bumps and dips in the road, but they can be overwhelmed by speed bumps, leading to a breakdown of the shocks. This can result in damage to the steering, alignment, tires, electrical system, engine mounting bolts, air conditioning, radiator, oil pan, and gaskets. In addition, the exhaust system, which runs along the underside of the vehicle, is particularly vulnerable to damage when a speed bump is hit too hard.

While speed bumps are intended to ensure safety, they can also pose risks if not approached with caution. Driving slowly and carefully over speed bumps can help mitigate the potential for damage.

The impact of speed bumps on emissions and vehicle damage has sparked debates about their effectiveness in reducing pollution. Some argue that smoother driving, rather than speed bumps, is the key to reducing vehicle emissions. However, others emphasize the need for speed bumps to control speeding and prioritize the safety of pedestrians and residents in congested areas.

The removal of speed bumps has been proposed by some as a solution to improving air quality and traffic flow, as seen in Mexico City's plan to remove up to 30,000 speed bumps. Yet, critics argue that the focus should be on reducing vehicle usage and encouraging alternative modes of transportation to address the root cause of vehicle pollution.

Speed bumps can reduce traffic accidents and lower vehicle speed

Speed bumps are a class of traffic-calming devices that use vertical deflection to slow down vehicles and improve safety conditions. They are widely used on roads to ensure drivers are paying attention and to reduce the risk of accidents. Speed bumps are also effective in residential areas, where they can deter drivers from speeding through neighbourhoods and improve safety for children and other pedestrians.

Speed is a primary factor in most vehicle accidents, increasing both the risk and severity of collisions. As drivers move faster, they have less time to respond to road conditions, and any resulting collision causes more damage. Speed bumps are an effective tool to counter speeding, as they force drivers to slow down and increase their awareness of the road. Research shows that speed bumps can reduce the odds of a child pedestrian being injured by more than half. They are also effective in preventing parking lot accidents and diverting traffic away from school zones and other sensitive areas.

While speed bumps are successful in reducing speeds and accidents, they may also have some disadvantages. For example, they can increase traffic noise and may damage vehicles if traversed at high speeds. Additionally, traditional speed bumps can slow down emergency vehicles, although this issue has been addressed with the development of speed cushions and dynamic speed bumps that allow larger vehicles to pass at higher speeds.

The effectiveness of speed bumps in reducing vehicle speed and improving safety is well-documented. Decades of studies have shown that speed bumps not only slow drivers down but also reduce car accidents and pedestrian deaths. They are particularly effective in residential areas, where they can improve safety for children and pedestrians and deter speeding and rat running. However, the decision to install speed bumps should be made on a case-by-case basis, considering the specific needs and risks of each location.

Smoothing out speed bumps can reduce emissions by up to 20%

Speed bumps are an important road safety feature, but they have also been linked to higher levels of air pollution. The friction between vehicles and speed bumps causes an increase in emissions, with vehicles driving between two speed bumps producing double the amount of pollutants. The acceleration and deceleration of vehicles as they approach and leave speed bumps also cause higher levels of noise and air pollution.

A report by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) has recommended that speed bumps be redesigned to facilitate smoother driving, which would reduce carbon emissions and other contaminants. The positioning of speed bumps encourages drivers to speed up and slow down between them, causing greater emissions. NICE recommends that speed bumps be repositioned to encourage drivers to maintain a steady speed.

Smoothing out speed bumps could reduce emissions by up to 20%, according to Samantha Heath, CEO of the London Sustainability Exchange, who contributed to the NICE report. This can be achieved by replacing traditional bumps with speed tables, which are longer and flatter, raising the whole vehicle off the ground.

While some have argued that removing speed bumps altogether would reduce emissions, this is controversial. Speed bumps are an important tool in reducing traffic congestion and controlling speeds, particularly in residential areas. Removing them could increase noise levels and make roads more dangerous, particularly for vulnerable road users. Instead, a multifaceted approach is needed to tackle vehicle emissions, including reducing the number of vehicles on the road, improving traffic flow, and encouraging smoother driving.

Speed bumps are not the cause of vehicle pollution

While speed bumps have been criticised for causing noise and increased emissions, they are not the primary cause of vehicle pollution. The core issue is that people drive too often, and too fast.

Speed bumps are intended to slow traffic and reduce through traffic. They are necessary because many drivers cannot be trusted to drive at safe and social speeds. Without speed bumps, drivers would be inclined to speed, which would be unsafe for pedestrians and other road users.

The argument against speed bumps is that they cause drivers to accelerate and decelerate rapidly, which increases fuel consumption and emissions. However, this is not an argument against the existence of speed bumps, but rather their design and placement. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) has recommended that speed bumps be redesigned to facilitate smoother driving, which would reduce emissions.

In addition, the problem of vehicle pollution cannot be blamed on speed bumps when the number of vehicles on the road is at a record high. In 2016, there were 320.5 billion vehicle miles travelled on Great Britain's roads, a 1.4% increase from the previous year. This included a 3.4% increase in van and light goods traffic, due to the growth in internet shopping. The combined effect of all this traffic is an estimated 20,000 premature deaths due to emissions, and more than 2,000 schools and nurseries facing illegal smog levels.

Rather than blaming speed bumps, the focus should be on reducing the number of vehicles on the road, and improving driving habits. This could include measures such as teaching smooth driving as standard, prohibiting idling outside hospitals and schools, and increasing the number of electric vehicle charging points.

Frequently asked questions