Trump's Wetlands: Pollution Control Rollbacks

Former US President Donald Trump has been criticized for his administration's attacks on the environment, including the removal of pollution controls on streams and wetlands. Trump's administration rolled back environmental rules and protections, including those intended to curb water pollution, and weakened the Clean Water Act by stripping away federal protections for wetlands and streams. Trump's policies have been described as favoring fossil fuel industries and developers over the environment, with his administration portraying farmers as the main beneficiaries of the rollbacks.

Trump's administration removed pollution controls to favour fossil fuel producers

The Trump administration has been heavily criticised for its attacks on environmental policies and its favouritism towards the fossil fuel industry. Notably, Trump's Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has been accused of weakening or revoking environmental rules and protections, including those related to water pollution and wetlands preservation.

In 2020, the Trump administration was set to remove protections against water pollution and strip away environmental safeguards for streams and wetlands, benefiting farmers, fossil fuel producers, and real estate developers. This move was justified as a way to relieve these industries of purportedly onerous and unnecessary burdens imposed by Obama-era rules. However, critics argued that it would make it harder to maintain a clean water supply and protect vital habitats and wildlife.

The Trump EPA has also been criticised for its reduced enforcement of rules intended to curb water pollution from various industrial facilities, including fossil fuel and petrochemical operations. According to an analysis by the Environmental Integrity Project, the EPA initiated significantly fewer cases during Trump's first term compared to the Biden administration. This decline in enforcement has raised concerns among environmental advocates and public health officials.

Furthermore, the Trump administration's budget proposals have included significant cuts to environmental initiatives and energy funding. These cuts have targeted the Energy Department and the EPA, with reductions in funding for grants and other assistance agreements related to environmental justice and climate action. The administration has also proposed ending funding for what it calls the "Green New Scam," signalling a further departure from environmental priorities.

Trump's actions have been characterised as favouring the fossil fuel industry, which donated heavily to his presidential campaign. His administration has launched efforts to wind back rules on emissions of greenhouse gases and toxins, as well as pipeline safety regulations. Additionally, sprawling tracts of land have been earmarked for new oil and gas drilling, and protected areas are being considered for commercial fishing and timber extraction.

In summary, the Trump administration's policies and actions have consistently favoured fossil fuel producers and other industries by removing pollution controls and weakening environmental protections. These decisions have had far-reaching consequences for the environment, public health, and the climate crisis.

The Clean Water Act (CWA) was weakened, stripping wetlands of federal protections

The Trump administration has been heavily criticized for its attacks on the environment. The Clean Water Act (CWA) was weakened, stripping wetlands of federal protections. This move has been seen as a victory for farmers, fossil fuel producers, and real estate developers, while environmental advocates and public health officials have raised concerns about the impact on water supply and wildlife.

The Trump administration's efforts to scale back environmental regulations have been justified as a way to reduce burdens on businesses. In the case of wetlands, the administration argued that farmers would no longer need to worry about unintentionally straying over the banks of federally protected water bodies. However, data shows that it is real estate developers and non-farm businesses that stand to gain the most from these regulatory changes.

The weakening of the CWA comes in the wake of the 2023 Supreme Court decision in Sackett v. EPA, which removed federal protections from millions of acres of wetlands and streams. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), under President Trump, has further pushed to narrow the definition of "Waters of the United States" (WOTUS), which determines which waters are protected. This move threatens the wildlife, businesses, and people who depend on these water bodies and puts nearby communities at greater risk of flooding, water pollution, and water shortages.

Research has shown that wetlands provide significant benefits, including flood protection, improved water supply and quality, carbon capture, and recreational opportunities. Despite this, wetlands in the United States have been steadily declining due to urban and suburban sprawl, as well as industrial agriculture operations. The loss of federal protections under the CWA is expected to exacerbate this issue, with industries seeking to maximize profits at the expense of the environment.

Trump's budget proposal included cuts to environmental justice initiatives

During his presidency, Donald Trump has been accused of launching attacks on the environment and climate change initiatives. Trump's budget proposal includes cuts to environmental justice initiatives, with the stated aim of ending what he calls the "Green New Scam". The proposal targets federal energy funding and environmental justice initiatives, with some of the steepest funding reductions aimed at the Energy Department and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

Trump's budget proposal seeks to cut $100 million from "taxpayer-funded programs that promote divisive racial discrimination and environmental justice grants that were destined to go to organizations that advance radical ideologies". The administration justifies these cuts by arguing that the federal government's environmental justice approach has focused on unrelated social goals. Trump has also eliminated White House advisors who worked to ensure that communities in heavily polluted areas received support, and has revoked the "Justice40" initiative, which mandated that 40% of benefits from specific environmental programs went to these communities.

