Do Trains Pollute Less Than Trucks?

The environmental impact of diesel locomotives is a widely discussed topic. While diesel engines emit fewer pollutants and use less fuel than steam engines, they still produce emissions that contribute to air pollution and climate change. Electric locomotives, on the other hand, are emission-free at the point of use, consume less energy, and are more energy-efficient. Studies have found that diesel trains may expose passengers, especially those sitting directly behind the locomotive, to elevated levels of pollutants, similar to those emitted by large trucks. However, the age of diesel locomotives and varying emission standards also play a role in the overall pollution levels.

Diesel Locomotives vs Trucks:

Electric trains are more energy-efficient, producing zero tailpipe emissions

Diesel locomotive engines are a major contributor to air pollution. The pollutants they produce include nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulphur dioxide (SO2), black carbon (BC), ultrafine particles (UFP), and nitrogen oxides (NOx). These emissions have been found to be significantly higher than those on busy roads or city streets.

In contrast, electric trains are more energy-efficient and produce zero tailpipe emissions. They are emission-free at the point of use, offering a cost-effective and energy-efficient way to improve air quality. Electric trains powered by renewable electricity can achieve a range of 241 km with a single standard boxcar and consume half the energy of diesel trains.

The benefits of converting diesel trains to electric are significant. Popovich et al.'s techno-economic analysis of battery-electric trains highlights the potential for both economic gains and emissions reduction. Improved and cheaper battery technology opens up the possibility of transitioning to battery-electric rail, which would save the US freight rail sector an estimated $94 billion over 20 years in health damage costs.

While diesel trains expose passengers, especially those sitting directly behind the locomotive, to elevated levels of harmful pollutants, electric trains do not produce direct emissions. This makes electric trains a much safer and healthier option for both passengers and staff.

In summary, electric trains are a more environmentally friendly and sustainable option than diesel locomotives. They produce zero tailpipe emissions, reduce air pollution, and have the potential to provide economic benefits. The transition to electric trains can improve air quality, particularly in enclosed train stations, and contribute to a healthier future for all.

Diesel trains emit pollutants such as NOx, SO2, and particulate matter

Diesel trains are a major contributor to air pollution. They emit pollutants such as NOx, SO2, and particulate matter, which have negative health and environmental impacts. Nitrogen dioxide (NO2), a type of NOx, is of particular concern as it is highly destructive to the ozone layer, contributing to climate change, urban smog, and acid rain.

NOx and SO2 emissions from diesel trains have been found to exceed European recommendations, especially in enclosed railway stations, posing risks to passengers and workers due to reduced air quality. Particulate matter emissions from diesel trains have also been a focus of environmental concerns, with studies measuring the impact on residents living near rail lines.

To address these issues, various initiatives have been undertaken. The EU-funded ENSPIRIT project aims to develop an innovative emissions abatement system to reduce pollution levels and meet global regulations. This system targets the removal of sulphur oxides, nitrogen oxides, and particulate matter from diesel train emissions. Additionally, companies like Vivarail have experimented with efficient diesel particulate filters, creating prototypes with low-emission diesel engines.

While these efforts are ongoing, electric locomotives offer a more environmentally friendly alternative to diesel trains. Electric trains are emission-free at the point of use, consume less energy, and reduce noise pollution. The shift to electric locomotives can significantly reduce air pollution and its associated health risks, aligning with global efforts to combat climate change. However, implementing electric trains may face economic and technical challenges, especially in regions with established diesel-powered rail infrastructure.

EU-funded projects aim to create innovative emissions abatement systems

Diesel locomotive engines are a major contributor to air pollution. Nitrogen dioxide (NO2) and sulphur dioxide (SO2) are readily produced by diesel locomotives and cause a host of health and environmental problems. Nitrogen dioxide is especially harmful, as it is 240 times more destructive to the ozone layer than carbon dioxide, making it a primary contributor to climate change.

