Lyft And Uber: Convenience Or Environmental Disaster?

The rise of ride-hailing companies like Uber and Lyft has sparked debates about their environmental impact and role in sustainable urban transportation systems. While these companies have the potential to reduce car ownership and promote shared rides, studies suggest they are currently increasing pollution and congestion, particularly in cities. For instance, a study by the Union of Concerned Scientists found that Uber and Lyft trips result in 69% more climate pollution than the low-carbon trips they displace, such as public transportation, biking, or walking. This has led to calls for these companies to electrify their fleets, improve connections to public transit, and incentivize customers to take pooled rides. Despite efforts to reduce their carbon footprint, Uber and Lyft's reliance on gas-burning vehicles and the convenience and affordability of their services continue to contribute to rising congestion and emissions in cities.

Uber and Lyft generate more pollution than trips they displace

Uber and Lyft have long been criticized for contributing to pollution and traffic congestion. A 2020 study by the Union of Concerned Scientists found that ride-hailing trips result in an estimated 69% more climate pollution on average than the trips they displace. This is because ride-hailing trips typically replace low-carbon trips such as public transportation, biking, or walking. The study also noted that ride-hailing services not only replace private car trips but also trips that could have been made on foot or by bike.

The study recommended that Uber and Lyft electrify their fleets and promote shared rides to reduce emissions. While both companies have shown a willingness to reduce their carbon footprint and have introduced various sustainability initiatives, their efforts have been slow and piecemeal. For example, Uber and Lyft have tried promoting pooled rides, but customers have been reluctant to share their trips. Similarly, their bike and scooter-sharing services are often unreliable due to local regulations and market conditions.

Another issue contributing to the problem is "deadheading," or the miles a vehicle travels without passengers between hired rides, which results in increased emissions and congestion. Additionally, a study based on the American Community Survey found that household vehicle ownership has increased in cities where Uber and Lyft are most heavily used, further adding to congestion and emissions.

Despite their efforts, the majority of trips on Uber and Lyft's platforms are still in gas-burning vehicles. This is because ride-hailing is often more convenient and less expensive than other less-polluting transportation options. As a result, Uber and Lyft are contributing to a significant increase in pollution and congestion, particularly in cities.

The companies increase total miles driven

A study by the Union of Concerned Scientists found that ride-hailing companies such as Uber and Lyft generate 69-70% more carbon pollution than the trips they displace. This is because ride-hailing trips usually replace low-carbon trips, such as public transportation, biking, or walking. The study also found that the number of miles driven by Americans has increased from 1.5 trillion to 3.2 trillion in the past 40 years, with the average American now driving 14,263 miles per year. This increase in miles driven is due in part to the convenience and low cost of ride-hailing services, which can make it more attractive to drive than to use alternative forms of transportation.

The study's authors recommend that Uber and Lyft make a more concerted effort to electrify their fleets and promote shared rides to reduce their carbon emissions. However, these strategies alone are unlikely to address the increase in vehicle miles travelled. For ride-hailing to contribute to better climate outcomes, the authors suggest that trips must be pooled and electric, displacing single-occupancy car trips and encouraging low-emissions modes such as mass transit, biking, and walking.

Another study based on the American Community Survey found that household vehicle ownership has increased in cities where Uber and Lyft are most heavily used. The rate of vehicle growth substantially exceeded population growth in five leading cities: Boston, Los Angeles, New York, Philadelphia, and Chicago. This suggests that the convenience and affordability of ride-hailing services may be contributing to an increase in vehicle ownership, which could further increase the number of miles driven and congestion on the roads.

Despite their public statements that they help public transport, Uber and Lyft have been criticized for adding to congestion and emissions and undermining public transport. A study of traffic levels in San Francisco between 2010 and 2016 found that traffic congestion increased by 62% during this period, with at least half of the increase attributed to ride-hailing services. While Uber and Lyft have argued that they bring people to stations and reduce the need for car ownership, the study's author, Gregory Erhardt, a civil engineering professor at the University of Kentucky, questioned whether these benefits were enough to offset the increase in congestion caused by transportation network companies (TNCs).

They add to congestion and emissions

A study by the Union of Concerned Scientists found that ride-hailing companies like Uber and Lyft generate 69% more carbon pollution than the trips they displace. This is because ride-hailing trips typically displace low-carbon trips, such as public transportation, biking, or walking.

