Gmos And Pollution: What's The Real Story?

The use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) has been a topic of debate for decades, with concerns about their potential environmental impact, including pollution. GMOs, designed to resist toxic weed killers, have led to a surge in herbicide use, with glyphosate, an active ingredient in some herbicides, being reclassified as a probable carcinogen. This has resulted in increased pollution of aquatic ecosystems and groundwater. However, GMOs can also have positive environmental impacts, such as reducing insecticide use and conserving species in agricultural ecosystems. With mandatory GMO labelling in only a handful of countries, the world lacks sufficient data to fully understand the complex effects of GMOs on the environment.

Do GMOs cause pollution?

Increased use of toxic herbicides

The use of toxic herbicides has increased since the introduction of GMOs. Monsanto, the world's top producer of GMO seeds, designs seeds that can resist the toxic weedkiller Roundup, which is also sold by Monsanto. This has resulted in a 15-fold increase in the use of toxic herbicides like Roundup since the introduction of GMOs. Glyphosate, the active ingredient in Roundup, has been reclassified as a probable carcinogen by the World Health Organization.

The impact of GMOs on herbicide use has been different for corn than for soybeans. Initially, farmers who switched to glyphosate-tolerant corn used less total herbicide than those who grew conventional corn. However, in recent years, the use of weedkillers on glyphosate-tolerant corn has increased, surpassing the amount used on non-GMO corn. Similarly, farmers growing genetically modified, glyphosate-tolerant soybeans have been using more weedkillers than their non-GMO counterparts, and this gap has been widening.

One reason for the increased herbicide use on glyphosate-tolerant crops could be the emergence of weeds that have evolved to become resistant to glyphosate. As a result, farmers may need to use more herbicides to combat the increasing number of resistant weeds. This rebound effect of herbicide use has been observed after an initial decrease when GMO crops were first introduced.

The widespread reliance on herbicide-dependent crops poses significant risks to biodiversity, soil health, and the overall food system's security. Additionally, certain pesticides have been linked to an increased risk of cancer and diseases such as Parkinson's and Alzheimer's, especially in populations with high exposures. Unborn children are particularly vulnerable, as pesticides have been associated with birth defects.

Pollution of aquatic ecosystems

The use of genetically modified crops has been a topic of debate among policymakers, scientists, and consumers due to its potential environmental, ecological, and health risks. While GM products have enabled increased yields and reduced pesticide usage, concerns have been raised about their impact on aquatic ecosystems.

Aquatic ecosystems are highly susceptible to disturbances from surrounding landscapes, particularly agricultural watersheds. The cultivation of genetically modified crops can impact these ecosystems through the introduction of insecticidal proteins and herbicides, which may enter water sources through surface runoff, leaching, and pesticide drift. This can lead to increased herbicide tolerance in weeds, reduced growth and increased mortality in non-target organisms, and the destruction of habitats for beloved species like the monarch butterfly.

For instance, in North America, the expansion of herbicide-tolerant GM corn and soy has been linked to the loss of the monarch butterfly's habitat. Additionally, studies have shown that pollen and plant parts containing toxins from Bt corn are washing into streams near cornfields, negatively impacting aquatic insects like caddisflies.

To address these issues, environmental risk assessments (ERAs) are conducted for GM crops. However, the guidance for ERA in aquatic ecosystems is not as well-defined as in terrestrial agroecosystems. Efforts are being made to improve risk assessment procedures, with a focus on identifying the diverse effects of GMOs, including their impact on aquatic habitats.

The potential risks of GM fish, such as increased feeding rates, wider environmental tolerances, and genetic mixing with natural fish populations, have also been highlighted. While proponents argue that GM fish will be domesticated and unlikely to survive in the wild, the potential ecological consequences warrant careful evaluation, similar to the introduction of any new aquatic species to a local ecosystem.

Impact on non-target species

The impact of GMOs on non-target species is a complex and evolving area of study. While the introduction of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) has provided benefits, such as reducing the need for chemical insecticides and promoting conservation tillage, there are also concerns about their effects on the environment and non-target species.