To address this issue, the EU has funded several projects to develop innovative emissions abatement systems. One such project is the ENSPIRIT project, which aims to create a system capable of reducing pollution levels and meeting stringent global regulations. The objective is to build a system that can decrease the levels of sulphur in locomotive fuel by 99%. Originally, the ENSPIRIT emission abatement system was designed to be located behind the locomotive(s), with one system able to eliminate emissions from two locomotives working together. However, research indicates that the system is more applicable to railway sidings, depots, and stations, treating trains that are not in use.

Another EU-funded initiative is the Horizon Europe research and innovation programme, which includes the SUNER-C project. This project aims to unite science, business, and societal stakeholders to accelerate the introduction of solar fuels and chemicals as a key element towards the EU's 2050 target of net-zero emissions. The Horizon 2020 EU program also funds the VIVALDI project, which focuses on innovative bio-based chains for CO2 valorisation as added-value organic acids.

The EU's Innovation Fund, one of the world's largest funding programmes for low-carbon technologies, supports various projects to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. One example is the TAKE-OFF project, which explores the development of sustainable aviation fuel through the conversion of CO2 and renewable H2. Additionally, the CO2SMOS project helps bio-based industries reduce their carbon footprint by transforming biogenic CO2 emissions into sustainable bioproducts like durable polymers and biodegradable materials.

While these EU-funded projects focus on emissions abatement systems, it is worth noting that the UK and other European countries are also making efforts to improve air quality in train stations. However, the replacement or retrofitting of older diesel locomotives to meet emission limits poses economic and technical challenges.

Older diesel trains are subject to less protective emissions standards

Diesel locomotive engines are a major contributor to air pollution, producing NOx and SO2. Nitrogen dioxide (NO2), a type of NOx, is particularly harmful as it is 240 times more destructive to the ozone layer than carbon dioxide, making it a primary contributor to climate change.

In the United States, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has recognized the harmful pollution emitted by older diesel trains and has taken action to address this issue. The EPA's regulations focus on older diesel locomotives that are not subject to modern pollution controls. Less than a quarter of the locomotives in the US fleet meet the most protective Tier 3 or Tier 4 standards that were adopted in 2008. The majority of trains in operation today are older models that are exempt from these stricter standards.

Similarly, in the United Kingdom, many diesel trains are also older and exempt from modern regulations. While the UK has made advancements through government-funded initiatives, railway stations are not required to comply with EU air quality standards, despite millions of passengers passing through them daily. This has led to situations where emissions within stations, such as London's Paddington Station, far exceed European recommendations.

The issue of older diesel trains and their emissions is not unique to the US and UK. Europe has made progress in electrifying its rail networks, but approximately half of the train lines remain non-electrified. The EU-funded ENSPIRIT project aims to create an innovative emissions abatement system to reduce pollution levels and meet global regulations. However, retrofitting older diesel locomotives to meet tighter emission limits is challenging, and fleet renewal is often seen as a more feasible solution.

Electric trains reduce noise pollution, benefiting local ecosystems

Electric trains are emission-free at the point of use, in contrast to diesel trains, which emit harmful pollutants such as nitrogen dioxide (NO2) and black carbon (BC). Diesel trains expose passengers, especially those sitting directly behind the locomotive, to elevated levels of pollutants. This is a significant issue, given the large number of stations serving non-electrified lines and the high volume of rail passengers.

The electrification of trains is an important strategy to reduce carbon emissions. Electric trains emit 20-35% less carbon per passenger mile than diesel trains and have zero emissions at the point of use, improving air quality in pollution hotspots. High-speed electric trains travelling at 300 km/h emit less CO2 per passenger kilometre than diesel trains travelling at their maximum speed of 220 km/h.

To address noise pollution caused by trains, governments and railway companies have implemented measures such as sound barriers, quieter rail technologies, soundproofing for nearby buildings, and restrictions on train horn use. These measures aim to reduce the impact of train noise on communities and the environment, as it can disrupt wildlife habitats and behaviour.

The benefits of electric trains in reducing noise pollution are evident in studies examining electric buses in urban areas. Results indicate that electric buses can reduce traffic noise by up to 4.4 dBA during the daytime in city centres, with similar effects expected for electric trains.

Overall, the adoption of electric trains is crucial for mitigating both air and noise pollution, creating healthier and more sustainable environments for local ecosystems and communities.

Frequently asked questions