Another study based on the American Community Survey concluded that household vehicle ownership has increased in cities where Uber and Lyft are most heavily used. The rate of vehicle growth substantially exceeded population growth in five leading cities: Boston, Los Angeles, New York, Philadelphia, and Chicago. This suggests that Uber and Lyft are contributing to an increase in the number of vehicles on the road, which can lead to greater congestion and emissions.

A study by the University of Kentucky's Gregory Erhardt found that traffic congestion in San Francisco increased by 62% between 2010 and 2016, and that at least half of that increase was due to Uber and Lyft. During this period, the use of public transport in the city decreased. While Uber and Lyft have argued that they help public transport by bringing people to stations and reducing car ownership, the study's author suggests that these benefits do not offset the increase in congestion caused by transportation network companies (TNCs).

Despite efforts by Lyft and Uber to reduce their environmental impact, such as investing in carbon offsets and incentivizing the use of electric vehicles, the majority of trips on these platforms are still made in gas-burning vehicles. While Lyft and Uber have committed to going 100% electric by 2030 and 2040, respectively, cities can take steps to ensure they follow through on these commitments, such as increasing the number of public chargers and requiring the companies to fund this infrastructure.

They undermine public transport

Several studies have found that ride-hailing companies like Uber and Lyft are undermining public transport. A study by the Union of Concerned Scientists found that ride-hailing trips generate 69% more climate pollution on average than the trips they displace, which are often low-carbon trips such as public transportation, biking, or walking. This is because ride-hailing trips typically involve a single person travelling in a car, which is a less efficient use of space and energy than a bus or train that can carry many more people.

Another study by UC Davis researchers found that more than half of the rides taken in Uber and Lyft vehicles replaced more sustainable forms of transportation, such as walking, cycling, carpooling, and public transit. This is likely due to the convenience and low cost of ride-hailing services, which can be more attractive to users than public transport. The study also found that higher-income people were more likely to use Uber and Lyft, which could lead to a collapse of cheaper public transit and negative economic impacts on lower-income individuals.

In addition to increasing pollution, Uber and Lyft have also been found to add to congestion, particularly in cities. A study of traffic levels in San Francisco between 2010 and 2016 found that traffic congestion increased by 62%, with at least half of that increase attributable to ride-hailing services. During this period, the use of public transport in the city decreased. While Uber and Lyft have argued that they help public transport by bringing people to stations and reducing the need for car ownership, the study's author, Gregory Erhardt, questioned whether these benefits were significant enough to offset the increase in congestion caused by ride-hailing services.

Furthermore, a study based on the American Community Survey found that household vehicle ownership has increased in cities where Uber and Lyft are most heavily used, with the rate of vehicle growth exceeding population growth. This suggests that ride-hailing services may not be reducing car ownership as much as they claim and could even be encouraging more people to purchase vehicles. Despite their potential benefits, Uber and Lyft's impact on public transport and congestion is a significant concern that needs to be addressed by city planners and officials.

They increase car travel

Ride-hailing services like Uber and Lyft have been accused of increasing car travel and traffic congestion. A study by the Union of Concerned Scientists found that ride-hailing trips result in an estimated 69% more climate pollution than the trips they displace. This is because, in cities, ride-hailing trips often replace low-carbon trips such as public transportation, biking, or walking.

Another study based on the American Community Survey found that household vehicle ownership has increased in cities where Uber and Lyft are most heavily used. The rate of vehicle growth substantially exceeded population growth in five major cities: Boston, Los Angeles, New York, Philadelphia, and Chicago. This suggests that, rather than reducing the number of cars on the road, Uber and Lyft may be contributing to an increase in car ownership and usage.

Uber and Lyft have argued that they help reduce car ownership and encourage the use of public transportation. For example, a smaller but significant number of respondents to a survey claimed to have sold a car because of the accessibility of Lyft and Uber. However, the same survey found that Uber and Lyft usage increased overall VMT and GHG emissions during the study period in two out of three cities. This suggests that, even if Uber and Lyft are reducing car ownership, they may still be increasing overall car travel and emissions.

Furthermore, a study of traffic levels in San Francisco between 2010 and 2016 found that traffic congestion increased by 62% during this period, and that at least half of this increase was attributable to Uber and Lyft. The study also found that the use of public transport in the city decreased during this time, suggesting that Uber and Lyft may be drawing people away from low-carbon forms of transportation.

While Uber and Lyft have the potential to reduce car travel and emissions in certain cases, their overall impact on car travel and congestion is currently negative. To become more sustainable, Uber and Lyft should electrify their fleets, increase shared rides, and improve connections to public transit hubs.

Frequently asked questions