One of the primary concerns is the potential impact on non-target insects and other wildlife. For example, a 1999 study found that Bacillus Thuringiensis (Bt) insect-resistant corn crops negatively impacted Monarch butterfly larvae. This issue has received significant attention due to the prominence of the Monarch butterfly as a beloved species in North America, where a large portion of GM crops are grown. However, it's important to note that the majority of studies on insecticidal proteins in IR seed production show no unintended adverse effects on natural enemies.

The use of GMOs has also led to an increase in the use of certain herbicides, particularly glyphosate, which has been linked to pollution in groundwater, surface water, and soils. This can have indirect effects on non-target species, as glyphosate can contaminate water sources and impact the health of aquatic ecosystems. Additionally, the development of glyphosate-resistant weeds has become a significant problem in some regions, leading to a shift in weed flora and potentially impacting non-target plant species.

In the fisheries sector, GM fish may pose risks to the environment due to their increased feeding rates, wider environmental tolerances, and potential for genetic mixing with native fish populations. These factors could lead to the displacement of local native populations and alter the composition of natural fish communities.

While the environmental impact of GMOs on non-target species is still being studied, it is clear that their introduction can have both positive and negative consequences. It is crucial to continue researching and understanding these impacts to ensure the responsible use and regulation of GMOs to minimize potential harm to non-target species and the environment as a whole.

Greenhouse gas emissions

Genetically modified (GM) crops have been widely used for over 20 years, mainly for canola, maize, cotton, and soybean crops. The adoption of GM crops has achieved significant environmental benefits by reducing pesticide use and greenhouse gas emissions, and increasing yields.

GM crops contribute to a reduction in fuel use from less frequent herbicide or insecticide applications and a reduction in the energy used in soil cultivation. The adoption of GM insect-resistant and herbicide-tolerant technology has reduced pesticide spraying by 671.4 million kg (8.2%) and, as a result, decreased the environmental impact associated with herbicide and insecticide use on these crops. The technology has also facilitated important cuts in fuel use and tillage changes, resulting in a significant reduction in the release of greenhouse gas emissions from the GM cropping area. In 2016, this was equivalent to removing 16.7 million cars from the roads.

A new study from Canada also shows that GM crops can help reduce agricultural greenhouse gas emissions. The study suggests that herbicide-tolerant GM crops and glyphosate can increase soil carbon sequestration, thereby keeping carbon dioxide in the ground rather than releasing it into the atmosphere where it contributes to global warming. Using tillage as a form of weed control contributes to soil disturbances, with the subsequent release of carbon into the atmosphere. Substituting tillage with weed-control measures that ensure minimal soil disturbance reduces the amount of carbon released and increases carbon sequestration.

Overall, the adoption of GM crops has been widely recognized as contributing to a reduction in global greenhouse gas emissions, with important implications for climate change mitigation and sustainable food production.

Herbicide-resistant weeds

The emergence of herbicide-resistant weeds is a natural consequence of the increased use of herbicides. As weeds are exposed to herbicides, they may develop resistance through various biochemical processes. These processes, collectively referred to as metabolism, modify herbicides into less toxic compounds, rendering them ineffective against the weeds. One metabolic process can impact several different herbicide families, limiting herbicide options for farmers.

The problem of herbicide-resistant weeds is exacerbated by the high costs associated with developing new herbicides and re-registering older ones. This limits the ability to replace lost herbicides due to resistance. Additionally, assessing resistant weed biotypes can be challenging and expensive, often requiring trial-and-error approaches to solve resistance problems.

To address this issue, it is crucial to view herbicides as a valuable resource that needs preservation. Implementing strategies for resistance prevention and management is essential. One such strategy is conservation tillage, or no-till farming, which makes it easier to control herbicide-resistant weeds. By not turning over the soil when planting new crops, farmers can reduce soil erosion, improve water retention, maintain soil nutrients, and lower their carbon footprint.

Frequently asked questions