Airplanes And Pollution: What's The Real Damage?

Air travel is one of the most carbon-intensive activities an individual can undertake, contributing 2.5% of the world's carbon emissions. In 2019, global aviation emitted 920 million tons of carbon dioxide, a 30% increase in six years. Aircraft engines emit ultrafine particles (UFPs) and, in the United States, three-quarters of private planes burn Avgas, releasing lead into the atmosphere. Airports also contribute to water pollution through jet fuel and de-icing chemical runoff. While new aircraft are becoming more efficient, the growth in demand for air travel is a central barrier to controlling aviation emissions.

Airplanes emit carbon dioxide and other gases

Aviation emissions include not only carbon dioxide but also other gases and water vapour trails. Aircraft generate a short-term increase and a long-term decrease in ozone and methane, as well as increased emissions of water vapour, soot, sulfur aerosols, and water contrails. These emissions have a warming effect on the planet, contributing to global warming and climate change. The aviation sector is one of the fastest-growing sources of carbon dioxide emissions, and if left unchecked, emissions could more than double by 2050.

To address the climate impact of the aviation industry, various measures have been proposed. The International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) has set goals for improving fuel efficiency by 2% annually through 2050 and ensuring carbon-neutral growth. Aircraft manufacturers such as Boeing and Airbus have developed new aircraft that meet or exceed CO2 emission requirements. The EPA and other regulatory bodies have established emission standards to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from aircraft.

Despite these efforts, the demand for air travel continues to grow, and emissions from aviation are expected to increase in the coming years. The most effective solution to reducing the climate and health impacts of aviation is to fly less. This can be achieved by choosing more sustainable modes of transport, such as trains, opting for longer individual holidays instead of multiple short trips, and reducing corporate travel.

In conclusion, airplanes emit carbon dioxide and other gases that contribute to air pollution and global warming. While efforts are being made to reduce emissions, the increasing demand for air travel poses a challenge. To mitigate the environmental impact of the aviation industry, a combination of technological improvements, policy interventions, and behavioural changes is necessary.

Air travel is a significant contributor to global warming

The aviation industry is one of the top carbon-polluting sectors, and if it were a country, it would be among the top 10 emitters. The number of passengers carried by the industry is expected to rise from 2.4 billion in 2010 to 8.2 billion in 2035, and without action, emissions from increased air travel could triple by 2050. The development of sustainable aviation fuels has received attention and funding, but experts say it is not feasible to create the amount of fuel needed.

The most effective solution to reducing the climate and health impacts of aviation is to fly less. Klöwer and colleagues calculated that a sustained annual decrease in air traffic by 2.5% would halt aviation's contribution to further warming. Other solutions include improving fuel efficiency, transitioning to carbon-neutral fuels, and cleaning exhaust with post-emissions controls.

Regulations and industry-wide standards have been implemented to reduce the climate impact of the aviation sector. By 2028, all regional and seven out of 10 mainline U.S. carriers will meet the emission standard for their fleet averages. Aircraft operations are also moving towards electrification, with large electric planes expected to be available by 2040.

Aircraft engines emit ultrafine particles and ozone

Scientific studies have investigated the impact of aircraft engine emissions on human health. Experiments have shown that particles emitted during ground idling have cytotoxic effects, comparable to those from gasoline and diesel engines. When inhaled, nanoparticles can reach the lower airways and, if defense mechanisms are overwhelmed, can cause irreparable damage to lung tissue. Additionally, exposure to ultrafine particles has been linked to increased IL-6 levels in the blood, indicating potential health risks.

Aircraft emissions also contribute to the formation of ozone, which has both short-term and long-term effects on the atmosphere. While ozone can have a cooling impact, the overall effect of aviation on global warming is a warming trend. The "radiative forcing" measure quantifies the difference between incoming and outgoing energy, with aviation accounting for approximately 3.5% of effective radiative forcing.

To address the health and environmental impacts of aviation, a portfolio of solutions is necessary. Reducing air traffic or transitioning to carbon-neutral fuels can help mitigate the climate and health consequences. Additionally, improving fuel efficiency and ensuring carbon-neutral growth are important goals for the industry. Overall, the complex interplay of factors contributes to the understanding of aircraft engine emissions' effects on pollution and human health.

Deicing fluids and jet fuel can cause water pollution

De-icing fluids and jet fuel can cause water pollution. De-icing fluids are often applied to aircraft through pressurized spraying systems, mounted on trucks or on large fixed boom devices. Safety regulations require the use of propylene glycol for de-icing, but this chemical can pollute water bodies, kill aquatic life, and contaminate drinking water. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has developed regulations requiring large airports to collect and store spent aircraft de-icing fluid (ADF), treat it, and then dispose of or recover it for reuse. Airports are also required by the EPA to regulate their effluent into the environment, as per the Clean Water Act.

The majority of ADF is available for discharge due to dripping, overspraying, tires rolling through it, or shearing during takeoff. Once on the ground, ADF mixes with precipitation and other chemicals found on airport pavements, such as aircraft fuel, lubricants, solvents, and metals from aircraft and ground vehicles. This contaminated water then enters the airport's storm drain system, and in many cases, is discharged directly into bodies of water without treatment. This runoff from de-icing activities, containing ADF, grit, and sand, can reduce oxygen levels in the water and harm the environment.

Jet fuel is another source of water pollution. There have been reports of jet fuel-contaminated drinking water at certain military bases. For example, at Camp Lejeune in North Carolina, wells supplying water were contaminated by a component of jet fuel from a leaking underground storage tank. Similarly, at the Red Hill Bulk Storage Facility in Hawaii, groundwater was contaminated by thousands of gallons of jet fuel, impacting drinking water on Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam.

Exposure to jet engine emissions, similar to diesel exhaust, includes volatile organic compounds and particulate matter. These emissions contain nano-sized particles that can reach the lower airways upon inhalation, posing risks to respiratory health. Studies have shown that short-term exposure to jet engine emissions can lead to cell membrane damage, oxidative stress, and increased inflammation. Additionally, the proximity to running jet engines or living near airports is associated with increased exposure, increased risk of disease, and adverse health effects.

Electric aircraft operations could reduce emissions

Airplane emissions have been a significant contributor to global warming. In 2018, direct emissions from aircraft operations accounted for about 2.5% of global CO2 emissions. However, as incomes rise and more people can afford to fly, this percentage is expected to increase.

The combustion of jet fuel is one of the most significant ways in which aviation contributes to climate change, accounting for an estimated 2%-3% of global CO2 emissions before considering additional warming effects from contrails. Apart from CO2, airplanes also emit ozone, methane, water vapour, soot, sulfur aerosols, and water contrails, which have a warming effect on the atmosphere.

To reduce the environmental impact of aviation, researchers have suggested a portfolio of solutions, including sustainable aviation fuels, and, most importantly, flying less. However, with the rise in demand for air travel, electric aircraft emerge as a promising alternative to traditional aircraft.

Electric aircraft, with their high-power, high-torque, lightweight electric motors, have the potential to revolutionize regional transportation. Unlike conventional aircraft, electric aircraft do not rely on fossil fuels and produce zero direct carbon emissions during operation. They are also more energy-efficient than gas turbine engines. As the electric grid transitions to renewable energy sources, the indirect carbon emissions associated with electric aircraft will further decrease, leading to a significant reduction in the aviation sector's overall carbon emissions.

In addition to reducing carbon emissions, electric aircraft also improve air quality. Traditional aircraft emit nitrogen oxides and particulate matter, which can cause respiratory issues and other health problems in communities near airports. With the development of electric aircraft, the aviation industry can move towards a greener and more sustainable future.

Frequently asked questions