Water Pollution And Nuclear Power Plants: What's The Truth?

Nuclear power plants have been a topic of debate for decades, with proponents arguing that they offer a cleaner alternative to fossil fuels, while critics point out the potential for catastrophic environmental disasters. While nuclear power plants do not directly emit carbon dioxide, their construction, operation, and fuel cycle can have significant environmental impacts. One of the primary concerns surrounding nuclear power plants is their potential to pollute water sources, as seen in the Fukushima disaster, where radioactive water leaked into the ocean, and the incident in Vermont Yankee, where radioactive water was released. The risk of water pollution is not just theoretical, as nuclear power plants produce radioactive waste and effluents that can contaminate drinking water and harm human health.

Radioactive leaks and accidents

There have been more than 100 serious nuclear accidents and incidents worldwide from 1952 to 2009, with 60% of these occurring in the USA. The Chernobyl disaster in 1986, the Fukushima nuclear disaster in 2011, the Three Mile Island accident in 1979, and the SL-1 accident in 1961 are some of the most prominent examples of serious nuclear power plant accidents.

The Chernobyl accident in 1986, for instance, released radioactive isotopes such as iodine-131 (I-131), cesium-134 (Cs-134), cesium-137 (Cs-137), strontium-90 (Sr-90), and plutonium-239 into the environment. These isotopes contaminated water sources, leading to increased levels of radioactive iodine in tap water in Tokyo, Japan, and Lake Kojanovskoe in Russia, which provided drinking water for about 9 million Ukrainians. The impact of the Chernobyl accident is still being studied, with researchers following over 12,500 people exposed to I-131 and finding a significant increase in thyroid cancer cases, with the risk remaining high for at least 30 years.

The Fukushima nuclear disaster in 2011, caused by an earthquake and tsunami, also resulted in the release of radioactive material and the evacuation of residents within 12 miles of the plant. Similarly, the Three Mile Island accident in 1979 was due to a stuck relief valve, causing the release of large amounts of radioactive cooling water into the containment building.

While nuclear power plants have diverse barriers and safety systems in place, along with trained operators and regulatory requirements, the potential for catastrophic failure and widespread contamination of water and air remains.

Tritium and other radioactive waste

Radioactive waste is a byproduct of nuclear power plants. Radioactive wastes are subject to strict regulations that govern their handling, transportation, storage, and disposal to protect human health and the environment. The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) regulates the operation of nuclear power plants and classifies radioactive waste as low-level or high-level. Low-level waste includes contaminated tools, protective clothing, wiping cloths, and other disposable items with small amounts of radioactive particles. High-level waste consists of spent nuclear reactor fuel, which is highly radioactive and initially stored in pools of water that act as a radiation shield.

Tritium, a radioactive isotope of hydrogen, is one of the radioactive wastes produced by nuclear power plants. It is generated naturally by the interaction between cosmic rays and the atmosphere, but nuclear power plants, nuclear weapons manufacturing, and atomic bomb testing also release significant amounts of tritium into the environment. Tritium releases from nuclear power plants into the atmosphere and bodies of water can be substantial, and it poses health risks due to its ability to emit radioactive beta particles. Tritium can be inhaled or swallowed, and its beta particles can damage DNA, potentially leading to serious diseases.

The high cost of tritium, which is practically non-existent in nature, has spurred interest in developing tritium-extracting solutions to decontaminate nuclear waste and recycle this valuable material. Researchers from Italy and France have made significant progress in this area, developing membrane technologies capable of decontaminating waste and extracting tritium for reuse. These innovations have the potential to reduce waste management costs and improve the efficiency of nuclear power plants.

While nuclear power plants do not directly burn fossil fuels and thus have lower carbon dioxide emissions, they still produce radioactive waste that can contaminate the environment and pose health risks. The potential for catastrophic accidents, such as fuel melting and the release of fission products, underscores the importance of effective waste management and safety protocols in the nuclear industry.

