Hydrogen Combustion Engines: Pollution-Free Power?

Hydrogen combustion engines are an increasingly popular alternative to traditional engines, with companies such as Kawasaki, Yamaha, Honda, Suzuki, and Cummins developing hydrogen-powered engines. Hydrogen combustion engines are a seemingly neat alternative as they make use of existing technology, are available now, and do not produce carbon dioxide. However, they do produce nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions, which are problematic. While hydrogen combustion engines emit less NOx than comparable diesel engines, this has led to concerns that truck manufacturers will deploy less advanced emissions control technologies.

Hydrogen combustion engines produce less carbon emission than traditional engines

Hydrogen combustion engines are an important technology in the path towards decarbonization. They are a seemingly neat alternative to traditional engines as they make use of existing technology and infrastructure, and they do not produce carbon dioxide. This is because hydrogen combustion engines burn hydrogen fuel, which does not contain carbon, and therefore do not produce carbon-based pollutants such as carbon monoxide or hydrocarbons.

While hydrogen combustion engines do not produce carbon emissions, they do produce nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions, which are a type of pollutant. The amount of NOx emitted depends on the air-fuel ratio used in the engine. If a stoichiometric air-fuel ratio is used, the combustion temperature is very high, resulting in a large amount of NOx emissions. However, hydrogen engines are typically designed to use more air than is theoretically required for complete combustion, which reduces the formation of NOx to near zero.

The production of hydrogen fuel can also result in greenhouse gas emissions, depending on the source of the hydrogen. Currently, most hydrogen is produced from natural gas, which has massive upstream emissions due to fugitive methane emissions. However, hydrogen can also be produced from renewable sources, such as water, which would reduce the overall emissions associated with hydrogen combustion engines.

Overall, hydrogen combustion engines have the potential to produce less carbon emission than traditional engines, especially when used in conjunction with other zero-emission technologies such as battery electric vehicles (BEVs) and hydrogen fuel-cell electric vehicles (FCEVs). However, there are still challenges associated with the refueling of hydrogen combustion engines and the production of hydrogen fuel that need to be addressed for them to become a viable solution for decarbonization.

Hydrogen combustion engines emit nitrogen oxides (NOx) that require aftertreatment

Hydrogen combustion engines are an important technology in the accelerated path to decarbonization. They are a seemingly neat alternative to traditional engines as they make use of existing technology and supply chains, and they don't produce carbon dioxide. However, hydrogen combustion engines do emit nitrogen oxides (NOx) which require aftertreatment.

Hydrogen combustion engines emit nitrogen oxides (NOx) during the combustion process. This is because hydrogen combustion occurs in an atmosphere containing nitrogen and oxygen. The formation of NOx is reduced to near zero when hydrogen engines are designed to use about twice as much air as theoretically required for complete combustion. However, this also reduces power output, so hydrogen engines are usually larger and/or equipped with turbochargers or superchargers.

NOx emissions from hydrogen combustion engines are problematic and may require additional control. They are a criteria pollutant and are regulated by organizations such as the EPA and European emission standards. The emissions can be controlled with an aftertreatment system, but this adds to the cost of the engine.

The development of hydrogen combustion engines may also be a short-sighted strategy. Governments or cities may crack down on NOx emissions, rendering the technology useless. Additionally, investments and time spent developing hydrogen combustion may delay focus on electrification technologies, which are the long-term solution.

Overall, while hydrogen combustion engines emit nitrogen oxides (NOx) that require aftertreatment, they are still a viable option for specific use cases and can support the growth of hydrogen infrastructure.

Hydrogen combustion engines are more efficient than traditional internal combustion engines

However, as hydrogen combustion occurs in an atmosphere containing nitrogen and oxygen, it can produce oxides of nitrogen known as NOx. The amount of NOx produced depends on the air-fuel ratio. At a stoichiometric air-fuel ratio, the combustion temperature is very high, resulting in a large amount of NOx formation. However, hydrogen engines are typically designed to use more air than theoretically required for complete combustion, which reduces NOx formation to near zero. This reduction in power output is compensated for by increasing the size of the engine or equipping them with turbochargers or superchargers.

Hydrogen combustion engines have a higher efficiency range than traditional internal combustion engines. The efficiency of a hydrogen combustion engine can be similar or slightly higher than that of a traditional combustion engine when well optimized. In comparison, the efficiency of a fuel cell is limited by the Gibbs free energy, which is typically higher than that of Carnot. The determination of a fuel cell's performance depends on the thermodynamic evaluation. Using hydrogen's lower heating value, the maximum fuel cell efficiency would be 94.5%.

