Fuel Cells And Pollution: Friend Or Foe?

Fuel cells are an alternative energy source that uses hydrogen to generate electricity. Hydrogen is the most abundant element in the universe and can be produced from diverse domestic resources with near-zero greenhouse gas emissions. Fuel cells have been proposed as a solution for reducing pollution, particularly in the transportation sector, which accounts for approximately 30% of total US energy needs and 70% of US petroleum consumption. However, the cost of fuel cells and the infrastructure required to support them remains a significant barrier to their widespread adoption. Additionally, while hydrogen fuel cells emit fewer pollutants than gasoline and diesel engines, the process of extracting hydrogen from hydrocarbons emits harmful pollution and greenhouse gases. This has led to concerns about the potential for hydrogen projects to prop up the fossil fuel industry.

Fuel cells do not cause pollution at the point of use

Fuel cells are an innovative technology that harnesses the power of hydrogen, the most abundant element in the universe, to generate electricity without causing any harmful pollution at the point of use. This clean and efficient energy source has the potential to revolutionize the way we power our world, particularly in the transportation and stationary power sectors.

At the heart of a fuel cell is a chemical reaction between oxygen and hydrogen or a hydrogen-rich fuel source. This process produces electricity, heat, and water, with no harmful emissions or pollutants released into the environment. It is a stark contrast to traditional combustion engines, which emit nitrogen oxides, hydrocarbons, and particulate matter that contribute to air pollution and negatively impact public health and the environment.

The environmental benefits of fuel cells are significant, especially when compared to conventional gasoline vehicles. Fuel cell electric vehicles running on renewable hydrogen have "well-to-wheels" emissions that are almost 100% lower than their gasoline counterparts. Even when running on hydrogen extracted from natural gas, the most common source currently, fuel cells emit 50% fewer greenhouse gases than combustion engines.

However, it is important to acknowledge that the process of hydrogen production can be energy-intensive and may involve some emissions. The most common method of hydrogen extraction, methane reformation, releases harmful pollutants and greenhouse gases, albeit less than burning the hydrocarbon directly. Nevertheless, advancements in technology and the use of renewable energy sources for hydrogen production can mitigate these emissions, making it a more sustainable option.

The challenges associated with fuel cells, such as cost and durability, are actively being addressed by researchers and industry partners. By overcoming these obstacles and leveraging the unique advantages of fuel cells, we can take a significant step towards a more sustainable and resilient energy future, reducing our reliance on fossil fuels and mitigating their environmental impacts.

Fuel cells are more efficient than combustion engines

Fuel cells are a promising technology for reducing pollution and offer a more efficient energy alternative to combustion engines. They produce electricity by combining oxygen and hydrogen in a chemical reaction, and as long as fuel is provided, they continue to operate. Importantly, when run on pure hydrogen, fuel cells emit no harmful pollution at their point of use, with water vapour and warm air as the only by-products. This is in stark contrast to the harmful emissions from gasoline and diesel vehicles, which include nitrogen oxides, hydrocarbons, and particulate matter.

The benefits of fuel cells extend beyond efficiency. They are highly reliable due to their lack of moving parts, making them quieter and potentially more dependable than combustion engines. Additionally, fuel cells offer scalability, as their modular construction ensures consistent performance regardless of size. The refuelling process for fuel cells is also significantly faster than recharging batteries, taking only 3-5 minutes, similar to refuelling a gasoline vehicle.

However, challenges remain for the widespread adoption of fuel cells. Hydrogen, the most abundant element in the universe, is challenging to store due to its low energy content by volume. It requires heavy compression, high-pressure storage, or cryogenic temperatures to be stored efficiently. Additionally, the cost of fuel cells, particularly the manufacturing of the fuel cell stack, remains a barrier to their competitiveness in the marketplace. Nevertheless, ongoing research and development aim to address these challenges, reduce costs, and improve the durability and performance of fuel cells.

Hydrogen is difficult to store

Compressed hydrogen is the technology of choice for the chemical industry and for most commercial hydrogen fuel cell vehicles. However, the volume of hydrogen is still much larger than that of other hydrocarbons—nearly four times as much as natural gas. This means that, for practical purposes, hydrogen needs to be compressed and stored in large, highly pressurised containers.