Safety measures and regulations

Nuclear power plants can potentially pollute water through the release of radioactive waste and effluents. However, nuclear power plants have strict safety measures and regulations in place to prevent and mitigate such incidents. These safety protocols are designed to protect the health and safety of neighbouring communities and the environment. Here are some of the key safety measures and regulations:

• Redundant Safety Measures: Nuclear power plants employ diverse and redundant barriers, safety systems, and backup measures to prevent and contain accidents. These include backup batteries, emergency power supply units, and watertight facilities.
• Containment Structures: Nuclear reactors are often housed within containment structures, such as large concrete domes, designed to contain accidental releases of radiation and prevent widespread contamination.
• Security and Restricted Access: Nuclear power plants have restricted access with armed security teams guarding a large area surrounding the facility. This helps prevent unauthorised access and potential sabotage.
• Training and Skills: Operators of nuclear reactors undergo specialised training to handle abnormal incidents, ensuring a quick and effective response to minimise any potential impact.
• Testing and Maintenance: Regular testing, maintenance, and reassessment of safety margins are conducted to identify and mitigate potential risks. This includes testing of pumps, filtration systems, and emergency response equipment.
• Environmental Monitoring: Nuclear operators continuously monitor environmental radiation, including air, water, soil, and agricultural samples, to detect any abnormal levels of radioactivity and ensure that power plants do not adversely affect the surrounding environment.
• Regulations for Radioactive Waste: Radioactive wastes, including low-level and high-level waste, are subject to strict regulations governing their handling, transportation, storage, and disposal. This helps protect human health and the environment from radioactive contamination.
• Seismic and Flood Protection: Safety measures are implemented to protect against earthquakes and flooding, including the construction of sea walls and coastal levees. Passive autocatalytic hydrogen recombiners are also installed to prevent hydrogen explosions in the presence of oxygen.
• Emergency Response: Regional emergency response centres are established to provide additional support and equipment in the event of a nuclear incident. Evacuation and shelter-in-place protocols are also implemented to minimise potential exposure to residents in the surrounding areas.
• Regulatory Oversight: Independent regulatory bodies, such as the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and the Nuclear Risk Research Center (NRRC), oversee the operation of nuclear power plants and review safety assessments. They ensure compliance with regulatory requirements and safety standards.

Nuclear fuel cycle and reprocessing

The nuclear fuel cycle is a series of industrial processes that involve the production of electricity from uranium in nuclear power reactors. Uranium is mined and then undergoes milling, conversion, enrichment, and fuel fabrication before being used as fuel in a nuclear reactor. After about three years in a reactor, the used fuel is removed and placed in a storage pond adjacent to the reactor, where the radiation levels decrease. The fuel is stored in these ponds for several months or years before being transferred to dry storage, either on-site or at a central storage facility.

The used fuel can then be reprocessed to recover unused plutonium and uranium, which can be recycled into new fuel. Reprocessing can also reduce the volume of high-level waste and decrease its radioactivity. However, reprocessing is a costly and controversial process. It requires advanced facilities and specialised personnel due to the high radioactivity of the spent nuclear fuel. There are also concerns about the proliferation of nuclear weapons, as the separated plutonium can be used for military purposes.

Another method of recycling plutonium and uranium is Russia's REMIX process, which is not yet commercialised. In this process, a non-separated mix of plutonium and low-enriched uranium is combined to produce fuel. Additionally, the PUREX process, originally designed to separate plutonium for nuclear weapons, is commonly used for reprocessing, although it has been criticised for producing waste with high long-lived radioactivity.

The combination of reprocessing and recycling in today's reactors is considered an interim phase, as the focus shifts to the development and utilisation of fast neutron reactors. These reactors can burn all the actinides (uranium, plutonium, and minor actinides) together, reducing the long-term radioactivity of high-level wastes and increasing the proliferation resistance of the fuel cycle.

Uranium mining and milling

Uranium is a naturally occurring element with an average concentration of 2.8 parts per million in the Earth's crust. Traces of it occur almost everywhere, and it can be recovered in two ways: by conventional mining of the rock (ore), or by using strong chemicals to dissolve uranium from the rock that is still in the ground and pumping it to the surface.

Uranium mining can use large amounts of water. For example, the Roxby Downs Olympic Dam mine in South Australia uses 35,000 m3 of water each day and plans to increase this to 150,000 m3 per day. Uranium mining also produces radioactive wastes that, if not managed properly, can contaminate the environment. Radioactive wastes are subject to special regulations that govern their handling, transportation, storage, and disposal to protect human health and the environment.

In the past, the waste rock produced by underground and open-pit mining was piled up outside the mine. This practice has caused problems, including on Navajo lands where more than half of the small, abandoned uranium mines from the middle of the 20th century and their wastes remain. Wind can blow radioactive dust from the wastes into populated areas, and the wastes can contaminate surface water used for drinking. Uranium minerals are always associated with more radioactive elements such as radium and radon in the ore, which arise from the radioactive decay of uranium over a few million years. Therefore, although uranium itself is barely radioactive, the ore which is mined, especially if it is very high-grade, is handled with some care for occupational health and safety reasons.

Frequently asked questions