Hydrogen fuel cells can be more than twice as efficient as burning hydrogen in a combustion engine. According to the U.S. Department of Energy, fuel cells are generally between 40% and 60% energy efficient, while internal combustion engines used in cars average around 20% to 25% efficiency over a driving cycle. The tank-to-wheel metric captures the efficiencies (use of fuel and emissions generated) from the charging or fueling point to discharge while driving. At the well-to-wheel level, the differences become more pronounced: efficiencies drop to around 35% for fuel cell electric vehicles (FCEVs), 30% for hydrogen internal combustion engines (H2-ICEs), and 20% for synfuels.

Hydrogen combustion engines can provide a zero-emissions option for specific use cases while supporting the growth of hydrogen infrastructure. Hydrogen is a clean fuel source, with water being the only byproduct of combustion, compared to the CO2 and other harmful emissions produced by gasoline or diesel. Hydrogen can be produced from various domestic resources, potentially reducing dependence on imported oil and increasing energy security.

Hydrogen combustion engines are a viable option for decarbonization

One of the key advantages of hydrogen combustion engines is their ability to reduce carbon emissions. Hydrogen fuel cells emit only water vapour and heat, with no carbon-based pollutants such as carbon monoxide or hydrocarbons. This is because hydrogen fuel does not contain carbon, which is the main source of greenhouse gas emissions from conventional petroleum engines. By eliminating carbon emissions, hydrogen combustion engines can play a significant role in achieving net-zero emissions targets.

Another benefit of hydrogen combustion engines is their compatibility with existing engine technology. Hydrogen internal combustion engines are modified versions of traditional gasoline-powered engines, allowing them to easily integrate into the service and maintenance offerings of most manufacturers. This makes hydrogen combustion engines appealing to businesses as they can preserve investments, jobs, and supply chains while transitioning to more sustainable practices.

Furthermore, hydrogen combustion engines have higher fuel economy and efficiency compared to traditional engines. Hydrogen has a wide flammability range, allowing it to be combusted over a broad range of fuel-air mixtures. This enables the engine to run on a lean fuel-air mixture, where the amount of fuel is less than theoretically required for combustion. As a result, fuel economy is improved, and the combustion reaction is more complete, reducing the amount of pollutants emitted.

However, it is important to acknowledge that hydrogen combustion engines do produce nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions, which can be harmful. While hydrogen combustion engines emit lower levels of NOx compared to diesel engines, it remains a criteria pollutant that needs to be addressed. Some producers argue that the operating conditions of hydrogen engines allow for much lower NOx generation, and aftertreatment systems can be employed to control these emissions.

Overall, hydrogen combustion engines present a viable option for decarbonization, particularly in the short term. They offer a neat alternative to traditional engines, providing zero-carbon emissions, improved fuel economy, and compatibility with existing technologies. However, the challenge of refuelling infrastructure and the need to control NOx emissions must be considered and addressed to ensure the successful implementation of hydrogen combustion engines as a decarbonization solution.

Hydrogen combustion engines are a sustainable alternative to fossil fuels

Hydrogen combustion engines are a seemingly neat alternative to fossil fuels. They make use of existing technology and infrastructure, and they are available now. Hydrogen combustion engines can leverage existing technologies and provide a zero-emissions option for specific use cases while supporting the growth of hydrogen infrastructure.

One of the main advantages of hydrogen combustion engines is that they do not produce carbon dioxide. Hydrogen is a carbon-free fuel, and as such, hydrogen combustion engines eliminate the main greenhouse gas emission of conventional petrol or diesel engines. This makes them an important technology in the accelerated path to decarbonization.

However, hydrogen combustion engines are not zero-emission. They produce nitrogen oxide emissions (NOx), which are harmful pollutants. While hydrogen combustion engines produce less NOx than diesel engines, this may simply lead to manufacturers deploying less advanced emissions control technologies. There is also a risk that governments or cities will crack down on NOx emissions, rendering the technology useless.

Another challenge associated with hydrogen combustion engines is the issue of refueling. Hydrogen combustion engines may be limited to locations near existing hydrogen infrastructure, such as ports or motorways. Additionally, most hydrogen is currently produced from natural gas, which results in massive emissions upstream.

Overall, hydrogen combustion engines have the potential to be a sustainable alternative to fossil fuels, but they also face several challenges and limitations. While they can help reduce carbon emissions, they may not necessarily lead to fewer overall emissions. The success of hydrogen combustion engines will depend on factors such as government regulations, infrastructure development, and the availability of hydrogen fuel.

Frequently asked questions