Another option is to store hydrogen as a liquid. However, this too is technically complex and costly. Hydrogen must be cooled to extremely low temperatures of around -253°C and stored in insulated tanks to maintain this low temperature and minimise evaporation. This requires a complex plant and a lot of energy. Some of the biggest users of liquid hydrogen include the semiconductor chip industry and as rocket fuel for space launches.

There are also issues associated with storing liquid hydrogen, such as boil-off. It is difficult to completely insulate the storage system, so some hydrogen will heat up and boil off, creating high pressures in the tank that need to be vented. This is a particularly big issue if the tank is left dormant for long periods.

Another alternative method of storing hydrogen is through chemical storage, where the hydrogen molecule reacts with a material to form a hydride. However, issues with this method include dehydrogenation, which requires high temperatures, and reversibility, which can be problematic if the storage material is used over many cycles.

Hydrogen fuel cells are more expensive than other fuel cells

Fuel cells are a promising technology for producing electricity without harmful emissions. Hydrogen, the most abundant element in the universe, is a particularly attractive fuel source for fuel cells because it only emits water vapour and warm air when used in a fuel cell. However, hydrogen fuel cells are currently more expensive than other fuel cells.

The high cost of hydrogen fuel cells is primarily due to the manufacturing process of the fuel cell stack, which is the most expensive part of a fuel cell. Platinum is one of the largest cost components of a direct hydrogen-fuelled polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell, and reducing the amount of platinum required or replacing it with a cheaper alternative is an active area of research and development. Additionally, the cost of building and maintaining hydrogen refuelling stations needs to decrease for hydrogen fuel cells to become more competitive with other fuel sources.

The storage of hydrogen also presents challenges due to its low energy content by volume. Storing enough hydrogen to meet consumer needs for light-duty vehicles, for example, requires either a larger tank or higher pressure than other gaseous fuels. This adds to the cost of hydrogen fuel cells compared to other types of fuel cells.

Despite the higher costs of hydrogen fuel cells, there is optimism that they will become more affordable in the future. The price of green hydrogen is falling, and the costs of renewable energy sources used for its production are also decreasing. Governments are also increasingly supporting hydrogen fuels with subsidies and investments in infrastructure, which is expected to drive down the cost of hydrogen fuel cells.

In conclusion, while hydrogen fuel cells currently face higher costs compared to other fuel cells, ongoing advancements in technology and infrastructure, along with growing government support, are expected to make them more cost-competitive in the future.

Hydrogen production methods can be polluting

Hydrogen is the most abundant element in the universe, but it does not exist in its pure state on Earth. Hydrogen must be derived from compounds such as water (H2O) or hydrocarbons. Hydrogen can be produced from diverse domestic resources, including fossil fuels, biomass, and water through electrolysis using electricity. The environmental impact and energy efficiency of hydrogen depend on how it is produced.

The two most common methods for producing hydrogen are steam-methane reforming and electrolysis (splitting water with electricity). Steam-methane reforming accounts for nearly all commercially produced hydrogen in the United States. This process involves reacting natural gas with high-temperature steam to create synthesis gas, a mixture of hydrogen, carbon monoxide, and a small amount of carbon dioxide. While this method is the cheapest, most efficient, and most common, it does emit some harmful pollution and greenhouse gases.

Electrolysis, on the other hand, does not produce any byproducts or emissions other than hydrogen and oxygen. However, the electricity used for electrolysis is currently provided by a mix of renewable sources, nuclear energy, and fossil fuels. The environmental and health benefits of hydrogen production depend on the source of hydrogen. When hydrogen is derived from low- or zero-emission sources, such as renewable energy or water, the environmental impact is reduced.

Other hydrogen production methods are also being explored, such as microbial biomass conversion, thermochemical water splitting, photobiological water splitting, and photoelectrochemical water splitting. However, these methods are still in the development stage and may require further innovation to reduce production costs and improve efficiency.

The production of hydrogen can be polluting, depending on the method used. While some methods, such as electrolysis, have minimal emissions, others, like steam-methane reforming, can emit harmful pollution and greenhouse gases. It is important to consider the environmental impact of hydrogen production when evaluating the sustainability of fuel cells.

Frequently asked questions