The proposed budget also includes a reduction of $235 million from the EPA's climate and environmental justice research. Additionally, it seeks to repeal more than $15 billion from the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, or the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, passed in 2021. The budget proposal also targets clean water funds, with a $2.46 billion reduction in Clean and Drinking Water State Revolving Loan Funds, which provide low-cost financing for water quality infrastructure projects.

Trump's budget proposal is part of a broader pattern of his administration's efforts to weaken or revoke environmental rules and escalate the use of fossil fuels. This includes removing pollution controls on streams and wetlands, rolling back rules on emissions of greenhouse gases and toxins, and freezing climate spending. The administration has also targeted renewable energy sources, blocked funding for climate research, and withdrawn the US from the Paris climate accords.

Trump's appointees instructed employees to halt work related to anti-discrimination laws

During his presidency, Donald Trump has been accused of dismantling environmental protections and weakening anti-discrimination laws. Trump's administration has rolled back a swathe of environmental policies, including those aimed at curbing air and water pollution from power plants, oil refineries, and hazardous waste sites. In addition, Trump has targeted protections for streams, wetlands, and groundwater, a move that has been celebrated by farmers, fossil fuel producers, and real estate developers.

Trump's appointees have also been implicated in instructing employees to halt work related to anti-discrimination laws. Specifically, at the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP), a division of the Labor Department, employees were told to stop enforcing equal employment opportunity (EEO) laws. The OFCCP is responsible for ensuring that government contractors do not discriminate based on race or gender in their hiring and pay practices. As a result of Trump's directive, complaints from veterans and individuals with disabilities have piled up, and audits of contractors' practices have stalled.

This pattern of halting the enforcement of laws and regulations that the president dislikes has been described as a "dramatic assertion of presidential power and authority" by Donald Kettl, a professor emeritus at the University of Maryland's School of Public Policy. In addition to the environmental and anti-discrimination laws, Trump has also targeted pipeline safety rules and water conservation standards for household appliances.

The Trump administration's efforts to downsize the federal workforce and reduce the scope of federal agencies have faced legal challenges. A California judge ordered the administration to halt its dramatic downsizing of the federal workforce, agreeing with labor unions and cities that such changes required Congressional cooperation. Despite these challenges, Trump's actions have had a significant impact, with a reduction in enforcement cases and a rollback of policies.

Trump's actions regarding environmental protections have been particularly concerning. His administration has launched numerous attacks on the environment, including repealing or weakening environmental rules and escalating the use of planet-heating fossil fuels. Trump has also targeted protections for endangered species and national monuments and has frozen climate spending. As a result, fewer environmental protections are in place, and more people are at risk of suffering the public health consequences of increased pollution.

Trump's administration reduced enforcement of rules intended to curb water pollution

The Trump administration has been heavily criticized for its approach to environmental policies, particularly concerning the reduction of rules intended to curb water pollution.

Trump officials scaled back on the enforcement of rules designed to curb water pollution from power plants, oil refineries, hazardous waste sites, and other industrial facilities. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) under Trump opened fewer cases against potential violators of environmental rules. This reduction in enforcement has been interpreted as a tactic employed by the administration to gut federal rules and policies that the president disagrees with.

Trump's actions have favored industries such as fossil fuels, with the administration removing environmental protections for streams, wetlands, and groundwater. These changes have been welcomed by farmers, fossil fuel producers, and real estate developers, who considered the previous regulations as burdensome. However, environmental advocates and public health officials have raised concerns, arguing that these changes will make it more difficult to maintain a clean water supply and protect habitats and wildlife.

Additionally, the Trump administration has been accused of targeting federal rules and regulations that impose burdens on businesses. They have portrayed farmers as the primary beneficiaries of the rollbacks, claiming that the previous regulations restricted their activities. However, data suggests that it is non-farm business sectors, such as real estate developers, that stand to gain the most from the reduced regulations.

The administration's efforts to weaken environmental protections extend beyond water pollution. They have also targeted laws intended to protect endangered species, national monuments, and climate spending. Furthermore, Trump has proposed budget cuts for environmental justice initiatives, with steep reductions in funding for the Energy Department and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

Overall, the Trump administration's actions have been characterized as a blitz upon the environment, with a focus on repealing or weakening environmental rules and escalating the use of planet-heating fossil fuels.

Frequently asked questions